Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Yes....they can call it whatever they want....and when they get caught lying about what it is...they can be held accountable for it.Liar. Nancy Pelosi called it an official impeachment *inquiry* which means they lied about the format they would follow.Sorry, this is an impeachment according to the Democrats, which puts this in a whole different ballpark.You're making false statements.
And Benghazi only took as long as it did because the Obama Administration lied about the causes.
And that's a discussion we could argue about all day too, however the point is the House had subpoena power to investigate to executive branch without calling the fabled "Impeachment Inquiry". Imagine if Obama had called for his appointees to ignore those subpoena's or tried to use Blanket Immunity to obstruct those investigations.
The Republicans made a point before of saying Obama wasn't the focus of the investigation, so they had the right to issue subpoenas to get to the truth. However, the Democrats are making all sorts of false claims the president did something illegal when the transcripts proved he wasn't. They're using a fake whistleblower to start an investigation based off of perjured testimony by the chairman doing the investigation.
It's okay for congress to subpoena witnesses if there is a reasonable suspicion of illegal acts, but they cannot issue them without probable cause....which is what they are doing. They lied about the process, the evidence, and about their direct contact and collusion with the whistleblower.
In the case of Benghazi Obama lied to the people of this country about the causes of the attack. He threatened witnesses with prosecution if they testified about what was really going on in Benghazi. He stonewalled and ignored requests for interviews from Republicans who threatened with subpoenas in various investigations.....but when they actually issued them Obama either asserted executive privilege or his witnesses claimed the 5th. You really have a short memory, dude.
They have never called it an impeachment. There are no articles of impeachment drawn up. The is no constitutional mechanism called an "Impeachment Inquiry". Furthermore, calling their investigation in the various committees doing the work and impeachment inquiry doesn't abrogate their subpoena power to investigate what they consider wrong doing by the administration.
It isn't an impeachment....as I have said repeatedly.
They had no right to use the word impeachment.
This is a yet another fraud perpetrated by Democrats on the public.
Now Nancy says they ain't gonna vote on an impeachment......and my guess is they never intended to.
Yawn. She can call it whateverthefuck she wants. They are certainly inquiring about possible impeachable offenses. Who exactly determines which words the Speaker of the House can use? Is there a book somewhere that lists the words they are not allowed to utter?
Do you think she meant "never" on impeachment?
Dreamer.
Liar. Nancy Pelosi called it an official impeachment *inquiry* which means they lied about the format they would follow.Sorry, this is an impeachment according to the Democrats, which puts this in a whole different ballpark.You're making false statements.So you think the House committees that investigated Benghazi didn't have subpoena power?
Sucks to be you.
Perhaps you think the endless investigations into Benghazi weren't driven by partisan politics too?
Kevin McCarthy, then in the running for Speaker of the House, said, "Everybody thought Hillary Clinton was unbeatable, right? But we put together a Benghazi special committee, a select committee. What are her numbers today? Her numbers are dropping...."
Of course it shows a pattern of behavior for the Republicans, why else would Trumpybear try to get the Ukraine to Trump up an investigation on Biden. It's worked in the past. Just the appearance is all that mattered.
And Benghazi only took as long as it did because the Obama Administration lied about the causes.
And that's a discussion we could argue about all day too, however the point is the House had subpoena power to investigate to executive branch without calling the fabled "Impeachment Inquiry". Imagine if Obama had called for his appointees to ignore those subpoena's or tried to use Blanket Immunity to obstruct those investigations.
The Republicans made a point before of saying Obama wasn't the focus of the investigation, so they had the right to issue subpoenas to get to the truth. However, the Democrats are making all sorts of false claims the president did something illegal when the transcripts proved he wasn't. They're using a fake whistleblower to start an investigation based off of perjured testimony by the chairman doing the investigation.
It's okay for congress to subpoena witnesses if there is a reasonable suspicion of illegal acts, but they cannot issue them without probable cause....which is what they are doing. They lied about the process, the evidence, and about their direct contact and collusion with the whistleblower.
In the case of Benghazi Obama lied to the people of this country about the causes of the attack. He threatened witnesses with prosecution if they testified about what was really going on in Benghazi. He stonewalled and ignored requests for interviews from Republicans who threatened with subpoenas in various investigations.....but when they actually issued them Obama either asserted executive privilege or his witnesses claimed the 5th. You really have a short memory, dude.
They have never called it an impeachment. There are no articles of impeachment drawn up. The is no constitutional mechanism called an "Impeachment Inquiry". Furthermore, calling their investigation in the various committees doing the work and impeachment inquiry doesn't abrogate their subpoena power to investigate what they consider wrong doing by the administration.
It isn't an impeachment....as I have said repeatedly.
They had no right to use the word impeachment.
This is a yet another fraud perpetrated by Democrats on the public.
Now Nancy says they ain't gonna vote on an impeachment......and my guess is they never intended to.
You're making false statements.So that explains Russian Collusion and the Ukrainian whistleblower complaint, but Benghazi and the emails don't fall under that definition.That is what is called is called a leading question. It also is one with no factual basis.
Democrats were only interested in obstruction, not in finding out the truth or exhonerating the Obama Administration
There is no exonerating anyone from a Conspiracy Theory. They morph like a virus.
- Something happened
- Somebody was guilty of a cover-up
- and Democrats refused to allow an investigation in congress
- So currently the DOJ is investigating all of the above as well as the criminal conspiracy to remove the president from office using illegal warrants.
So you think the House committees that investigated Benghazi didn't have subpoena power?
Sucks to be you.
Perhaps you think the endless investigations into Benghazi weren't driven by partisan politics too?
Kevin McCarthy, then in the running for Speaker of the House, said, "Everybody thought Hillary Clinton was unbeatable, right? But we put together a Benghazi special committee, a select committee. What are her numbers today? Her numbers are dropping...."
Of course it shows a pattern of behavior for the Republicans, why else would Trumpybear try to get the Ukraine to Trump up an investigation on Biden. It's worked in the past. Just the appearance is all that mattered.
And Benghazi only took as long as it did because the Obama Administration lied about the causes.
7 Benghazi Investigations happened because Republicans refused to believe that what you just posted, is a total lie. Every investigation report said that the Administration did not lie about the cause of the attack, and every chairman closed the report folder which said "No lies, no wrongdoing" and vowed to keep investigating until they found something.
5 years of investigation and not one lie that FOX News fed to you fools was ever proven to be true. Not one.
Liar. Nancy Pelosi called it an official impeachment *inquiry* which means they lied about the format they would follow.Sorry, this is an impeachment according to the Democrats, which puts this in a whole different ballpark.You're making false statements.
And Benghazi only took as long as it did because the Obama Administration lied about the causes.
And that's a discussion we could argue about all day too, however the point is the House had subpoena power to investigate to executive branch without calling the fabled "Impeachment Inquiry". Imagine if Obama had called for his appointees to ignore those subpoena's or tried to use Blanket Immunity to obstruct those investigations.
The Republicans made a point before of saying Obama wasn't the focus of the investigation, so they had the right to issue subpoenas to get to the truth. However, the Democrats are making all sorts of false claims the president did something illegal when the transcripts proved he wasn't. They're using a fake whistleblower to start an investigation based off of perjured testimony by the chairman doing the investigation.
It's okay for congress to subpoena witnesses if there is a reasonable suspicion of illegal acts, but they cannot issue them without probable cause....which is what they are doing. They lied about the process, the evidence, and about their direct contact and collusion with the whistleblower.
In the case of Benghazi Obama lied to the people of this country about the causes of the attack. He threatened witnesses with prosecution if they testified about what was really going on in Benghazi. He stonewalled and ignored requests for interviews from Republicans who threatened with subpoenas in various investigations.....but when they actually issued them Obama either asserted executive privilege or his witnesses claimed the 5th. You really have a short memory, dude.
They have never called it an impeachment. There are no articles of impeachment drawn up. The is no constitutional mechanism called an "Impeachment Inquiry". Furthermore, calling their investigation in the various committees doing the work and impeachment inquiry doesn't abrogate their subpoena power to investigate what they consider wrong doing by the administration.
It isn't an impeachment....as I have said repeatedly.
They had no right to use the word impeachment.
This is a yet another fraud perpetrated by Democrats on the public.
Now Nancy says they ain't gonna vote on an impeachment......and my guess is they never intended to.
BULLSHIT. The impeachment enquiry is whatever Congress, under Speaker Pelosi, decides it will be. There are no rules, no set procedures or processes.
Liar. Nancy Pelosi called it an official impeachment *inquiry* which means they lied about the format they would follow.Sorry, this is an impeachment according to the Democrats, which puts this in a whole different ballpark.You're making false statements.
And Benghazi only took as long as it did because the Obama Administration lied about the causes.
And that's a discussion we could argue about all day too, however the point is the House had subpoena power to investigate to executive branch without calling the fabled "Impeachment Inquiry". Imagine if Obama had called for his appointees to ignore those subpoena's or tried to use Blanket Immunity to obstruct those investigations.
The Republicans made a point before of saying Obama wasn't the focus of the investigation, so they had the right to issue subpoenas to get to the truth. However, the Democrats are making all sorts of false claims the president did something illegal when the transcripts proved he wasn't. They're using a fake whistleblower to start an investigation based off of perjured testimony by the chairman doing the investigation.
It's okay for congress to subpoena witnesses if there is a reasonable suspicion of illegal acts, but they cannot issue them without probable cause....which is what they are doing. They lied about the process, the evidence, and about their direct contact and collusion with the whistleblower.
In the case of Benghazi Obama lied to the people of this country about the causes of the attack. He threatened witnesses with prosecution if they testified about what was really going on in Benghazi. He stonewalled and ignored requests for interviews from Republicans who threatened with subpoenas in various investigations.....but when they actually issued them Obama either asserted executive privilege or his witnesses claimed the 5th. You really have a short memory, dude.
They have never called it an impeachment. There are no articles of impeachment drawn up. The is no constitutional mechanism called an "Impeachment Inquiry". Furthermore, calling their investigation in the various committees doing the work and impeachment inquiry doesn't abrogate their subpoena power to investigate what they consider wrong doing by the administration.
It isn't an impeachment....as I have said repeatedly.
They had no right to use the word impeachment.
This is a yet another fraud perpetrated by Democrats on the public.
Now Nancy says they ain't gonna vote on an impeachment......and my guess is they never intended to.
BULLSHIT. The impeachment enquiry is whatever Congress, under Speaker Pelosi, decides it will be. There are no rules, no set procedures or processes.
Graham has impeachment double standard
Nothing has changed.....The trump regime stonewalling Congress is Impeachable...
Our country is based in Checks and Balances.....Without that assurance....an Authoritarian system will rise.....
The stonewalling of Congress by trump and his thugs is turning the Constitution on its head....IT WILL BE ADDED TO THE ARTICLES IF IMPEACHMENT. trump WILLBE IMPEACHED.....Snakes deserve to be Impeached.
If the defiance goes to court....the trump regime will lose Bigly....
He has lost all the challenges to the subpoenas thus far.
He won't win in court. The constitution and truth aren't on his side.
Liar. Nancy Pelosi called it an official impeachment *inquiry* which means they lied about the format they would follow.Sorry, this is an impeachment according to the Democrats, which puts this in a whole different ballpark.And that's a discussion we could argue about all day too, however the point is the House had subpoena power to investigate to executive branch without calling the fabled "Impeachment Inquiry". Imagine if Obama had called for his appointees to ignore those subpoena's or tried to use Blanket Immunity to obstruct those investigations.
The Republicans made a point before of saying Obama wasn't the focus of the investigation, so they had the right to issue subpoenas to get to the truth. However, the Democrats are making all sorts of false claims the president did something illegal when the transcripts proved he wasn't. They're using a fake whistleblower to start an investigation based off of perjured testimony by the chairman doing the investigation.
It's okay for congress to subpoena witnesses if there is a reasonable suspicion of illegal acts, but they cannot issue them without probable cause....which is what they are doing. They lied about the process, the evidence, and about their direct contact and collusion with the whistleblower.
In the case of Benghazi Obama lied to the people of this country about the causes of the attack. He threatened witnesses with prosecution if they testified about what was really going on in Benghazi. He stonewalled and ignored requests for interviews from Republicans who threatened with subpoenas in various investigations.....but when they actually issued them Obama either asserted executive privilege or his witnesses claimed the 5th. You really have a short memory, dude.
They have never called it an impeachment. There are no articles of impeachment drawn up. The is no constitutional mechanism called an "Impeachment Inquiry". Furthermore, calling their investigation in the various committees doing the work and impeachment inquiry doesn't abrogate their subpoena power to investigate what they consider wrong doing by the administration.
It isn't an impeachment....as I have said repeatedly.
They had no right to use the word impeachment.
This is a yet another fraud perpetrated by Democrats on the public.
Now Nancy says they ain't gonna vote on an impeachment......and my guess is they never intended to.
BULLSHIT. The impeachment enquiry is whatever Congress, under Speaker Pelosi, decides it will be. There are no rules, no set procedures or processes.
Translation: The "inquiry" is nothing more than a political hackjob against a duly elected president. There will be no real outcome, nothing will come out of it and it will be a waste of taxpayer dollars yet again. It carries no weight whatsoever.
Republicans are embarassed and sheepish at the testimony of the government workers,Liar. Nancy Pelosi called it an official impeachment *inquiry* which means they lied about the format they would follow.Sorry, this is an impeachment according to the Democrats, which puts this in a whole different ballpark.
The Republicans made a point before of saying Obama wasn't the focus of the investigation, so they had the right to issue subpoenas to get to the truth. However, the Democrats are making all sorts of false claims the president did something illegal when the transcripts proved he wasn't. They're using a fake whistleblower to start an investigation based off of perjured testimony by the chairman doing the investigation.
It's okay for congress to subpoena witnesses if there is a reasonable suspicion of illegal acts, but they cannot issue them without probable cause....which is what they are doing. They lied about the process, the evidence, and about their direct contact and collusion with the whistleblower.
In the case of Benghazi Obama lied to the people of this country about the causes of the attack. He threatened witnesses with prosecution if they testified about what was really going on in Benghazi. He stonewalled and ignored requests for interviews from Republicans who threatened with subpoenas in various investigations.....but when they actually issued them Obama either asserted executive privilege or his witnesses claimed the 5th. You really have a short memory, dude.
They have never called it an impeachment. There are no articles of impeachment drawn up. The is no constitutional mechanism called an "Impeachment Inquiry". Furthermore, calling their investigation in the various committees doing the work and impeachment inquiry doesn't abrogate their subpoena power to investigate what they consider wrong doing by the administration.
It isn't an impeachment....as I have said repeatedly.
They had no right to use the word impeachment.
This is a yet another fraud perpetrated by Democrats on the public.
Now Nancy says they ain't gonna vote on an impeachment......and my guess is they never intended to.
BULLSHIT. The impeachment enquiry is whatever Congress, under Speaker Pelosi, decides it will be. There are no rules, no set procedures or processes.
Translation: The "inquiry" is nothing more than a political hackjob against a duly elected president. There will be no real outcome, nothing will come out of it and it will be a waste of taxpayer dollars yet again. It carries no weight whatsoever.
Yeah, keep thinking that. Have you even looked at the evidence? This is completely out of Trump and Barr's control. One of the Democrats commented that behind closed doors, Republicans are embarassed and sheepish at the testimony of the government workers, and the manner in which the Trump Administration is being portrayed.
You assholes are lucky this testimony isn't coming out in public. The lying, the slanders, the abuses of power. If even House Republicans are embarassed, I seriously doubt that you'll be very happy when what is being said is made public.
Yeah, if it made Republicans look bad it would be public. Telling that it's not, eh?
LMAO @ "no official impeachment..."There's no official impeachment...Pelosi knows that calling for a vote on that is political kamikaze attack...There is only the fake "impeachment inquiry" being run by the compulsive lying and leaking crapweasel Schiff....But the linked piece is from the hacks at Salon....GIGO.
Just more swill from one of the forum's top haters.
View attachment 284735
LMAO @ "no official impeachment..."There's no official impeachment...Pelosi knows that calling for a vote on that is political kamikaze attack...There is only the fake "impeachment inquiry" being run by the compulsive lying and leaking crapweasel Schiff....But the linked piece is from the hacks at Salon....GIGO.
Just more swill from one of the forum's top haters.
View attachment 284735
You may have just set new standards for denial.
