Guess who the Democrats are running for the House midterms?

Is this an attempt at an organized coup?

  • Nothing to see here, move along.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Mango

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    10

Marion Morrison

Diamond Member
Feb 10, 2017
59,298
16,837
2,190
Apparently a high percentage of CIA people.

"There are 57 candidates for the Democratic nomination in 44 congressional districts who boast as their major credential their years of service in intelligence, in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, at the State Department, or some combination of all three. They make up the largest single occupational group running in the Democratic primaries that began March 6 in Texas and extend through mid-September, selecting the candidates who will appear on the general election ballot on November 6.

Aside from their sheer number, and the fact that more than 40 percent, 24 of the 57, are women, there are other aspects worth considering."

Yeah, like why so many CIA-types running for political office and only for the Democrat party? :th_BlackHelicopter:

4-part article with names and affiliations. I wouldn't worry too much about people that were just Marines or Ranger combat veterans, it's the ones that were spooks and "intelligence" that are likely to be very bad.


The CIA Democrats: Part two
 
Last edited:
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #4
Maybe if the idiots of society could figure out the games being played as they manipulate the sheep they'd realize they are being fkd on purpose and the only way to win is CHEAT, oh wait that didn't work for Hillary bahaah.
" WE WILL BREAK UP THE USA" . and they just don't get it as these dumbasses bite every bullet put out there racial bait, speech bait, freedom bait, gun baits, it's all in plain view most are to fkn stupid to see it all right in front of them.

View attachment 182085


FLASHBACK: EU Chief Juncker Called For Breakup of US – Now Vowing Trade War

A Russian troll farm worker, linking to another Alex Jones tinfoil hat conspiracy theory.

The desperation is strong with this one.

Off-topic:

There's been a serious influx of Russian and leftist trolls here lately. Gearing up for the midterms early, perhaps?
 
upload_2018-3-12_10-47-4.png



Julian Assange ⌛ on Twitter
 
Maybe if the idiots of society could figure out the games being played as they manipulate the sheep they'd realize they are being fkd on purpose and the only way to win is CHEAT, oh wait that didn't work for Hillary bahaah.
" WE WILL BREAK UP THE USA" . and they just don't get it as these dumbasses bite every bullet put out there racial bait, speech bait, freedom bait, gun baits, it's all in plain view most are to fkn stupid to see it all right in front of them.

View attachment 182085


FLASHBACK: EU Chief Juncker Called For Breakup of US – Now Vowing Trade War

A Russian troll farm worker, linking to another Alex Jones tinfoil hat conspiracy theory.

The desperation is strong with this one.

An idiot speaks again, gawd you are a dumbass. You should try to educat yourself because you really look and sound pathetically stupid as hell.

Just as Tucker made this one look like an idiot , the fact you even mention Russian bots applies to you as well.

You MUST WORK FOR CHINA AND BE A CHINA BOT..........

upload_2018-3-12_12-39-4.png


Tucker Carlson demolishes liberal left, Russian bot believer (Video)
 
Last edited:
Apparently a high percentage of CIA people.

"There are 57 candidates for the Democratic nomination in 44 congressional districts who boast as their major credential their years of service in intelligence, in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, at the State Department, or some combination of all three. They make up the largest single occupational group running in the Democratic primaries that began March 6 in Texas and extend through mid-September, selecting the candidates who will appear on the general election ballot on November 6.

Aside from their sheer number, and the fact that more than 40 percent, 24 of the 57, are women, there are other aspects worth considering."

Yeah, like why so many CIA-types running for political office and only for the Democrat party? :th_BlackHelicopter:

4-part article with names and affiliations. I wouldn't worry too much about people that were just Marines or Rangers, it's the ones that were spooks and "intelligence" that are likely to be very bad.


The CIA Democrats: Part two
I'll be running for president....... Again.........

My campaign poster;

1b7f014eb261899754a8d21aafa66590.jpg
 
Maybe if the idiots of society could figure out the games being played as they manipulate the sheep they'd realize they are being fkd on purpose and the only way to win is CHEAT, oh wait that didn't work for Hillary bahaah.
" WE WILL BREAK UP THE USA" . and they just don't get it as these dumbasses bite every bullet put out there racial bait, speech bait, freedom bait, gun baits, it's all in plain view most are to fkn stupid to see it all right in front of them.

View attachment 182085


FLASHBACK: EU Chief Juncker Called For Breakup of US – Now Vowing Trade War

A Russian troll farm worker, linking to another Alex Jones tinfoil hat conspiracy theory.

The desperation is strong with this one.

Off-topic:

There's been a serious influx of Russian and leftist trolls here lately. Gearing up for the midterms early, perhaps?
Like who?
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #9
Apparently a high percentage of CIA people.

"There are 57 candidates for the Democratic nomination in 44 congressional districts who boast as their major credential their years of service in intelligence, in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, at the State Department, or some combination of all three. They make up the largest single occupational group running in the Democratic primaries that began March 6 in Texas and extend through mid-September, selecting the candidates who will appear on the general election ballot on November 6.

Aside from their sheer number, and the fact that more than 40 percent, 24 of the 57, are women, there are other aspects worth considering."

Yeah, like why so many CIA-types running for political office and only for the Democrat party? :th_BlackHelicopter:

4-part article with names and affiliations. I wouldn't worry too much about people that were just Marines or Rangers, it's the ones that were spooks and "intelligence" that are likely to be very bad.


The CIA Democrats: Part two
I'll be running for president....... Again.........

My campaign poster;

1b7f014eb261899754a8d21aafa66590.jpg


Ming was a spook? :eek:
 
Maybe if the idiots of society could figure out the games being played as they manipulate the sheep they'd realize they are being fkd on purpose and the only way to win is CHEAT, oh wait that didn't work for Hillary bahaah.
" WE WILL BREAK UP THE USA" . and they just don't get it as these dumbasses bite every bullet put out there racial bait, speech bait, freedom bait, gun baits, it's all in plain view most are to fkn stupid to see it all right in front of them.

View attachment 182085


FLASHBACK: EU Chief Juncker Called For Breakup of US – Now Vowing Trade War

A Russian troll farm worker, linking to another Alex Jones tinfoil hat conspiracy theory.

The desperation is strong with this one.

Off-topic:

There's been a serious influx of Russian and leftist trolls here lately. Gearing up for the midterms early, perhaps?
Like who?

20 or so new signups in the past 2 weeks, that's who.
 
Apparently a high percentage of CIA people.

"There are 57 candidates for the Democratic nomination in 44 congressional districts who boast as their major credential their years of service in intelligence, in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, at the State Department, or some combination of all three. They make up the largest single occupational group running in the Democratic primaries that began March 6 in Texas and extend through mid-September, selecting the candidates who will appear on the general election ballot on November 6.

Aside from their sheer number, and the fact that more than 40 percent, 24 of the 57, are women, there are other aspects worth considering."

Yeah, like why so many CIA-types running for political office and only for the Democrat party? :th_BlackHelicopter:

4-part article with names and affiliations. I wouldn't worry too much about people that were just Marines or Rangers, it's the ones that were spooks and "intelligence" that are likely to be very bad.


The CIA Democrats: Part two
I'll be running for president....... Again.........

My campaign poster;

1b7f014eb261899754a8d21aafa66590.jpg


Ming was a spook? :eek:
No, We (in the royal sense) controlled the spooks...... :thup:
 
Apparently a high percentage of CIA people.

"There are 57 candidates for the Democratic nomination in 44 congressional districts who boast as their major credential their years of service in intelligence, in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, at the State Department, or some combination of all three. They make up the largest single occupational group running in the Democratic primaries that began March 6 in Texas and extend through mid-September, selecting the candidates who will appear on the general election ballot on November 6.

Aside from their sheer number, and the fact that more than 40 percent, 24 of the 57, are women, there are other aspects worth considering."

Yeah, like why so many CIA-types running for political office and only for the Democrat party? :th_BlackHelicopter:

4-part article with names and affiliations. I wouldn't worry too much about people that were just Marines or Ranger combat veterans, it's the ones that were spooks and "intelligence" that are likely to be very bad.


The CIA Democrats: Part two
Geez I hope I didn’t get a virus from visiting that sketchy blog post you linked to.

So, how long have you opposed former members of the CIA, Military, and State Department running for office?
 
Apparently a high percentage of CIA people.

"There are 57 candidates for the Democratic nomination in 44 congressional districts who boast as their major credential their years of service in intelligence, in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, at the State Department, or some combination of all three. They make up the largest single occupational group running in the Democratic primaries that began March 6 in Texas and extend through mid-September, selecting the candidates who will appear on the general election ballot on November 6.

Aside from their sheer number, and the fact that more than 40 percent, 24 of the 57, are women, there are other aspects worth considering."

Yeah, like why so many CIA-types running for political office and only for the Democrat party? :th_BlackHelicopter:

4-part article with names and affiliations. I wouldn't worry too much about people that were just Marines or Ranger combat veterans, it's the ones that were spooks and "intelligence" that are likely to be very bad.


The CIA Democrats: Part two
Geez I hope I didn’t get a virus from visiting that sketchy blog post you linked to.

So, how long have you opposed former members of the CIA, Military, and State Department running for office?

That "sketchy blog" is run by socialists, just like you.
 
Apparently a high percentage of CIA people.

"There are 57 candidates for the Democratic nomination in 44 congressional districts who boast as their major credential their years of service in intelligence, in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, at the State Department, or some combination of all three. They make up the largest single occupational group running in the Democratic primaries that began March 6 in Texas and extend through mid-September, selecting the candidates who will appear on the general election ballot on November 6.

Aside from their sheer number, and the fact that more than 40 percent, 24 of the 57, are women, there are other aspects worth considering."

Yeah, like why so many CIA-types running for political office and only for the Democrat party? :th_BlackHelicopter:

4-part article with names and affiliations. I wouldn't worry too much about people that were just Marines or Ranger combat veterans, it's the ones that were spooks and "intelligence" that are likely to be very bad.


The CIA Democrats: Part two
Geez I hope I didn’t get a virus from visiting that sketchy blog post you linked to.

So, how long have you opposed former members of the CIA, Military, and State Department running for office?

That "sketchy blog" is run by socialists, just like you.
Yet you’re the one agreeing with them
 
That should go over like a lead balloon, for those paying attention.
 
Those "CIA" Democrats are too "intelligent" for their own good. Social democrat. National socialist. White nationalist. No, I would not say they are "world socialist."

Dianne Feinstein (United States Senator for California) comes to mind. I do not like those ladies.

In the CIA Democrats' world there is money for sex, but no money for hard, honest work. I do not like their version of the world.
 
Apparently a high percentage of CIA people.

"There are 57 candidates for the Democratic nomination in 44 congressional districts who boast as their major credential their years of service in intelligence, in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, at the State Department, or some combination of all three. They make up the largest single occupational group running in the Democratic primaries that began March 6 in Texas and extend through mid-September, selecting the candidates who will appear on the general election ballot on November 6.

Aside from their sheer number, and the fact that more than 40 percent, 24 of the 57, are women, there are other aspects worth considering."

Yeah, like why so many CIA-types running for political office and only for the Democrat party? :th_BlackHelicopter:

4-part article with names and affiliations. I wouldn't worry too much about people that were just Marines or Ranger combat veterans, it's the ones that were spooks and "intelligence" that are likely to be very bad.


The CIA Democrats: Part two
Geez I hope I didn’t get a virus from visiting that sketchy blog post you linked to.

So, how long have you opposed former members of the CIA, Military, and State Department running for office?

That "sketchy blog" is run by socialists, just like you.
Yet you’re the one agreeing with them

I agree with what I do. :dunno:
 

Forum List

Back
Top