Graduated 5th from bottom of 899 calls Rhodes Scholar - "not very bright"

When I hear John McCain, who graduated 5th from the bottom out of a class of 899, calling Susan Rice, a Rhodes Scholar, "Not Very Bright", I just sigh and say to myself, "figures".

Not only that, the Republican Leadership is calling her "incompetent". This is the same party that let Bin Laden go, invaded Iraq, ruined the economy, helped move millions of jobs to China, blew it after Katrina and on and on.

Remember that OTHER Rice who suggested Iraq was developing nuclear weapons????? The one who said "No one ever thought of using passenger jets as weapons"?????? The one who with a report that said, "al Qaeda attack imminent"?????

So Susan Rice repeats the intelligence she is given because Republicans are playing politics with a national tragedy that happened 10,000 miles away in a country that just went through a revolution at an embassy Republicans had cut their security budget?????

And this coming from John McCain? A man whose father and grandfather, using "Rich White People's Affirmative Action" to get him into an academy where he graduated 5th from the bottom???? Out of nearly a thousand graduates???? Probabilities suggest he was the most stupid person in every class he was in.

Only Republicans could look at the most stupid person in EVERY SINGLE CLASS and say, "Wow, let's make them president". Only Republicans. No one else.

And they call someone else "incompetent". If they were wrong about EVERYTHING else, why would they be right now???? Short answer?

This coming from the man who told us Sarah Palin was qualified to be President?
 
So Susan Rice repeats the intelligence she is given because Republicans are playing politics with a national tragedy that happened 10,000 miles away in a country that just went through a revolution at an embassy Republicans had cut their security budget?????
Still mindlessly repeating that lie, I see.
Only Republicans could look at the most stupid person in EVERY SINGLE CLASS and say, "Wow, let's make them president". Only Republicans. No one else.
What were Obama's college grades?

Why is "Frank Marshall Davis" listed as Obama's father on his real birth certificate?

Frank is a birfer?!!! :ack-1:
 
When I hear John McCain, who graduated 5th from the bottom out of a class of 899, calling Susan Rice, a Rhodes Scholar, "Not Very Bright", I just sigh and say to myself, "figures".

Not only that, the Republican Leadership is calling her "incompetent". This is the same party that let Bin Laden go, invaded Iraq, ruined the economy, helped move millions of jobs to China, blew it after Katrina and on and on.

Remember that OTHER Rice who suggested Iraq was developing nuclear weapons????? The one who said "No one ever thought of using passenger jets as weapons"?????? The one who with a report that said, "al Qaeda attack imminent"?????

So Susan Rice repeats the intelligence she is given because Republicans are playing politics with a national tragedy that happened 10,000 miles away in a country that just went through a revolution at an embassy Republicans had cut their security budget?????

And this coming from John McCain? A man whose father and grandfather, using "Rich White People's Affirmative Action" to get him into an academy where he graduated 5th from the bottom???? Out of nearly a thousand graduates???? Probabilities suggest he was the most stupid person in every class he was in.

Only Republicans could look at the most stupid person in EVERY SINGLE CLASS and say, "Wow, let's make them president". Only Republicans. No one else.

And they call someone else "incompetent". If they were wrong about EVERYTHING else, why would they be right now???? Short answer?


Audio: Clinton Tales​
http://clintoncrimes.tripod.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderfiles/Clinton%20Tales%20of%20Getting%20Bin%20Laden.wav


AIM Report #18 - Clinton Tales of Getting Bin Laden​

In recent commentaries we talked about how the Clinton administration had actually helped support Osama bin Ladens al-Qaeda terrorist organization. This was done partly through support of the Kosovo Liberation Army, the KLA, in its war against Serbia. The core of the KLA were radical Muslim Marxists who trafficked in heroin, and were linked to bin Laden. It was also done, arguably, as a geopolitical consideration, believing that the Taliban government of Afghanistan served American interests as a check on Iran.
Clintons actions as president have come under close scrutiny as journalists and politicians have begun to analyze how the U.S. was so vulnerable to the September eleventh attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. Recent articles by the Associated Press and the Philadelphia Inquirer have charged that the Clinton administration had opportunities to eliminate bin Laden, but failed to do so. The Inquirer article reported that the U.S. had for years both "the knowledge and capability to kill...bin Laden." It said that American special forces and CIA operatives had been in Afghanistan, but were prohibited by the White House from going after him.

Bin Ladens terrorist organization had been linked to the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, and to the 1998 bombings of the U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, for which he was indicted by the U.S. government. Clinton signed a policy directive authorizing the CIA to prepare a plan to get him. We attacked one of his camps in Afghanistan with cruise missiles and reportedly killing some of his supporters. Our missiles also destroyed an aspirin plant in Sudan owned by a Saudi businessman. It was targeted because it was believed to be a chemical-weapons plant owned by bin Laden.

The AP has reported that last December the Pentagon told President Clinton that they knew the location of bin Laden and could take him out. But Clinton decided it was too risky, and refused to authorize such an action. Clinton was asked by Fox News if this was true. He said it was not true and that his best shot was when he bombed bin Ladens training camp in 98. Several days later he told the London Times he had authorized bin Ladens capture or assassination two years ago, but the intelligence information needed to carry it out was never available.

Representative Dana Rohrabacher, a Republican from California, charged in a speech on the House floor on September 17, that the Clinton administration had secretly informed Pakistan and Saudi Arabia that it would not try to overthrow the Taliban. He had tried in vain to persuade the Clinton administration that this was a mistake and that the U.S. should be supporting the Northern Alliance, which has succeeded in keeping the Taliban from taking over all of Afghanistan.

Rohrabacher, an authority on Afghanistan, also said that he was going to see White House officials on September 11 to warn them that the Talibans assassination of Commander Massoud, the leader of the Northern Alliance, meant that bin Laden was going to do something so terrible that retaliation would be required. He was right, but his warning was too late.
Read more:
Clinton and Bin Laden

The agony of Susan Rice​


By: Rich Lowry

As it happens, the mouthpiece defense probably has a lot to it. Rice was aiming to please the White House in a high-profile audition. If she’s nominated, Republicans shouldn’t let the ritualistic cries of racism scare them off of holding her accountable. On the other hand, they shouldn’t get distracted from more important questions involving the president himself.

Was he apprised of prior attacks on the consulate, and what did he do with that information? When did he get the accurate account of the attack from the intelligence agencies? What did he do when he learned of the hours-long attack, and what orders did he give to help the besieged Americans?

We know in great detail the president’s involvement in the Osama bin Laden raid. But Benghazi has been a closed book. If the White House had a good story to tell, presumably the New York Times already would have reported the details in a 5,000-word front-page article built on leaks by anonymous administration officials.

Read the Article
The Agony of Susan Rice - Rich Lowry - National Review Online

we get it. :eusa_eh: You are quite good at cut 'n pasting from rw-friendly, sources. How about some of your own commentary asswipe?
 
Obama was magna cum laude at Harvard, so uh.....use your google if you need to know what qualifies as such.

Yup, but it's obvious he never learned a work-ethic suitable for the job and since his foreign and domestic policies are a soup-sandwich I don't see what all that education did to help us.

All of the learnin didn't teach him how to produce a workable budget.
 
Id have more respect for someone who tried and failed then someone who sits and hates and talks and wont go down in history...period.
Do you respect someone who tried and failed, and says his failures are successes or blames them on someone else, and says he's going to do the exact same things again, only they'll work this time, really?
 
obama's term as editor of the HLR ranks as the worst in all of Harvard's history. Probably because Harvard had to ignore their own rules by having an Editor who had never been published. obama never wrote a published paper, nor has he ever had a published review. His legal career was likewise unremarkable for never having progressed beyond being a second chair. obama was the quintessential affirmative action student and employee. His accomplishments are zero. But, because of this place and time, he is more than qualified to run an ineptocracy.

Obama was magna cum laude at Harvard, so uh.....use your google if you need to know what qualifies as such.

Affirmative action took care of any qualifications needed for obama.
...and...


The European Affirmative Action Committee handed Obama a Cracker Jack box with a Nobel Peace Prize in it....just in case he ever does something to deserve it.


What a goddamned farce!
 
USNA ranks their graduates based on academics, leadership and other factors.

Whereas Rhodes Scholars are political picks, especially a black female. A black female can get a Rhodes Scholar spot over a white male 99% of the time by being equal or slightly worse than the white male. White males have to really stand out compared to black females and black males like Obamination.

Oh, McCain was a Naval Aviator compared to a political bloward like Rice that has only moved up in life by being a black female without a criminal record, drug problems and out of wedlock kids.
 
The woman went out and absolutely lied for Obama.

The President who slept while his men were under attack and let them die.
 
Affirmative action. McCain may have profited as a legacy although he proved his worth in unspeakable trials, still, there is little doubt that liberal icons such as Rice, Holder and Obama would have been ambulance chasers and instead coasted until today without the fawning of the "progressive" educational system and media.
 
Affirmative action incompetent Rhodes scholars, Magna Cum Laudes and Nobel prize winners? I give you an 85% chance racist dingbat hater dupe rating...change the channel. Pure sore loser Pubcrappe.
 
William F "Bull" Halsey graduated at roughly the same level of his graduating class at Annapolis. Halsey still managed to earn his place in that pantheon of American heroes that saved the world.
How's your German or your Japanese? Or if you happen to be Jewish...... the questions that could be asked would be infinitely worse and more offensive.
As always "Its not the dog in the fight, its the fight in the dog."
 
Affirmative action incompetent Rhodes scholars, Magna Cum Laudes and Nobel prize winners? I give you an 85% chance racist dingbat hater dupe rating...change the channel. Pure sore loser Pubcrappe.

I figured you out.

You're facing serious criminal charges and post here in the hopes the judges will accept your posts as part of your diminished capacity defense
 
Last edited:
Affirmative action incompetent Rhodes scholars, Magna Cum Laudes and Nobel prize winners? I give you an 85% chance racist dingbat hater dupe rating...change the channel. Pure sore loser Pubcrappe.

I figured you out.

You facing serious criminal charges and post here in the hopes the judges will accept your posts as part of your diminished capacity defense

I thought it was he is ignorant.
 
When I hear John McCain, who graduated 5th from the bottom out of a class of 899, calling Susan Rice, a Rhodes Scholar, "Not Very Bright", I just sigh and say to myself, "figures".

Not only that, the Republican Leadership is calling her "incompetent". This is the same party that let Bin Laden go, invaded Iraq, ruined the economy, helped move millions of jobs to China, blew it after Katrina and on and on.

Remember that OTHER Rice who suggested Iraq was developing nuclear weapons????? The one who said "No one ever thought of using passenger jets as weapons"?????? The one who with a report that said, "al Qaeda attack imminent"?????

So Susan Rice repeats the intelligence she is given because Republicans are playing politics with a national tragedy that happened 10,000 miles away in a country that just went through a revolution at an embassy Republicans had cut their security budget?????

And this coming from John McCain? A man whose father and grandfather, using "Rich White People's Affirmative Action" to get him into an academy where he graduated 5th from the bottom???? Out of nearly a thousand graduates???? Probabilities suggest he was the most stupid person in every class he was in.

Only Republicans could look at the most stupid person in EVERY SINGLE CLASS and say, "Wow, let's make them president". Only Republicans. No one else.

And they call someone else "incompetent". If they were wrong about EVERYTHING else, why would they be right now???? Short answer?

Being smart doesn't mean a thing if you don't us it in a rational manner. The ability to learn does not equate to productivity.

Being stupid and irrational equates to the ability to parrot, it seems.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top