Harvard Lecture on 9/11 research and government manipulations

[whitehall]

Who the fuk would destroy the symbol of capitalism and kill 3,000 people sitting at their desks on a pretty September morning? Some sinister renegade American agency? You might as well conclude that UFO's did it. We saw the freaking planes hit the freaking towers.

 

[Rat in the Hat]

I like how the World Trade Centers had everything but the steel explode into dust before they even hit the ground.

The many VERTICAL support columns that ran from bedrock all the way to the top floor removed themselves ALL THE WAY DOWN fast enough so that if a ball was dropped right beside the top floor...the top floor still almost hit the ground as fast even though the top floor had to work its way all the way down through the many VERTICAL support columns that ran from bedrock to the top.

Everything but the steel was exploded like a bag of flour before the buildings even hit the ground.

ABC News: "skyscrapers exploding like a bag of flour"
New World Trade Center 9/11 aerial images from ABC News | Mail Online

Even a NASA Physicist says there is no doubt in his mind explosives were used to bring down the World Trade Centers.

OpEdNews - Article: Seven Senior Federal Engineers and Scientists Call for New 9/11 Investigation

Seven Senior Federal Engineers and Scientists Call for New 9/11 Investigation:

boock boock booock cluck cluck cluckity cluuck clcuk bock

...

Did you post as Ohio-Golfer in the old Arguewitheveryone forum?

I was never a member of AWE, but I've heard a lot about it from 9/11 Rimjob

 

[x0Maximilian0x]

Who the fuk would destroy the symbol of capitalism and kill 3,000 people sitting at their desks on a pretty September morning? Some sinister renegade American agency? You might as well conclude that UFO's did it. We saw the freaking planes hit the freaking towers.

Yes there were planes

Yes it was slipped into the media just before 9/11 about successfully flying Boeing passenger jets with remote control

Was it an event to frame a perfect scapegoat?

Yes terrorists exist, but, were they framed to gain strategic squares on the worlds chessboard?

 

[x0Maximilian0x]

All war is simply strategy of sacrificing and gaining....whether it be a lot of military men sacrificed for strategic goals or a lot of civilians sacrificed for strategic goals...

 

[eots]

Who the fuk would destroy the symbol of capitalism and kill 3,000 people sitting at their desks on a pretty September morning? Some sinister renegade American agency? You might as well conclude that UFO's did it. We saw the freaking planes hit the freaking towers.

why do you insist on constantly repeating that we say planes hit the towers when no one is disputing that ..is it because the rest of your argument is so weak ???

 

[x0Maximilian0x]

Dr. Graeme MacQueen of McMaster is the guest lecturer at Harvard. For the thousandth time ...we saw the planes hit the Towers. The left is in a bind because they would have to indict Bill Clinton in the salleged conspiracy so they drift into ho-hum esoteric political drivel and hopeless conspiracies wrapped around the Iraq conflict. Nothing makes sense when you consider the extent of the alleged conspiracy extending through at least two but maybe several administrations and involving the split second timing between some unknown sinister (US?) agency coordinating a schedule with a bunch of nut-case jihadists. We saw the freaking planes hit the towers.

Did you ever ask yourself why...no matter what personality puppet is elected...the U.S. has the exact same foreign policy...no matter what personality is in office?

It is no coincidence that no matter who gets elected...nothing changes...by the way...do you chose who gets put on the ballot?

Each new president is simply a new puppet to keep the American Titanic pointed in the same direction...

Replacing Depublicans with Remocrats isn't putting a new direction of foreign policy in office...it is simply rearranging deck chairs on the titanic...

 

[daws101]

Who the fuk would destroy the symbol of capitalism and kill 3,000 people sitting at their desks on a pretty September morning? Some sinister renegade American agency? You might as well conclude that UFO's did it. We saw the freaking planes hit the freaking towers.

why do you insist on constantly repeating that we say planes hit the towers when no one is disputing that ..is it because the rest of your argument is so weak ???

speaking of weak arguments....thermite.....massive cover up, the myth of wtc 7 remote controlled 767's, symmetrical collapse

 

[Obamerican]

Dr. Graeme MacQueen of McMaster is the guest lecturer at Harvard. For the thousandth time ...we saw the planes hit the Towers.

no one here is saying planes did not hit the towers so why do you continually repeat this ???

The left is in a bind because they would have to indict Bill Clinton in the salleged conspiracy so they drift into ho-hum esoteric political drivel and hopeless conspiracies wrapped around the Iraq conflict. Nothing makes sense when you consider the extent of the alleged conspiracy extending through at least two but maybe several administrations and involving the split second timing between some unknown sinister (US?) agency coordinating a schedule with a bunch of nut-case jihadists. We saw the freaking planes hit the towers.

funny that it makes sense to many high level u.s intelligence...but then what would they know..right

Patriots Question 9/11 - Responsible Criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report

Because another poster that you refuse to distance yourself from is 7Forever, a known moron. Your answer to why you don't distance yourself was, "He has a right to his opinion." Yet none of us do because we disagree with your "theories"? You have a problem with hanging on to total idiots.

 

[eots]

no one here is saying planes did not hit the towers so why do you continually repeat this ???



funny that it makes sense to many high level u.s intelligence...but then what would they know..right

Patriots Question 9/11 - Responsible Criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report

Because another poster that you refuse to distance yourself from is 7Forever, a known moron. Your answer to why you don't distance yourself was, "He has a right to his opinion." Yet none of us do because we disagree with your "theories"? You have a problem with hanging on to total idiots.

7 who ?

 

[eots]

If you are asking if I belive the no plane theroy is correct..I do not think it is.. but more importantly is what I know did not happen..a truthful investigation into the collapse and the events of 9/11

 

[x0Maximilian0x]

NYC GOV ANDREW CUOMO WANTS THE TRUTH SO HERE IS THE TRUTH - YouTube

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oTLpru3MkgI&feature=g-all-u&context=G25c8028FAAAAAAAAQAA"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oTLpru3MkgI&feature=g-all-u&context=G25c8028FAAAAAAAAQAA[/ame]
You posted a great piece of forgotten information about 9/11

Some excellent info in this documentary which also has some excellent examples of what investigative media will not touch about 9/11 like a hot potato...

The very last scene should not have been in it...just my opinion

 

[x0Maximilian0x]

9-11 Cop Who Arrested Dancing Israelis Speaks - YouTube

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-B2J7tp8eg]9-11 Cop Who Arrested Dancing Israelis Speaks - YouTube[/ame]

Excellent interview of the Cop who arrested 5 Israeli's on 9/11...this information pieces in with the information Eots posted above.

This is yet more of forgotten information which investigative media will not touch about 9/11 like a hot potato.

 

[x0Maximilian0x]

Very informative documentary that brings some disturbing information and facts about 9/11 event that shows there is much more to the story than what was spoonfed to American's within minutes after the attack...

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yuC_4mGTs98]9/11: A Conspiracy Theory - YouTube[/ame]

 

[x0Maximilian0x]

Before the first tower even collapsed on 9/11 there was an elaborate pre-written story being broadcast on mass media to American's only 33 minutes after the second tower was hit.

Were these stories prepared in advance of 9/11 attack?

Who wrote these elaborate stories and got them on the air with the media within minutes after the 9/11 attack?

9/11 attack was sold to the public through media at great speed...begs the question...were these stories pre-written...or just the investigation pre-investigated before the 9/11 attack?

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BVFZu97fWbU]9 11 THE BIG CLUE EVERYONE MISSED - YouTube[/ame]

 

[x0Maximilian0x]

Asia Times doing some very recent investigative journalism into the events of 9/11

Article posted today March 21, 2012 about 9/11 attacks

Remember the insider trading ordeal that would show someone had direct knowledge about 9/11...therefore be an accessory to the crimes of 9/11?

Asia Times just posted an article about it and new technology about spotting insider trading and 9/11 is being investigated...

Asia Times Online :: Asian news and current affairs

 

[x0Maximilian0x]

I got into a little writing mode about the first man propagating the "official story" spoonfed to American's for 9/11 on another thread and wanted to add it here because it pieces in...


Interesting how the story was put out so fast...before any tower even collapsed and only 33 minutes after the second tower got hit was an elaborate story being aired on who's responsible...

Well it certainly brings to question if the "official story" for 9/11 was prewitten before the attacks...

If nothing else it sure looks bad for the investigation into who was responsible for 9/11 being completed so fast... let alone the investigation on who was responsible having to make its way to the media with an elaborate story written...

The story being out so fast is incriminating enough let alone if you think about...was the investigation done before the attacks even happened...I think the answer is quite clear.

Another interesting fact is the first guy who promoted the story was Jerome Hauer who just happened to be...

*Bio Warfare expert...which brings to mind the anthrax attacks right after 9/11 targeting Senate and Media

*Drug Company Director...which brings to mind the fact that the White House staff was taking the medication for anthrax before the first anthrax attack even occured...(fact if you are not too lazy to check for yourself)

*Commissioner for Office of Emergency Management...which brings to mind how it was being reinforced as a sky bunker just before 9/11 on the 23rd floor of World Tade Center 7, Building 7...with its floors, walls, windows all being reinforced making it some type of tree fort within sight of the World Trade Center twin towers...

*Bush Administration Insider...last but not least

 

[x0Maximilian0x]

Asia Times doing some very recent investigative journalism into the events of 9/11

Article posted today March 21, 2012 about 9/11 attacks

Remember the insider trading ordeal that would show someone had direct knowledge about 9/11...therefore be an accessory to the crimes of 9/11?

Asia Times just posted an article about it and new technology about spotting insider trading and 9/11 is being investigated...

Asia Times Online :: Asian news and current affairs

Here is a very interesting and disturbing part of the article...this helps piece together...well just read for yourself...

"According to a report by Bloomberg published in early October 2001, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) began a probe into certain stock market transactions around 9/11 that included 38 companies, among them: American Airlines, United Airlines, Continental Airlines, Northwest Airlines, Southwest Airlines, Boeing, Lockheed Martin Corp., American Express Corp., American International Group, AXA SA, Bank of America Corp., Bank of New York Corp., Bear Stearns, Citigroup, Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., Morgan Stanley, General Motors and Raytheon. [14]

So far, so good. In the same month, however, the San Francisco Chronicle newspaper reported that the SEC took the unprecedented step to deputize hundreds, if not even thousands of key stakeholders in the private sector for their investigation. In a statement that was sent to almost all listed companies in the US, the SEC asked the addressed companies to assign senior staff for the investigation, who would be aware of "the sensitive nature" of the case and could be relied on to "exercise appropriate discretion". [15]

In essence, it was about controlling information, not about provision and disclosure of facts. Such a course of action involves compromising consequences. Ruppert:
What happens when you deputize someone in a national security or criminal investigation is that you make it illegal for them to disclose publicly what they know. Smart move. In effect, they become government agents and are controlled by government regulations rather than their own conscience. In fact, they can be thrown into jail without a hearing if they talk publicly. I have seen this implied threat time after time with federal investigators, intelligence agents, and even members of United States Congress who are bound so tightly by secrecy oaths and agreements that they are not even able to disclose criminal activities inside the government for fear of incarceration.[16]"

 

[daws101]

post# 31 thru 38 are:

 

[whitehall]

Lots of people are invited to speak at Harvard including some rapper who uses 3 letters instead of a name. It don't mean sh't to speak at Harvard.

 

[daws101]

Lots of people are invited to speak at Harvard including some rapper who uses 3 letters instead of a name. It don't mean sh't to speak at Harvard.