Government may seize your fingerprints to unlock apple devices federal court rules

[MindWars]

(SP) — A federal court ruled the United States government is not violating a citizen’s Fifth Amendment rights when they require a citizen to apply his or her fingerprints to a sensor so authorities can access a device.

Government May 'Seize' Your Fingerprint to Unlock Apple Devices, Federal Court Rules


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Just because these law creating pricks want to control you by making up some bs law doesn't mean the law is constitutionally right to do. They ( the courts) use terroristic bs to fear the sheep into accepting it , these courts use their power to say " WE WANT TO ACCESS YOUR PRIVATE" information the bastards that they are. Sheep can only say " but it's the law" so freaking what these idiots can make up anything as a law like ice cream will cause you to grow a freaking extra arm.

They said years ago SLAVERY was allowed ..............So uhmmm ok lets accept this bs from these paid of bastards too.

APPLE YOU NEED TO GET UP AND FIGHT BACK FOR THE RIGHTS OF THE PEOPLE AND YOUR USERS!! IN THE END PPL WILL WISE UP AND STOP USING THESE SMART PHONES ALTOGETHER.
( not sure that can happen , the stoppage of using them) lol.

 

[Penelope]

Good, unless you have something to hide.

 

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

Good, unless you have something to hide.

So you were a fan of the Patriot Act too?

 

[Ringel05]

Good thing I don't own anything Apple...........

 

[Skull Pilot]

Good, unless you have something to hide.

So you were a fan of the Patriot Act too?

If they get a warrant there is no problem.

 

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

Good, unless you have something to hide.

So you were a fan of the Patriot Act too?

If they get a warrant there is no problem.

As long as you are consistent.

 

[Ringel05]

In the OP's desire to share her paranoia will all she omitted this from her OMG rant;

The Supreme Court has held that authorities may compel displays of “physical features.” For example, a person may be forced to put on a shirt to see if it fits, provide a blood sample, submit to fingerprinting or photographs, or provide a voice or handwriting sample.

Oops........

 

[Skull Pilot]

Good, unless you have something to hide.

So you were a fan of the Patriot Act too?

If they get a warrant there is no problem.

As long as you are consistent.

A warrant should be provided for any type of search. Searches can include fingerprints and DNA. If just cause is found for the search a warrant will be issued.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

There is like using a photo for facial recognition. The court is correct.

 

[MindWars]

Good, unless you have something to hide.

So you were a fan of the Patriot Act too?

Oh hell no I sure in the hell wasn't lol.

 

[MindWars]

In the OP's desire to share her paranoia will all she omitted this from her OMG rant;

The Supreme Court has held that authorities may compel displays of “physical features.” For example, a person may be forced to put on a shirt to see if it fits, provide a blood sample, submit to fingerprinting or photographs, or provide a voice or handwriting sample.

Oops........

I'm sure you have enough brains left to know this isn't just an apple thing.

 

[MindWars]

Good, unless you have something to hide.

So you were a fan of the Patriot Act too?

If they get a warrant there is no problem.

Search » Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!

 

[JakeStarkey]

If the court grants a warrant, sure.

 

[Ringel05]

In the OP's desire to share her paranoia will all she omitted this from her OMG rant;

The Supreme Court has held that authorities may compel displays of “physical features.” For example, a person may be forced to put on a shirt to see if it fits, provide a blood sample, submit to fingerprinting or photographs, or provide a voice or handwriting sample.

Oops........

I'm sure you have enough brains left to know this isn't just an apple thing.

Given that response apparently you responded to the wrong post I made.......... considering it's you I'm not surprised.

Oh and responding to your response; no shit Sherlock. Did you figure that out on your own or did a sane person tell you?

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Good, unless you have something to hide.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

(SP) — A federal court ruled the United States government is not violating a citizen’s Fifth Amendment rights when they require a citizen to apply his or her fingerprints to a sensor so authorities can access a device.

Government May 'Seize' Your Fingerprint to Unlock Apple Devices, Federal Court Rules


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Just because these law creating pricks want to control you by making up some bs law doesn't mean the law is constitutionally right to do. They ( the courts) use terroristic bs to fear the sheep into accepting it , these courts use their power to say " WE WANT TO ACCESS YOUR PRIVATE" information the bastards that they are. Sheep can only say " but it's the law" so freaking what these idiots can make up anything as a law like ice cream will cause you to grow a freaking extra arm.

They said years ago SLAVERY was allowed ..............So uhmmm ok lets accept this bs from these paid of bastards too.

APPLE YOU NEED TO GET UP AND FIGHT BACK FOR THE RIGHTS OF THE PEOPLE AND YOUR USERS!! IN THE END PPL WILL WISE UP AND STOP USING THESE SMART PHONES ALTOGETHER.
( not sure that can happen , the stoppage of using them) lol.

It requires a warrant, dumbass.

And why are you standing up for people engaging in kiddie porn? Weren't you one of the retards pushing the phony Pizzagate conspiracy?

 

[Vastator]

(SP) — A federal court ruled the United States government is not violating a citizen’s Fifth Amendment rights when they require a citizen to apply his or her fingerprints to a sensor so authorities can access a device.

Government May 'Seize' Your Fingerprint to Unlock Apple Devices, Federal Court Rules


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Just because these law creating pricks want to control you by making up some bs law doesn't mean the law is constitutionally right to do. They ( the courts) use terroristic bs to fear the sheep into accepting it , these courts use their power to say " WE WANT TO ACCESS YOUR PRIVATE" information the bastards that they are. Sheep can only say " but it's the law" so freaking what these idiots can make up anything as a law like ice cream will cause you to grow a freaking extra arm.

They said years ago SLAVERY was allowed ..............So uhmmm ok lets accept this bs from these paid of bastards too.

APPLE YOU NEED TO GET UP AND FIGHT BACK FOR THE RIGHTS OF THE PEOPLE AND YOUR USERS!! IN THE END PPL WILL WISE UP AND STOP USING THESE SMART PHONES ALTOGETHER.
( not sure that can happen , the stoppage of using them) lol.

Good find! I'll handle this potential liability... Thanks for posting.

 

[MindWars]

Good, unless you have something to hide.

So if there's nothing to fear.....................then lets see you do this :

1. POST YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS
2. POST YOUR PASS WORD
3. GIVE US ALL THE PHOTOS YOU HAVE ON YOUR PHONE/COMPUTER/IPAD
4. GIVES US YOUR CHECKING ACCOUNT INFORMATION P.W. INCLUDED
5. GIVE US YOUR CREDIT CARD INFORMATION
6. GIVE US THE LOG IN INFORMATION TO THIS SITE
7. GIVES US THE ADDRESSES TO EVERYONE IN YOUR CONTACTS LIST
8. TELL US WHERE YOU LIVE
9. DON'T YOU LOCK YOUR DOORS AT NIGHT
10. GIVE US YOUR DRIVER LICENSE INFORMATION
11. CAN WE LISTEN TO YOUR PHONE CALLS

I HAVE A VIDEO FOR THAT.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Good, unless you have something to hide.

So if there's nothing to fear.....................then lets see you do this :

1. POST YOUR EMAIL ADDRESS
2. POST YOUR PASS WORD
3. GIVE US ALL THE PHOTOS YOU HAVE ON YOUR PHONE/COMPUTER/IPAD
4. GIVES US YOUR CHECKING ACCOUNT INFORMATION P.W. INCLUDED
5. GIVE US YOUR CREDIT CARD INFORMATION
6. GIVE US THE LOG IN INFORMATION TO THIS SITE
7. GIVES US THE ADDRESSES TO EVERYONE IN YOUR CONTACTS LIST
8. TELL US WHERE YOU LIVE
9. DON'T YOU LOCK YOUR DOORS AT NIGHT
10. GIVE US YOUR DRIVER LICENSE INFORMATION
11. CAN WE LISTEN TO YOUR PHONE CALLS

I HAVE A VIDEO FOR THAT.

I was pointing out to her that she is parroting a Nazi, you idiot.

 

[MindWars]

(SP) — A federal court ruled the United States government is not violating a citizen’s Fifth Amendment rights when they require a citizen to apply his or her fingerprints to a sensor so authorities can access a device.

Government May 'Seize' Your Fingerprint to Unlock Apple Devices, Federal Court Rules


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Just because these law creating pricks want to control you by making up some bs law doesn't mean the law is constitutionally right to do. They ( the courts) use terroristic bs to fear the sheep into accepting it , these courts use their power to say " WE WANT TO ACCESS YOUR PRIVATE" information the bastards that they are. Sheep can only say " but it's the law" so freaking what these idiots can make up anything as a law like ice cream will cause you to grow a freaking extra arm.

They said years ago SLAVERY was allowed ..............So uhmmm ok lets accept this bs from these paid of bastards too.

APPLE YOU NEED TO GET UP AND FIGHT BACK FOR THE RIGHTS OF THE PEOPLE AND YOUR USERS!! IN THE END PPL WILL WISE UP AND STOP USING THESE SMART PHONES ALTOGETHER.
( not sure that can happen , the stoppage of using them) lol.

It requires a warrant, dumbass.

And why are you standing up for people engaging in kiddie porn? Weren't you one of the retards pushing the phony Pizzagate conspiracy?

Grow a brain NO IT DOESN"T require a warrant in many states.


If the federal government had access to every email you’ve ever written and every phone call you’ve ever made, it’s almost certain that they could find something you’ve done which violates a provision in the 27,000 pages of federal statues or 10,000 administrative regulations. You probably do have something to hide, you just don’t know it yet.

Why 'I Have Nothing to Hide' Is the Wrong Way to Think About Surveillance