Gun ban advocate concedes gun bans don't work

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Little-Acorn, Mar 2, 2007.

  1. Little-Acorn
    Online

    Little-Acorn Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2006
    Messages:
    8,320
    Thanks Received:
    2,016
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    Ratings:
    +5,817
    Gun ban advocate admits gun bans "have failed utterly"

    2/28/2007

    It didn't make the newspapers or the network news here, but one of the loudest voices for England and Scotland's handgun ban has admitted it's been a dismal failure.

    Ian Bell worked long and hard to make sure the ban passed a decade ago. But writing in Scotland's Sunday Herald, he says, "My idea didn't work... guns have become commonplace, so commonplace that every would-be terrorist worth his salt must be armed to the teeth. Bans have failed utterly."

    What Bell says is true. Guns have become common, at least among the criminals in England. Gun crime has doubled since the ban took effect. But guns aren't common among the law-abiding. In fact, they've disappeared, leaving ordinary Britons helpless against criminals.

    It's good that Ian Bell's admitted the ban's been a failure. But I notice he never called for an end to the ban.

    Admitting failure's a good first step, but it does nothing if you don't take the next step of righting a wrong.

    Audio stream (MP3 file):
    Download
    http://www.nranews.com/blogmedia/170/WLP_3_1_07_GBConcedesDefeat.mp3
     
  2. Bern80
    Offline

    Bern80 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2004
    Messages:
    8,094
    Thanks Received:
    720
    Trophy Points:
    138
    Ratings:
    +726
    It just amazes me that people think it would work in the first place. They treat it like some type of social experiment when it isn't. It's basic math. More guns in the hands of law abiding citizens = less crime.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  3. Annie
    Offline

    Annie Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2003
    Messages:
    50,847
    Thanks Received:
    4,644
    Trophy Points:
    1,790
    Ratings:
    +4,770
  4. Bern80
    Offline

    Bern80 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2004
    Messages:
    8,094
    Thanks Received:
    720
    Trophy Points:
    138
    Ratings:
    +726
    Have it, but thanks
     
  5. Annie
    Offline

    Annie Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2003
    Messages:
    50,847
    Thanks Received:
    4,644
    Trophy Points:
    1,790
    Ratings:
    +4,770
    Welcome, looked interesting.
     
  6. Bullypulpit
    Offline

    Bullypulpit Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2004
    Messages:
    5,849
    Thanks Received:
    378
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Columbus, OH
    Ratings:
    +379
    Actually, given the tenor of the time, the right to keep and bear arms was included in the Constitution so citizens could protect themselves from a despotic and tyrannical government. But it works for the citizens protecting themselves from each other as well. If some creeps breaks into my house intent on robbing us and get a cap busted in his ass, it's all good to me.
     
  7. gabosaurus
    Offline

    gabosaurus Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2007
    Messages:
    95
    Thanks Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Location:
    San Francisco
    Ratings:
    +5
    I don't understand the need for handguns. Why are they useful for except for killing other people. If you need self-defense, keep a rifle in your home.
    And why does anyone need a machine gun or assault rifle?
     
  8. sitarro
    Offline

    sitarro Gold Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2003
    Messages:
    5,186
    Thanks Received:
    999
    Trophy Points:
    153
    Location:
    USA
    Ratings:
    +1,001

    A handgun is easier to conceal than a rifle, much better for protection from the kind of violent nutcases that the ACLU and the Democrat party have helped spawn....ask any violent felon who they want for President and you will get the same answer, a Democrat. As for home protection a 20 or 12 gauge pump shotgun is the wisest choice with a small Glock 45 in your belt just in case. The shotgun is a bit messy but just the sound of the mechanism loading the first round from a dark room will scare off most criminals.


    Why does someone(Nancy Pelosi) need a 757 to travel across the country for fundraisers when an airliner that is already going there is available every couple of hours? Security? Bring some extra air marshalls with handguns and automatic assault weapons.
     
  9. CSM
    Offline

    CSM Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2004
    Messages:
    6,907
    Thanks Received:
    708
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Northeast US
    Ratings:
    +708
    It's sentiments like that Bully, that make you near and dear to my heart!
     
  10. CSM
    Offline

    CSM Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2004
    Messages:
    6,907
    Thanks Received:
    708
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Northeast US
    Ratings:
    +708
    I just have to ask...what makes a rifle an "assault rifle"? Do you know?

    I suspect you mean "automatic weapons" and "militarized firearms". Truthfully, in my opinion, why shouldn't law abiding citizens own any type of firearm they want? Pistol, rifle, shotgun or even a cannon...who cares. Either the owner is law abiding or they are not.
     

Share This Page