- Sep 16, 2012
- 57,743
- 51,269
- 3,605
There are two ways to stop these mass shootings as far as I can tell. They fall into two categories.
Mass gangland shootings and the shootings such as the ones discussed in this thread.
Well, the first we can eliminate the same way we did during the 1920's. We decriminalized a victimless crime (using alcohol to excessive quantities,) and treated those who harmed themselves as though it were a medical problem. Today, gangs fight for turf to sell illegal drugs using guns, to the point where some urban centers have unconstitutionally restricted citizens from owning guns to the point now, where the only ones who own guns are the criminals. These mass gangland rampage shootings rarely make the news.
Why don't they make the news for the elites agenda to make gun control an issue? Well, naturally because it doesn't instill fear in voters to vote for policy makers who will restrict or curtail their right to bear arms. Why should they care about the inner city and gang land crime? And gang members aren't exactly a voting block, nor would they care about curbing the legal right to bear their arms for their nefarious illegal activity if they did vote.
The real way to end this type of violence is obvious to any thinking person, taking away the cause of the violence, not the means by which they enforce their territory. It worked with the first prohibition, no reason it wouldn't work now. But of course, that is a whole other thread. You want to end gun violence there, end prohibition.
Which brings us to the SECOND type of highly publicized mass shooting.
Get rid of establishment corruption that wishes to end our rights, you get rid of this type of tragedy. Fine, I'll say what many have thought in passing.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B0VV614-a3w]Alexis Psyop, School Sucks, Panera Cares - New World Next Week - YouTube[/ame]
CIA, mind control & mass shootings - Is there a correlation?
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/58093
Whether or not any of this is true, it is true that the entity that kills the most people with guns are people's own governments. Who benefits the most by making gun ownership illegal? Free citizens of a nation? No, certainly not. Taking freedom away from people is never a good idea. That posits that people are not sane and logical enough to exercise freedom. The only entity that benefits are governments and powerful elites.
When the soldiers they are training to oppress and enslave the public wake up and decide to walk out on them, it will be nice that those soldiers have their own guns at home to protect the nation, won't it? As long as America remains an egalitarian nation and not a brainwashed globalized nation, we will endure. This issue will forever be a non-starter as long as we remain true to what makes us AMERICAN. No matter how many innocents these monsters kill, or how many bodies the media elites want to stand on to try to take our freedom.
It just might be that the one percent that decided to bail out the "too big to fail" banks and corporations have something even more sinister in mind when the next crash comes. I can assure you, they do.
"We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time
Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended
our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost
forty years."
"It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world
if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years.
But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a
world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite
and world bankers is surely preferable to the national
auto-determination practiced in past centuries."
~David Rockefeller
Mass gangland shootings and the shootings such as the ones discussed in this thread.
Well, the first we can eliminate the same way we did during the 1920's. We decriminalized a victimless crime (using alcohol to excessive quantities,) and treated those who harmed themselves as though it were a medical problem. Today, gangs fight for turf to sell illegal drugs using guns, to the point where some urban centers have unconstitutionally restricted citizens from owning guns to the point now, where the only ones who own guns are the criminals. These mass gangland rampage shootings rarely make the news.
Why don't they make the news for the elites agenda to make gun control an issue? Well, naturally because it doesn't instill fear in voters to vote for policy makers who will restrict or curtail their right to bear arms. Why should they care about the inner city and gang land crime? And gang members aren't exactly a voting block, nor would they care about curbing the legal right to bear their arms for their nefarious illegal activity if they did vote.
The real way to end this type of violence is obvious to any thinking person, taking away the cause of the violence, not the means by which they enforce their territory. It worked with the first prohibition, no reason it wouldn't work now. But of course, that is a whole other thread. You want to end gun violence there, end prohibition.
Which brings us to the SECOND type of highly publicized mass shooting.
Get rid of establishment corruption that wishes to end our rights, you get rid of this type of tragedy. Fine, I'll say what many have thought in passing.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B0VV614-a3w]Alexis Psyop, School Sucks, Panera Cares - New World Next Week - YouTube[/ame]
CIA, mind control & mass shootings - Is there a correlation?
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/58093
Whether or not any of this is true, it is true that the entity that kills the most people with guns are people's own governments. Who benefits the most by making gun ownership illegal? Free citizens of a nation? No, certainly not. Taking freedom away from people is never a good idea. That posits that people are not sane and logical enough to exercise freedom. The only entity that benefits are governments and powerful elites.
When the soldiers they are training to oppress and enslave the public wake up and decide to walk out on them, it will be nice that those soldiers have their own guns at home to protect the nation, won't it? As long as America remains an egalitarian nation and not a brainwashed globalized nation, we will endure. This issue will forever be a non-starter as long as we remain true to what makes us AMERICAN. No matter how many innocents these monsters kill, or how many bodies the media elites want to stand on to try to take our freedom.
It just might be that the one percent that decided to bail out the "too big to fail" banks and corporations have something even more sinister in mind when the next crash comes. I can assure you, they do.
"We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time
Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended
our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost
forty years."
"It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world
if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years.
But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a
world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite
and world bankers is surely preferable to the national
auto-determination practiced in past centuries."
~David Rockefeller
