Great Socialist Central Banks Intervention Not Bush-Perry "Go-It-Alone!"

Discussion in 'Economy' started by mascale, Sep 15, 2011.

  1. mascale
    Offline

    mascale VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2009
    Messages:
    4,035
    Thanks Received:
    210
    Trophy Points:
    85
    Ratings:
    +453
    Anyone knows that Texas Governors are really hard to tell apart. George Bush saw Weapons of Mass Destruction in entire nation-states where they were not. Rick Perry now sees Weapons of Mass Destruction in entire Texas neighborhoods where they are not(?)! He goes jogging there loaded(?). . .or armed. . . .or whatever it is he does(?)!

    The President of the World Bank mainly sees "Dangerous Tmes" by comparison. The Socialist Central Governments--In Clear Contrast to all of the above--are engaged in solving the European financial crisis!

    Central banks to provide dollar liquidity - Sep. 15, 2011

    "Go-It-Alone" money is better thought commodity-based--in metals instead of in something valueable, like clean air or water. "Go-It-Alone" is more about a central leader or family hoarding it all, then distributing what they have to fund supportive armies, led by aristocrats. Shop-keepers mainly then rely on banking mathematics to slowly grow commerce. Similar to a Ponzi-Scheme, they rarely have what they owe to depositors. Even money they lend is spent and so the borrower rarely has enough on hand to repay the loan.

    Republicans know about flakes when they spot them! They are called shopkeepers and business-owners.

    A history of business and commerce slowly happens, subject to the problems of arithmetic, most succinctly addressed in Proverbs 22:16. So the Adjustable Rate Mortgages oppressed the poor: With heinous interest rates, intended for profit. The Bush-Perry-GOP-Tea-Party Tax Cuts give to the rich. The rich get richer. The poor get poorer. The whole thing crashes on down. Ruin and want is all that is left. Tarp funds get send to the bankers, for a job well-done!

    Socialists tend to market-supports instead. Central Governments do pensions, education, roads and bridges, medical health plans, housing supports, and income supports of all types. Central Regulations are created intended to increase the flow of funds in the market, as opposed to the squatting-funds in the purses and pocketbooks of Old Fat White People, Cavorting About Naked On Other People's Yachts--Dumping Substance And Other Tresure Into the Sea.

    Socialist Central Banks have clearly reached a semblance of agreement on a market and income support intevention, contrary to Laissez-Faire. A Final Solution To the Presbyterian Question is at hand: "Just where is all this money going to come from?!"

    The Obama Administration put into place the Refundable Tax Credit, Schedule M, in the IRS code. The "Go-It-Alone" Tea Party GOP took that away at the first chance they had.

    "Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
    (Many Granny-Squaws With Squatting-Funds Now In Lands Of Many Nations: Busy at work with one-armed bandits(?)! Hmmmm! Many Young Braves Don't Go There!)
     
    Last edited: Sep 15, 2011
  2. Brutus
    Offline

    Brutus Senior Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2011
    Messages:
    1,432
    Thanks Received:
    64
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +64

    1) actually everyone is waiting for Greece to collapse the entire European economy and end the EU


    2) Europe has about 68% of our standard of living because socialism does not work. Anyone should know this???
     
  3. Listening
    Offline

    Listening Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2011
    Messages:
    14,989
    Thanks Received:
    1,641
    Trophy Points:
    260
    Ratings:
    +2,044
    Can you provide some information on this claim ?

    I thought there were some places like Switzerland that had a very high standard of living.
     
  4. expat_panama
    Offline

    expat_panama Silver Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2011
    Messages:
    2,461
    Thanks Received:
    252
    Trophy Points:
    98
    Ratings:
    +253
    Switzerland has the world's highest per-capita income. Higher than the US. Switzerland does not use the Euro, they never joined up with that stuff and they still use their own 'Swiss Franc'.
     
  5. Listening
    Offline

    Listening Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2011
    Messages:
    14,989
    Thanks Received:
    1,641
    Trophy Points:
    260
    Ratings:
    +2,044
    My apologies.

    But the request is still there to provide some information on your claim. I have not heard this before and would like to learn more.
     
  6. expat_panama
    Offline

    expat_panama Silver Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2011
    Messages:
    2,461
    Thanks Received:
    252
    Trophy Points:
    98
    Ratings:
    +253
    If you mean about income there are lots of sources ( "per capita income" Switzerland highest - Google Search ) but as I was looking at it again I noticed that controversy's come up over ways to compare income in terms of purchasing power. Saying "Switzerland is one of the highest countries ranked by percapita income" starts fewer arguments.

    Googling key words "Swiss Franc", euro, Switzerland verifies the currency claim with fewer lose ends.
     
  7. mascale
    Offline

    mascale VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2009
    Messages:
    4,035
    Thanks Received:
    210
    Trophy Points:
    85
    Ratings:
    +453
    The world's most advanced--as opposed to developing--economy is likely Sweden. Sweden is Socialist de facto and de jure. Private ownership and religious production values are in fact in place. So are the following:

    1. Universal health Care
    2. Non-Profit hospitals
    3. Social Security
    4. Free Education with pro-student incentives.
    5. Extensive Government Regulation of the Workplace, and of executive administrations in
    the workplace.

    Swedish economy - SWEDEN.SE

    Texas it is not, and in the sense that Haiti it is not, and East Africa it is not. Texas is near to number one in federal grants, federal employment, and federal military spending. Many would say that None of That Is At All Like Sweden. East Africa is beset with the plague of Western, U. N. Missionaries--ostensibly hunting for orphans to ship back home. In Haiti that became the stuff of legend. Apparently Texas governors feel at home in such locations. None of the three areas are comparable to Sweden. Sweden is even widely known to be anti-war. Sweden has no problem with multi-nationalism, and especially in global economics and routine business. Texas mainly has some remaining oil, by comparison. Texas is better said a prime example of "The Reagan Trajectory" of federal spending on the rich. The poor and middle in Texas are not included, or involved.

    Probably Hollywood, can relate most easily to that--any of that, and without exception! See for example, the gang-land music and feature-film sub-culture. Hollywood knows about "Reagan Trajectory," Integration.

    "Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
    (Armed and Loaded while out jogging: Not now even in Lands of Many Nations!)
     
    Last edited: Sep 16, 2011
  8. Listening
    Offline

    Listening Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2011
    Messages:
    14,989
    Thanks Received:
    1,641
    Trophy Points:
    260
    Ratings:
    +2,044
    I was looking for some information or your source on the 68% of our standard of living.

    I will do some work on my own, but this is not a metric that I have spent that much time with.
     
  9. Listening
    Offline

    Listening Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2011
    Messages:
    14,989
    Thanks Received:
    1,641
    Trophy Points:
    260
    Ratings:
    +2,044
    The last I checked, Sweden had the population of Michigan (about 10 millioin people). This is about 3.5% of the population of the entire United States. So, does universal health care have to be about the U.S. or can Michigan have it's own ?

    Why can't Michigan run itself like Sweden ?
     
  10. expat_panama
    Offline

    expat_panama Silver Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2011
    Messages:
    2,461
    Thanks Received:
    252
    Trophy Points:
    98
    Ratings:
    +253
    People in Sweden talk funny too, doesn't mean Americans should. The issue is what suits our needs.

    Each of these programs have already been instituted in the US to one degree or another, so we've all pretty much had a chance to decide whether we want more or less of which. My preference (and probably that of most Americans) is for an immediate end to 1, 2, and 5, a phasing out of 3, and local control of 4.
     

Share This Page