Half of men may have HPV infections

[BolshevikHunter]

Vaccines are money losers for pharmaceuticals.

Lifestyle drugs like viagra are the money makers.

For the same reason that dermatologists make a shit ton of money more than internists.

Umm, Excuse me geauxtohell, but do you care to elaborate on that assumption? How can "Lifestyle drugs", which are a choice, be more profitable than a Vaccine, which are usually (or quickly all becoming) mandatory? That makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. Not trying to attack you, Just wondering bro? ~BH

I thought I'd point out that with something like Viagra, money is spent on a regular basis for it, whereas a vaccine would be taken/purchased far less frequently. That would explain something like Viagra being more of a money-maker.

That is a very good point my friend, but if we are talking all vaccines, then I am not too sure because many are required annually. The required amount of vaccines on newborn infants alone comes to a very high number. In the first year or two almost every single visit has a required vaccine, or should I say vaccines. Funny thing is, they test there effects on the body of only one single vaccine, not the combined 3 or 4 that usually are given all at once. The recent whooping cough vaccine, TDAP, Which is for whooping, tetanus and one other that I can't remember, is given to a 12 year old all at once. In California, you're child cannot attend Jr. High without a doctors varification of have given the shots.

Anyway, My Son had a very severe allergic reaction where he had hives that look like he had chicken pocks for 3 or 4 days even though he already had chicken pocks, and it was found that he was allergic to the combined drugs. Nevertheless, Your original point is a good arguement in regards to the profit levels. ~BH

 

[geauxtohell]

Umm, Excuse me geauxtohell, but do you care to elaborate on that assumption? How can "Lifestyle drugs", which are a choice, be more profitable than a Vaccine, which are usually (or quickly all becoming) mandatory? That makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. Not trying to attack you, Just wondering bro? ~BH

I thought I'd point out that with something like Viagra, money is spent on a regular basis for it, whereas a vaccine would be taken/purchased far less frequently. That would explain something like Viagra being more of a money-maker.

That is a very good point my friend, but if we are talking all vaccines, then I am not too sure because many are required annually. The required amount of vaccines on newborn infants alone comes to a very high number. In the first year or two almost every single visit has a required vaccine, or should I say vaccines. Funny thing is, they test there effects on the body of only one single vaccines, not the combined 3 or 4 that usually are given all at once. The recent whooping cough vaccine, TDAP, Which is for whooping, tetanus and one other that I can't remember, is given to a 12 year old all at once. In California, you're child cannot attend Jr. High without a doctors varification of have given the shots.

Anyway, My Son had a very severe allergic reaction where he had hives that look like he had chicken pocks for 3 or 4 days even though he already had chicken pocks, and it was found that he was allergic to the combines drugs. Nevertheless, Your original point is a good arguement in regards to the profit levels. ~BH

Only the flu vax is required annually.

 

[BolshevikHunter]

Vaccines are money losers for pharmaceuticals.

Lifestyle drugs like viagra are the money makers.

For the same reason that dermatologists make a shit ton of money more than internists.

Umm, Excuse me geauxtohell, but do you care to elaborate on that assumption? How can "Lifestyle drugs", which are a choice, be more profitable than a Vaccine, which are usually (or quickly all becoming) mandatory? That makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. Not trying to attack you, Just wondering bro? ~BH

Hey, good to see you over here.

The R&D behind vaccines makes them cost prohibitive. Furthermore, they are pushed out as a public health concern and sold at rock bottom prices. Physicians typically lose money on vaccines.

As for viagra:

Pharmaceutical Phenoms: America's Best-Selling Medicines

You too buddy. Well, It seems that even at rock bottom prices, they are making a killing out here by forcing every child in public school to get it. It's funny too, because they leave the borders wide open, and then wonder why whooping cough is all of a sudden back again. Thanks bro. ~BH

 

[BolshevikHunter]

I thought I'd point out that with something like Viagra, money is spent on a regular basis for it, whereas a vaccine would be taken/purchased far less frequently. That would explain something like Viagra being more of a money-maker.

That is a very good point my friend, but if we are talking all vaccines, then I am not too sure because many are required annually. The required amount of vaccines on newborn infants alone comes to a very high number. In the first year or two almost every single visit has a required vaccine, or should I say vaccines. Funny thing is, they test there effects on the body of only one single vaccines, not the combined 3 or 4 that usually are given all at once. The recent whooping cough vaccine, TDAP, Which is for whooping, tetanus and one other that I can't remember, is given to a 12 year old all at once. In California, you're child cannot attend Jr. High without a doctors varification of have given the shots.

Anyway, My Son had a very severe allergic reaction where he had hives that look like he had chicken pocks for 3 or 4 days even though he already had chicken pocks, and it was found that he was allergic to the combines drugs. Nevertheless, Your original point is a good arguement in regards to the profit levels. ~BH

Only the flu vax is required annually.

I don't even think it's "required" bro, just suggested correct? ~BH

 

[syrenn]

That is a very good point my friend, but if we are talking all vaccines, then I am not too sure because many are required annually. The required amount of vaccines on newborn infants alone comes to a very high number. In the first year or two almost every single visit has a required vaccine, or should I say vaccines. Funny thing is, they test there effects on the body of only one single vaccines, not the combined 3 or 4 that usually are given all at once. The recent whooping cough vaccine, TDAP, Which is for whooping, tetanus and one other that I can't remember, is given to a 12 year old all at once. In California, you're child cannot attend Jr. High without a doctors varification of have given the shots.

Anyway, My Son had a very severe allergic reaction where he had hives that look like he had chicken pocks for 3 or 4 days even though he already had chicken pocks, and it was found that he was allergic to the combines drugs. Nevertheless, Your original point is a good arguement in regards to the profit levels. ~BH

Only the flu vax is required annually.

I don't even think it's "required" bro, just suggested correct? ~BH

With some jobs it is a requirement. Otherwise it is a voluntary vaccine.

 

[Tank]

Black and hispanic women are only about 15% of the US population, but the make up almost 70% of all women infected with HPV.

 

[BolshevikHunter]

Only the flu vax is required annually.

I don't even think it's "required" bro, just suggested correct? ~BH

With some jobs it is a requirement. Otherwise it is a voluntary vaccine.

I would guess the medical field? Or atleast all the hippie peoples park campers back in the day? ~BH

 

[geauxtohell]

That is a very good point my friend, but if we are talking all vaccines, then I am not too sure because many are required annually. The required amount of vaccines on newborn infants alone comes to a very high number. In the first year or two almost every single visit has a required vaccine, or should I say vaccines. Funny thing is, they test there effects on the body of only one single vaccines, not the combined 3 or 4 that usually are given all at once. The recent whooping cough vaccine, TDAP, Which is for whooping, tetanus and one other that I can't remember, is given to a 12 year old all at once. In California, you're child cannot attend Jr. High without a doctors varification of have given the shots.

Anyway, My Son had a very severe allergic reaction where he had hives that look like he had chicken pocks for 3 or 4 days even though he already had chicken pocks, and it was found that he was allergic to the combines drugs. Nevertheless, Your original point is a good arguement in regards to the profit levels. ~BH

Only the flu vax is required annually.

I don't even think it's "required" bro, just suggested correct? ~BH

Right. "Suggested" annually. Thanks.

Whooping cough is back because people believe there is a cause between vaccines and autism and children aren't getting their DTaP (P is for pertussis, the bug that causes whooping cough) shots.

 

[JBeukema]

So.... Asian chicks are safe, right?

 

[BolshevikHunter]

Only the flu vax is required annually.

I don't even think it's "required" bro, just suggested correct? ~BH

Right. "Suggested" annually. Thanks.

Whooping cough is back because people believe there is a cause between vaccines and autism and children aren't getting their DTaP (P is for pertussis, the bug that causes whooping cough) shots.

You a doctor geauxtohell? I guess after all these years I never asked you. Seems like you are educated on the subject. I have studied pharmaceutical sales and profits because it concerns me, but I am obviously no doctor. I do have a very good friend who is that tends to lean more your way about the subject of vaccines. ~BH

 

[waltky]

Boys gettin' Gardasil too...

HPV vaccine for boys has 'good start' in 1st year
29 Aug.`13 — When the HPV vaccine was first recommended for boys, health officials worried it would be an unusually hard sell. But a new report suggests that might not be the case.

About 1 in 5 boys got at least one of the recommended three doses last year, relatively good for a new vaccine aimed at adolescents. The shots are largely intended not to protect boys from disease, but to stop them from spreading a sexually transmitted virus to girls that could cause cervical cancer. The vaccine hasn't been very popular among girls. The government report issued Thursday is the first real sense of how many boys are getting the shots. "It's a good start," said Shannon Stokley, a vaccination expert with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Introduced in 2006, the vaccine protects against human papillomavirus, which is spread during sex. Most infections go away on their own, without people developing symptoms. But the virus can cause cervical cancer in females, genital warts in both sexes, and some other, less common conditions like throat and anal cancer.

The vaccine was first recommended for girls ages 11 and 12 because it works best if given before a teen starts to have sex. In 2011, it was also recommended for boys that age to help prevent the virus's spread. The CDC report covers vaccination rates for last year, the first full year since the shots were advised for boys. It's based on telephone calls to families for about 19,000 boys and girls ages 13 to 17. About 21 percent of the boys had gotten at least one of the three doses. Less than 7 percent were fully vaccinated. The rates look relatively good compared to the initial rates for some other vaccines aimed at adolescents. For example, the initial rate for a meningococcal vaccine was just 12 percent.

Rates tend to start low when a vaccine is first recommended and build after. So the HPV numbers for boys are reason to be optimistic, said the CDC's Dr. Melinda Wharton, although she added a word of caution. "Given how the coverage level has stalled for girls, though, a solid start isn't enough," she said. For girls, the initial rate for at least one HPV shot was 25 percent. Last year, it was about 54 percent and hadn't changed much from the previous two years. Only a third was fully immunized with all three doses last year. "We'd really like to do much better with boys and girls," Wharton said.

HPV vaccine for boys has 'good start' in 1st year

 

[waltky]

Granny said Uncle Ferd can have sex with dat woman - she done had her HPV shot...

CDC: 25 Percent of Men Infected with Cancer-causing HPV
April 06, 2017 - A cancer causing strain of the human papillomavirus, or HPV, has infected 25 percent of men and 20 percent of women in the United States, new statistics from the National Center for Health Statistics.

Furthermore, some 45 percent of men have a genital form of the virus. "Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common sexually-transmitted infection in the United States," the team at the NCHS, part of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, wrote. "Some HPV types can cause genital warts and are considered low risk, with a small chance for causing cancer. Other types are considered high risk, causing cancer in different areas of the body including the cervix and vagina in women, penis in men, and anus and oropharynx [mouth and throat] in both men and women."

Lauren Fant, left, 18, braces for a shot of the HPV vaccine administered by nurse Stephanie Pearson in Marietta, Georgia​

The virus has been linked to head and neck cancer as well as cervical cancer. According to NBC News, doctors think about 70 percent of head and neck cancers are caused by HPV spread through oral sex. They add that by 2020, head and neck cancers will be more common than the cervical cancer caused by the virus. Roughly four percent of adults are infected with an oral, cancer causing strain of HPV. Men had a higher rate than women.

For people under 25, there is a vaccine that can defend against the cancer causing strains of HPV. Among older adults, the virus continues to be passed around. According to NBC, the FDA-approved vaccines are Cervarix and Gardasil. There are 109 known strains of HPV.

CDC: 25 Percent of Men Infected with Cancer-causing HPV

 

[Rambunctious]

Hey! I just remembered why I'm single

We all know why you are single...

 

[yiostheoy]

CHICAGO (Reuters) – Half of men in the general population may be infected with human papillomavirus or HPV, the human wart virus that causes cervical and other cancers, strengthening the case for vaccinating boys against HPV, U.S. researchers said on Monday.

U.S. vaccine advisers have been weighing whether boys and young men should be vaccinated against the human papillomavirus, as they already recommend for girls and young women, but some worry the vaccine is too costly to justify its use.

Half of men may have HPV infections: study - Yahoo! News

Sounds like a ploy to sell more drugs and boost the profits of pharmaceutical companies to me.

It makes sense for 14 year old boys to get the vaccine before they start fokking at 15 or 16.

No telling what the Susie's already have on their little rotten crotches.

 

[yiostheoy]

It only stands to reason that a high percentage of men are infected with HPV. The women have to get it from somewhere.

This is simply good medicine. We will effectively eliminate cervical cancer through a vaccine.

Not to mention genital warts.

The problem is that men are asymptomatic. If their dicks were being cut off because of this .... i bet the story would change.

And if pigs were birds they could fly.

Not only that, but if a buzzard had a piano on his azz then there would be music in the air !!

 

[waltky]

High-risk HPV—the types of the virus that can cause cancer...

The Best Way to Protect Your Kids From HPV
April 7, 2017 - Human papillomavirus (HPV), a sexually transmitted infection, is remarkably common, according to a new publication from the National Center for Health Statistics, part of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The report reveals that 25 percent of men and 20 percent of women ages 18 to 59 are infected with what's called high-risk HPV—the types of the virus that can cause cancer. Previous studies of just women put the prevalence closer to 15 percent. "That’s pretty startling," says Geraldine McQuillan, Ph.D., an infectious disease epidemiologist at the CDC and the lead author of the report. "People tend to ho-hum this whole thing, not think it’s really an issue. ... This is an infection that leads to cancer—it's important."

Just 15 years ago, sexually active adults had no reliable way to protect against HPV. But for young people today, the infection is preventable: The HPV vaccine, approved for girls and women in 2006 and boys and men in 2009, offers protection against the riskiest forms of the virus—ideally before people are ever exposed to it. The CDC recommends the vaccine for all adolescents. Yet most remain unvaccinated.

Research has shown that primary care physicians do not recommend the HPV vaccine as strongly as they do other adolescent vaccines—in large part because it takes longer to discuss, and doctors perceive parents as unsupportive of the vaccine for their kids. A consortium of National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers recently (PDF) released a statement that called the low vaccination rates "a serious public health threat." "Every parent should take stock of these statistics," says Consumer Reports medical director Orly Avitzur, M.D. "The vaccine provides a window of opportunity to prevent HPV-related cancers in adulthood."

HPV: A Preventable Problem