R
rdean
Guest
- Thread starter
- #61
But since he chose to become a republican he is brilliant. no?
no
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
But since he chose to become a republican he is brilliant. no?
Affirmative action incompetent Rhodes scholars, Magna Cum Laudes and Nobel prize winners? I give you an 85% chance racist dingbat hater dupe rating...change the channel. Pure sore loser Pubcrappe.
I figured you out.
You facing serious criminal charges and post here in the hopes the judges will accept your posts as part of your diminished capacity defense
I thought it was he is ignorant.
there is a fourth type.The mindless sheep are obvious. Harvard publicizes their honors graduates list, yearly. Now, theres three types of people:
Those who know that, because they do their homework and are not mindless sheep.
The mindless sheep who blindly accept that its a secret, and have not done backbresearch.
Conspiracy theorists.
Out yourselves, fools.
But since he chose to become a republican he is brilliant. no?
no
When I hear John McCain, who graduated 5th from the bottom out of a class of 899, calling Susan Rice, a Rhodes Scholar, "Not Very Bright", I just sigh and say to myself, "figures".
Not only that, the Republican Leadership is calling her "incompetent". This is the same party that let Bin Laden go, invaded Iraq, ruined the economy, helped move millions of jobs to China, blew it after Katrina and on and on.
Remember that OTHER Rice who suggested Iraq was developing nuclear weapons????? The one who said "No one ever thought of using passenger jets as weapons"?????? The one who with a report that said, "al Qaeda attack imminent"?????
So Susan Rice repeats the intelligence she is given because Republicans are playing politics with a national tragedy that happened 10,000 miles away in a country that just went through a revolution at an embassy Republicans had cut their security budget?????
And this coming from John McCain? A man whose father and grandfather, using "Rich White People's Affirmative Action" to get him into an academy where he graduated 5th from the bottom???? Out of nearly a thousand graduates???? Probabilities suggest he was the most stupid person in every class he was in.
Only Republicans could look at the most stupid person in EVERY SINGLE CLASS and say, "Wow, let's make them president". Only Republicans. No one else.
And they call someone else "incompetent". If they were wrong about EVERYTHING else, why would they be right now???? Short answer?
When I hear John McCain, who graduated 5th from the bottom out of a class of 899, calling Susan Rice, a Rhodes Scholar, "Not Very Bright", I just sigh and say to myself, "figures".
Not only that, the Republican Leadership is calling her "incompetent". This is the same party that let Bin Laden go, invaded Iraq, ruined the economy, helped move millions of jobs to China, blew it after Katrina and on and on.
Remember that OTHER Rice who suggested Iraq was developing nuclear weapons????? The one who said "No one ever thought of using passenger jets as weapons"?????? The one who with a report that said, "al Qaeda attack imminent"?????
So Susan Rice repeats the intelligence she is given because Republicans are playing politics with a national tragedy that happened 10,000 miles away in a country that just went through a revolution at an embassy Republicans had cut their security budget?????
And this coming from John McCain? A man whose father and grandfather, using "Rich White People's Affirmative Action" to get him into an academy where he graduated 5th from the bottom???? Out of nearly a thousand graduates???? Probabilities suggest he was the most stupid person in every class he was in.
Only Republicans could look at the most stupid person in EVERY SINGLE CLASS and say, "Wow, let's make them president". Only Republicans. No one else.
And they call someone else "incompetent". If they were wrong about EVERYTHING else, why would they be right now???? Short answer?
Still lying about the security budget, Deany?
"In testimony Wednesday before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, Charlene Lamb, a deputy assistant secretary of state for diplomatic security, was asked, “Was there any budget consideration and lack of budget which led you not to increase the number of people in the security force there?”
Lamb responded, “No, sir.”"
I figured you out.
You facing serious criminal charges and post here in the hopes the judges will accept your posts as part of your diminished capacity defense
I thought it was he is ignorant.
It's not physically possible to be THAT ignorant, it has to be a plot
When I hear John McCain, who graduated 5th from the bottom out of a class of 899, calling Susan Rice, a Rhodes Scholar, "Not Very Bright", I just sigh and say to myself, "figures".
Not only that, the Republican Leadership is calling her "incompetent". This is the same party that let Bin Laden go, invaded Iraq, ruined the economy, helped move millions of jobs to China, blew it after Katrina and on and on.
Remember that OTHER Rice who suggested Iraq was developing nuclear weapons????? The one who said "No one ever thought of using passenger jets as weapons"?????? The one who with a report that said, "al Qaeda attack imminent"?????
So Susan Rice repeats the intelligence she is given because Republicans are playing politics with a national tragedy that happened 10,000 miles away in a country that just went through a revolution at an embassy Republicans had cut their security budget?????
And this coming from John McCain? A man whose father and grandfather, using "Rich White People's Affirmative Action" to get him into an academy where he graduated 5th from the bottom???? Out of nearly a thousand graduates???? Probabilities suggest he was the most stupid person in every class he was in.
Only Republicans could look at the most stupid person in EVERY SINGLE CLASS and say, "Wow, let's make them president". Only Republicans. No one else.
And they call someone else "incompetent". If they were wrong about EVERYTHING else, why would they be right now???? Short answer?
Still lying about the security budget, Deany?
"In testimony Wednesday before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, Charlene Lamb, a deputy assistant secretary of state for diplomatic security, was asked, “Was there any budget consideration and lack of budget which led you not to increase the number of people in the security force there?”
Lamb responded, “No, sir.”"
House Republicans cut the administration’s request for embassy security funding by $128 million in fiscal 2011 and $331 million in fiscal 2012....Last year, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton warned that Republicans’ proposed cuts to her department would be “detrimental to America’s national security” — a charge Republicans rejected.
Ryan, Issa and other House Republicans voted for an amendment in 2009 to cut $1.2 billion from State operations, including funds for 300 more diplomatic security positions. Under Ryan’s budget, non-defense discretionary spending, which includes State Department funding, would be slashed nearly 20 percent in 2014, which would translate to more than $400 million in additional cuts to embassy security.
Breaking: It Turns Out That Protecting Our Embassies Costs Money
Only Republicans with their great "economic wisdom" can say, "Let's cut the budget. It won't affect anything". Or, "Cutting taxes won't add to the deficit". Or, "Give money to rich people and they will 'trickle down' on the middle class".
Just the law of averages tells us that eventually, they will be right about something. They can't always be wrong about everything. Can they? Is it possible to be wrong about everything all the time?
Affirmative action incompetent Rhodes scholars, Magna Cum Laudes and Nobel prize winners? I give you an 85% chance racist dingbat hater dupe rating...change the channel. Pure sore loser Pubcrappe.
I've met a ton of "academically bright" people who lacked any reasoning skills and were totally unable to translate their knowledge to real world cricumstances.
Rice should have said the attack was being investigated and she wasn't going to speculate on the cuase without more information, instead she continued with the pro-muslim line that Maobama fed her and she is likely to pay the price for it.
Being so bright, she should have recognized the oncoming bus.
Still lying about the security budget, Deany?
"In testimony Wednesday before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, Charlene Lamb, a deputy assistant secretary of state for diplomatic security, was asked, Was there any budget consideration and lack of budget which led you not to increase the number of people in the security force there?
Lamb responded, No, sir."
House Republicans cut the administrations request for embassy security funding by $128 million in fiscal 2011 and $331 million in fiscal 2012....Last year, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton warned that Republicans proposed cuts to her department would be detrimental to Americas national security a charge Republicans rejected.
Ryan, Issa and other House Republicans voted for an amendment in 2009 to cut $1.2 billion from State operations, including funds for 300 more diplomatic security positions. Under Ryans budget, non-defense discretionary spending, which includes State Department funding, would be slashed nearly 20 percent in 2014, which would translate to more than $400 million in additional cuts to embassy security.
Breaking: It Turns Out That Protecting Our Embassies Costs Money
Only Republicans with their great "economic wisdom" can say, "Let's cut the budget. It won't affect anything". Or, "Cutting taxes won't add to the deficit". Or, "Give money to rich people and they will 'trickle down' on the middle class".
Just the law of averages tells us that eventually, they will be right about something. They can't always be wrong about everything. Can they? Is it possible to be wrong about everything all the time?
Why do you continue to lie, Deany?
"In testimony Wednesday before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, Charlene Lamb, a deputy assistant secretary of state for diplomatic security, was asked, Was there any budget consideration and lack of budget which led you not to increase the number of people in the security force there?
Lamb responded, No, sir.
I've met a ton of "academically bright" people who lacked any reasoning skills and were totally unable to translate their knowledge to real world cricumstances.
Rice should have said the attack was being investigated and she wasn't going to speculate on the cuase without more information, instead she continued with the pro-muslim line that Maobama fed her and she is likely to pay the price for it.
Being so bright, she should have recognized the oncoming bus.
That's a bullshit lie and you know it. It's one of those things Republicans say to feel better about themselves. "Smart people have no common sense". Well, the truth is, stupid people have less common sense than anybody.
House Republicans cut the administrations request for embassy security funding by $128 million in fiscal 2011 and $331 million in fiscal 2012....Last year, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton warned that Republicans proposed cuts to her department would be detrimental to Americas national security a charge Republicans rejected.
Ryan, Issa and other House Republicans voted for an amendment in 2009 to cut $1.2 billion from State operations, including funds for 300 more diplomatic security positions. Under Ryans budget, non-defense discretionary spending, which includes State Department funding, would be slashed nearly 20 percent in 2014, which would translate to more than $400 million in additional cuts to embassy security.
Breaking: It Turns Out That Protecting Our Embassies Costs Money
Only Republicans with their great "economic wisdom" can say, "Let's cut the budget. It won't affect anything". Or, "Cutting taxes won't add to the deficit". Or, "Give money to rich people and they will 'trickle down' on the middle class".
Just the law of averages tells us that eventually, they will be right about something. They can't always be wrong about everything. Can they? Is it possible to be wrong about everything all the time?
Why do you continue to lie, Deany?
"In testimony Wednesday before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, Charlene Lamb, a deputy assistant secretary of state for diplomatic security, was asked, Was there any budget consideration and lack of budget which led you not to increase the number of people in the security force there?
Lamb responded, No, sir.
He stated that Charlene Lamb, the deputy assistant secretary for international programs, wanted to keep the number of U.S. security personnel in Benghazi artificially low. He said Lamb believed the Benghazi facilities did not need any diplomatic security special agents because there was a residential safe haven to fall back to in an emergency.
Lamb defended her assessment during the hearing, claiming that the team believed it had the "correct number of assets" in Benghazi at the time of the attack.
Ex-security officers testify about frustration at State Department over Libya security | Fox News
You guys know this is a witch hunt. Trying to nail someone on "sketchy" info. If they had the proper budget, they would probably have had more security. But even then, who knows what is going on in a country 10,000 miles away that just went through a revolution?
And look at Republicans. Who said "Who ever thought people would use a passenger jet as a weapon" and "invaded the wrong country".
Republicans are making themselves look ever more stupid to the American people. The more information that comes out, the more stupid they will look. And they don't even know it. The very definition of "stupid".
Affirmative action incompetent Rhodes scholars, Magna Cum Laudes and Nobel prize winners? I give you an 85% chance racist dingbat hater dupe rating...change the channel. Pure sore loser Pubcrappe.
I can't believe how much you covered in just a few words. Good job.
I've met a ton of "academically bright" people who lacked any reasoning skills and were totally unable to translate their knowledge to real world cricumstances.
Rice should have said the attack was being investigated and she wasn't going to speculate on the cuase without more information, instead she continued with the pro-muslim line that Maobama fed her and she is likely to pay the price for it.
Being so bright, she should have recognized the oncoming bus.
That's a bullshit lie and you know it. It's one of those things Republicans say to feel better about themselves. "Smart people have no common sense". Well, the truth is, stupid people have less common sense than anybody.
What were Obama's college grades?
I guess you told Rderp.When I hear John McCain, who graduated 5th from the bottom out of a class of 899, calling Susan Rice, a Rhodes Scholar, "Not Very Bright", I just sigh and say to myself, "figures".
Not only that, the Republican Leadership is calling her "incompetent". This is the same party that let Bin Laden go, invaded Iraq, ruined the economy, helped move millions of jobs to China, blew it after Katrina and on and on.
Remember that OTHER Rice who suggested Iraq was developing nuclear weapons????? The one who said "No one ever thought of using passenger jets as weapons"?????? The one who with a report that said, "al Qaeda attack imminent"?????
So Susan Rice repeats the intelligence she is given because Republicans are playing politics with a national tragedy that happened 10,000 miles away in a country that just went through a revolution at an embassy Republicans had cut their security budget?????
And this coming from John McCain? A man whose father and grandfather, using "Rich White People's Affirmative Action" to get him into an academy where he graduated 5th from the bottom???? Out of nearly a thousand graduates???? Probabilities suggest he was the most stupid person in every class he was in.
Only Republicans could look at the most stupid person in EVERY SINGLE CLASS and say, "Wow, let's make them president". Only Republicans. No one else.
And they call someone else "incompetent". If they were wrong about EVERYTHING else, why would they be right now???? Short answer?
Being smart doesn't mean a thing if you don't us it in a rational manner. The ability to learn does not equate to productivity.
Being stupid and irrational equates to the ability to parrot, it seems.
I don't know how many times I've corrected your lie. But you're not interested in the truth, as you have demonstrated so many times.When I hear John McCain, who graduated 5th from the bottom out of a class of 899, calling Susan Rice, a Rhodes Scholar, "Not Very Bright", I just sigh and say to myself, "figures".
Not only that, the Republican Leadership is calling her "incompetent". This is the same party that let Bin Laden go, invaded Iraq, ruined the economy, helped move millions of jobs to China, blew it after Katrina and on and on.
Remember that OTHER Rice who suggested Iraq was developing nuclear weapons????? The one who said "No one ever thought of using passenger jets as weapons"?????? The one who with a report that said, "al Qaeda attack imminent"?????
So Susan Rice repeats the intelligence she is given because Republicans are playing politics with a national tragedy that happened 10,000 miles away in a country that just went through a revolution at an embassy Republicans had cut their security budget?????
And this coming from John McCain? A man whose father and grandfather, using "Rich White People's Affirmative Action" to get him into an academy where he graduated 5th from the bottom???? Out of nearly a thousand graduates???? Probabilities suggest he was the most stupid person in every class he was in.
Only Republicans could look at the most stupid person in EVERY SINGLE CLASS and say, "Wow, let's make them president". Only Republicans. No one else.
And they call someone else "incompetent". If they were wrong about EVERYTHING else, why would they be right now???? Short answer?
Still lying about the security budget, Deany?
"In testimony Wednesday before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, Charlene Lamb, a deputy assistant secretary of state for diplomatic security, was asked, Was there any budget consideration and lack of budget which led you not to increase the number of people in the security force there?
Lamb responded, No, sir."
House Republicans cut the administrations request for embassy security funding by $128 million in fiscal 2011 and $331 million in fiscal 2012....Last year, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton warned that Republicans proposed cuts to her department would be detrimental to Americas national security a charge Republicans rejected.
Ryan, Issa and other House Republicans voted for an amendment in 2009 to cut $1.2 billion from State operations, including funds for 300 more diplomatic security positions. Under Ryans budget, non-defense discretionary spending, which includes State Department funding, would be slashed nearly 20 percent in 2014, which would translate to more than $400 million in additional cuts to embassy security.
Breaking: It Turns Out That Protecting Our Embassies Costs Money
Only Republicans with their great "economic wisdom" can say, "Let's cut the budget. It won't affect anything". Or, "Cutting taxes won't add to the deficit". Or, "Give money to rich people and they will 'trickle down' on the middle class".
Just the law of averages tells us that eventually, they will be right about something. They can't always be wrong about everything. Can they? Is it possible to be wrong about everything all the time?