Harry Reid: Cancer’s Best Friend

[Flanders]

Harry Reid: Why would we save children with cancer when federal employees are hurting?
By: John Hayward
10/2/2013 04:41 PM

http://www.humanevents.com/2013/10/...th-cancer-when-federal-employees-are-hurting/​

Reid said nothing more than let kids with cancer die humanely. I’m sure if he could get away with it he would personally put down kids with cancer for the same reason wounded animals are destroyed. The only ideological difference between Reid and Kermit Gosnell is that Gosnell did his own butchering:​

XXXXX​

Had anybody but a Democrat said the following the media would have crucified them:​

“But if you can help one child with cancer, why wouldn’t you do it?” Bash pressed.

“Why would we want to do that?” snarled Reid. ”I have 1,100 people at Nellis Air Force Base that are sitting home. They have a few problems of their own.”​

Yet the media ignored it completely. How do I know that? Because FOX ignored it. If FOX’s talking heads refused to touch it you can be sure the other networks gave Reid a pass, too.​

http://www.usmessageboard.com/healt...16398-ideological-twins-reid-and-gosnell.html

Thank God that Reid is retiring. Unfortunately, he is going out with one last chance to punish people with cancer:

Harry Reid blocks giving terminally ill 'right to try' new treatments
By Joel Gehrke
9/28/16 4:52 PM

Harry Reid blocks giving terminally ill 'right to try' new treatments​

 

[tinydancer]

Yikes!

 

[S.J.]

Reid always has been a POS. Maybe he'll have another "gym accident". That's what Guido called it, anyway.

 

[BULLDOG]

Harry Reid: Why would we save children with cancer when federal employees are hurting?
By: John Hayward
10/2/2013 04:41 PM

http://www.humanevents.com/2013/10/...th-cancer-when-federal-employees-are-hurting/​

Reid said nothing more than let kids with cancer die humanely. I’m sure if he could get away with it he would personally put down kids with cancer for the same reason wounded animals are destroyed. The only ideological difference between Reid and Kermit Gosnell is that Gosnell did his own butchering:​

XXXXX​

Had anybody but a Democrat said the following the media would have crucified them:​

“But if you can help one child with cancer, why wouldn’t you do it?” Bash pressed.

“Why would we want to do that?” snarled Reid. ”I have 1,100 people at Nellis Air Force Base that are sitting home. They have a few problems of their own.”​

Yet the media ignored it completely. How do I know that? Because FOX ignored it. If FOX’s talking heads refused to touch it you can be sure the other networks gave Reid a pass, too.​

http://www.usmessageboard.com/healt...16398-ideological-twins-reid-and-gosnell.html

Thank God that Reid is retiring. Unfortunately, he is going out with one last chance to punish people with cancer:

Harry Reid blocks giving terminally ill 'right to try' new treatments
By Joel Gehrke
9/28/16 4:52 PM

Harry Reid blocks giving terminally ill 'right to try' new treatments​

Damn. If fox gives it a pass, it must really be stupid. They will try to make something of almost anything.

 

[PurpleOwl]

Harry Reid: Why would we save children with cancer when federal employees are hurting?
By: John Hayward
10/2/2013 04:41 PM

http://www.humanevents.com/2013/10/...th-cancer-when-federal-employees-are-hurting/​

Reid said nothing more than let kids with cancer die humanely. I’m sure if he could get away with it he would personally put down kids with cancer for the same reason wounded animals are destroyed. The only ideological difference between Reid and Kermit Gosnell is that Gosnell did his own butchering:​

XXXXX​

Had anybody but a Democrat said the following the media would have crucified them:​

“But if you can help one child with cancer, why wouldn’t you do it?” Bash pressed.

“Why would we want to do that?” snarled Reid. ”I have 1,100 people at Nellis Air Force Base that are sitting home. They have a few problems of their own.”​

Yet the media ignored it completely. How do I know that? Because FOX ignored it. If FOX’s talking heads refused to touch it you can be sure the other networks gave Reid a pass, too.​

http://www.usmessageboard.com/healt...16398-ideological-twins-reid-and-gosnell.html

Thank God that Reid is retiring. Unfortunately, he is going out with one last chance to punish people with cancer:

Harry Reid blocks giving terminally ill 'right to try' new treatments
By Joel Gehrke
9/28/16 4:52 PM

Harry Reid blocks giving terminally ill 'right to try' new treatments​

thats stupid

 

[gipper]

Harry Reid is a criminal for the things he has done, like most of the political class.

He and they should be in solitary confinement in Super Max.

 

[S.J.]

Harry Reid is a criminal for the things he has done, like most of the political class.

He and they should be in solitary confinement in Super Max.

They should torture 'em too. Make 'em watch this:

 

[gipper]

Harry Reid is a criminal for the things he has done, like most of the political class.

He and they should be in solitary confinement in Super Max.

They should torture 'em too. Make 'em watch this:

That is torture. Has to be much worse than water boarding.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Harry Reid: Why would we save children with cancer when federal employees are hurting?
By: John Hayward
10/2/2013 04:41 PM

http://www.humanevents.com/2013/10/...th-cancer-when-federal-employees-are-hurting/​

Reid said nothing more than let kids with cancer die humanely. I’m sure if he could get away with it he would personally put down kids with cancer for the same reason wounded animals are destroyed. The only ideological difference between Reid and Kermit Gosnell is that Gosnell did his own butchering:​

XXXXX​

Had anybody but a Democrat said the following the media would have crucified them:​

“But if you can help one child with cancer, why wouldn’t you do it?” Bash pressed.

“Why would we want to do that?” snarled Reid. ”I have 1,100 people at Nellis Air Force Base that are sitting home. They have a few problems of their own.”​

Yet the media ignored it completely. How do I know that? Because FOX ignored it. If FOX’s talking heads refused to touch it you can be sure the other networks gave Reid a pass, too.​

http://www.usmessageboard.com/healt...16398-ideological-twins-reid-and-gosnell.html

Thank God that Reid is retiring. Unfortunately, he is going out with one last chance to punish people with cancer:

Harry Reid blocks giving terminally ill 'right to try' new treatments
By Joel Gehrke
9/28/16 4:52 PM

Harry Reid blocks giving terminally ill 'right to try' new treatments​

Damn. If fox gives it a pass, it must really be stupid. They will try to make something of almost anything.

Great rebuttle there bulldog.

Maybe we should call you windage.

 

[BULLDOG]

Harry Reid: Why would we save children with cancer when federal employees are hurting?
By: John Hayward
10/2/2013 04:41 PM

http://www.humanevents.com/2013/10/...th-cancer-when-federal-employees-are-hurting/​

Reid said nothing more than let kids with cancer die humanely. I’m sure if he could get away with it he would personally put down kids with cancer for the same reason wounded animals are destroyed. The only ideological difference between Reid and Kermit Gosnell is that Gosnell did his own butchering:​

XXXXX​

Had anybody but a Democrat said the following the media would have crucified them:​

“But if you can help one child with cancer, why wouldn’t you do it?” Bash pressed.

“Why would we want to do that?” snarled Reid. ”I have 1,100 people at Nellis Air Force Base that are sitting home. They have a few problems of their own.”​

Yet the media ignored it completely. How do I know that? Because FOX ignored it. If FOX’s talking heads refused to touch it you can be sure the other networks gave Reid a pass, too.​

http://www.usmessageboard.com/healt...16398-ideological-twins-reid-and-gosnell.html

Thank God that Reid is retiring. Unfortunately, he is going out with one last chance to punish people with cancer:

Harry Reid blocks giving terminally ill 'right to try' new treatments
By Joel Gehrke
9/28/16 4:52 PM

Harry Reid blocks giving terminally ill 'right to try' new treatments​

Damn. If fox gives it a pass, it must really be stupid. They will try to make something of almost anything.

Great rebuttle there bulldog.

Maybe we should call you windage.

I was agreeing with the post that the media doesn't seem to care. Like it said, Fox won't even bother with it, and we both know fox will jump on almost anything that portrays a Democratic party member in a bad light. Why do you think Fox isn't interested.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Harry Reid: Why would we save children with cancer when federal employees are hurting?
By: John Hayward
10/2/2013 04:41 PM

http://www.humanevents.com/2013/10/...th-cancer-when-federal-employees-are-hurting/​

Reid said nothing more than let kids with cancer die humanely. I’m sure if he could get away with it he would personally put down kids with cancer for the same reason wounded animals are destroyed. The only ideological difference between Reid and Kermit Gosnell is that Gosnell did his own butchering:​

XXXXX​

Had anybody but a Democrat said the following the media would have crucified them:​

“But if you can help one child with cancer, why wouldn’t you do it?” Bash pressed.

“Why would we want to do that?” snarled Reid. ”I have 1,100 people at Nellis Air Force Base that are sitting home. They have a few problems of their own.”​

Yet the media ignored it completely. How do I know that? Because FOX ignored it. If FOX’s talking heads refused to touch it you can be sure the other networks gave Reid a pass, too.​

http://www.usmessageboard.com/healt...16398-ideological-twins-reid-and-gosnell.html

Thank God that Reid is retiring. Unfortunately, he is going out with one last chance to punish people with cancer:

Harry Reid blocks giving terminally ill 'right to try' new treatments
By Joel Gehrke
9/28/16 4:52 PM

Harry Reid blocks giving terminally ill 'right to try' new treatments​

Damn. If fox gives it a pass, it must really be stupid. They will try to make something of almost anything.

Great rebuttle there bulldog.

Maybe we should call you windage.

I was agreeing with the post that the media doesn't seem to care. Like it said, Fox won't even bother with it, and we both know fox will jump on almost anything that portrays a Democratic party member in a bad light. Why do you think Fox isn't interested.

How does Fox passing on it make it stupid ?

I don't know what Fox jumps on and does not.

 

[BULLDOG]

Harry Reid: Why would we save children with cancer when federal employees are hurting?
By: John Hayward
10/2/2013 04:41 PM

http://www.humanevents.com/2013/10/...th-cancer-when-federal-employees-are-hurting/​

Reid said nothing more than let kids with cancer die humanely. I’m sure if he could get away with it he would personally put down kids with cancer for the same reason wounded animals are destroyed. The only ideological difference between Reid and Kermit Gosnell is that Gosnell did his own butchering:​

XXXXX​

Had anybody but a Democrat said the following the media would have crucified them:​

“But if you can help one child with cancer, why wouldn’t you do it?” Bash pressed.

“Why would we want to do that?” snarled Reid. ”I have 1,100 people at Nellis Air Force Base that are sitting home. They have a few problems of their own.”​

Yet the media ignored it completely. How do I know that? Because FOX ignored it. If FOX’s talking heads refused to touch it you can be sure the other networks gave Reid a pass, too.​

http://www.usmessageboard.com/healt...16398-ideological-twins-reid-and-gosnell.html

Thank God that Reid is retiring. Unfortunately, he is going out with one last chance to punish people with cancer:

Harry Reid blocks giving terminally ill 'right to try' new treatments
By Joel Gehrke
9/28/16 4:52 PM

Harry Reid blocks giving terminally ill 'right to try' new treatments​

Damn. If fox gives it a pass, it must really be stupid. They will try to make something of almost anything.

Great rebuttle there bulldog.

Maybe we should call you windage.

I was agreeing with the post that the media doesn't seem to care. Like it said, Fox won't even bother with it, and we both know fox will jump on almost anything that portrays a Democratic party member in a bad light. Why do you think Fox isn't interested.

How does Fox passing on it make it stupid ?

I don't know what Fox jumps on and does not.

Sure you do. Anything that can possibly oppose the left is what they want. Things have to be exceptionally stupid for them to pass on it.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

Harry Reid: Why would we save children with cancer when federal employees are hurting?
By: John Hayward
10/2/2013 04:41 PM

http://www.humanevents.com/2013/10/...th-cancer-when-federal-employees-are-hurting/​

Reid said nothing more than let kids with cancer die humanely. I’m sure if he could get away with it he would personally put down kids with cancer for the same reason wounded animals are destroyed. The only ideological difference between Reid and Kermit Gosnell is that Gosnell did his own butchering:​

XXXXX​

Had anybody but a Democrat said the following the media would have crucified them:​

“But if you can help one child with cancer, why wouldn’t you do it?” Bash pressed.

“Why would we want to do that?” snarled Reid. ”I have 1,100 people at Nellis Air Force Base that are sitting home. They have a few problems of their own.”​

Yet the media ignored it completely. How do I know that? Because FOX ignored it. If FOX’s talking heads refused to touch it you can be sure the other networks gave Reid a pass, too.​

http://www.usmessageboard.com/healt...16398-ideological-twins-reid-and-gosnell.html

Thank God that Reid is retiring. Unfortunately, he is going out with one last chance to punish people with cancer:

Harry Reid blocks giving terminally ill 'right to try' new treatments
By Joel Gehrke
9/28/16 4:52 PM

Harry Reid blocks giving terminally ill 'right to try' new treatments​

Damn. If fox gives it a pass, it must really be stupid. They will try to make something of almost anything.

Great rebuttle there bulldog.

Maybe we should call you windage.

I was agreeing with the post that the media doesn't seem to care. Like it said, Fox won't even bother with it, and we both know fox will jump on almost anything that portrays a Democratic party member in a bad light. Why do you think Fox isn't interested.

How does Fox passing on it make it stupid ?

I don't know what Fox jumps on and does not.

Sure you do. Anything that can possibly oppose the left is what they want. Things have to be exceptionally stupid for them to pass on it.

And you got there where ? From watching Fox ? Do tell.