Happy birthday

Discussion in 'Military' started by CSM, Jun 14, 2007.

  1. CSM
    Offline

    CSM Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2004
    Messages:
    6,907
    Thanks Received:
    708
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Northeast US
    Ratings:
    +708
    Happy birthday to the US Army and all you Army vets out there.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
  2. Annie
    Offline

    Annie Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2003
    Messages:
    50,847
    Thanks Received:
    4,644
    Trophy Points:
    1,790
    Ratings:
    +4,770
    Dittos! Thank you army!
     
  3. Care4all
    Offline

    Care4all Warrior Princess Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2007
    Messages:
    32,676
    Thanks Received:
    6,600
    Trophy Points:
    1,170
    Location:
    Maine
    Ratings:
    +11,024
    Thank you Army, and thank you to one of its vets, my hubby!

    However, our permanent army is unconstitutional, imho.

    The constitution clearly states that our federal government can not fund a standing army more than 2 years per time...called up for war....i believe war is implied. Instead we have a permanent army, airforce, marines, etc...

    We are not suppose to have a standing, permanent army, ( in my opinion to protect us citizens from having an over reaching gvt that pursues wars of choice, VS WARS OF SELF DEFENSE AND NECESSITY and to protect us from the useless spending on the Military industrial Complex which they could forsee.)

    We spit on our own constitution and our forfather's daily, by having a permanent Army imo.

     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  4. Truthmatters
    Offline

    Truthmatters BANNED

    Joined:
    May 10, 2007
    Messages:
    80,182
    Thanks Received:
    2,223
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +2,233
    thanks Army and the people who ARE the army!

    To raise and support armies, but no appropriation of money to that use shall be for a longer term than two years;

    I think they mena the money has to come up for vote every two years which would mean the congress can redirect the Army if the people so wish.

    A Navy but no Army?

    I think they at the time felt the Navy was to protect our shores.

    There is no mention of Air force for obvious reasons so no restriction but we need that to protect our borders.

    There is just too many ways to interpitate the constitution which without trying to determine what kind of intent they were trying to achieve with the laws you can take away from it interpitations which will tear us apart.


    We are at a fragile stage in this democracy where the constitution is stretching and bending to try and fit a time which its founders could not have possibly immagined.

    Bush has made this even more problematic with his affront on our traditions unpartisan service.

    This is a perfect storm of wrong president at the wrong time.

    The next president is going to be very important to this process.

    Im affraid we may have the wrong Scotus also.
     
  5. RetiredGySgt
    Offline

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,509
    Thanks Received:
    5,897
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +8,920
    The military is NOT unconstitutional. It meets the requirments set forth under the Constitution in that it is only funded for a maximum 2 years at a time. Congress MUST pass new funding every 2 years at a minimum and generally every year.

    While it is assumed the Military will continue on indefinately, it is still temperary and only serves at the pleasure of Congress.
     
  6. RetiredGySgt
    Offline

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,509
    Thanks Received:
    5,897
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +8,920
    The Term Army is assumed correctly to mean an ARMED Military Force, that includes all 4 military branches and any future branch that would be an armed military force.
     
  7. Care4all
    Offline

    Care4all Warrior Princess Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2007
    Messages:
    32,676
    Thanks Received:
    6,600
    Trophy Points:
    1,170
    Location:
    Maine
    Ratings:
    +11,024
    congress can not fund anything, any project, longer than 2 years for the army is how i read it rgs?

    the navy they can fund all they want, the state malitias, (today's national guard) they can fund all they want.... is how it reads to me?
     
  8. RetiredGySgt
    Offline

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,509
    Thanks Received:
    5,897
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +8,920
    Not sure, I do know the Navy is funded exactly like the Army and Airforce and marine Corps. Every year, 2 at the most.

    I would argue that since the National Guard is considered an integral part of the Army it should be funded by FEDERAL money the same way. If the States are paying, then yes they do not have to follow the requirement.

    As for Militia, the Guard is just a federalized force, the Constitution is clear, each State can maintain more troops that are NOT available for Federal Duty, they just chose not to. So while the Guard may be "militia" it is not the only militia allowed.
     
  9. actsnoblemartin
    Offline

    actsnoblemartin I love Andrea & April

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2007
    Messages:
    4,039
    Thanks Received:
    407
    Trophy Points:
    98
    Location:
    La Mesa, CA
    Ratings:
    +407
    Thank you army and all vets, god bless you :)

     
  10. Gunny
    Offline

    Gunny Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2004
    Messages:
    44,689
    Thanks Received:
    6,753
    Trophy Points:
    198
    Location:
    The Republic of Texas
    Ratings:
    +6,770
    Happy Birthday to all you Army doggies.:thup:
     

Share This Page