^^^
Yea. The sky was falling in 2010. I guess we learned nothing from Chicken Little.
Yea. The sky was falling in 2010. I guess we learned nothing from Chicken Little.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
^^^
Yea. The sky was falling in 2010. I guess we learned nothing from Chicken Little.
No the fact that you have no clue what you are talking about, cherry pick the data; cant read or do math and think that stating spending in the year 2007 is some how a revelation is why you are a retard.2007 we spent 2.7 trillion
2010 we spent 3.7 trillion
we had 137.6 million with a job in 2007
we had 129 in 2010
from 03 to 08 we created 7 million jobs
from 09 to the present we lost about the same with the "available work force number" plummeting
And some-how discussing that with some makes you "R"
I'm not to concerned about what you think of me considering that you can't do subtraction or speak EnglishZZZ people have caught on, even the liberals see you have no class bud, it will follow you through life if you do not stop it
But when you make it personal, it then has nothing to do with the facts, the debate, the spin nor the lies ZZZ
It is the same in life
After the Bush administration tax cuts, there were 52 months of continuous job creation and economic expansion.
52 months of job creation and expansion is the largest such period in American history
After the Bush administration tax cuts, there were 52 months of continuous job creation and economic expansion.
52 months of job creation and expansion is the largest such period in American history
There was a return of the massive deficit that fueled that. Borrowed prosperity.
DWYER: Bush tax cuts boosted federal revenue - Washington Times
But the real jolt for tax-cutting opponents was that the 03 Bush tax cuts also generated a massive increase in federal tax receipts. From 2004 to 2007, federal tax revenues increased by $785 billion, the largest four-year increase in American history. According to the Treasury Department, individual and corporate income tax receipts were up 40 percent in the three years following the Bush tax cuts. And (bonus) the rich paid an even higher percentage of the total tax burden than they had at any time in at least the previous 40 years. This was news to theNew York Times, whose astonished editorial board could only describe the gains as a surprise windfall.
Lose jobs
lose wall street wealth
you lose taxable income
Not Tax Policy as this was proved as well as job growth until the credit bubble busted
You wonder why BHO has ignored those jobs in this jobless recovery?
And yet Wages were essentially stagnant and this is a consumer spending based economy.
And even with such growth in revenues Bush still overspent by around 5 trillion.
Not really anything to be proud of.
DWYER: Bush tax cuts boosted federal revenue - Washington Times
But the real jolt for tax-cutting opponents was that the 03 Bush tax cuts also generated a massive increase in federal tax receipts. From 2004 to 2007, federal tax revenues increased by $785 billion, the largest four-year increase in American history. According to the Treasury Department, individual and corporate income tax receipts were up 40 percent in the three years following the Bush tax cuts. And (bonus) the rich paid an even higher percentage of the total tax burden than they had at any time in at least the previous 40 years. This was news to theNew York Times, whose astonished editorial board could only describe the gains as a surprise windfall.
Lose jobs
lose wall street wealth
you lose taxable income
Not Tax Policy as this was proved as well as job growth until the credit bubble busted
You wonder why BHO has ignored those jobs in this jobless recovery?
And yet Wages were essentially stagnant and this is a consumer spending based economy.
And even with such growth in revenues Bush still overspent by around 5 trillion.
Not really anything to be proud of.
The spending was definitely a minus, but unemployment averaging 5.3% was a plus. Obama has managed to spend 5 trillion in less than 4 years, and did it without the Senate passing a budget for 3 of those years.
Have they forgotten that Bush ballooned the deficits pumping billions of borrowed dollars worth of government spending into the economy?
Have they forgotten that Bush ballooned the deficits pumping billions of borrowed dollars worth of government spending into the economy?
Can you explain why Bush doing that is bad, but Obama doing the same thing is good?
One would get the impression that Obama doesn't give a damn about American jobs.Have they forgotten that Bush ballooned the deficits pumping billions of borrowed dollars worth of government spending into the economy?
Can you explain why Bush doing that is bad, but Obama doing the same thing is good?
Obama added 500 billion to our baseline
he has not allowed the Oil and Gas to expand as GWB had planned
over 50% of the jobs we have recovered came from Texas, ND, Louisiana, Oklahoma
drill baby drill
GWB had a plan,
One would get the impression that Obama doesn't give a damn about American jobs.Can you explain why Bush doing that is bad, but Obama doing the same thing is good?
Obama added 500 billion to our baseline
he has not allowed the Oil and Gas to expand as GWB had planned
over 50% of the jobs we have recovered came from Texas, ND, Louisiana, Oklahoma
drill baby drill
GWB had a plan,
And one would be correct.
DWYER: Bush tax cuts boosted federal revenue - Washington Times
But the real jolt for tax-cutting opponents was that the 03 Bush tax cuts also generated a massive increase in federal tax receipts. From 2004 to 2007, federal tax revenues increased by $785 billion, the largest four-year increase in American history. According to the Treasury Department, individual and corporate income tax receipts were up 40 percent in the three years following the Bush tax cuts. And (bonus) the rich paid an even higher percentage of the total tax burden than they had at any time in at least the previous 40 years. This was news to theNew York Times, whose astonished editorial board could only describe the gains as a surprise windfall.
Lose jobs
lose wall street wealth
you lose taxable income
Not Tax Policy as this was proved as well as job growth until the credit bubble busted
You wonder why BHO has ignored those jobs in this jobless recovery?