Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Another funny jr. post praising President Bush.
President Bushes legacy will be two fold. First, Iraq. Including but not limited to invading a country that was not planning on attacking us, (nor could have if they wanted to), did not represent a serious or immediate threat to us, did not have the WMD President Bush and hius people claimed, and getting thousands of US soldiers killed. His invasion and occupation is also responsible for an unknown number of innocent Iraqi civilians. Second he presided over the worst economic meltdown since 1929.
President Obama's is still being written.
AIG pays us back. The forst 50% of tarp saved the economy
His leadership post 9-11 prevented a more serious economic collapse than we had
Saddam, gone
UBL, gone (thanks to water boarding in 2006 as well as Navy seals/CIA)
His tax rate will be in place for 99% of us
Sarbanes Oxley, huge success
His medicare plan was under funded, but also a huge success
was within 163 billion of a balanced budget, 2007
Numerous bi partisan legislation events such as No Child left behind, removing Saddam, Etc...
Budgets through 2008 (BHO signed the 09 budget 3/2009, called the Omnibus bill
Now how is BHO doing?
no jobs
huge debt
Obama care in which some of his own now want out of some
It is not even close people
Man this irritated all the usual subjects....the progressives and the paulbots (notice how they always get upset about the same things?) and I love it. I am sure Bush was not a great President cause he didnt use his Veto power to keep the democrats in check after 2006....People seem to ignore that it all fell apart after they took control. No Bushes major fault was that he thought democrats loved the country as the rest of us do......You cant trust socialists.
Was Bush small government? Nope. Yet did he spend as much in 8 years as Obama did in 2? Nope
Did he try to fix education instead of just let the union have thier way? Yep. Didnt work out the way he thought cause again he thought progressives cared about kids and they dont.
You see Bushes major fault was thinking progressives are like americans and they are not.
As for the wars....Maybe when you little kids grow up you will realize what happened in 2001....You will also realize that Bush kept us safer then Obama has.
man this irritated all the usual subjects....the progressives and the paulbots (notice how they always get upset about the same things?) and i love it. I am sure bush was not a great president cause he didnt use his veto power to keep the democrats in check after 2006....people seem to ignore that it all fell apart after they took control. No bushes major fault was that he thought democrats loved the country as the rest of us do......you cant trust socialists.
Was bush small government? Nope. Yet did he spend as much in 8 years as obama did in 2? Nope
did he try to fix education instead of just let the union have thier way? Yep. Didnt work out the way he thought cause again he thought progressives cared about kids and they dont.
You see bushes major fault was thinking progressives are like americans and they are not.
As for the wars....maybe when you little kids grow up you will realize what happened in 2001....you will also realize that bush kept us safer then obama has.
except for when he didn't
.
One thing is for sure: We'll never get the lives, limbs and minds back of the thousands of American soldiers who should never have been sent to the Iraq & Afghanistan in the first place, nor the 4 TRILLION or so that was borrowed and then spent on those wars. Obama has been weak in getting us out of there, but he didn't put us there in the first place, and no spin can change that fact.
Think of all the lives and money that could have been saved had we just sent our armchair Rambos instead.
.
We'll never get the lives back of the 58,000 plus americans from lbj's vietnam either.
Another funny jr. post praising President Bush.
President Bushes legacy will be two fold. First, Iraq. Including but not limited to invading a country that was not planning on attacking us, (nor could have if they wanted to), did not represent a serious or immediate threat to us, did not have the WMD President Bush and hius people claimed, and getting thousands of US soldiers killed. His invasion and occupation is also responsible for an unknown number of innocent Iraqi civilians. Second he presided over the worst economic meltdown since 1929.
President Obama's is still being written.
How conveniently you leave out the scores of Dems from the late nineties claiming Iraq was a threat to U.S. security and interests. Iraq as a threat to the U.S. was not a GWB exclusive pal... he picked up where the Clintons, Albright's, Berger's, Gore's, etc. left off.
But hey, that's what partisan hacks do.
Another funny jr. post praising President Bush.
President Bushes legacy will be two fold. First, Iraq. Including but not limited to invading a country that was not planning on attacking us, (nor could have if they wanted to), did not represent a serious or immediate threat to us, did not have the WMD President Bush and hius people claimed, and getting thousands of US soldiers killed. His invasion and occupation is also responsible for an unknown number of innocent Iraqi civilians. Second he presided over the worst economic meltdown since 1929.
President Obama's is still being written.
How conveniently you leave out the scores of Dems from the late nineties claiming Iraq was a threat to U.S. security and interests. Iraq as a threat to the U.S. was not a GWB exclusive pal... he picked up where the Clintons, Albright's, Berger's, Gore's, etc. left off.
But hey, that's what partisan hacks do.
Where in the Iraq liberation Act of 1998 did it call for US troop to invade, occupy and remove government of Iraq? Most of the rhetoric in 1998 was the lead up to Desert Fox. Furthermore, the Democrats who voted in favor of allowing Preisdent Bush to decide to invade Iraq should have resigned in disgrace.
Another funny jr. post praising President Bush.
President Bushes legacy will be two fold. First, Iraq. Including but not limited to invading a country that was not planning on attacking us, (nor could have if they wanted to), did not represent a serious or immediate threat to us, did not have the WMD President Bush and hius people claimed, and getting thousands of US soldiers killed. His invasion and occupation is also responsible for an unknown number of innocent Iraqi civilians. Second he presided over the worst economic meltdown since 1929.
President Obama's is still being written.
How conveniently you leave out the scores of Dems from the late nineties claiming Iraq was a threat to U.S. security and interests. Iraq as a threat to the U.S. was not a GWB exclusive pal... he picked up where the Clintons, Albright's, Berger's, Gore's, etc. left off.
But hey, that's what partisan hacks do.
Where in the Iraq liberation Act of 1998 did it call for US troop to invade, occupy and remove government of Iraq? Most of the rhetoric in 1998 was the lead up to Desert Fox. Furthermore, the Democrats who voted in favor of allowing Preisdent Bush to decide to invade Iraq should have resigned in disgrace.
never mid the fact that the intelligence agencies of many countries all came to the same conclusion.How conveniently you leave out the scores of Dems from the late nineties claiming Iraq was a threat to U.S. security and interests. Iraq as a threat to the U.S. was not a GWB exclusive pal... he picked up where the Clintons, Albright's, Berger's, Gore's, etc. left off.
But hey, that's what partisan hacks do.
Where in the Iraq liberation Act of 1998 did it call for US troop to invade, occupy and remove government of Iraq? Most of the rhetoric in 1998 was the lead up to Desert Fox. Furthermore, the Democrats who voted in favor of allowing Preisdent Bush to decide to invade Iraq should have resigned in disgrace.
Democrats were cowards. So was the media
They did not want to be labled by their Republican opponents as "Soft on Terror" so they voted for the war without asking critical questions
never mid the fact that the intelligence agencies of many countries all came to the same conclusion.Where in the Iraq liberation Act of 1998 did it call for US troop to invade, occupy and remove government of Iraq? Most of the rhetoric in 1998 was the lead up to Desert Fox. Furthermore, the Democrats who voted in favor of allowing Preisdent Bush to decide to invade Iraq should have resigned in disgrace.
Democrats were cowards. So was the media
They did not want to be labled by their Republican opponents as "Soft on Terror" so they voted for the war without asking critical questions
Must make you feel intelligent that you know more today than the intelligence agencises of many countries didnt know back then.
man this irritated all the usual subjects....the progressives and the paulbots (notice how they always get upset about the same things?) and i love it. I am sure bush was not a great president cause he didnt use his veto power to keep the democrats in check after 2006....people seem to ignore that it all fell apart after they took control. No bushes major fault was that he thought democrats loved the country as the rest of us do......you cant trust socialists.
Was bush small government? Nope. Yet did he spend as much in 8 years as obama did in 2? Nope
did he try to fix education instead of just let the union have thier way? Yep. Didnt work out the way he thought cause again he thought progressives cared about kids and they dont.
You see bushes major fault was thinking progressives are like americans and they are not.
As for the wars....maybe when you little kids grow up you will realize what happened in 2001....you will also realize that bush kept us safer then obama has.
except for when he didn't
boom.
except for when he didn't
boom.
TWO WORDS "GORELICK MEMO"!!!!
Here find out why Clinton's quest to keep his Chinese donations for missile secrets prevented the CIA from sharing with FBI the 9/11 bombers!!!
As the No. 2 person in the Clinton Justice Department, Ms. Gorelick rejected advice from the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, who warned against placing more limits on communications between law-enforcement officials and prosecutors pursuing counterterrorism cases, according to several internal documents written in summer 1995.
The documents — released yesterday by the Justice Department at the request of two Senate Republicans — drew renewed calls for Ms. Gorelick to testify publicly before the September 11 commission about the so-called “wall” between law enforcement and intelligence agencies that many have blamed for allowing the 2001 terrorist attacks to occur.
Memos show Gorelick involvement in 'wall' - Washington Times
except for when he didn't
boom.
TWO WORDS "GORELICK MEMO"!!!!
Here find out why Clinton's quest to keep his Chinese donations for missile secrets prevented the CIA from sharing with FBI the 9/11 bombers!!!
As the No. 2 person in the Clinton Justice Department, Ms. Gorelick rejected advice from the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, who warned against placing more limits on communications between law-enforcement officials and prosecutors pursuing counterterrorism cases, according to several internal documents written in summer 1995.
The documents released yesterday by the Justice Department at the request of two Senate Republicans drew renewed calls for Ms. Gorelick to testify publicly before the September 11 commission about the so-called wall between law enforcement and intelligence agencies that many have blamed for allowing the 2001 terrorist attacks to occur.
Memos show Gorelick involvement in 'wall' - Washington Times
never mid the fact that the intelligence agencies of many countries all came to the same conclusion.Democrats were cowards. So was the media
They did not want to be labled by their Republican opponents as "Soft on Terror" so they voted for the war without asking critical questions
Must make you feel intelligent that you know more today than the intelligence agencises of many countries didnt know back then.
Actually, intelligence agencies in those countries came to the conclusion that Iraq was not a threat. Notice the absence of key allies in the "Coalition of the Willing" France, Germany, Canada, Mexico all urged Bush to wait
Most telling was UN weapons inspector Hans Blix who urged Bush to wait so that he could complete more inspections. Bush attacked before Blix could come up with evidence that there were no WMDs
Hans Blix - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Blix's statements about the Iraq WMD program came to contradict the claims of the George W. Bush administration,[6] and attracted a great deal of criticism from supporters of the invasion of Iraq. In an interview on BBC TV on 8 February 2004, Dr. Blix accused the US and British governments of dramatising the threat of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, in order to strengthen the case for the 2003 war against the regime of Saddam Hussein. Ultimately, no stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction were ever found
How conveniently you leave out the scores of Dems from the late nineties claiming Iraq was a threat to U.S. security and interests. Iraq as a threat to the U.S. was not a GWB exclusive pal... he picked up where the Clintons, Albright's, Berger's, Gore's, etc. left off.
But hey, that's what partisan hacks do.
Where in the Iraq liberation Act of 1998 did it call for US troop to invade, occupy and remove government of Iraq? Most of the rhetoric in 1998 was the lead up to Desert Fox. Furthermore, the Democrats who voted in favor of allowing Preisdent Bush to decide to invade Iraq should have resigned in disgrace.
So you are saying you are, today, smarter than congress was back in 2002?
Not too difficult seeing as you know the outcome.
Makes you one smart person.
Why dont you play yesterdays lottery today? Bet you pick the right numbers!
AIG pays us back. The forst 50% of tarp saved the economy
His leadership post 9-11 prevented a more serious economic collapse than we had
Saddam, gone
UBL, gone (thanks to water boarding in 2006 as well as Navy seals/CIA)
His tax rate will be in place for 99% of us
Sarbanes Oxley, huge success
His medicare plan was under funded, but also a huge success
was within 163 billion of a balanced budget, 2007
Numerous bi partisan legislation events such as No Child left behind, removing Saddam, Etc...
Budgets through 2008 (BHO signed the 09 budget 3/2009, called the Omnibus bill
Now how is BHO doing?
no jobs
huge debt
Obama care in which some of his own now want out of some
It is not even close people
Obama continues most all of Dubya's programs.
LOL
