Government Cover-ups: Martin Luther King Jr.

[007]

Government Cover-ups: Martin Luther King Jr.


From the World Affairs Brief:

Martin Luther King was another public figure that was assassinated for the martyr effect. As the evidence below shows, the evidence of King's corruption, womanizing and Communist sympathies, we was becoming more a liability to the Civil Rights agenda than an asset. It was only a matter of time before King's reputation would self-destruct. By engineering his death and blaming it on a supposed racist, the Powers That Be could turn MLK into a hero. With the assistance of controlled judges, they could have his records sealed and make sure the public would not have access to the real Martin Luther King.

MARTIN LUTHER KING--THE MAN BEHIND THE MEDIA MASK

Every year America endures the same propaganda media-blitz on Martin Luther King day--the false portrayal of the “Reverend” King as an American hero; a saintly, self-sacrificing religious martyr for the cause of civil rights. He was everything but that and certainly no hero that any American should look up to. I have written extensively about the defense of true civil rights, no one can accuse me of hating the cause. I say this be way of introduction in anticipation of the fury my remarks will generate among the media attempting to perpetrate this growing myth upon American culture. Everything about Martin Luther King is a fraud. Here are the real facts.

Cover-up: Martin Luther King Jr.

 

[007]

I know... I realize most people are aware of this. It's the dirty little secret people like to just ignore. I mean hey, why not? Everybody is getting a day off work for it, so why not just blow it off and be happy? Yeah... who cares. The guy is dead.

 

[Mr. Shaman]

I know... I realize most people are aware of this. It's the dirty little secret people like to just ignore. I mean hey, why not? Everybody is getting a day off work for it, so why not just blow it off and be happy? Yeah... who cares. The guy is dead.

We can always rely on you....

....FAUX Noise fans....

....to crawl-out, from under your rocks, on MLK Day.​

 

[JakeStarkey]

MLK was not a communist or a socialist, although he may have become a socialist later in his life had he lived into the seventies and eighties. He was a womanizer, yes, and, he may have plagiarized part of his dissertation, yet. He also led and gave his life for civil rights, yes. He is truly an American hero and icon.

 

[ClosedCaption]

You can count on the cons to attempt to rewrite history every year about this time

 

[JakeStarkey]

You can count on the cons to attempt to rewrite history every year about this time

Not true cons, CC, like George Will. Reactionaries, yes, perversions from the foundations of the world, will lie about MLK.

 

[bodecea]

Government Cover-ups: Martin Luther King Jr.


From the World Affairs Brief:

Martin Luther King was another public figure that was assassinated for the martyr effect. As the evidence below shows, the evidence of King's corruption, womanizing and Communist sympathies, we was becoming more a liability to the Civil Rights agenda than an asset. It was only a matter of time before King's reputation would self-destruct. By engineering his death and blaming it on a supposed racist, the Powers That Be could turn MLK into a hero. With the assistance of controlled judges, they could have his records sealed and make sure the public would not have access to the real Martin Luther King.

MARTIN LUTHER KING--THE MAN BEHIND THE MEDIA MASK

Every year America endures the same propaganda media-blitz on Martin Luther King day--the false portrayal of the “Reverend” King as an American hero; a saintly, self-sacrificing religious martyr for the cause of civil rights. He was everything but that and certainly no hero that any American should look up to. I have written extensively about the defense of true civil rights, no one can accuse me of hating the cause. I say this be way of introduction in anticipation of the fury my remarks will generate among the media attempting to perpetrate this growing myth upon American culture. Everything about Martin Luther King is a fraud. Here are the real facts.

Cover-up: Martin Luther King Jr.

Always a good thing for those like you to very clearly self identify. Thank you. (if anyone had any doubt before...that is)

 

[007]

I see the usually cadre of liberal idiots are here in all their glorious denial...

 

[JakeStarkey]

Libs, mods, and cons, all of the good ones in America, honor King.

Those who troll him hate the principles of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence.

 

[g5000]

So what do we have? A preacher man who was a whoremongering plagiarist. Who also happened to lead the civil rights movement that changed America for the better.

That about sum it up?

 

[JakeStarkey]

So what do we have? A preacher man who was a whoremongering plagiarist. Who also happened to lead the civil rights movement that changed America for the better.

That about sum it up?

Yep, contradiction defines America.

 

[California Girl]

MLK was not a communist or a socialist, although he may have become a socialist later in his life had he lived into the seventies and eighties. He was a womanizer, yes, and, he may have plagiarized part of his dissertation, yet. He also led and gave his life for civil rights, yes. He is truly an American hero and icon.

He may have become a staunch conservative. Speculation is really not helpful to rational debate, Jokey. Seriously. It just isn't.

 

[JakeStarkey]

SillyGirl, you complain about speculation? Based on his track record, MLK would have probably become a socialist before he became a conservative, particularly as the Strom Thurmonds moved into the GOP. Of course, he still had those hardcore southern racist dems to contend with.

 

[Big Black Dog]

I thought it was common knowledge that the only reason he was at that hotel was to meet up with a white woman.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Never heard that, bbd, and if so, why is that germane to anything?

 

[California Girl]

SillyGirl, you complain about speculation? Based on his track record, MLK would have probably become a socialist before he became a conservative, particularly as the Strom Thurmonds moved into the GOP. Of course, he still had those hardcore southern racist dems to contend with.

He became a Christian, and his Doctorate studies (which the left seem to adore mentioning) are in systematic theology and philosophy.

You can say he might have become a socialist. I can just as easily claim that he may have become a conservative.

It is ridiculous and pointless to claim either. Because the man is dead. We will never know... and you cannot prove your opinion as being more valid than any other. It's jibberish.

 

[JakeStarkey]

SillyGirl, you complain about speculation? Based on his track record, MLK would have probably become a socialist before he became a conservative, particularly as the Strom Thurmonds moved into the GOP. Of course, he still had those hardcore southern racist dems to contend with.

He became a Christian, and his Doctorate studies (which the left seem to adore mentioning) are in systematic theology and philosophy. You can say he might have become a socialist. I can just as easily claim that he may have become a conservative. It is ridiculous and pointless to claim either. Because the man is dead. We will never know... and you cannot prove your opinion as being more valid than any other. It's jibberish.

Of course we can. It is jibberish to suggest otherwise. Looking at the totality of the man and his work, one can make reasonable conclusions. Reasonable, we can conclude he would not have become a conservative in that day and age.

 

[Katzndogz]

If you look at King's history, the real history not the crap we are forcefed. King was attracted to the communist party and appeared at quite a few communist events. He believed in the communist political goals. This is what brought him to the attention of Robert Kennedy who instructed Hoover to surveil him to find out how active King was in the communist party. Living through those days and looking back at them from a historical perspective, it seems that King was not communist, but a student of communisim. In his own writings he said that he was attracted to commumisim for what it offered but was essentially Godless. The atheisim of communisim repelled him and he rejected the communist party as inconsistent with his Church.

King thought the ideal society was a synthesis of both communisim and capitalisim. An economic capitalistic structure with a communist foundation. His synthesis of the thesis and antithesis is basically Marxism.

In his famous I have a dream speech, everyone knows that he had a dream in which his daughters would be judged by the content of their character not the color of their skin, Everyone knows that. We can all recite the "dream". That was not the entirety of the speech. Towards the end King expresses his REAL DREAM

"Communism forgets that life is individual. Capitalism forgets that life is social, and the kingdom of brotherhood is found neither in the thesis of communism nor the antithesis of capitalism but in a higher synthesis. It is found in a higher synthesis that combines the truths of both. - 1967

 

[JakeStarkey]

If you look at King's history, the real history not the crap we are forcefed. King was attracted to the communist party and appeared at quite a few communist events. He believed in the communist political goals. This is what brought him to the attention of Robert Kennedy who instructed Hoover to surveil him to find out how active King was in the communist party. Living through those days and looking back at them from a historical perspective, it seems that King was not communist, but a student of communisim. In his own writings he said that he was attracted to commumisim for what it offered but was essentially Godless. The atheisim of communisim repelled him and he rejected the communist party as inconsistent with his Church.

King thought the ideal society was a synthesis of both communisim and capitalisim. An economic capitalistic structure with a communist foundation. His synthesis of the thesis and antithesis is basically Marxism.

In his famous I have a dream speech, everyone knows that he had a dream in which his daughters would be judged by the content of their character not the color of their skin, Everyone knows that. We can all recite the "dream". That was not the entirety of the speech. Towards the end King expresses his REAL DREAM

"Communism forgets that life is individual. Capitalism forgets that life is social, and the kingdom of brotherhood is found neither in the thesis of communism nor the antithesis of capitalism but in a higher synthesis. It is found in a higher synthesis that combines the truths of both. - 1967

Based on the above, then the teachings of Piux XI, John XIII, and John Paul II would make them inevitably far lefties. In fact, they warned of the problems of both unregulated capitalism and collectivist Marxism. I visited a class taught by Angela Davis, and, guess what, I did not become a communist.

I doubt there is very little to suggest that King would have become a communist.

 

[California Girl]

SillyGirl, you complain about speculation? Based on his track record, MLK would have probably become a socialist before he became a conservative, particularly as the Strom Thurmonds moved into the GOP. Of course, he still had those hardcore southern racist dems to contend with.

He became a Christian, and his Doctorate studies (which the left seem to adore mentioning) are in systematic theology and philosophy. You can say he might have become a socialist. I can just as easily claim that he may have become a conservative. It is ridiculous and pointless to claim either. Because the man is dead. We will never know... and you cannot prove your opinion as being more valid than any other. It's jibberish.

Of course we can. It is jibberish to suggest otherwise. Looking at the totality of the man and his work, one can make reasonable conclusions. Reasonable, we can conclude he would not have become a conservative in that day and age.

Reasonably, no, we can not conclude that... we can not 'conclude' anything - it is nothing more than opinion. You cannot conclude from opinion. There are no facts on which to base a conclusion. Because he is dead. He was staunchly opposed to abortion (social conservative), he was staunchly for personal responsibility (conservative), he was many things - certainly not a perfect man... but I like my heroes with flaws. But no one party and no one ideology can claim him. He was a good American though. And, at least to me, that is the salient point.