Haplogroups descendants of Japheth in Europe (Iapezia)

[historycisalpin]

Related video:

 

[Fenton Lum]

Not a whiff of molecular biological or genentic evidence anywhere in that. Got anything else?

 

[historycisalpin]

The evidence is there, if it is estimated that most of the Y chromosome haplogroups have an Saharasian of Indo-Mesopotamic origin, non-European course.

Saharasia:

 

[Fenton Lum]

Cool, so how about primary peer reviewed journal articles, got any?

 

[historycisalpin]

There are different theories about it, the anti-Semitic and Eurocentric, for example, he believes that the Nordic peoples have nothing to do with Japheth, by departing from biblical history and the genetic studies.

Are theories that have no value, because not approved by any scientific community, those Eurocentric.

 

[Fenton Lum]

There are different theories about it, the anti-Semitic and Eurocentric, for example, he believes that the Nordic peoples have nothing to do with Japheth, by departing from biblical history and the genetic studies.

Are theories that have no value, because not approved by any scientific community, those Eurocentric.

Then fuck it, no data. So thus far as per current knowledge, all hominid life began in Africa.

 

[historycisalpin]

Here too there are conflicting theories:

Some claim that man is born in Africa, there are those, however, he argues that there are two or three strains, one African, one Asian and one Mesopotamian.

 

[The Great Goose]

Cool.

 

[Ringel05]

Here too there are conflicting theories:

Some claim that man is born in Africa, there are those, however, he argues that there are two or three strains, one African, one Asian and one Mesopotamian.

Actually two conflicting hypothesis, theories require some confirmation based on actual observation and supporting (peer reviewed) experiment results.

 

[The Irish Ram]

Not a whiff of molecular biological or genentic evidence anywhere in that. Got anything else?

^

 

[william the wie]

This is simply a Christian take on "The Seven Daughters of Eve" by Bryan Sykes

 

[historycisalpin]

Israeli archaeologists have discovered ancient artifacts in a cave outside of Tel Aviv, and seems to have thrown new light on the theory of human origins. The archaeologist at Tel Aviv University, Ran Barkai, said that what was found in the Qesem Cave reveals a people far more advanced than the image acceptance of our stone age ancestors to the Middle Paleolithic period. "We know that they had a number of different knives, almost like a modern butcher, who used the cave to cut meat. And we also have what we call cutlery ... only that we are in the middle Paleolithic. " Archaeologists have also found human teeth in different layers of the cave. "It 'was immediately clear from the comparison that explains the archeologo- human teeth found in the Qesem Cave resembled most of the homo-sapiens teeth who has lived in Israel a long time after." According to a widely accepted by the scientific community theory, modern humans would have emerged in Africa about 200,000 years ago. Yet European and US dental anthropologists who have studied the teeth found in the Qesem Cave, such as paleo-anthropologist Shara Bailey Dental of New York University, said that these would be older than that period, as reported WorldScience. In a recent article published in the Journal of Physical Anthropology, Barkai and her team suggest three theories: the teeth of Qesem Cave may belong to primitive humans that developed independently from those in Africa and Europe. Or they could be, as suggested by Shara Bailey, Neanderthal evolution in Southwest Asia. Another hypothesis is that it may belong to species of unknown and extinct hominids. Occorerà test hypotheses, remains resolutely open the possibility that those eight teeth found in Israel and dated to 400,000 years ago might just belong to hominids of our species, Homo sapiens. If the dating is correct, he says the archaeologist Avi Gopher, "would change the entire modern human evolution framework." This would mean that truly modern man originated in Mesopotamia and this certainly might help to look even more credibility to the Old Testament, although it -occorre ripeterlo- was written not to affirm historical and scientific truth, but exclusively moral. The news is also riprotata on ScienceDaily.

Recenti scoperte: le origini dell’uomo potrebbero essere in Isreale

 

[historycisalpin]

Independence of Padania (current northern Italy)

Statuette of an ancient Jewish patriarch wearing ephod Hebrew

Certainly these two images have to lump, especially under the ethno anthropological profile, these traits are not native europid.

Also interesting is this site:

The Proto-Semitic tribe of Scandinavians

 

[yiostheoy]

There are different theories about it, the anti-Semitic and Eurocentric, for example, he believes that the Nordic peoples have nothing to do with Japheth, by departing from biblical history and the genetic studies.

Are theories that have no value, because not approved by any scientific community, those Eurocentric.

It is irrational to take a storybook like the Tenakh and try to create scientific theories around it.

Moses was not a geneticist he was just a political refugee trying to lead out a caste of Hebrew slaves from their captivity in Egypt.

Moses' stories are fun to read --

- the garden and the snake

- the boat and the flood

- the Babylonian with 12 sons from 4 wives.

But it is not rational to take them seriously.

 

[yiostheoy]

This is simply a Christian take on "The Seven Daughters of Eve" by Bryan Sykes

Thank you.

The Seven Daughters of Eve - Wikipedia

 

[historycisalpin]

There are different theories about it, the anti-Semitic and Eurocentric, for example, he believes that the Nordic peoples have nothing to do with Japheth, by departing from biblical history and the genetic studies.

Are theories that have no value, because not approved by any scientific community, those Eurocentric.

It is irrational to take a storybook like the Tenakh and try to create scientific theories around it.

Moses was not a geneticist he was just a political refugee trying to lead out a caste of Hebrew slaves from their captivity in Egypt.

Moses' stories are fun to read --

- the garden and the snake

- the boat and the flood

- the Babylonian with 12 sons from 4 wives.

But it is not rational to take them seriously.

I repeat that for me, the Bible is an ancient chronicle story, which does not speak of God as such, if anything, it was later sanctified.

Also interesting is the book Sigmund Freud, entitled: "Moses and Monotheism", where the father of psychoanalysis claimed that Moses was not jew, but in fact an Egyptian ancient nobility who transmitted to the monotheistic religion of the Jewish people Pharaoh Akhenaton (or probably was Akhenaten himself to do so). The Jews, according to the thesis of Freud, Moses murdered, abandoned the religion that these had transmitted to them and collectively they forgot what they had done.

Freud explains that several years after the murder of Moses, the rebels had regretted their action thus forming the concept of Messiah, as a hope for the return of Moses as the Saviour of Israel. Freud claims that the guilt for the murder of Moses was inherited through the generations; it was this guilt which then pushed the Jews to the creation of the religion, that He might make them feel better by decreasing the disapproval of what they had done.

Post Scriptum:

The fact is that he was not a native of the holy land, he was always a Semite, or an African-semitic from Egypt.