Haneyya gov't slams Israel's terrorist attack on police center in Gaza

[P F Tinmore]

GAZA, (PIC)-- The Palestinian government in Gaza strongly denounced the Israeli wanton attack on the naval police headquarters north of the Gaza Strip on Monday which led to the killing of one policeman and the injury of many others.

It stated that the killing of a policeman while on duty is a war crime punishable by international law and called for enforcing that law against Israel.

Haneyya gov't slams Israel's terrorist attack on police center in Gaza

 

[docmauser1]

The Palestinian government in Gaza strongly denounced

What didn't they denounce, yet? Who cares, anyway.

 

[P F Tinmore]

The Palestinian government in Gaza strongly denounced

What didn't they denounce, yet? Who cares, anyway.

It is clear that Israel supporters do not care about any law.

 

[JStone]

Former Gazan Nonie Darwish, Human Rights Activist, Founder, Arabs For Israel... An Arab-Made Misery - WSJ.com

International donors pledged almost $4.5 billion in aid for Gaza earlier this month. It has been very painful for me to witness over the past few years the deteriorating humanitarian situation in that narrow strip where I lived as a child in the 1950s.

It is Hamas, an Islamist terror organization supported by Iran, which is using and abusing Palestinians... While Hamas leaders hid in the well-stocked bunkers and tunnels they prepared before they provoked Israel into attacking them, Palestinian civilians were exposed and caught in the deadly crossfire between Hamas and Israeli soldiers.

Both Israel and Egypt are fearful of terrorist infiltration from Gaza -- all the more so since Hamas took over -- and have always maintained tight controls over their borders with Gaza. The Palestinians continue to endure hardships because Gaza continues to serve as the launching pad for terror attacks against Israeli citizens. Those attacks come in the form of Hamas missiles that indiscriminately target Israeli kindergartens, homes and businesses.

And Hamas continued these attacks more than two years after Israel withdrew from Gaza in the hope that this step would begin the process of building a Palestinian state, eventually leading to a peaceful, two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. There was no "cycle of violence" then, no justification for anything other than peace and prosperity. But instead, Hamas chose Islamic jihad. Gazans' and Israelis' hopes have been met with misery for Palestinians and missiles for Israelis.

Hamas, an Iran proxy, has become a danger not only to Israel, but also to Palestinians as well as to neighboring Arab states, who fear the spread of radical Islam could destabilize their countries.

Arabs claim they love the Palestinian people, but they seem more interested in sacrificing them. If they really loved their Palestinian brethren, they'd pressure Hamas to stop firing missiles at Israel. In the longer term, the Arab world must end the Palestinians' refugee status and thereby their desire to harm Israel. It's time for the 22 Arab countries to open their borders and absorb the Palestinians of Gaza who wish to start a new life. It is time for the Arab world to truly help the Palestinians, not use them.

 

[destroythedome]

GAZA, (PIC)-- The Palestinian government in Gaza strongly denounced the Israeli wanton attack on the naval police headquarters north of the Gaza Strip on Monday which led to the killing of one policeman and the injury of many others.

It stated that the killing of a policeman while on duty is a war crime punishable by international law and called for enforcing that law against Israel.

Haneyya gov't slams Israel's terrorist attack on police center in Gaza

Just because the terrorist gang of hamas call their terrorist buddies policemen dosent protect them from retaliation from launching rockets. hamas can call them girlscouts it dosent make it so. How many rocket launching terrorists have these so called policemen arrested? NONE BECAUSE THEY ARE ROCKET LAUNCHING TERRORISTS THEMSELVES.

 

[P F Tinmore]

GAZA, (PIC)-- The Palestinian government in Gaza strongly denounced the Israeli wanton attack on the naval police headquarters north of the Gaza Strip on Monday which led to the killing of one policeman and the injury of many others.

It stated that the killing of a policeman while on duty is a war crime punishable by international law and called for enforcing that law against Israel.

Haneyya gov't slams Israel's terrorist attack on police center in Gaza

Just because the terrorist gang of hamas call their terrorist buddies policemen dosent protect them from retaliation from launching rockets. hamas can call them girlscouts it dosent make it so. How many rocket launching terrorists have these so called policemen arrested? NONE BECAUSE THEY ARE ROCKET LAUNCHING TERRORISTS THEMSELVES.

International law states that police are civilians and it is illegal to attack civilians. Police are protected persons.

Occupying powers have no legal protection in international or Palestinian law. Since these attacks are not illegal, the police have no authority to stop them.

 

[JStone]

GAZA, (PIC)-- The Palestinian government in Gaza strongly denounced the Israeli wanton attack on the naval police headquarters north of the Gaza Strip on Monday which led to the killing of one policeman and the injury of many others.

It stated that the killing of a policeman while on duty is a war crime punishable by international law and called for enforcing that law against Israel.

Haneyya gov't slams Israel's terrorist attack on police center in Gaza

Just because the terrorist gang of hamas call their terrorist buddies policemen dosent protect them from retaliation from launching rockets. hamas can call them girlscouts it dosent make it so. How many rocket launching terrorists have these so called policemen arrested? NONE BECAUSE THEY ARE ROCKET LAUNCHING TERRORISTS THEMSELVES.

International law states that police are civilians and it is illegal to attack civilians. Police are protected persons.

Occupying powers have no legal protection in international or Palestinian law. Since these attacks are not illegal, the police have no authority to stop them.

US State Department: Terrorist Designation of HAMAS Operative Muhammad Hisham Muhammad Isma'il Abu Ghazala

The State Department has designated Muhammad Hisham Muhammad Isma’il Abu Ghazala under E.O. 13224, which targets terrorists and those providing support to terrorists or acts of terrorism. This action will help stem the flow of finances to Abu Ghazala by prohibiting U.S. persons from engaging in transactions with him and freezing any assets he may have under U.S. jurisdiction.
Designated as a Foreign Terrorist Organization since 1997, HAMAS has carried out attacks – such as suicide bombings, rocket launches, improvised explosive device attacks, and shootings – against civilian targets inside Israel

http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2011/09/173352.htm

 

[destroythedome]

GAZA, (PIC)-- The Palestinian government in Gaza strongly denounced the Israeli wanton attack on the naval police headquarters north of the Gaza Strip on Monday which led to the killing of one policeman and the injury of many others.

It stated that the killing of a policeman while on duty is a war crime punishable by international law and called for enforcing that law against Israel.

Haneyya gov't slams Israel's terrorist attack on police center in Gaza

Just because the terrorist gang of hamas call their terrorist buddies policemen dosent protect them from retaliation from launching rockets. hamas can call them girlscouts it dosent make it so. How many rocket launching terrorists have these so called policemen arrested? NONE BECAUSE THEY ARE ROCKET LAUNCHING TERRORISTS THEMSELVES.

International law states that police are civilians and it is illegal to attack civilians. Police are protected persons.

Occupying powers have no legal protection in international or Palestinian law. Since these attacks are not illegal, the police have no authority to stop them.

The sad thing is you actually believe the stupid comments you make. Get a brain scan soon. If the doctors can find yours that is.

 

[JStone]

GAZA, (PIC)-- The Palestinian government in Gaza strongly denounced the Israeli wanton attack on the naval police headquarters north of the Gaza Strip on Monday which led to the killing of one policeman and the injury of many others.

It stated that the killing of a policeman while on duty is a war crime punishable by international law and called for enforcing that law against Israel.

Haneyya gov't slams Israel's terrorist attack on police center in Gaza

Just because the terrorist gang of hamas call their terrorist buddies policemen dosent protect them from retaliation from launching rockets. hamas can call them girlscouts it dosent make it so. How many rocket launching terrorists have these so called policemen arrested? NONE BECAUSE THEY ARE ROCKET LAUNCHING TERRORISTS THEMSELVES.

International law states that police are civilians and it is illegal to attack civilians. Police are protected persons.

Occupying powers have no legal protection in international or Palestinian law. Since these attacks are not illegal, the police have no authority to stop them.

Eugene Rostow, former Dean of the Yale Law School, Under Secretary of State in the Johnson administration, US State Dept Legal Advisor, Drafter of UN Res. 242 pertaining to Israeli land in the West Bank... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugene_V._Rostow

The British Mandate recognized the right of the Jewish people to "close settlement" in the whole of the Mandated territory [Palestine]. The Jewish right of settlement in Palestine west of the Jordan river, that is, in Israel, the West Bank, Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip, was made unassailable. That right has never been terminated and cannot be terminated except by a recognized peace between Israel and its neighbors. And perhaps not even then, in view of Article 80 of the U.N. Charter, "the Palestine article," which provides that "nothing in the Charter shall be construed ... to alter in any manner the rights whatsoever of any states or any peoples or the terms of existing international instruments...."

The mandate implicitly denies Arab claims to national political rights in the area in favor of the Jews; the mandated territory was in effect reserved to the Jewish people for their self-determination and political development, in acknowledgment of the historic connection of the Jewish people to the land. Lord Curzon, who was then the British Foreign Minister, made this reading of the mandate explicit. There remains simply the theory that the Arab inhabitants of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip have an inherent 'natural law' claim to the area. Neither customary international law nor the United Nations Charter acknowledges that every group of people claiming to be a nation has the right to a state of its own."

Resolved: are the settlements legal? Israeli West Bank policies

 

[P F Tinmore]

HAMAS has carried out attacks – such as suicide bombings, rocket launches, improvised explosive device attacks, and shootings – against civilian targets inside Israel

"Civilian" is not the definitive term. All Palestinians are "civilians" but some are protected persons and some are not. Israeli settlers and Palestinian militants are not considered protected persons.

 

[JStone]

HAMAS has carried out attacks – such as suicide bombings, rocket launches, improvised explosive device attacks, and shootings – against civilian targets inside Israel

"Civilian" is not the definitive term. All Palestinians are "civilians" but some are protected persons and some are not. Israeli settlers and Palestinian militants are not considered protected persons.

Eugene Rostow, former Dean of the Yale Law School, Under Secretary of State in the Johnson administration, US State Dept Legal Advisor, Drafter of UN Res. 242 pertaining to Israeli land in the West Bank Eugene V. Rostow - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The British Mandate recognized the right of the Jewish people to "close settlement" in the whole of the Mandated territory [Palestine]. The Jewish right of settlement in Palestine west of the Jordan river, that is, in Israel, the West Bank, Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip, was made unassailable. That right has never been terminated and cannot be terminated except by a recognized peace between Israel and its neighbors. And perhaps not even then, in view of Article 80 of the U.N. Charter, "the Palestine article," which provides that "nothing in the Charter shall be construed ... to alter in any manner the rights whatsoever of any states or any peoples or the terms of existing international instruments...."

The mandate implicitly denies Arab claims to national political rights in the area in favor of the Jews; the mandated territory was in effect reserved to the Jewish people for their self-determination and political development, in acknowledgment of the historic connection of the Jewish people to the land. Lord Curzon, who was then the British Foreign Minister, made this reading of the mandate explicit. There remains simply the theory that the Arab inhabitants of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip have an inherent 'natural law' claim to the area. Neither customary international law nor the United Nations Charter acknowledges that every group of people claiming to be a nation has the right to a state of its own."

Resolved: are the settlements legal? Israeli West Bank policies

 

[P F Tinmore]

HAMAS has carried out attacks – such as suicide bombings, rocket launches, improvised explosive device attacks, and shootings – against civilian targets inside Israel

"Civilian" is not the definitive term. All Palestinians are "civilians" but some are protected persons and some are not. Israeli settlers and Palestinian militants are not considered protected persons.

Eugene Rostow, former Dean of the Yale Law School, Under Secretary of State in the Johnson administration, US State Dept Legal Advisor, Drafter of UN Res. 242 pertaining to Israeli land in the West Bank Eugene V. Rostow - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The British Mandate recognized the right of the Jewish people to "close settlement" in the whole of the Mandated territory [Palestine]. The Jewish right of settlement in Palestine west of the Jordan river, that is, in Israel, the West Bank, Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip, was made unassailable. That right has never been terminated and cannot be terminated except by a recognized peace between Israel and its neighbors. And perhaps not even then, in view of Article 80 of the U.N. Charter, "the Palestine article," which provides that "nothing in the Charter shall be construed ... to alter in any manner the rights whatsoever of any states or any peoples or the terms of existing international instruments...."

The mandate implicitly denies Arab claims to national political rights in the area in favor of the Jews; the mandated territory was in effect reserved to the Jewish people for their self-determination and political development, in acknowledgment of the historic connection of the Jewish people to the land. Lord Curzon, who was then the British Foreign Minister, made this reading of the mandate explicit. There remains simply the theory that the Arab inhabitants of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip have an inherent 'natural law' claim to the area. Neither customary international law nor the United Nations Charter acknowledges that every group of people claiming to be a nation has the right to a state of its own."

Resolved: are the settlements legal? Israeli West Bank policies

Do you have documentation and not just a personal opinion to confirm that.

BTW, what does that have to do with protected persons?

 

[JStone]

"Civilian" is not the definitive term. All Palestinians are "civilians" but some are protected persons and some are not. Israeli settlers and Palestinian militants are not considered protected persons.

Eugene Rostow, former Dean of the Yale Law School, Under Secretary of State in the Johnson administration, US State Dept Legal Advisor, Drafter of UN Res. 242 pertaining to Israeli land in the West Bank Eugene V. Rostow - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The British Mandate recognized the right of the Jewish people to "close settlement" in the whole of the Mandated territory [Palestine]. The Jewish right of settlement in Palestine west of the Jordan river, that is, in Israel, the West Bank, Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip, was made unassailable. That right has never been terminated and cannot be terminated except by a recognized peace between Israel and its neighbors. And perhaps not even then, in view of Article 80 of the U.N. Charter, "the Palestine article," which provides that "nothing in the Charter shall be construed ... to alter in any manner the rights whatsoever of any states or any peoples or the terms of existing international instruments...."

The mandate implicitly denies Arab claims to national political rights in the area in favor of the Jews; the mandated territory was in effect reserved to the Jewish people for their self-determination and political development, in acknowledgment of the historic connection of the Jewish people to the land. Lord Curzon, who was then the British Foreign Minister, made this reading of the mandate explicit. There remains simply the theory that the Arab inhabitants of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip have an inherent 'natural law' claim to the area. Neither customary international law nor the United Nations Charter acknowledges that every group of people claiming to be a nation has the right to a state of its own."

Resolved: are the settlements legal? Israeli West Bank policies

Do you have documentation and not just a personal opinion to confirm that.

Eugene Rostow, Legal scholar, former Dean of the Yale Law School, Under Secretary of State in the Johnson administration, US State Dept Legal Advisor, Drafter of UN Res. 242 pertaining to Israeli land in the West Bank Eugene V. Rostow - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[P F Tinmore]

Eugene Rostow, former Dean of the Yale Law School, Under Secretary of State in the Johnson administration, US State Dept Legal Advisor, Drafter of UN Res. 242 pertaining to Israeli land in the West Bank Eugene V. Rostow - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Do you have documentation and not just a personal opinion to confirm that.

Eugene Rostow, Legal scholar, former Dean of the Yale Law School, Under Secretary of State in the Johnson administration, US State Dept Legal Advisor, Drafter of UN Res. 242 pertaining to Israeli land in the West Bank Eugene V. Rostow - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

OK, he is allowed to his opinion but where in the documents does he get that opinion.

 

[JStone]

Do you have documentation and not just a personal opinion to confirm that.

Eugene Rostow, Legal scholar, former Dean of the Yale Law School, Under Secretary of State in the Johnson administration, US State Dept Legal Advisor, Drafter of UN Res. 242 pertaining to Israeli land in the West Bank Eugene V. Rostow - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

OK, he is allowed to his opinion but where in the documents does he get that opinion.

http://www.law.yale.edu/ylr/pdfs/v50-2/Rostow.pdf

 

[P F Tinmore]

Eugene Rostow, Legal scholar, former Dean of the Yale Law School, Under Secretary of State in the Johnson administration, US State Dept Legal Advisor, Drafter of UN Res. 242 pertaining to Israeli land in the West Bank Eugene V. Rostow - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

OK, he is allowed to his opinion but where in the documents does he get that opinion.

http://www.law.yale.edu/ylr/pdfs/v50-2/Rostow.pdf

Still no documents?

 

[JStone]

OK, he is allowed to his opinion but where in the documents does he get that opinion.

http://www.law.yale.edu/ylr/pdfs/v50-2/Rostow.pdf

Still no documents?

 

[JDzBrain]

Exactly so Stone!

When the so called Palestinians living in Jerusalem were asked last year in a first ever poll conducted by Gallup whether they prefer living there under Israeli law or the Palestinian Authority occupation...over 80% say Israeli!

That should tell any thinking person everything they need to know about the reality of Arabs that have experienced both cultures think about life under Sharia law and an oppressive Palestinian regime!

Oh, I say so called Palestinians because there hasn't been Palestinians living in Palestine in over 2000 years. And some would argue quite logically that the NEVER WAS a Palestinian state. The current Palestinians are Jordanians, Egyptians, Syrians, Israelite and the decedents of a dozen other cultures that have settled, conquered, occupied and divided the area up throughout time...including the Turks and Greeks. They are people abandoned by their OWN countries of origin and remain outcast as radicals!

Their destiny is in their own hands. Renouncing violence, evicting the radical Islamist from their government and living peacefully with their neighbors is the ONLY way they will get the peace the CLAIM to want.

Cause the truth is, Israel will NOT capitulate to ANYone...including the UN, Obama or some Iranian backed terrorist groups. That's a FACT.

Their history has taught them well what that will lead to and they will fight to the last man to prevent a second holocaust being inflicted on them because they didn't fight back!

And by the way, I'm not Jewish or of Jewish decent. Hell, I'm not even religious. I just know enough to look at history and understand that there can be only one peaceful outcome, but there are several ways to be peace that WILL be paid for in BLOOD!

The choice is up to the Palestinians!

 

[JStone]

Exactly so Stone!

When the so called Palestinians living in Jerusalem were asked last year in a first ever poll conducted by Gallup whether they prefer living there under Israeli law or the Palestinian Authority occupation...over 80% say Israeli!

That should tell any thinking person everything they need to know about the reality of Arabs that have experienced both cultures think about life under Sharia law and an oppressive Palestinian regime!

Oh, I say so called Palestinians because there hasn't been Palestinians living in Palestine in over 2000 years. And some would argue quite logically that the NEVER WAS a Palestinian state. The current Palestinians are Jordanians, Egyptians, Syrians, Israelite and the decedents of a dozen other cultures that have settled, conquered, occupied and divided the area up throughout time...including the Turks and Greeks. They are people abandoned by their OWN countries of origin and remain outcast as radicals!

Their destiny is in their own hands. Renouncing violence, evicting the radical Islamist from their government and living peacefully with their neighbors is the ONLY way they will get the peace the CLAIM to want.

Cause the truth is, Israel will NOT capitulate to ANYone...including the UN, Obama or some Iranian backed terrorist groups. That's a FACT.

Their history has taught them well what that will lead to and they will fight to the last man to prevent a second holocaust being inflicted on them because they didn't fight back!

And by the way, I'm not Jewish or of Jewish decent. Hell, I'm not even religious. I just know enough to look at history and understand that there can be only one peaceful outcome, but there are several ways to be peace that WILL be paid for in BLOOD!

The choice is up to the Palestinians!

Washington Post: Why Palestinians Want To Be Israelis

One of the givens of the Middle East peace process is that Palestinians are eager to be free of rule by Israel and to live in a state of their own. That's why a new poll of the Arabs of East Jerusalem is striking: It shows that more of those people actually would prefer to be citizens of Israel than of a Palestinian state.

The awkward fact is that the 270,000 Arabs who live in East Jerusalem may not be very enthusiastic about joining Palestine. The survey, which was designed and supervised by former State Department Middle East researcher David Pollock, found that only 30 percent said they would prefer to be citizens of Palestine in a two-state solution, while 35 percent said they would choose Israeli citizenship. (The rest said they didn't know or refused to answer.) Forty percent said they would consider moving to another neighborhood in order to become a citizen of Israel rather than Palestine, and 54 percent said that if their neighborhood were assigned to Israel, they would not move to Palestine.

The reasons for these attitudes are pretty understandable, even healthy. Arabs say they prefer Israel's jobs, schools, health care and welfare benefits to those of a Palestinian state -- and their nationalism is not strong enough for them to set aside these advantages in order to live in an Arab country.

PostPartisan - Why Palestinians want to be Israeli citizens

 

[docmauser1]

Israeli settlers and Palestinian militants are not considered protected persons.

Why are palistanian settlers "protected persons"? Why the discrimination, anyone?