Gun control vs. Vehicle control (DUI)..........

[Quantum Windbag]

Hell yes
And let's have gun owners insure their guns

You or someone else uses your gun to kill or injure...YOU PAY

Sounds fair to me

OK. If someone steals your car and kills someone, you pay. If someone buys your car and kills someone, you pay. If someone trips in your house and injures himself while trying to rob it, you pay.
Still down with that, Nutwinger?

If someone steals your car and kills someone you pay? Depends.........did you lock up your car like a reasonable person, forcing them to break a window to gain entrance? If so, you don't pay.

However.......................if you leave your car with the keys in it and the engine running? If they steal it and kill someone, you pay, because you were not responsible in making sure your car was secured.

If someone buys your car and kills someone? No. You don't pay. Why? Because in the act of selling the car, you have transferred responsiblity of the vehicle in exchange for cash. The car (once you sell it) is no longer your problem or responsibility.

If someone trips in your house while trying to rob it and injures themselves? No payment. They came in uninvited and therefore are not subject to the care of the householder. If you come in uninvited and unannounced, do you really think the person whose house you're robbing is going to warn you of the step?

Castle doctrine says you don't have to warn them, it's defense of your home.

I am so glad that there are not enough idiots like you around to force me to take action.

 

[ABikerSailor]

"Take action"? Like what QW?

Are you proposing "second ammendment solutions"?

 

[Quantum Windbag]

"Take action"? Like what QW?

Are you proposing "second ammendment solutions"?

I said I am thankful there aren't more idiots like you, I am not proposing anything.

 

[jtpr312]

You left out the most important difference of all. There are NO criminal background checks for cars. Even a 5 time DUI can buy a car. THINK

A DUI can buy a car

But he can't get anyone to insure him so that he can drive it on public roads

Well actually that's not true. Most states require by law that companies insure drivers regardless of them being high risk, and sometimes drunks just drive w/o insurance.

 

[The Rabbi]

Wrong, states actually require insurance companies to provide insurance.

And when people can't afford it, they quit driving, right?
Wrong. They drive anyway. Same way people will own and carry guns anyway. Because gun laws only affect law abiding citizens, which aren't the ones you're trying to restrict.

Of course they don't quit driving.

Right. They just do it illegally. Laws only affect law abiding people.
QED.

 

[Stephanie]

"Take action"? Like what QW?

Are you proposing "second ammendment solutions"?

that is the dummest thing I have ever heard

 

[bigrebnc1775]

"Take action"? Like what QW?

Are you proposing "second ammendment solutions"?

in your opinion what would be the grounds for overthrowing the government?

 

[ShootSpeeders]

. Because gun laws only affect law abiding citizens, which aren't the ones you're trying to restrict.

HAHAHAHA. What a stupid thing to say. There are no law abiding citizens. Every day you speed and drive drunk on the highways. Two super violent crimes that kill thousands of americans each year.

 

[The Rabbi]

. Because gun laws only affect law abiding citizens, which aren't the ones you're trying to restrict.

HAHAHAHA. What a stupid thing to say. There are no law abiding citizens. Every day you speed and drive drunk on the highways. Two super violent crimes that kill thousands of americans each year.

If there are no law abiding citizens why aren't we all in jail?

You're a fucktard and a half. And your rep rating shows it.