GWB believed Clinton's LIES about Saddam/WMDs!!!

Discussion in 'Politics' started by healthmyths, Nov 1, 2012.

  1. healthmyths
    Offline

    healthmyths Gold Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2011
    Messages:
    15,246
    Thanks Received:
    2,045
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +3,856
    BEFORE BUSH ... When CLINTON was President...

    "..deny Iraq the capacity to develop WMD".Bill Clinton,1998
    "..most brutal dictators of Century", Biden,1998
    "Iraq compliance with Resolution 687 becomes shell game"..Daschle 1998
    "He will use those WMDs again,as he has ten times since 1983" ..Berger- Clinton National. Security. Advisor 1998
    "posed by Iraq's refusal to end its WMD programs" Levin 1998
    "Saddam has been engaged in development of WMDs which is a threat.."Pelosi 1998
    "Hussein has chosen to spend his money on building WMDS.."Albright 1999

    And if after GWB was President.. should he have called THESE people liars also???

    "Saddam to refine delivery systems, that will threaten the US..."Graham 2001
    "Saddam has ignored the mandate of the UN and is building WMDs and the means to deliver.." Levin 2002
    "Iraq's search for WMDs ...will continue as long as Saddam's in power"..Gore 2002
    "Saddam retains stockpiles of WMDS.."Byrd 2002
    "give President authority to use force..to disarm Saddam because an arsenal of WMDs.threat our security".Kerry 2002
    "..Unmistakable evidence Saddam developing nuclear weapons next 5 years.."Rockefeller 2002
    "Violated over 11 years every UN resolution demanding disarming WMDs.."Waxman 2002
    "He's given aid,comfort & sanctuary to al Qaeda members..and keep developing WMDs"..Hillary 2002
    "Compelling evidence Saddam has WMDs production storage capacity.." Graham 2002
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
  2. Mac1958
    Offline

    Mac1958 Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2011
    Messages:
    30,252
    Thanks Received:
    6,507
    Trophy Points:
    1,160
    Location:
    Independent Ave.
    Ratings:
    +20,509
    .

    :rolleyes:

    .
     
  3. healthmyths
    Offline

    healthmyths Gold Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2011
    Messages:
    15,246
    Thanks Received:
    2,045
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +3,856
    Is it just a little bit hypocritical of most Bush bashers to say BUSH LIED about WMDs when ALL the information regarding WMDs was DEVELOPED UNDER CLINTON???

    Bush did no more then BELIEVE the intelligence people that developed the WMDs concerns UNDER CLINTON!
     
  4. healthmyths
    Offline

    healthmyths Gold Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2011
    Messages:
    15,246
    Thanks Received:
    2,045
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +3,856
    Tom Browkaw believed!!!

    A lot of people believed that he did have weapons of mass destruction.
    President Clinton did, in fact. I was over there with the U.N. weapons inspector and it was not clear. I would fly over later acres and acres and miles and miles of what they call igloos. These are ammunition storage depots, and General Petraeus said to me one day, "We don't know what's in there." Well, it turns out not much because he was trying to kind of rope a dope Iran, trying to persuade Iran that he had weapons of mass destruction. And my own belief is that some of his colonels generated a lot of paper that indicated they had weapons, they were getting money from him, and some of that money may be stored away somewhere.

    Read more: Tom Brokaw: President Clinton Thought Saddam Hussein Had WMD | NewsBusters.org
     
  5. healthmyths
    Offline

    healthmyths Gold Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2011
    Messages:
    15,246
    Thanks Received:
    2,045
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +3,856
    Five days later, Hayes notes, U.N. Ambassador Bill Richardson(D) (now the governor of New Mexico) made an appearance on CNN, where he talked of "direct evidence of ties between Osama bin Laden" and Sudan's Military Industrial Corporation.

    "You combine that with Sudan support for terrorism, their connections with Iraq on VX, and you combine that, also, with the chemical precursor issue, and Sudan's leadership support for Osama bin Laden, and you've got a pretty clear-cut case.
     
  6. zeke
    Offline

    zeke Gold Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2012
    Messages:
    8,272
    Thanks Received:
    1,111
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Ratings:
    +1,868
    Once again. Rethugs don't have the balls to proudly proclaim that what they did to Iraq was necessary and good for us and them.

    No, instead we have this new concentrated effort to absolve themselves of blame by saying it was all the Dems fault. Us rethugs are guilty of nothing except believing Democrats. What fine leadership you rethugs display.

    Why are you rethugs not proud of your actions concerning Iraq?

    Is it because it was a miserable failure? (except for a few of Dick Cheneys friends)
     
  7. Mac1958
    Offline

    Mac1958 Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2011
    Messages:
    30,252
    Thanks Received:
    6,507
    Trophy Points:
    1,160
    Location:
    Independent Ave.
    Ratings:
    +20,509


    If I didn't know better, I'd say this thread was an attempt to blame Clinton and others for the horrific decision to launch the hideous war in Iraq.

    .
     
  8. healthmyths
    Offline

    healthmyths Gold Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2011
    Messages:
    15,246
    Thanks Received:
    2,045
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +3,856
    So where are all you Bush Bashers??? Explain how Iraq all of a sudden had WMDs on Jan 20, 2001 when Bush took office???
     
  9. zeke
    Offline

    zeke Gold Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2012
    Messages:
    8,272
    Thanks Received:
    1,111
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Ratings:
    +1,868

    Another attempt. I have seen a few others. And of course the standard rethug reply is the list of Dems who agreed that Saddam was a bad man.

    But why won't the rethugs proudly proclaim that Iraq was a fine idea and a roaring success?

    Why do they need to blame someone else for the war?

    Any rethugs care to answer that question?
     
  10. healthmyths
    Offline

    healthmyths Gold Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2011
    Messages:
    15,246
    Thanks Received:
    2,045
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +3,856
    Actually I'm pointing OUT your blinders!
    Clinton was the FIRST contributor to WMDs LIE.

    OH and by the way... Iraq LIBERATION WAS A SUCCESS and militarily "mission accomplished on 5/1/2003!
    It wasn't till YOU TRAITORS the MSM and these LEADING CHEERLEADERS for Terrorists starting your campaign to prolong Iraq and
    your concerted efforts to murder 3,000 more troops at a cost of $600 billion!

    When you and these traitors were so quick to jump on the bandwagons of CHEERLEADING that :
    Media complicity in at the minimum HELPED prolong the Iraq conflict by promoting these commonly held attitudes by our leaders about our troops!
    [A) our troops are Terrorists.. called that by the below:
    Presidential candidates that said: "American soldiers going into the homes of Iraqis in the dead of night, terrorizing kids and children."
    Senator Kerry (D) calling our troops "TERRORISTS"!

    B) Our troops KILL Civilians
    or a future President saying: Senator Obama said "troops are air-raiding villages and killing civilians,"

    C) Our troops cold blooded killers
    U.S. Rep. John Murtha(D)"Our troops killed innocent civilians in cold blood,”

    D)Calling our troops Nazis, Soviets
    Durbin (D) "must have been done by Nazis, Soviets --action of Americans in the treatment of their prisoners.
     
    Last edited: Nov 1, 2012

Share This Page