Grassley publicly accuses Schumer of lying knowingly to the American people

A thirteen minute vid by a homer far right Republican without time or date or url?

C-Span2 june 22, 2017 US Senate Reacts Unveiling GOP Health Care Bill, Jun 22 2017 | C-SPAN.org
Transcript Jake...

MR. GRASSLEY: IN MARCH, MR. MR. COMEY BRIEFED RANKING MEMBER FEINSTEIN AND ME, AS CHAIRMAN AND RANKING MEMBER OF THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE, ON THE RUSSIAN INVESTIGATION. THIS INCLUDED TELLING US WHO WAS AND WHO WAS NOT UNDER INVESTIGATION. AFTER THAT MEETING, I PUBLICLY CALLED FOR MR. COMEY TO TELL THE PUBLIC WHAT HE HAD TOLD US ABOUT WHETHER PRESIDENT TRUMP WAS UNDER INVESTIGATION. LET ME ASK THE LEADER, MR. LEADER, I DIDN'T REALIZE YOU WERE GOING TO BE HERE TO SPEAK, SO I'LL YIELD THE FLOOR AND START OVER AGAIN. MR. McCONNELL: I WOULD THANK MY FRIEND FROM IOWA. I'LL JUST BE A MINUTE. MADAM PRESIDENT, I ASK UNANIMOUS CONSENT THAT NOT WITHSTANDING ROULETTE 22, ALL -- RULE 22 ALL POSTCLOTURE TIME ON THE BILLINGSLEA NOMINATION EXPIRE AT 2 P.M. TODAY AND PORE ON THE KRISTINE L. SVINICKI NOMINATION EXPIRE ON MONDAY, JUNE 26. THE PRESIDING OFFICER: IS THERE OBJECTION? WITHOUT OBJECTION. MR. McCONNELL: I THANK MY FRIEND FROM IOWA.
MR. GRASSLEY: MADAM PRESIDENT. THE PRESIDING OFFICER: THE SENATOR FROM IOWA. MR. GRASSLEY: IN MARCH, MR. COMEY BRIEFED RANKING MEMBER FEINSTEIN AND THIS SENATOR ON THE RUSSIA INVESTIGATION. THIS INCLUDED TELLING US WHO WAS AND WHO WAS NOT UNDER INVESTIGATION. AFTER THAT MEETING I SPUNICALLY CALLED --
I PUBLICLY CALLED FOR MR. COMEY TO TELL THE PUBLIC WHAT HE HAD TOLD US ABOUT WHETHER PRESIDENT TRUMP WAS UNDER INVESTIGATION. I DID THIS BECAUSE THE PUBLIC HAD A RIGHT TO KNOW. MR. COMEY TOLD ME AND OTHER CONGRESSIONAL LEADERS THAT PRESIDENT TRUMP WAS NOT UNDER INVESTIGATION. HE EVEN TOLD THE PRESIDENT HIMSELF -- AND I UNDERSTAND THAT IT WAS REPEATEDLY TOLD TO THE PRESIDENT. BUT MR. COMEY DIDN'T LISTEN TO MY REQUEST FOR TRANSPARENCY. AND I THINK TRANSPARENCY IN GOVERNMENT IS VERY IMPORTANT BECAUSE TRANSPARENCY BRINGS ACCOUNTABILITY, AND GOVERNMENT NEEDS TO BE ACCOUNTABLE. MR. COMEY DIDN'T LISTEN TO THE PRESIDENT'S REQUEST. ONLY MONTHS LATER HAS THE TRUTH FINALLY COME OUT. WELL, IT OUGHT TO RAISE A QUESTION WITH ANYBODY WHAT HAPPENED IN THE MEANTIME. WHAT HAPPENED BECAUSE MR. COMEY REFUSED TO TELL THE AMERICAN PEOPLE THAT THE PRESIDENT WASN'T UNDER INVESTIGATION. THE SHORT ANSWER IS SOMETHING YOU SEE ALMOST HOURLY, PARTICULARLY IN THIS CITY. MEDIA HYSTERIA. COUNTLESS MEDIA ARTICLES FALSELY CLAIMED THE PRESIDENT WAS UNDER INVESTIGATION FOR COLLUDING WITH RUSSIA. AND UNFORTUNATELY, A NUMBER OF OUR DEMOCRATIC COLLEAGUES IN THE HOUSE AND SENATE PLAYED RIGHT ALONG. OVER AND OVER AGAIN THE MEDIA PUBLISHED SELECTIVE LEAKS. THEY PUBLISHED CLASSIFIED HALF-TRUTHS. ALL THIS WAS USED TO MAKE FALSE ALLEGATIONS OF SINISTER CONDUCT BY THE PRESIDENT. AND OF COURSE, THERE WAS A LOT OF PEOPLE WHO BELIEVED IT. THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY CONDUCTED AN ASSESSMENT OF RUSSIA'S EFFORTS TO INTERFERE IN THE ELECTION. THAT ASSESSMENT SAID ONE OF RUSSIA'S GOALS WAS TO UNDERMINE PUBLIC CONFIDENCE IN OUR DEMOCRATIC SYSTEM. BECAUSE MR. COMEY REFUSED TO TELL THE PUBLIC THAT THE F.B.I. WAS NOT INVESTIGATING THE PRESIDENT, CONSPIRACY THEORIES AND, OF COURSE, WILD SPECULATION HAVE RUN RAMPANT ABOUT THE ELECTION, ABOUT THE PRESIDENT, AND ABOUT RUSSIA. THESE CONSPIRACY THEORIES AND WILD SPECULATION HAVE PLAYED RIGHT INTO RUSSIA'S AIM OF UNDERMINING FAITH IN OUR DEMOCRATIC SYSTEM. NOW THAT DOESN'T COME OUT VERY OFTEN IN THESE STORIES, BUT YOU HAVE TO UNDERSTAND, RUSSIA MAKES A CAREER OUT OF NOT ONLY IN THE UNITED STATES UNDERMINING DEMOCRAT SYSTEMS, LOOK AT WHAT THEY'VE DONE IN THE UKRAINE MILITARILY. LOOK AT WHAT THEY'VE DONE IN FRANCE WITH THE ELECTIONS, NETHERLANDS WITH THE ELECTIONS, AND THEY'RE TALKING ABOUT UPCOMING ELECTIONS IN GERMANY WHERE THEY'LL TRY TO DO THE SAME THING.
BECAUSE, YOU SEE, AUTOCRATS DON'T LIKE DEMOCRATIC SYSTEMS THAT WORK, AND WHAT THEY CAN DO TO UNDERMINE THOSE DEMOCRATIC SYSTEMS IS GOING TO OBVIOUSLY MAKE THEM LOOK BETTER. THOSE NATIONAL SECURITY CONCERNS SHOULD HAVE TAKEN PRECEDENT. MR. COMEY SAID THAT HE WAS WORRIED ABOUT THE DUTY TO CORRECT THE RECORD IF EVIDENCE OF COLLUSION INVOLVING THE PRESIDENT CAME TO LIGHT LATER ON. BUT THAT CONCERN WAS MERELY HYPOTHETICAL.
IN OTHER WORDS, PURE SPECULATION. IN THE UNLIKELY EVENT THAT IT CAME TO PASS, THE PUBLIC SHOULD KNOW IF THE F.B.I. IS PURSUING A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION AGAINST THE PRESIDENT. JUST LIKE THE PUBLIC SHOULD KNOW IF THE F.B.I. IS PURSUING A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION AGAINST A MAJOR PARTY'S NOMINEE FOR PRESIDENT. BUT MR. COMEY AGREED WITH ATTORNEY GENERAL LYNCH TO SHADE THE TRUTH IN FAVOR OF THE CLINTON CAMPAIGN RHETORIC AND CALL WHAT WAS AN INVESTIGATION A MATTER -- ,QUOTE-UNQUOTE, -- A MATTER, INSTEAD OF USING THE WORD "INVESTIGATION" AT THE ORDERING BY THE --
IT CAME ABOUT BECAUSE OF THE ORDERING BY ATTORNEY GENERAL LYNCH.
AFTER A YEAR OF THE ENTIRE MIGHT OF THE UNITED STATES INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY AND THE F.B.I. LOOKING FOR EVIDENCE OF COLLUSION WITH THE RUSSIANS, WHERE IS THAT EVIDENCE? BUT AFTER ALL OF THIS CHAOS AND MOUNTAINS OF INNUENDO ABOUT THE PRESIDENT AND COLLUSION WITH RUSSIA, THE TRUTH FINALLY CAME OUT. THE F.B.I. WAS NOT INVESTIGATING PRESIDENT TRUMP IN THE RUSSIA PROBE. SO THE MEDIA WAS WRONG. SO THE DEMOCRATS WERE WRONG. SO THE WILD SPECULATION AND CONSPIRACY THEORIES ENDED UP HARMING OUR COUNTRY. THEY PLAYED RIGHT INTO RUSSIA'S HANDS. AND HOW DID WE ALL LEARN ABOUT THIS TRUTH? IN PRESIDENT TRUMP'S LETTER REMOVING MR. COMEY FROM OFFICE, AT FIRST MOST DIDN'T BELIEVE IT. THE MEDIA SCOFFED WHEN THEY WROTE WHAT THE PRESIDENT SAID IN THAT LETTER. THEY INSISTED THAT MR. COMEY WOULD NEVER TELL THE PRESIDENT HE WAS NOT UNDER INVESTIGATION. WELL, WE LEARNED EARLIER THIS MONTH FROM MR. COMEY HIMSELF THAT HE HAD DONE EXACTLY THAT. IT WASN'T A SURPRISE TO ME BECAUSE MR. COMEY HAD TOLD ME THE SAME THING. I HAVE TO NOTE SOMETHING ELSE HERE. MR. COMEY DIDN'T JUST TELL THE PRESIDENT, SENATOR FEINSTEIN AND ME THAT THE PRESIDENT WAS NOT UNDER INVESTIGATION. HE HAD ALSO TOLD THE GANG OF EIGHT. OF COURSE THE GANG OF EIGHT INCLUDES SENATE MINORITY LEADER, SENATOR SCHUMER. BUT EVEN AFTER MR. COMEY TOLD THE GANG OF EIGHT THAT THE PRESIDENT WAS NOT UNDER INVESTIGATION, THE MINORITY LEADER TOLD THE MEDIA THAT THE PRESIDENT WAS UNDER INVESTIGATION. AND OF COURSE THAT FURTHER HELPED FEED MEDIA HYSTERIA. THE MAJORITY LEADER EVEN TRIED TO -- OR THE MINORITY LEADER EVEN TRIED TO SAY THAT THE SENATE SHOULD VOTE ON THE SUPREME COURT NOMINATION BECAUSE A PRESIDENT WAS UNDER INVESTIGATION. AND THE WHOLE TIME HE KNEW IT WASN'T TRUE. SO MEDIA HYSTERIA AND BASELESS POLITICAL ATTACKS FILLED THE VACUUM LEFT BY MR. COMEY'S FAILURE TO INFORM THE PUBLIC TO BE TRANSPARENT, TO BE ACCOUNTABLE. THE ODD THING ABOUT IT IS NONE OF THIS FIASCO HAD TO HAPPEN IF MR. COMEY HAD JUST BEEN TRANSPARENT WITH THE PUBLIC, AS I UNDERSTOOD IT TO BE, IT COULD HAVE BEEN AVOIDED. UNFORTUNATELY, NOW IT LOOKS LIKE MR. COMEY AND THE MEDIA MIGHT BE DOING THE SAME THING TO ATTORNEY GENERAL SESSIONS. TO WEEKS AGO MR. COMEY SAID THAT HE DIDN'T TELL THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ABOUT THE CONVERSATION HE SUPPOSEDLY HAD WITH THE PRESIDENT ABOUT GENERAL FLYNN. MR. COMEY SAID, THIS WAS BECAUSE HE BELIEVED THE ATTORNEY WAS GOING TO RECUSE HIMSELF FROM THE RUSSIA INVESTIGATION. MR. COMEY SAID THE F.B.I. WAS AWARE OF THE FACTS THAT HE COULDN'T DISCUSS IN AN OPEN SETTING THAT COULD HAVE MADE THE ATTORNEY GENERAL CONTINUE ENGAGEMENT PROBLEMATIC. WELL, THAT VAGUE STATEMENT SOUNDS VERY MISS -- MYSTERIOUS TO PEOPLE WHO DON'T KNOW THE WHOLE TRUTH. THEY WILL WONDER WHAT WERE THESE SECRET FACTS? AND WHAT DID THE F.B.I. CONCLUDE ABOUT THOSE SECRET FACTS? WAS THE ATTORNEY GENERAL UNDER INVESTIGATION? DID THE ATTORNEY GENERAL COLLUDE WITH RUSSIA? ONCE AGAIN, MR. COMEY IS NOT BEING AS TRANSPARENT ABOUT SENIOR GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS AND THE RUSSIA INVESTIGATION AS HE COULD OR SHOULD BE. NOW THE SPECULATION IS RUNNING RAMPANT AGAIN, THIS TIME ABOUT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL. INSTEAD OF THE PRESIDENT. CNN REPORTED THAT MR. COMEY TOLD THE INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE BEHIND CLOSED DOORS THAT THE ISSUE WAS A POSSIBLE ADDITIONAL MEETING BETWEEN SESSIONS AND THE RUSSIAN AMBASSADOR. THE MEDIA HAS BEGUN TO SPECULATE ALL SORTS OF NEFARIOUS THINGS. SO HERE WE GO AGAIN. THE RUMOR MILL IS BACK IN BUSINESS. IT'S INSINUATING IMPROPER TIES WITH RUSSIANS AND UNDERMINING PEOPLE'S FAITH IN ANOTHER SENIOR GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS WITH ALSO THE FOLLOW-UP THAT IT ALSO UNDERMINES PEOPLE'S CONFIDENCE IN OUR INSTITUTIONS IN GOVERNMENT AND MAYBE EVEN IN OUR CONSTITUTION. THIS IS THE SAME DESTRUCTIVE PATTERN, AND IT PLAYS RIGHT INTO RUSSIA'S HANDS AGAIN. WELL, THIS TIME AROUND WE SHOULDN'T PUT UP WITH IT. WE OUGHT TO SAY ENOUGH IS ENOUGH. THERE'S NO REASON MR. COMEY COULDN'T HAVE TOLD THE PUBLIC THE WHOLE TRUTH. WEDNESDAY -- ONCE AGAIN THREEL MONTHS AGO MR. COMEY SPECIFICALLY TOLD MEMBERS WHO WAS AND WHO WAS NOT UNDER INVESTIGATION IN THE RUSSIAN PROBE. HE SHOULD ALSO TELL THE PUBLIC WHETHER THE F.B.I. EVER HAD AN OPEN INVESTIGATION ON ATTORNEY GENERAL SESSIONS. HE SHOULD TELL THE PUBLIC WHETHER THE F.B.I. CHECKED OUT THE TIMES SESSIONS MET THE RUSSIAN AMBASSADOR. HE SHOULD TELL THE PUBLIC WHETHER THE F.B.I. LOOKED INTO THE MAYFLOWER MEETING, THE MAY FLOWER HOTEL MEETING AND THE EVENT THAT WENT ON THERE. HE SHOULD TELL THE PUBLIC IF THE F.B.I. FOUND NOTHING IMPROPER ABOUT THESE MEETINGS. IF THERE WAS NOTHING TO IT, HE SHOULD SAY SO PUBLICLY. HE SHOULD NOT BE TELLING SENATORS ONE THING BEHIND CLOSED DOORS AND THEN MAKING PUBLIC INSINUATIONS THAT ARE DIFFERENT. HE IS THE PERSON THAT CAN NIP THIS RIDICULOUS SPECULATION IN THE BUD. MR. COMEY SHOULD HAVE TOLD THE PUBLIC EARLIER WHAT HE TOLD MEMBERS ABOUT THE PRESIDENT. AND NOW HE SHOULD TELL THE PUBLIC WHAT HE TOLD MEMBERS ABOUT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL. ENOUGH OF THIS NONSENSE. THE INVESTIGATIONS OF RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE AND OF CIRCUMSTANCES SURROUNDING MR. COMEY'S FIRING WILL CONTINUE. I'M CONFIDENT THAT WE WILL EVENTUALLY GET ALL THE FACTS ONE WAY OR ANOTHER. AND WE WILL GO -- WE'RE GOING TO GO WHERE THE FACTS TAKE US. IN THE MEANTIME, IT'S TIME TO STOP THE RUMOR MONGERING. IT'S TIME TO STOP THE INNUENDOS AND HALF-TRUTHS. IT'S TIME TO STOP LEAKING NATIONAL SECURITY INFORMATION TO SCORE POLITICAL POINTS. AND IT'S TIME TO STOP PLAYING INTO RUSSIA'S HANDS BY INTENTIONALLY SOWING FALSE DOUBT ABOUT YOUR POLITICAL OPPONENTS. INSTEAD IT'S QUITE OBVIOUS IT'S TIME TO GET BACK TO DOING THE PEOPLE'S BUSINESS. I YIELD THE FLOOR, AND I SUGGEST THE ABSENCE OF A
China called, they want the great wall o text back.
 
Most who voted for either Johnson or McMullin are not too concerned if Trump goes down and Pence becomes President.

A more conservative, albeit neo-con, administration like that of a Pence would be far more acceptable to real Americans.
What movie is that from?
 
Most who voted for either Johnson or McMullin are not too concerned if Trump goes down and Pence becomes President.

A more conservative, albeit neo-con, administration like that of a Pence would be far more acceptable to real Americans.
What movie is that from?
Keep telling yourself that.

Alt Right Tears.jpg
 
Most who voted for either Johnson or McMullin are not too concerned if Trump goes down and Pence becomes President.

A more conservative, albeit neo-con, administration like that of a Pence would be far more acceptable to real Americans.
What movie is that from?
Keep telling yourself that.

View attachment 135284
I do! To date it's all you got
The GOP, not the Dems, are running the investigations of Trump, his associates, and the Russians, and you ignore reality. That will make it hurt even more for you folks when the findings come out.
 
Most who voted for either Johnson or McMullin are not too concerned if Trump goes down and Pence becomes President.

A more conservative, albeit neo-con, administration like that of a Pence would be far more acceptable to real Americans.
What movie is that from?
Keep telling yourself that.

View attachment 135284
I do! To date it's all you got
The GOP, not the Dems, are running the investigations of Trump, his associates, and the Russians, and you ignore reality. That will make it hurt even more for you folks when the findings come out.
You said Romney was going to win. You said McCain was going to win. You said X and Y and Z would happen immediately if Trump were elected.

The AltRight Right are traitors to America and its ideals.
 
Respected Iowa Senator Chuck Grassley lambastes the treasonous--yes, treasonous--actions of the media and fellow senators Chuck Schumer and Diane Feinstein for their roles in the Comey/Russia circus. It's detailed and it's devastating. Schumer should be brought up on charges.


Dear God! Talk about bloviating! Does this guy get paid by the hour? I could have said as much in 30 seconds! Turn his fucking pacemaker up! And it was all about Comey, not Schumer or Feinstein. And again, totally absent any CONSEQUENCES for these people for what they did. Try going before the IRS and play circus with them like that. They won't say Tsk Tsk, shame, shame.
 
Most who voted for either Johnson or McMullin are not too concerned if Trump goes down and Pence becomes President.

A more conservative, albeit neo-con, administration like that of a Pence would be far more acceptable to real Americans.
What movie is that from?
Keep telling yourself that.

View attachment 135284
I do! To date it's all you got
The GOP, not the Dems, are running the investigations of Trump, his associates, and the Russians, and you ignore reality. That will make it hurt even more for you folks when the findings come out.
Dude, there is no investigation of trump. Sorry. There is only your movie the dems made
 
“If a nation expects to be ignorant & free, in a state of civilisation, it expects what never was & never will be. The functionaries of every government have propensities to command at will the liberty & property of their constituents. There is no safe deposit for these but with the people themselves; nor can they be safe with them without information. Where the press is free and every man able to read, all is safe.” - Thomas Jefferson -
 
Most who voted for either Johnson or McMullin are not too concerned if Trump goes down and Pence becomes President.

A more conservative, albeit neo-con, administration like that of a Pence would be far more acceptable to real Americans.
What movie is that from?
Keep telling yourself that.

View attachment 135284
I do! To date it's all you got
The GOP, not the Dems, are running the investigations of Trump, his associates, and the Russians, and you ignore reality. That will make it hurt even more for you folks when the findings come out.
You said Romney was going to win. You said McCain was going to win. You said X and Y and Z would happen immediately if Trump were elected.

The AltRight Right are traitors to America and its ideals.
Talking to yourself too special
 
“If a nation expects to be ignorant & free, in a state of civilisation, it expects what never was & never will be. The functionaries of every government have propensities to command at will the liberty & property of their constituents. There is no safe deposit for these but with the people themselves; nor can they be safe with them without information. Where the press is free and every man able to read, all is safe.” - Thomas Jefferson -
And then there are democrats
 
Should be interesting to see which Dem buckles first...
Mueller is after Trump.

Grassley can yell all he wants about Comey; it's Mueller he should be worried about. He's got a guy who can make witnesases "turn on friends, colleagues and superiors." This guy broke Enron apart in Houston in the day.

Mueller team lawyer brings witness-flipping expertise to Trump probes

Mueller team lawyer brings witness-flipping expertise to Trump probes
  • Andrew Weissmann is known for a skill that may come in handy in the investigation of Russian ties: persuading witnesses to turn on friends, colleagues and superiors.
  • Securing the cooperation of people close to Trump could be important for Mueller, who is investigating whether Trump himself has sought to obstruct justice.
 
Most who voted for either Johnson or McMullin are not too concerned if Trump goes down and Pence becomes President.

A more conservative, albeit neo-con, administration like that of a Pence would be far more acceptable to real Americans.


Ahh poor jakey can't handle his Messiah getting his legacy trashed


.
 
Grassley is astounding. He knows as well as I do that the matter of Trump's not being a "person of interest" in the "Russia" investigation and who else may be the subject(s) of it can be likened to that of the eye of a hurricane. There apparently is nothing going one with Trump himself, but all around him there are individuals who've misrepresented the mere fact of their having had dialogues with a known/suspected Russian spy, at least one of whom happens to be the ambassador.

Quite simply, if one's job necessarily calls for one to interact with the likes of Sergei Kislyak, and one knows from the briefings one received from the IC that Russia/Putin implemented a campaign to interfere in the U.S. electoral process, why attest to having had no contact with the man (or any other Russian official)? I mean really. Does one forget that such meetings are a natural part of one's job and that one has been doing one's job? I'm sorry, but I don't see one innocuous reason for misrepresenting basic binary facts the way several Trump Administration players have and in the climate in which they have done.

Consider the scenario where one and one's partner last night willfully participate in S&M intimacies that include striking one's partner, and one is asked did you hit someone yesterday. The truthful answer is "yes." The question wasn't did one strike another in anger; it was whether one struck someone. Answering truthfully allows one to explain the nature of the hit and move on. Answering untruthfully can lead to all sorts of other questions -- inquiries that didn't need to be pursued had one merely told the truth from the start -- if/when it's discovered that one did in all likelihood hit someone.

What's been going on with the Trump Administration and its key players is, right now at least, a matter of those individuals being discovered to have misrepresented simple truths, which in turn has engendered a storm of doubt and questions. This didn't need to be; and it wouldn't be had those individuals been unequivocal and honest in their remarks. But they didn't, and here we are.
 
“If a nation expects to be ignorant & free, in a state of civilisation, it expects what never was & never will be. The functionaries of every government have propensities to command at will the liberty & property of their constituents. There is no safe deposit for these but with the people themselves; nor can they be safe with them without information. Where the press is free and every man able to read, all is safe.” - Thomas Jefferson -
We desperately need to free the press from the iron-grip of the hostile and disloyal Jewish ethnic monopoly, agreed.
 

Forum List

Back
Top