Growing Isolation: Boycott of Israel Crosses to Governments’ Realm

Jos

Rookie
Feb 6, 2010
7,412
757
0
Should Israel be worried? Very much so, for the age of total impunity is coming to an end. Critical voices of the Israeli occupation and mistreatment of Palestinians are rising — not only within civil society circles, but among world governments as well.

The picture may seem grim if seen through the prisms of the recent US Republican and Democratic National Conventions. But the world is not the United States’ government, which is defined by self-serving politics and a quisling corporate media that often places Israeli interests over those of the US itself. Now with the decline of the US as an economic superpower, and as other countries and regional blocs jockey for an advanced position in the new world order, Israel is sure to suffer further isolation in coming years.

Almost daily new evidence is emerging to demonstrate this increasingly stark reality. Israel’s friends are fully aware of this, as are Israeli politicians. The emerging new realization is that money and power are rarely enough to buy legitimacy. South Africa is expectedly leading the way towards that new global paradigm shift, and others countries are following suit.

Recently, South Africa’s cabinet passed a decision requiring Israel to distinguish between products made in Israel and those made in illegal Jewish colonies in the West Bank. The decision was both politically sound and morally consistent with the country’s anti-apartheid legacy. It was also a natural progression of South Africa’s policies, which have reflected impatience with Israel through the years.
http://dissidentvoice.org/2012/09/growing-isolation-boycott-of-israel-crosses-to-governments-realm/
 
Should Israel be worried? Very much so, for the age of total impunity is coming to an end. Critical voices of the Israeli occupation and mistreatment of Palestinians are rising — not only within civil society circles, but among world governments as well.

The picture may seem grim if seen through the prisms of the recent US Republican and Democratic National Conventions. But the world is not the United States’ government, which is defined by self-serving politics and a quisling corporate media that often places Israeli interests over those of the US itself. Now with the decline of the US as an economic superpower, and as other countries and regional blocs jockey for an advanced position in the new world order, Israel is sure to suffer further isolation in coming years.

Almost daily new evidence is emerging to demonstrate this increasingly stark reality. Israel’s friends are fully aware of this, as are Israeli politicians. The emerging new realization is that money and power are rarely enough to buy legitimacy. South Africa is expectedly leading the way towards that new global paradigm shift, and others countries are following suit.

Recently, South Africa’s cabinet passed a decision requiring Israel to distinguish between products made in Israel and those made in illegal Jewish colonies in the West Bank. The decision was both politically sound and morally consistent with the country’s anti-apartheid legacy. It was also a natural progression of South Africa’s policies, which have reflected impatience with Israel through the years.
http://dissidentvoice.org/2012/09/growing-isolation-boycott-of-israel-crosses-to-governments-realm/
Yousef salivates whenever he hears about a boycott against Israel. Why not tell us, Yousef,. how wonderfully South Africa is doing economically? Meanwhile, hadn't you better rush to India and tell them to stop doing business with Israel? No wonder there were Hindu posters on another board who would always be saying "God bless Israel."

Israel blesses India with agricultural assistance
Israel recently set up a project to bring its hard won agricultural know how to India, which has over a billion mouths to feed every day but suffers from low crop yields. "Israel's agriculture is based on cooperative principles," said Orna Sagiv, Israel's consul-general in the Indian state of Gajurat. "Water is a precious resource for our country as it is for Gujarat. Drip irrigation using recycled water is what we practice in Israel, while water from desalination plant is supplied to houses. It is this philosophy that we want to share with Gujarat."
 
its old news-----she seems to have posted it at least a hundred times
It seems that posters like Yousef like to tell us about boycotts of Israel over and over and over, but they never tell us when countries cooperate with Israel on certain ventures or which countries have respect for Israel and vice versa.

UK, Israel launch regenerative medicine projects
The British and Israeli governments will jointly fund five major research projects in regenerative medicine - the process of replacing or regenerating human cells, tissues or organs to restore or establish normal function in diseased ones. British Ambassador to Israel Matthew Gould announced the program on Monday as part of the BIRAX Regenerative Medicine Initiative, a five-year multi-million Pound program launched in 2008. Prominent stem cell researchers from both countries are working to develop treatments and/or cures for multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease and Type 1 Diabetes.

Stamp demonstrates strong ties between Israel and Nepal
As part of events celebrating decades of cooperation, the governments of Israel and the Himalayan Kingdom of Nepal recently issued a joint stamp featuring the Dead Sea and Mount Everest, the lowest and highest places on Earth. The stamp also features the flags of the two countries and an inscription in Hebrew, Nepalese, Arabic and English.
 
Boycotts of Israeli products are good for business-------when they are boycotted the arabs develope a HUNGER FOR THEM
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #6
its old news-----she seems to have posted it at least a hundred times

September 12th, 2012
Recently, South Africa’s cabinet passed a decision requiring Israel to distinguish between products made in Israel and those made in illegal Jewish colonies in the West Bank. The decision was both politically sound and morally consistent with the country’s anti-apartheid legacy. It was also a natural progression of South Africa’s policies, which have reflected impatience with Israel through the years.

It is clear that Israel has chosen the apartheid option, not just as a de facto outcome of its military policies, but through a decided legal and political pattern. South Africa’s decision, however, was not just motivated by political necessity. Veterans of the anti-apartheid struggle have had numerous influences on the country’s civil society. Even the new generation is intoned with a freedom discourse that unites most sectors of society. ‘Freedom for Palestine’ was a natural fit in that powerful discourse and no amount of Israeli propaganda has been enough to deter South Africans from standing in solidarity with Palestinians. The feelings are, of course, mutual.

The total output of Israeli trade with South Africa was modest to begin with. Since 2009, trade volumes dipped significantly, and political ties became colder than ever. This had much to do with the Israel war on Gaza (2008-09) and what was seen as an act of Israeli piracy against the Turkish ship the Mavi Marmara in May 31, 2011. South Africa, along with few other countries, withdrew its ambassador from Israel in protest of the deadly raid which killed nine peace activists.
http://dissidentvoice.org/2012/09/growing-isolation-boycott-of-israel-crosses-to-governments-realm/
 
its old news-----she seems to have posted it at least a hundred times

September 12th, 2012
Recently, South Africa’s cabinet passed a decision requiring Israel to distinguish between products made in Israel and those made in illegal Jewish colonies in the West Bank. The decision was both politically sound and morally consistent with the country’s anti-apartheid legacy. It was also a natural progression of South Africa’s policies, which have reflected impatience with Israel through the years.

It is clear that Israel has chosen the apartheid option, not just as a de facto outcome of its military policies, but through a decided legal and political pattern. South Africa’s decision, however, was not just motivated by political necessity. Veterans of the anti-apartheid struggle have had numerous influences on the country’s civil society. Even the new generation is intoned with a freedom discourse that unites most sectors of society. ‘Freedom for Palestine’ was a natural fit in that powerful discourse and no amount of Israeli propaganda has been enough to deter South Africans from standing in solidarity with Palestinians. The feelings are, of course, mutual.

The total output of Israeli trade with South Africa was modest to begin with. Since 2009, trade volumes dipped significantly, and political ties became colder than ever. This had much to do with the Israel war on Gaza (2008-09) and what was seen as an act of Israeli piracy against the Turkish ship the Mavi Marmara in May 31, 2011. South Africa, along with few other countries, withdrew its ambassador from Israel in protest of the deadly raid which killed nine peace activists.
http://dissidentvoice.org/2012/09/growing-isolation-boycott-of-israel-crosses-to-governments-realm/

Next to the PA the Israeli West Bank communities are the largest employers of Palestinian Arabs in the West Bank, employing some 30,000 of them and paying higher wages than are available anywhere else. Despite determined efforts of Abbas and Fayyad to force these people to quit these jobs and be unable to support their families, the number continues to grow.

Should the South African move negatively impact the economies of Israel's West Bank communities, which is doubtful, some Palestinian Arab workers will lose their jobs and likely be unable to find another, indicating that while the South African government is clearly anti Israeli, it is not pro Palestinian Arab.
 
its old news-----she seems to have posted it at least a hundred times

September 12th, 2012
Recently, South Africa’s cabinet passed a decision requiring Israel to distinguish between products made in Israel and those made in illegal Jewish colonies in the West Bank. The decision was both politically sound and morally consistent with the country’s anti-apartheid legacy. It was also a natural progression of South Africa’s policies, which have reflected impatience with Israel through the years.

It is clear that Israel has chosen the apartheid option, not just as a de facto outcome of its military policies, but through a decided legal and political pattern. South Africa’s decision, however, was not just motivated by political necessity. Veterans of the anti-apartheid struggle have had numerous influences on the country’s civil society. Even the new generation is intoned with a freedom discourse that unites most sectors of society. ‘Freedom for Palestine’ was a natural fit in that powerful discourse and no amount of Israeli propaganda has been enough to deter South Africans from standing in solidarity with Palestinians. The feelings are, of course, mutual.

The total output of Israeli trade with South Africa was modest to begin with. Since 2009, trade volumes dipped significantly, and political ties became colder than ever. This had much to do with the Israel war on Gaza (2008-09) and what was seen as an act of Israeli piracy against the Turkish ship the Mavi Marmara in May 31, 2011. South Africa, along with few other countries, withdrew its ambassador from Israel in protest of the deadly raid which killed nine peace activists.
http://dissidentvoice.org/2012/09/growing-isolation-boycott-of-israel-crosses-to-governments-realm/
What Yousef doesn't tell us is that the Arabs have jobs in the West Bank, so when you boycott goods from there, the Arabs are being hurt too. Naturally Yousef doesn't care about the Arabs being hurt economically in the West Bank as long as he can continue posting about boycotts. Meanwhile, Israel has other countries to trade with which of course Yousef doesn't like them doing so. As far as that Turkish ship is concerned, how come those phonies don't try to help Muslims elsewhere -- like the Pakistanis who are still suffering from the floods or those in the Swat Valley. The other Turkish ships seemed to obey orders and weren't harmed so why did this one ship disobey? Of course we know that they were sayng they wanted to be martyrs when they left so they were ready to make trouble. I wouldn't say that people who want to be martyrs are actual peace activists.
 
its old news-----she seems to have posted it at least a hundred times

September 12th, 2012
Recently, South Africa’s cabinet passed a decision requiring Israel to distinguish between products made in Israel and those made in illegal Jewish colonies in the West Bank. The decision was both politically sound and morally consistent with the country’s anti-apartheid legacy. It was also a natural progression of South Africa’s policies, which have reflected impatience with Israel through the years.

It is clear that Israel has chosen the apartheid option, not just as a de facto outcome of its military policies, but through a decided legal and political pattern. South Africa’s decision, however, was not just motivated by political necessity. Veterans of the anti-apartheid struggle have had numerous influences on the country’s civil society. Even the new generation is intoned with a freedom discourse that unites most sectors of society. ‘Freedom for Palestine’ was a natural fit in that powerful discourse and no amount of Israeli propaganda has been enough to deter South Africans from standing in solidarity with Palestinians. The feelings are, of course, mutual.

The total output of Israeli trade with South Africa was modest to begin with. Since 2009, trade volumes dipped significantly, and political ties became colder than ever. This had much to do with the Israel war on Gaza (2008-09) and what was seen as an act of Israeli piracy against the Turkish ship the Mavi Marmara in May 31, 2011. South Africa, along with few other countries, withdrew its ambassador from Israel in protest of the deadly raid which killed nine peace activists.
http://dissidentvoice.org/2012/09/growing-isolation-boycott-of-israel-crosses-to-governments-realm/

Jos,

I think it is great what South Africa is doing, but they shoulod really go further. Since Apartheid is practiced inside the pre 1949 borders, as well as the pre 1967 borders, as well as the OPT, boycott of all Israeli products and all products produced by illegal settlements in the OPT is called for. I refer to the findings of prior Russel Tribunals for my statements here that Israel carries out Apartheid practices throughout the pe 1949 borders, and pre 1967 borders, as well as the OPT.

Sherri
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: Jos
its old news-----she seems to have posted it at least a hundred times

September 12th, 2012
Recently, South Africa’s cabinet passed a decision requiring Israel to distinguish between products made in Israel and those made in illegal Jewish colonies in the West Bank. The decision was both politically sound and morally consistent with the country’s anti-apartheid legacy. It was also a natural progression of South Africa’s policies, which have reflected impatience with Israel through the years.

It is clear that Israel has chosen the apartheid option, not just as a de facto outcome of its military policies, but through a decided legal and political pattern. South Africa’s decision, however, was not just motivated by political necessity. Veterans of the anti-apartheid struggle have had numerous influences on the country’s civil society. Even the new generation is intoned with a freedom discourse that unites most sectors of society. ‘Freedom for Palestine’ was a natural fit in that powerful discourse and no amount of Israeli propaganda has been enough to deter South Africans from standing in solidarity with Palestinians. The feelings are, of course, mutual.

The total output of Israeli trade with South Africa was modest to begin with. Since 2009, trade volumes dipped significantly, and political ties became colder than ever. This had much to do with the Israel war on Gaza (2008-09) and what was seen as an act of Israeli piracy against the Turkish ship the Mavi Marmara in May 31, 2011. South Africa, along with few other countries, withdrew its ambassador from Israel in protest of the deadly raid which killed nine peace activists.
http://dissidentvoice.org/2012/09/growing-isolation-boycott-of-israel-crosses-to-governments-realm/

Jos,

I think it is great what South Africa is doing, but they shoulod really go further. Since Apartheid is practiced inside the pre 1949 borders, as well as the pre 1967 borders, as well as the OPT, boycott of all Israeli products and all products produced by illegal settlements in the OPT is called for. I refer to the findings of prior Russel Tribunals for my statements here that Israel carries out Apartheid practices throughout the pe 1949 borders, and pre 1967 borders, as well as the OPT.

Sherri
It looks like Sherri doesn't care if her Arab brothers have no work because of a boycott of all Israeli products. However, we know that hypocrites like Sherri and the rest of her friends would never boycott some medical invention comining out of Israel if it could help them, now would they? Meanwhile, I just know, since Sherri is such an honest person, she is going to tell us how the non-Muslim people in Muslim countries are treated like second-class citizens. Go ahead, Sherri, tell us about it -- how many of the non Muslim workers are treated like slaves.
 

Jos,

I think it is great what South Africa is doing, but they shoulod really go further. Since Apartheid is practiced inside the pre 1949 borders, as well as the pre 1967 borders, as well as the OPT, boycott of all Israeli products and all products produced by illegal settlements in the OPT is called for. I refer to the findings of prior Russel Tribunals for my statements here that Israel carries out Apartheid practices throughout the pe 1949 borders, and pre 1967 borders, as well as the OPT.

Sherri
It looks like Sherri doesn't care if her Arab brothers have no work because of a boycott of all Israeli products. However, we know that hypocrites like Sherri and the rest of her friends would never boycott some medical invention comining out of Israel if it could help them, now would they? Meanwhile, I just know, since Sherri is such an honest person, she is going to tell us how the non-Muslim people in Muslim countries are treated like second-class citizens. Go ahead, Sherri, tell us about it -- how many of the non Muslim workers are treated like slaves.

Hossfly,

The issue is Israel and Palestine and how people of conscience should respond to Apartheid, with Boycotts.

What happens somewhere else in a Muslim country does not operate to justify Israel's Apartheid practices in Palestine.

And as far as the suggestion that some life sAVING TECHNOLOGY WOULD NOT BE BOYCOTTED, that would be a personal choice for each individual to make.

Would I want medical technology profiting off of dead Palestinian babies to be used to save my life? That is the question one could be confronted with, I suppose. and I leave that for each person confronted with it to respond to, as they see fit

Sherri
 
its old news-----she seems to have posted it at least a hundred times

September 12th, 2012
Recently, South Africa’s cabinet passed a decision requiring Israel to distinguish between products made in Israel and those made in illegal Jewish colonies in the West Bank. The decision was both politically sound and morally consistent with the country’s anti-apartheid legacy. It was also a natural progression of South Africa’s policies, which have reflected impatience with Israel through the years.

It is clear that Israel has chosen the apartheid option, not just as a de facto outcome of its military policies, but through a decided legal and political pattern. South Africa’s decision, however, was not just motivated by political necessity. Veterans of the anti-apartheid struggle have had numerous influences on the country’s civil society. Even the new generation is intoned with a freedom discourse that unites most sectors of society. ‘Freedom for Palestine’ was a natural fit in that powerful discourse and no amount of Israeli propaganda has been enough to deter South Africans from standing in solidarity with Palestinians. The feelings are, of course, mutual.

The total output of Israeli trade with South Africa was modest to begin with. Since 2009, trade volumes dipped significantly, and political ties became colder than ever. This had much to do with the Israel war on Gaza (2008-09) and what was seen as an act of Israeli piracy against the Turkish ship the Mavi Marmara in May 31, 2011. South Africa, along with few other countries, withdrew its ambassador from Israel in protest of the deadly raid which killed nine peace activists.
http://dissidentvoice.org/2012/09/growing-isolation-boycott-of-israel-crosses-to-governments-realm/
What Yousef doesn't tell us is that the Arabs have jobs in the West Bank, so when you boycott goods from there, the Arabs are being hurt too. Naturally Yousef doesn't care about the Arabs being hurt economically in the West Bank as long as he can continue posting about boycotts. Meanwhile, Israel has other countries to trade with which of course Yousef doesn't like them doing so. As far as that Turkish ship is concerned, how come those phonies don't try to help Muslims elsewhere -- like the Pakistanis who are still suffering from the floods or those in the Swat Valley. The other Turkish ships seemed to obey orders and weren't harmed so why did this one ship disobey? Of course we know that they were sayng they wanted to be martyrs when they left so they were ready to make trouble. I wouldn't say that people who want to be martyrs are actual peace activists.

Working for Israel is temporary money that eventually makes their employment opportunities worse.

They get paid to cut their own throats.
 
Jos,

I think it is great what South Africa is doing, but they shoulod really go further. Since Apartheid is practiced inside the pre 1949 borders, as well as the pre 1967 borders, as well as the OPT, boycott of all Israeli products and all products produced by illegal settlements in the OPT is called for. I refer to the findings of prior Russel Tribunals for my statements here that Israel carries out Apartheid practices throughout the pe 1949 borders, and pre 1967 borders, as well as the OPT.

Sherri
It looks like Sherri doesn't care if her Arab brothers have no work because of a boycott of all Israeli products. However, we know that hypocrites like Sherri and the rest of her friends would never boycott some medical invention comining out of Israel if it could help them, now would they? Meanwhile, I just know, since Sherri is such an honest person, she is going to tell us how the non-Muslim people in Muslim countries are treated like second-class citizens. Go ahead, Sherri, tell us about it -- how many of the non Muslim workers are treated like slaves.

Hossfly,

The issue is Israel and Palestine and how people of conscience should respond to Apartheid, with Boycotts.

What happens somewhere else in a Muslim country does not operate to justify Israel's Apartheid practices in Palestine.

And as far as the suggestion that some life sAVING TECHNOLOGY WOULD NOT BE BOYCOTTED, that would be a personal choice for each individual to make.

Would I want medical technology profiting off of dead Palestinian babies to be used to save my life? That is the question one could be confronted with, I suppose. and I leave that for each person confronted with it to respond to, as they see fit

Sherri
Since Sherri is trying so hard to convince all of the readers that she is such a good Christian woman, surely she will listen to what this Reverend has to say, a Reverend who actually fought apartheid in South Afriica so he should know what he is talking about. And, let me add, I doubt that Sherri cares what her Muslim brethren are doing to others in Muslim countries. Her entire focus is on Israel like every good Muslim.
Dismantling the myth that Israel is an Apartheid state on Vimeo
 
What Yousef doesn't tell us is that the Arabs have jobs in the West Bank, so when you boycott goods from there, the Arabs are being hurt too. Naturally Yousef doesn't care about the Arabs being hurt economically in the West Bank as long as he can continue posting about boycotts. Meanwhile, Israel has other countries to trade with which of course Yousef doesn't like them doing so. As far as that Turkish ship is concerned, how come those phonies don't try to help Muslims elsewhere -- like the Pakistanis who are still suffering from the floods or those in the Swat Valley. The other Turkish ships seemed to obey orders and weren't harmed so why did this one ship disobey? Of course we know that they were sayng they wanted to be martyrs when they left so they were ready to make trouble. I wouldn't say that people who want to be martyrs are actual peace activists.

Working for Israel is temporary money that eventually makes their employment opportunities worse.

They get paid to cut their own throats.
Now isn't that strange because the Arabs have been coming into Israel for years and years and years to work there, and they were very disappointed when all those jobs disappeared for them. Meanwhile, perhaps Tinny can tell us why the oil-rich Gulf States haven't set up industries for their Muslim brethren so that they wouldn't have to depend on Israel for work. We know some of these countries threw the Palestinians workers out of their own countries, but surely they could have sprung for some factories for the Palestinians. Even a Jewish fellow set up a factory in Jordan to help the Arabs there. His wife, who during an interview with a financial reporter, said that her husband did this for altruistic purposes and he wasn't making any profit at all. It's a shame that Tinny's friends couldn't do the same. Are these countries too busy funding the terrorists rather than helping your friends, Tinny?
 
LMAO This thread is so funny. For over 3000 years Israel's old enemies have forcasted Israel's forthcoming demise. And three thousand years from now Israel's new enemies will still be doing the same.
 
LMAO This thread is so funny. For over 3000 years Israel's old enemies have forcasted Israel's forthcoming demise. And three thousand years from now Israel's new enemies will still be doing the same.

MJB12741,

Your ignorance is glaring, as there has only been an Israel for 64 years.

Sherri
 
What Yousef doesn't tell us is that the Arabs have jobs in the West Bank, so when you boycott goods from there, the Arabs are being hurt too. Naturally Yousef doesn't care about the Arabs being hurt economically in the West Bank as long as he can continue posting about boycotts. Meanwhile, Israel has other countries to trade with which of course Yousef doesn't like them doing so. As far as that Turkish ship is concerned, how come those phonies don't try to help Muslims elsewhere -- like the Pakistanis who are still suffering from the floods or those in the Swat Valley. The other Turkish ships seemed to obey orders and weren't harmed so why did this one ship disobey? Of course we know that they were sayng they wanted to be martyrs when they left so they were ready to make trouble. I wouldn't say that people who want to be martyrs are actual peace activists.

Working for Israel is temporary money that eventually makes their employment opportunities worse.

They get paid to cut their own throats.
Now isn't that strange because the Arabs have been coming into Israel for years and years and years to work there, and they were very disappointed when all those jobs disappeared for them. Meanwhile, perhaps Tinny can tell us why the oil-rich Gulf States haven't set up industries for their Muslim brethren so that they wouldn't have to depend on Israel for work. We know some of these countries threw the Palestinians workers out of their own countries, but surely they could have sprung for some factories for the Palestinians. Even a Jewish fellow set up a factory in Jordan to help the Arabs there. His wife, who during an interview with a financial reporter, said that her husband did this for altruistic purposes and he wasn't making any profit at all. It's a shame that Tinny's friends couldn't do the same. Are these countries too busy funding the terrorists rather than helping your friends, Tinny?

Indeed, and you have no clue as to why that happens.
 
Working for Israel is temporary money that eventually makes their employment opportunities worse.

They get paid to cut their own throats.
Now isn't that strange because the Arabs have been coming into Israel for years and years and years to work there, and they were very disappointed when all those jobs disappeared for them. Meanwhile, perhaps Tinny can tell us why the oil-rich Gulf States haven't set up industries for their Muslim brethren so that they wouldn't have to depend on Israel for work. We know some of these countries threw the Palestinians workers out of their own countries, but surely they could have sprung for some factories for the Palestinians. Even a Jewish fellow set up a factory in Jordan to help the Arabs there. His wife, who during an interview with a financial reporter, said that her husband did this for altruistic purposes and he wasn't making any profit at all. It's a shame that Tinny's friends couldn't do the same. Are these countries too busy funding the terrorists rather than helping your friends, Tinny?

Indeed, and you have no clue as to why that happens.
Sure I do, Tinmore. It's all because of that rampant inbreeding.
 
Now isn't that strange because the Arabs have been coming into Israel for years and years and years to work there, and they were very disappointed when all those jobs disappeared for them. Meanwhile, perhaps Tinny can tell us why the oil-rich Gulf States haven't set up industries for their Muslim brethren so that they wouldn't have to depend on Israel for work. We know some of these countries threw the Palestinians workers out of their own countries, but surely they could have sprung for some factories for the Palestinians. Even a Jewish fellow set up a factory in Jordan to help the Arabs there. His wife, who during an interview with a financial reporter, said that her husband did this for altruistic purposes and he wasn't making any profit at all. It's a shame that Tinny's friends couldn't do the same. Are these countries too busy funding the terrorists rather than helping your friends, Tinny?

Indeed, and you have no clue as to why that happens.
Sure I do, Tinmore. It's all because of that rampant inbreeding.

I rest my case.
 

Forum List

Back
Top