Guns are already banned in schools. That's why they're targeted.

[Katzndogz]

Just go ahead and say you don't want us to protect children. Everybody knows that's what this is all about. Progressives actually want children to die...which is why they continue to fight for measures that will ensure they die.

Of course liberals want children to die. They want them to die before they are even born. They not only want them to die, but you'll find the libs protecting child predators as much as child killers. And, make no mistake about it, this entire controversy is protecting the killer. It's not his fault. It's the gun's fault. Adam Lanza is trivial. He did nothing wrong except to be misunderstood. Adam Lanza is an afterthought. The whole controversy is to take every person in the country and make them as defenseless as those kids in the classroom. That's the point. That's the goal.

How horrible for the left that an off duty cop stopped another massacre in Texas, or a guy carrying his own piece stopped one in Oregon. But what libs really REALLY hate are kids who protect themselves.

12-Year-Old Oklahoma Girl Shoots Home Intruder | TIME.com

You just KNOW that libs cry over how the intruder's rights were violated.

 

[Katzndogz]

Crickets.

Go figure. Why don't progressives care to address this?

Because they are not on speaking terms with the truth. They object to protecting children in our schools not because they think there are better ways to protect them, but because it just doesn't rank high on their list of priorities.

Their #1 priority has always been to reduce the population, starting with the most vulnerable and defenseless. You will never convince them that protecting children from killers is a good thing.

Just think of it as post birth abortion.

 

[koshergrl]

What's funny is rw and peeballs are actually shrieking "stay away from children! People who want to protect children are crazy!"

And they think that's sane.

 

[jillian]

Crickets.

Go figure. Why don't progressives care to address this?

Because they are not on speaking terms with the truth. They object to protecting children in our schools not because they think there are better ways to protect them, but because it just doesn't rank high on their list of priorities.

Their #1 priority has always been to reduce the population, starting with the most vulnerable and defenseless. You will never convince them that protecting children from killers is a good thing.

Just think of it as post birth abortion.

i wonder... are you evil, or just terminally stupid?

 

[koshergrl]

You're maintaining that we should leave our children unprotected when we know there are loons targeting them.

And you think katz is stupid?

 

[BallsBrunswick]

This thread is retarded.

 

[mjollnir]

 

[koshergrl]

Nice argument.

So we all agree that progressives do not want school children protected.

 

[AmyNation]

The school was protected, they had a new security system and the doors were locked, he used the gun to force his way in.

What do you want? Armed guards at every point of entry?

 

[koshergrl]

If that's what it takes..which we know it is.

Establishments that don't advertise as "gun free" zones aren't targeted by loons who want to shoot as many people as possible. That's a fact. These guys seek out places that don't have guns.

Why? So they can kill more people.

That's why they target schools. They know they can shoot until they get tired of shooting.

 

[koshergrl]

The school was protected, they had a new security system and the doors were locked, he used the gun to force his way in.

And how effective was that?

As opposed to...say:

"Woodham drove his mother's car to Pearl High School. Wearing a trench coat, to hide his rifle when he entered the school, Woodham fatally shot Lydia Kaye Dew and Christina Menefee, his former girlfriend. Pearl High School assistant band director, Jeff Cannon, was standing five feet away from Dew when she was fatally shot. Woodham went on to wound seven others before attempting to leave in his mother's car.He was subdued by assistant principal Joel Myrick, who pulled a .45-cal. pistol from his car and ordered the gunman to the ground"

Pearl High School shooting - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

28 dead. 2 dead....

Which school would you prefer your child attended on the day of the respective shootings?

 

[koshergrl]

28 dead...or 8?

Which school would you hope your child is in on the day of a shooting?

"The attacker was stopped by long-time Mercaz HaRav student Yitzchak Dadon and off-duty Israel Defense Forces Captain David Shapira who fought back using their personal firearms."

Mercaz HaRav massacre - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[AmyNation]

So KG, your solution is to require all elementary school teachers carry a .45 at all times?

 

[koshergrl]

Nope. My solution is to take reasonable precautions to protect our children from attack.

What is your solution?

Oh yeah. No protection, under any circumstances. Got it.

 

[AmyNation]

And yet, you haven't said what those "reasonable precautions" are. What exactly is your solution?

 

[koshergrl]

Armed guards.

 

[koshergrl]

Visible armed guards. And allow those employees who feel comfortable doing so to pack.

 

[koshergrl]

It's a no-brainer. The fact that progressives think that it's more civilized to leave our children vulnerable just shows how skewed they are.

The most important thing is that they never concede that people need protection from other people..and they are willing to sacrifice their children, and ours, to that ridiculous stance. Obviously, children should be protected. You can boo hoo about guns and you can go after private gun ownership...but children will continue to be targeted, because the shooters know they are unprotected.

We all know that gun laws aren't going to make a difference to these loons. 38 people, most of them children, were blown up in Massachusetts in 1927 when a disgruntled school board treasurer decided to target them. We have more restrictive gun laws now....the issue isn't GUN LAWS. Kids dont' get targeted because our gun laws aren't restrictive enough.

They get targeted because the criminal lunatics who target them KNOW THEY ARE UNGUARDED. They know they can get the most bang for their buck in schools, because the chances are very slight that anyone will be able to stop them before they take out a shitload of people.

Why? Because our schools aren't guarded. Because they are gun-free zones.

You lunatics who insist that we not guard our children are even more disgusting than the ones who actually shoot them. At least those guys are crazy. You aren't crazy, you're just callous and have no regard for innocent life.

But I've always known that.

 

[AmyNation]

There are around 100,000 public schools in America. 2 armed guards per school will cost around $70,000 a year, times by 100,000 schools

$7,000,000,000 per year, on the low end.

 

[AmyNation]

That's only 2 guards, if you add a guard for every door, plus the cost of training the guards, and the staff, plus the cost of the legal suits that will arise...