Hadley-Crut graph shows temperature trending DOWN

Discussion in 'Politics' started by bripat9643, Jun 2, 2012.

  1. bripat9643
    Offline

    bripat9643 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2011
    Messages:
    81,719
    Thanks Received:
    10,010
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Ratings:
    +39,012
    [​IMG]
     
  2. konradv
    Online

    konradv Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2010
    Messages:
    24,155
    Thanks Received:
    2,829
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Baltimore
    Ratings:
    +6,741
    Politics?
     
  3. Lakhota
    Offline

    Lakhota Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    54,315
    Thanks Received:
    5,902
    Trophy Points:
    1,870
    Location:
    Native America
    Ratings:
    +22,934
    Like your IQ and grasp on reality...
     
  4. OohPooPahDoo
    Offline

    OohPooPahDoo Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Messages:
    15,347
    Thanks Received:
    979
    Trophy Points:
    175
    Location:
    N'Awlins Mid-City
    Ratings:
    +1,327

    Why does it only go back to 2001?
     
    Last edited: Jun 2, 2012
  5. Mad Scientist
    Offline

    Mad Scientist Feels Good!

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    24,196
    Thanks Received:
    5,259
    Trophy Points:
    270
    Ratings:
    +8,148
    That's because we built a few Windmills. Watch em go round and round! :uhoh3:
     
  6. SniperFire
    Offline

    SniperFire Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2012
    Messages:
    13,627
    Thanks Received:
    1,220
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Inside Your Head
    Ratings:
    +1,227
    Poop.

    Here comes another Ice Age.

    Get out there and make some emissions, people!
     
  7. healthmyths
    Offline

    healthmyths Gold Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2011
    Messages:
    17,195
    Thanks Received:
    2,365
    Trophy Points:
    260
    Ratings:
    +5,074
    NO Most likely they are NOW including 12.5% of the earth's land mass i.e.... Siberia!

    One of major criticism has been the exclusion over 50 years of data from 12.5% of the world's land mass.

    Those readings were for Siberia and when added to the other readings would have
    diminished the premise that the earth's temperature was rising.

    "The number of [Siberian ]stations increased from 8 in 1901 to 23 in 1951 and
    then decreased to 12 from 1989 to present Only four stations,
    those at Irkutsk, Bratsk, Chita and Kirensk, cover the entire 20th century.

    IEA analysts say climatologists use the data of stations located in large
    populated centers that are influenced by the urban-warming effect
    more frequently than the correct data of remote stations…

    The scale of global warming was exaggerated due to temperature distortions
    for Russia accounting for 12.5% of the world’s land mass.

    The IEA said it was necessary to recalculate all global-temperature data in order
    to assess the scale of such exaggeration.Climategatekeeping: Siberia « Climate Audit
     
  8. bripat9643
    Offline

    bripat9643 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2011
    Messages:
    81,719
    Thanks Received:
    10,010
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Ratings:
    +39,012
    Turds like you are always telling us we should not question what the "climate scientists" tell us. Hadley is telling us that there is no global warming.


    It sucks to be a warmist cult member these days, doesn't it?
     
  9. bripat9643
    Offline

    bripat9643 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2011
    Messages:
    81,719
    Thanks Received:
    10,010
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Ratings:
    +39,012
    If it went back to 1998, the downward trend would be even more pronounced.
     

Share This Page