Guess who's just as guilty of focusing on NFL and ignoring PR?

cnelsen

Gold Member
Oct 11, 2016
4,317
497
160
Washington, DC
President Trump has been excoriated as a demon, racist, heartless, witless, tone deaf, Nazi, KKK, orange white supremacist by the unhinged local leftist loonies for tweeting more about the NFL than Puerto Rico's travails. See? the herd squeals, racist!racist!racist!racist!racist!racist!racist!

So I went back and took the most recent 250 posts from Current Events and the most recent 250 posts from Politics and, judging only by the headlines, counted how many posts were about the NFL and kneeling and how many posts were about Puerto Rico. There were 128 about the NFL and 17 about Puerto Rico. Of the 17 about Puerto Rico, only two weren't complaining about Trump's response and comparing his Puerto Rico response to his NFL response.

So, you left-wing lunatics, by your own standards, you are guilty of being demon, racist, heartless, witless, tone deaf, Nazi, KKK, orange white supremacists yourselves, fucking phonies. Here's Michelle Malkin, taking you down another few pegs. (I wonder how you can stand to look at yourselves in the mirror in the mornings. No wonder you all hate life with such zeal.)

Iā€™m calling foul on all the leftists rushing to protect the NFLā€™s protest crusaders from President Donald Trumpā€™s criticism of their national anthem antics.

Their shabby line of defense? The NFL is a ā€œprivate enterpriseā€ whose ā€œrightsā€ are being violated by those who dare to challenge the leagueā€™s political radicalization. The anti-Trump Democratic Coalition has even filed an ethics complaint alleging that the presidentā€™s comments constitute a criminal violation against using government offices ā€œto influence the employment decisions and practicesā€ of a private entity.

Funny. These fair-weather friends of corporate free speech and the First Amendment were nowhere to be found when Boston Mayor Tom Menino and Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel were vowing to shut down Chick-Fil-A in their towns as government retaliation against the foundersā€˜ private religious beliefs.

As for the NFLā€™s status as a ā€œprivateā€ enterprise? Thatā€™s some Super Bowl-sized audacity right there. I first started tracking publicly subsidized sports boondoggles with my very first watchdog website, Porkwatch, back in 1999. Since then, taxpayers at all levels of government have foot the bill for football stadiums to the tune of an estimated $1 billion every year.

Over the past decade, new tax-supported NFL stadiums rose up for the Indianapolis Colts (the $720 million Lucas Oil Stadium), the Dallas Cowboys (the $1.15 billion AT&T Stadium) the New York Jets and Giants (the $1.6 billion MetLife Stadium, the Minnesota Vikings (the $1.1 billion U.S. Bank Stadium), the Atlanta Falcons (the $1.5 billion Mercedes-Benz Stadium), and the San Francisco 49ers (the $1.3 billion Leviā€™s Stadium in Santa Clara).

Next in the works: a whopping $2.6 billion stadium for the Los Angeles Chargers and Rams and a $1.9 billion stadium for the Oakland Raiders when they move to Las Vegas. Left behind? An $83 million taxpayer debt on two-decade-old renovations to the Alameda County Coliseum that the Raiders are abandoning.

Both political parties have supported massive redistribution of taxes from working people to the gridironā€™s spoiled 1-percenters. Public-private sports palace boosters employ the same bogus economic development math as the federal governmentā€™s infamous Solyndra green energy loans, stimulus rip-offs and jobs programs. Citizens are promised an enormous multiplier of jobs and benefits in return for their ā€œinvestments.ā€ But instead theyā€™ve been saddled with a field of schemes.

Sports economists have concluded repeatedly that the effects of stadium subsidies on employment and economic activity are negligibleā€“or even negative. Scott Wolla of the St. Louis Federal Reserve reported earlier this year, ā€œIn a 2017 poll, 83 percent of the economists surveyed agreed that ā€˜Providing state and local subsidies to build stadiums for professional sports teams is likely tocost the relevant taxpayers more than any local economic benefits that are generated.'ā€

Yet, the NFL, its teams and its sponsors continue to benefit from a bonanza of tax-free loans, municipal bonds, rent waivers and property tax exemptions. Congress provided the league with an antitrust exemption that protects its monopoly broadcasting rights. Localities have raided ā€œemergencyā€ funds to help pay for stadium construction. And corporate benefactors write off their expenses for luxury boxes, tickets and naming-rights purchases.

As long as the NFL has its hog noses buried in the taxpayer trough, Iā€™ll keep speaking up about all the football militants who backed former 49ers QB Colin Kaepernick and his disgusting cops-as-pigs socks.

You wanna raise your fists on the field? Get your grubby hands out of our pockets first.

Michelle Malkin: NFL Pigskins at the Public Trough | VDARE - premier news outlet for patriotic immigration reform
 
The National Guard has been deployed in PR and $Money$ has been sent to help them, and more is on the way.
 
These fair-weather friends of corporate free speech and the First Amendment were nowhere to be found when Boston Mayor Tom Menino and Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel were vowing to shut down Chick-Fil-A in their towns as government retaliation against the foundersā€˜ private religious beliefs.

I suggest you check to see whether the members whom you had in mind when you wrote the above and called them "fair weather friends" were even members here at the time of those events.
 
President Trump has been excoriated as a demon, racist, heartless, witless, tone deaf, Nazi, KKK, orange white supremacist by the unhinged local leftist loonies for tweeting more about the NFL than Puerto Rico's travails. See? the herd squeals, racist!racist!racist!racist!racist!racist!racist!

So I went back and took the most recent 250 posts from Current Events and the most recent 250 posts from Politics and, judging only by the headlines, counted how many posts were about the NFL and kneeling and how many posts were about Puerto Rico. There were 128 about the NFL and 17 about Puerto Rico. Of the 17 about Puerto Rico, only two weren't complaining about Trump's response and comparing his Puerto Rico response to his NFL response.

So, you left-wing lunatics, by your own standards, you are guilty of being demon, racist, heartless, witless, tone deaf, Nazi, KKK, orange white supremacists yourselves, fucking phonies. Here's Michelle Malkin, taking you down another few pegs. (I wonder how you can stand to look at yourselves in the mirror in the mornings. No wonder you all hate life with such zeal.)

Iā€™m calling foul on all the leftists rushing to protect the NFLā€™s protest crusaders from President Donald Trumpā€™s criticism of their national anthem antics.

Their shabby line of defense? The NFL is a ā€œprivate enterpriseā€ whose ā€œrightsā€ are being violated by those who dare to challenge the leagueā€™s political radicalization. The anti-Trump Democratic Coalition has even filed an ethics complaint alleging that the presidentā€™s comments constitute a criminal violation against using government offices ā€œto influence the employment decisions and practicesā€ of a private entity.

Funny. These fair-weather friends of corporate free speech and the First Amendment were nowhere to be found when Boston Mayor Tom Menino and Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel were vowing to shut down Chick-Fil-A in their towns as government retaliation against the foundersā€˜ private religious beliefs.

As for the NFLā€™s status as a ā€œprivateā€ enterprise? Thatā€™s some Super Bowl-sized audacity right there. I first started tracking publicly subsidized sports boondoggles with my very first watchdog website, Porkwatch, back in 1999. Since then, taxpayers at all levels of government have foot the bill for football stadiums to the tune of an estimated $1 billion every year.

Over the past decade, new tax-supported NFL stadiums rose up for the Indianapolis Colts (the $720 million Lucas Oil Stadium), the Dallas Cowboys (the $1.15 billion AT&T Stadium) the New York Jets and Giants (the $1.6 billion MetLife Stadium, the Minnesota Vikings (the $1.1 billion U.S. Bank Stadium), the Atlanta Falcons (the $1.5 billion Mercedes-Benz Stadium), and the San Francisco 49ers (the $1.3 billion Leviā€™s Stadium in Santa Clara).

Next in the works: a whopping $2.6 billion stadium for the Los Angeles Chargers and Rams and a $1.9 billion stadium for the Oakland Raiders when they move to Las Vegas. Left behind? An $83 million taxpayer debt on two-decade-old renovations to the Alameda County Coliseum that the Raiders are abandoning.

Both political parties have supported massive redistribution of taxes from working people to the gridironā€™s spoiled 1-percenters. Public-private sports palace boosters employ the same bogus economic development math as the federal governmentā€™s infamous Solyndra green energy loans, stimulus rip-offs and jobs programs. Citizens are promised an enormous multiplier of jobs and benefits in return for their ā€œinvestments.ā€ But instead theyā€™ve been saddled with a field of schemes.

Sports economists have concluded repeatedly that the effects of stadium subsidies on employment and economic activity are negligibleā€“or even negative. Scott Wolla of the St. Louis Federal Reserve reported earlier this year, ā€œIn a 2017 poll, 83 percent of the economists surveyed agreed that ā€˜Providing state and local subsidies to build stadiums for professional sports teams is likely tocost the relevant taxpayers more than any local economic benefits that are generated.'ā€

Yet, the NFL, its teams and its sponsors continue to benefit from a bonanza of tax-free loans, municipal bonds, rent waivers and property tax exemptions. Congress provided the league with an antitrust exemption that protects its monopoly broadcasting rights. Localities have raided ā€œemergencyā€ funds to help pay for stadium construction. And corporate benefactors write off their expenses for luxury boxes, tickets and naming-rights purchases.

As long as the NFL has its hog noses buried in the taxpayer trough, Iā€™ll keep speaking up about all the football militants who backed former 49ers QB Colin Kaepernick and his disgusting cops-as-pigs socks.

You wanna raise your fists on the field? Get your grubby hands out of our pockets first.

Michelle Malkin: NFL Pigskins at the Public Trough | VDARE - premier news outlet for patriotic immigration reform

Explain to our feeble brains how starting threads on the USMB message board would help Puerto Rico.

Then essplain the same thing I asked the last asshat who tried to make this a thing, who the fuck are you to decide what topics anybody can post on?

Dumb shit.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #5
President Trump has been excoriated as a demon, racist, heartless, witless, tone deaf, Nazi, KKK, orange white supremacist by the unhinged local leftist loonies for tweeting more about the NFL than Puerto Rico's travails. See? the herd squeals, racist!racist!racist!racist!racist!racist!racist!

So I went back and took the most recent 250 posts from Current Events and the most recent 250 posts from Politics and, judging only by the headlines, counted how many posts were about the NFL and kneeling and how many posts were about Puerto Rico. There were 128 about the NFL and 17 about Puerto Rico. Of the 17 about Puerto Rico, only two weren't complaining about Trump's response and comparing his Puerto Rico response to his NFL response.

So, you left-wing lunatics, by your own standards, you are guilty of being demon, racist, heartless, witless, tone deaf, Nazi, KKK, orange white supremacists yourselves, fucking phonies. Here's Michelle Malkin, taking you down another few pegs. (I wonder how you can stand to look at yourselves in the mirror in the mornings. No wonder you all hate life with such zeal.)

Iā€™m calling foul on all the leftists rushing to protect the NFLā€™s protest crusaders from President Donald Trumpā€™s criticism of their national anthem antics.

Their shabby line of defense? The NFL is a ā€œprivate enterpriseā€ whose ā€œrightsā€ are being violated by those who dare to challenge the leagueā€™s political radicalization. The anti-Trump Democratic Coalition has even filed an ethics complaint alleging that the presidentā€™s comments constitute a criminal violation against using government offices ā€œto influence the employment decisions and practicesā€ of a private entity.

Funny. These fair-weather friends of corporate free speech and the First Amendment were nowhere to be found when Boston Mayor Tom Menino and Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel were vowing to shut down Chick-Fil-A in their towns as government retaliation against the foundersā€˜ private religious beliefs.

As for the NFLā€™s status as a ā€œprivateā€ enterprise? Thatā€™s some Super Bowl-sized audacity right there. I first started tracking publicly subsidized sports boondoggles with my very first watchdog website, Porkwatch, back in 1999. Since then, taxpayers at all levels of government have foot the bill for football stadiums to the tune of an estimated $1 billion every year.

Over the past decade, new tax-supported NFL stadiums rose up for the Indianapolis Colts (the $720 million Lucas Oil Stadium), the Dallas Cowboys (the $1.15 billion AT&T Stadium) the New York Jets and Giants (the $1.6 billion MetLife Stadium, the Minnesota Vikings (the $1.1 billion U.S. Bank Stadium), the Atlanta Falcons (the $1.5 billion Mercedes-Benz Stadium), and the San Francisco 49ers (the $1.3 billion Leviā€™s Stadium in Santa Clara).

Next in the works: a whopping $2.6 billion stadium for the Los Angeles Chargers and Rams and a $1.9 billion stadium for the Oakland Raiders when they move to Las Vegas. Left behind? An $83 million taxpayer debt on two-decade-old renovations to the Alameda County Coliseum that the Raiders are abandoning.

Both political parties have supported massive redistribution of taxes from working people to the gridironā€™s spoiled 1-percenters. Public-private sports palace boosters employ the same bogus economic development math as the federal governmentā€™s infamous Solyndra green energy loans, stimulus rip-offs and jobs programs. Citizens are promised an enormous multiplier of jobs and benefits in return for their ā€œinvestments.ā€ But instead theyā€™ve been saddled with a field of schemes.

Sports economists have concluded repeatedly that the effects of stadium subsidies on employment and economic activity are negligibleā€“or even negative. Scott Wolla of the St. Louis Federal Reserve reported earlier this year, ā€œIn a 2017 poll, 83 percent of the economists surveyed agreed that ā€˜Providing state and local subsidies to build stadiums for professional sports teams is likely tocost the relevant taxpayers more than any local economic benefits that are generated.'ā€

Yet, the NFL, its teams and its sponsors continue to benefit from a bonanza of tax-free loans, municipal bonds, rent waivers and property tax exemptions. Congress provided the league with an antitrust exemption that protects its monopoly broadcasting rights. Localities have raided ā€œemergencyā€ funds to help pay for stadium construction. And corporate benefactors write off their expenses for luxury boxes, tickets and naming-rights purchases.

As long as the NFL has its hog noses buried in the taxpayer trough, Iā€™ll keep speaking up about all the football militants who backed former 49ers QB Colin Kaepernick and his disgusting cops-as-pigs socks.

You wanna raise your fists on the field? Get your grubby hands out of our pockets first.

Michelle Malkin: NFL Pigskins at the Public Trough | VDARE - premier news outlet for patriotic immigration reform

Explain to our feeble brains how starting threads on the USMB message board would help Puerto Rico.

Then essplain the same thing I asked the last asshat who tried to make this a thing, who the fuck are you to decide what topics anybody can post on?

Dumb shit.
The point, turd, is, for whatever reason, the NFL protests are way more interesting to us than yet another hurricane in a place that already costs us a mint and is such a corrupt incompetent mess that more Ricans live in the US than in Puerto Rico. So we ALL find the NFL protests more interesting and important, including Pres. Trump. So he tweets about it. Which he does. He tweets. Deal with it. Instead, the unhinged freaks of the left immediately set up their howling about how "racist" Trump is, even though THEY THEMSELVES ALSO FIND THE NFL KNEELING MORE INTERESTING.

Do you see, turd, how fucking stupid and vicious and insane you people are? Starting threads on USMB and tweeting are equally helpful to PR, jackass, but Trump's a racist.
 
Explain to our feeble brains how starting threads on the USMB message board would help Puerto Rico.
Then essplain the same thing I asked the last asshat who tried to make this a thing, who the fuck are you to decide what topics anybody can post on?
Dumb shit.

1368649068274.gif
 
President Trump has been excoriated as a demon, racist, heartless, witless, tone deaf, Nazi, KKK, orange white supremacist by the unhinged local leftist loonies for tweeting more about the NFL than Puerto Rico's travails. See? the herd squeals, racist!racist!racist!racist!racist!racist!racist!

So I went back and took the most recent 250 posts from Current Events and the most recent 250 posts from Politics and, judging only by the headlines, counted how many posts were about the NFL and kneeling and how many posts were about Puerto Rico. There were 128 about the NFL and 17 about Puerto Rico. Of the 17 about Puerto Rico, only two weren't complaining about Trump's response and comparing his Puerto Rico response to his NFL response.

So, you left-wing lunatics, by your own standards, you are guilty of being demon, racist, heartless, witless, tone deaf, Nazi, KKK, orange white supremacists yourselves, fucking phonies. Here's Michelle Malkin, taking you down another few pegs. (I wonder how you can stand to look at yourselves in the mirror in the mornings. No wonder you all hate life with such zeal.)

Iā€™m calling foul on all the leftists rushing to protect the NFLā€™s protest crusaders from President Donald Trumpā€™s criticism of their national anthem antics.

Their shabby line of defense? The NFL is a ā€œprivate enterpriseā€ whose ā€œrightsā€ are being violated by those who dare to challenge the leagueā€™s political radicalization. The anti-Trump Democratic Coalition has even filed an ethics complaint alleging that the presidentā€™s comments constitute a criminal violation against using government offices ā€œto influence the employment decisions and practicesā€ of a private entity.

Funny. These fair-weather friends of corporate free speech and the First Amendment were nowhere to be found when Boston Mayor Tom Menino and Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel were vowing to shut down Chick-Fil-A in their towns as government retaliation against the foundersā€˜ private religious beliefs.

As for the NFLā€™s status as a ā€œprivateā€ enterprise? Thatā€™s some Super Bowl-sized audacity right there. I first started tracking publicly subsidized sports boondoggles with my very first watchdog website, Porkwatch, back in 1999. Since then, taxpayers at all levels of government have foot the bill for football stadiums to the tune of an estimated $1 billion every year.

Over the past decade, new tax-supported NFL stadiums rose up for the Indianapolis Colts (the $720 million Lucas Oil Stadium), the Dallas Cowboys (the $1.15 billion AT&T Stadium) the New York Jets and Giants (the $1.6 billion MetLife Stadium, the Minnesota Vikings (the $1.1 billion U.S. Bank Stadium), the Atlanta Falcons (the $1.5 billion Mercedes-Benz Stadium), and the San Francisco 49ers (the $1.3 billion Leviā€™s Stadium in Santa Clara).

Next in the works: a whopping $2.6 billion stadium for the Los Angeles Chargers and Rams and a $1.9 billion stadium for the Oakland Raiders when they move to Las Vegas. Left behind? An $83 million taxpayer debt on two-decade-old renovations to the Alameda County Coliseum that the Raiders are abandoning.

Both political parties have supported massive redistribution of taxes from working people to the gridironā€™s spoiled 1-percenters. Public-private sports palace boosters employ the same bogus economic development math as the federal governmentā€™s infamous Solyndra green energy loans, stimulus rip-offs and jobs programs. Citizens are promised an enormous multiplier of jobs and benefits in return for their ā€œinvestments.ā€ But instead theyā€™ve been saddled with a field of schemes.

Sports economists have concluded repeatedly that the effects of stadium subsidies on employment and economic activity are negligibleā€“or even negative. Scott Wolla of the St. Louis Federal Reserve reported earlier this year, ā€œIn a 2017 poll, 83 percent of the economists surveyed agreed that ā€˜Providing state and local subsidies to build stadiums for professional sports teams is likely tocost the relevant taxpayers more than any local economic benefits that are generated.'ā€

Yet, the NFL, its teams and its sponsors continue to benefit from a bonanza of tax-free loans, municipal bonds, rent waivers and property tax exemptions. Congress provided the league with an antitrust exemption that protects its monopoly broadcasting rights. Localities have raided ā€œemergencyā€ funds to help pay for stadium construction. And corporate benefactors write off their expenses for luxury boxes, tickets and naming-rights purchases.

As long as the NFL has its hog noses buried in the taxpayer trough, Iā€™ll keep speaking up about all the football militants who backed former 49ers QB Colin Kaepernick and his disgusting cops-as-pigs socks.

You wanna raise your fists on the field? Get your grubby hands out of our pockets first.

Michelle Malkin: NFL Pigskins at the Public Trough | VDARE - premier news outlet for patriotic immigration reform
Go count the posts about how people should shut the fuck up about the NFL because Puerto Rico is dying. You'll find 0 from Trump scum.
 
President Trump has been excoriated as a demon, racist, heartless, witless, tone deaf, Nazi, KKK, orange white supremacist by the unhinged local leftist loonies for tweeting more about the NFL than Puerto Rico's travails. See? the herd squeals, racist!racist!racist!racist!racist!racist!racist!

So I went back and took the most recent 250 posts from Current Events and the most recent 250 posts from Politics and, judging only by the headlines, counted how many posts were about the NFL and kneeling and how many posts were about Puerto Rico. There were 128 about the NFL and 17 about Puerto Rico. Of the 17 about Puerto Rico, only two weren't complaining about Trump's response and comparing his Puerto Rico response to his NFL response.

So, you left-wing lunatics, by your own standards, you are guilty of being demon, racist, heartless, witless, tone deaf, Nazi, KKK, orange white supremacists yourselves, fucking phonies. Here's Michelle Malkin, taking you down another few pegs. (I wonder how you can stand to look at yourselves in the mirror in the mornings. No wonder you all hate life with such zeal.)

Iā€™m calling foul on all the leftists rushing to protect the NFLā€™s protest crusaders from President Donald Trumpā€™s criticism of their national anthem antics.

Their shabby line of defense? The NFL is a ā€œprivate enterpriseā€ whose ā€œrightsā€ are being violated by those who dare to challenge the leagueā€™s political radicalization. The anti-Trump Democratic Coalition has even filed an ethics complaint alleging that the presidentā€™s comments constitute a criminal violation against using government offices ā€œto influence the employment decisions and practicesā€ of a private entity.

Funny. These fair-weather friends of corporate free speech and the First Amendment were nowhere to be found when Boston Mayor Tom Menino and Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel were vowing to shut down Chick-Fil-A in their towns as government retaliation against the foundersā€˜ private religious beliefs.

As for the NFLā€™s status as a ā€œprivateā€ enterprise? Thatā€™s some Super Bowl-sized audacity right there. I first started tracking publicly subsidized sports boondoggles with my very first watchdog website, Porkwatch, back in 1999. Since then, taxpayers at all levels of government have foot the bill for football stadiums to the tune of an estimated $1 billion every year.

Over the past decade, new tax-supported NFL stadiums rose up for the Indianapolis Colts (the $720 million Lucas Oil Stadium), the Dallas Cowboys (the $1.15 billion AT&T Stadium) the New York Jets and Giants (the $1.6 billion MetLife Stadium, the Minnesota Vikings (the $1.1 billion U.S. Bank Stadium), the Atlanta Falcons (the $1.5 billion Mercedes-Benz Stadium), and the San Francisco 49ers (the $1.3 billion Leviā€™s Stadium in Santa Clara).

Next in the works: a whopping $2.6 billion stadium for the Los Angeles Chargers and Rams and a $1.9 billion stadium for the Oakland Raiders when they move to Las Vegas. Left behind? An $83 million taxpayer debt on two-decade-old renovations to the Alameda County Coliseum that the Raiders are abandoning.

Both political parties have supported massive redistribution of taxes from working people to the gridironā€™s spoiled 1-percenters. Public-private sports palace boosters employ the same bogus economic development math as the federal governmentā€™s infamous Solyndra green energy loans, stimulus rip-offs and jobs programs. Citizens are promised an enormous multiplier of jobs and benefits in return for their ā€œinvestments.ā€ But instead theyā€™ve been saddled with a field of schemes.

Sports economists have concluded repeatedly that the effects of stadium subsidies on employment and economic activity are negligibleā€“or even negative. Scott Wolla of the St. Louis Federal Reserve reported earlier this year, ā€œIn a 2017 poll, 83 percent of the economists surveyed agreed that ā€˜Providing state and local subsidies to build stadiums for professional sports teams is likely tocost the relevant taxpayers more than any local economic benefits that are generated.'ā€

Yet, the NFL, its teams and its sponsors continue to benefit from a bonanza of tax-free loans, municipal bonds, rent waivers and property tax exemptions. Congress provided the league with an antitrust exemption that protects its monopoly broadcasting rights. Localities have raided ā€œemergencyā€ funds to help pay for stadium construction. And corporate benefactors write off their expenses for luxury boxes, tickets and naming-rights purchases.

As long as the NFL has its hog noses buried in the taxpayer trough, Iā€™ll keep speaking up about all the football militants who backed former 49ers QB Colin Kaepernick and his disgusting cops-as-pigs socks.

You wanna raise your fists on the field? Get your grubby hands out of our pockets first.

Michelle Malkin: NFL Pigskins at the Public Trough | VDARE - premier news outlet for patriotic immigration reform

Explain to our feeble brains how starting threads on the USMB message board would help Puerto Rico.

Then essplain the same thing I asked the last asshat who tried to make this a thing, who the fuck are you to decide what topics anybody can post on?

Dumb shit.
The point, turd, is, for whatever reason, the NFL protests are way more interesting to us than yet another hurricane in a place that already costs us a mint and is such a corrupt incompetent mess that more Ricans live in the US than in Puerto Rico. So we ALL find the NFL protests more interesting and important, including Pres. Trump. So he tweets about it. Which he does. He tweets. Deal with it. Instead, the unhinged freaks of the left immediately set up their howling about how "racist" Trump is, even though THEY THEMSELVES ALSO FIND THE NFL KNEELING MORE INTERESTING.


What the fuck is the issue, Stoopid? Are we expected to argue about whether Puerto Rico is disrespecting the country by needing help?

You're actually claiming to come to some kind of conclusion based on some number of topics you add up while wanking? And you think that's science? I'm gonna go waaaaaay out on a limb here and guess that you do not work as an actuary. Amirite?


Do you see, turd, how fucking stupid and vicious and insane you people are? Starting threads on USMB and tweeting are equally helpful to PR, jackass, but Trump's a racist.

Whatever you say Sparkles. I've started no threads on any of this. Didn't need to. But while we're on the topic, your starting yet another thread whining about what threads are started, accomplishes -------------- what?

Take a pill. Ring for the nurse. When she asks which pill you need tell her the one for the Whiny Little Bitch syndrome. Have her hold your hand while you cry about not seeing the topics you want on the internets. And I hope they give her a raise.

Holy SHIT what a fuggin' whiner.
 
President Trump has been excoriated as a demon, racist, heartless, witless, tone deaf, Nazi, KKK, orange white supremacist by the unhinged local leftist loonies for tweeting more about the NFL than Puerto Rico's travails. See? the herd squeals, racist!racist!racist!racist!racist!racist!racist!

So I went back and took the most recent 250 posts from Current Events and the most recent 250 posts from Politics and, judging only by the headlines, counted how many posts were about the NFL and kneeling and how many posts were about Puerto Rico. There were 128 about the NFL and 17 about Puerto Rico. Of the 17 about Puerto Rico, only two weren't complaining about Trump's response and comparing his Puerto Rico response to his NFL response.

So, you left-wing lunatics, by your own standards, you are guilty of being demon, racist, heartless, witless, tone deaf, Nazi, KKK, orange white supremacists yourselves, fucking phonies. Here's Michelle Malkin, taking you down another few pegs. (I wonder how you can stand to look at yourselves in the mirror in the mornings. No wonder you all hate life with such zeal.)

Iā€™m calling foul on all the leftists rushing to protect the NFLā€™s protest crusaders from President Donald Trumpā€™s criticism of their national anthem antics.

Their shabby line of defense? The NFL is a ā€œprivate enterpriseā€ whose ā€œrightsā€ are being violated by those who dare to challenge the leagueā€™s political radicalization. The anti-Trump Democratic Coalition has even filed an ethics complaint alleging that the presidentā€™s comments constitute a criminal violation against using government offices ā€œto influence the employment decisions and practicesā€ of a private entity.

Funny. These fair-weather friends of corporate free speech and the First Amendment were nowhere to be found when Boston Mayor Tom Menino and Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel were vowing to shut down Chick-Fil-A in their towns as government retaliation against the foundersā€˜ private religious beliefs.

As for the NFLā€™s status as a ā€œprivateā€ enterprise? Thatā€™s some Super Bowl-sized audacity right there. I first started tracking publicly subsidized sports boondoggles with my very first watchdog website, Porkwatch, back in 1999. Since then, taxpayers at all levels of government have foot the bill for football stadiums to the tune of an estimated $1 billion every year.

Over the past decade, new tax-supported NFL stadiums rose up for the Indianapolis Colts (the $720 million Lucas Oil Stadium), the Dallas Cowboys (the $1.15 billion AT&T Stadium) the New York Jets and Giants (the $1.6 billion MetLife Stadium, the Minnesota Vikings (the $1.1 billion U.S. Bank Stadium), the Atlanta Falcons (the $1.5 billion Mercedes-Benz Stadium), and the San Francisco 49ers (the $1.3 billion Leviā€™s Stadium in Santa Clara).

Next in the works: a whopping $2.6 billion stadium for the Los Angeles Chargers and Rams and a $1.9 billion stadium for the Oakland Raiders when they move to Las Vegas. Left behind? An $83 million taxpayer debt on two-decade-old renovations to the Alameda County Coliseum that the Raiders are abandoning.

Both political parties have supported massive redistribution of taxes from working people to the gridironā€™s spoiled 1-percenters. Public-private sports palace boosters employ the same bogus economic development math as the federal governmentā€™s infamous Solyndra green energy loans, stimulus rip-offs and jobs programs. Citizens are promised an enormous multiplier of jobs and benefits in return for their ā€œinvestments.ā€ But instead theyā€™ve been saddled with a field of schemes.

Sports economists have concluded repeatedly that the effects of stadium subsidies on employment and economic activity are negligibleā€“or even negative. Scott Wolla of the St. Louis Federal Reserve reported earlier this year, ā€œIn a 2017 poll, 83 percent of the economists surveyed agreed that ā€˜Providing state and local subsidies to build stadiums for professional sports teams is likely tocost the relevant taxpayers more than any local economic benefits that are generated.'ā€

Yet, the NFL, its teams and its sponsors continue to benefit from a bonanza of tax-free loans, municipal bonds, rent waivers and property tax exemptions. Congress provided the league with an antitrust exemption that protects its monopoly broadcasting rights. Localities have raided ā€œemergencyā€ funds to help pay for stadium construction. And corporate benefactors write off their expenses for luxury boxes, tickets and naming-rights purchases.

As long as the NFL has its hog noses buried in the taxpayer trough, Iā€™ll keep speaking up about all the football militants who backed former 49ers QB Colin Kaepernick and his disgusting cops-as-pigs socks.

You wanna raise your fists on the field? Get your grubby hands out of our pockets first.

Michelle Malkin: NFL Pigskins at the Public Trough | VDARE - premier news outlet for patriotic immigration reform

Explain to our feeble brains how starting threads on the USMB message board would help Puerto Rico.

Then essplain the same thing I asked the last asshat who tried to make this a thing, who the fuck are you to decide what topics anybody can post on?

Dumb shit.
The point, turd, is, for whatever reason, the NFL protests are way more interesting to us than yet another hurricane in a place that already costs us a mint and is such a corrupt incompetent mess that more Ricans live in the US than in Puerto Rico. So we ALL find the NFL protests more interesting and important, including Pres. Trump. So he tweets about it. Which he does. He tweets. Deal with it. Instead, the unhinged freaks of the left immediately set up their howling about how "racist" Trump is, even though THEY THEMSELVES ALSO FIND THE NFL KNEELING MORE INTERESTING.


What the fuck is the issue, Stoopid? Are we expected to argue about whether Puerto Rico is disrespecting the country by needing help?

You're actually claiming to come to some kind of conclusion based on some number of topics you add up while wanking? And you think that's science? I'm gonna go waaaaaay out on a limb here and guess that you do not work as an actuary. Amirite?


Do you see, turd, how fucking stupid and vicious and insane you people are? Starting threads on USMB and tweeting are equally helpful to PR, jackass, but Trump's a racist.

Whatever you say Sparkles. I've started no threads on any of this. Didn't need to. But while we're on the topic, your starting yet another thread whining about what threads are started, accomplishes -------------- what?

Take a pill. Ring for the nurse. When she asks which pill you need tell her the one for the Whiny Little Bitch syndrome. Have her hold your hand while you cry about not seeing the topics you want on the internets. And I hope they give her a raise.

Holy SHIT what a fuggin' whiner.
Truth hurts, doesn't it, asshole? You people are toxic. I demonstrated it. And you can't deal.
 
The PR story is not all that interesting. People are in trouble, but even though they're American citizens, they're not whites and therefore whites and even non-whites don't really care that much if they live and die. Call me a racist for saying it, but it's true.

Here's proof. CBS ran a story about South Africa, and they showed a video of a white man in a suit desperately trying to escape from the middle of a black mob.

The anchor made sure to tell us that the lone white man found safety, and was still alive and in good health.

Now thousands of blacks died at the hands of the ANC during that time, some brutually murdered when a tire was put over their heads, and the tire doused with gasoline and set on fire. It's a slow and painful way to die. And the media cared nothing about all these black victims of ANC terrorism because they were black.

What I'm saying is that the life of one white man meant more to CBS and it's audience than the lives of thousands of blacks.
 
The PR story is not all that interesting. People are in trouble, but even though they're American citizens, they're not whites and therefore whites and even non-whites don't really care that much if they live and die. Call me a racist for saying it, but it's true.

Here's proof. CBS ran a story about South Africa, and they showed a video of a white man in a suit desperately trying to escape from the middle of a black mob.

The anchor made sure to tell us that the lone white man found safety, and was still alive and in good health.

Now thousands of blacks died at the hands of the ANC during that time, some brutually murdered when a tire was put over their heads, and the tire doused with gasoline and set on fire. It's a slow and painful way to die. And the media cared nothing about all these black victims of ANC terrorism because they were black.

What I'm saying is that the life of one white man meant more to CBS and it's audience than the lives of thousands of blacks.
Malaysian Air 747 Goes Down En Route to Beijing; 2 Americans Feared Dead
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top