Gov. Jerry Brown signs bill removing penalty for using gun in crime

[MindWars]

At the end of the latest legislation session Gov. Jerry Brown (D) signed a bill removing mandatory enhanced sentencing for criminals who use guns in the commission of their crimes.
Gov. Jerry Brown Signs Bill Removing Penalty for Using Gun in Crime | Breitbart


If you didn't think Democrats esp. this one wasn't a nut job this should seal that thought up for you.

This stupid sob must be doing it for the illegals/immigrants or something..

 

[MindWars]

Stay the hell there you leftards, my gawd you stupid ass will turn the states you flee to into the same bs you ran from like morons you can't seem to get that through your heads..

 

[pismoe]

they understand Mindwars ,

 

[william the wie]

The problem increasingly in the entire Blur Wall but California in particular is that the deduction caps have destroyed the real estate market and with mortgage rates expected to go past 5% soon the fire season will be year round.

 

[Tijn Von Ingersleben]

"Senate Bill 620 removed the mandatory enhancement for using a gun for crime. SB 620 removed the mandatory enhancement from the Penal Code and placed it at the discretion of the judge presiding over the case."

He didn't make it legal, he left it to the discretion up to the judiciary. There is a very distinct difference.
Additionally:
(d) Notwithstanding the limitation in subdivision (a) relating to being an element of the offense, the additional term provided by this section shall be imposed for any violation of Section 245 if a firearm is used, or for murder if the killing is perpetrated by means of shooting a firearm from a motor vehicle, intentionally at another person outside of the vehicle with the intent to inflict great bodily injury or death.
...
(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any person who, in the commission of a felony specified in subdivision (a), personally uses a firearm, shall be punished by an additional and consecutive term of imprisonment in the state prison for 10 years. The firearm need not be operable or loaded for this enhancement to apply.
(c) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any person who, in the commission of a felony specified in subdivision (a), personally and intentionally discharges a firearm, shall be punished by an additional and consecutive term of imprisonment in the state prison for 20 years.
(d) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any person who, in the commission of a felony specified in subdivision (a), Section 246, or subdivision (c) or (d) of Section 26100, personally and intentionally discharges a firearm and proximately causes great bodily injury, as defined in Section 12022.7, or death, to any person other than an accomplice, shall be punished by an additional and consecutive term of imprisonment in the state prison for 25 years to life.

Bill Text - SB-620 Firearms: crimes: enhancements.
So, If a person is killed or injured during the commission of a crime the previous still stands. I don't disagree with this.

 

[MindWars]

"Senate Bill 620 removed the mandatory enhancement for using a gun for crime. SB 620 removed the mandatory enhancement from the Penal Code and placed it at the discretion of the judge presiding over the case."

He didn't make it legal, he left it to the discretion up to the judiciary. There is a very distinct difference.
Additionally:
(d) Notwithstanding the limitation in subdivision (a) relating to being an element of the offense, the additional term provided by this section shall be imposed for any violation of Section 245 if a firearm is used, or for murder if the killing is perpetrated by means of shooting a firearm from a motor vehicle, intentionally at another person outside of the vehicle with the intent to inflict great bodily injury or death.
...
(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any person who, in the commission of a felony specified in subdivision (a), personally uses a firearm, shall be punished by an additional and consecutive term of imprisonment in the state prison for 10 years. The firearm need not be operable or loaded for this enhancement to apply.
(c) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any person who, in the commission of a felony specified in subdivision (a), personally and intentionally discharges a firearm, shall be punished by an additional and consecutive term of imprisonment in the state prison for 20 years.
(d) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any person who, in the commission of a felony specified in subdivision (a), Section 246, or subdivision (c) or (d) of Section 26100, personally and intentionally discharges a firearm and proximately causes great bodily injury, as defined in Section 12022.7, or death, to any person other than an accomplice, shall be punished by an additional and consecutive term of imprisonment in the state prison for 25 years to life.

Bill Text - SB-620 Firearms: crimes: enhancements.
So, If a person is killed or injured during the commission of a crime the previous still stands. I don't disagree with this.

Kind of like releasing 10,000 sex offenders it's just got that special little wording that looks good on paper but behind the scenes it's a different story.

 

[Deno]

"Senate Bill 620 removed the mandatory enhancement for using a gun for crime. SB 620 removed the mandatory enhancement from the Penal Code and placed it at the discretion of the judge presiding over the case."

He didn't make it legal, he left it to the discretion up to the judiciary. There is a very distinct difference.
Additionally:
(d) Notwithstanding the limitation in subdivision (a) relating to being an element of the offense, the additional term provided by this section shall be imposed for any violation of Section 245 if a firearm is used, or for murder if the killing is perpetrated by means of shooting a firearm from a motor vehicle, intentionally at another person outside of the vehicle with the intent to inflict great bodily injury or death.
...
(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any person who, in the commission of a felony specified in subdivision (a), personally uses a firearm, shall be punished by an additional and consecutive term of imprisonment in the state prison for 10 years. The firearm need not be operable or loaded for this enhancement to apply.
(c) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any person who, in the commission of a felony specified in subdivision (a), personally and intentionally discharges a firearm, shall be punished by an additional and consecutive term of imprisonment in the state prison for 20 years.
(d) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any person who, in the commission of a felony specified in subdivision (a), Section 246, or subdivision (c) or (d) of Section 26100, personally and intentionally discharges a firearm and proximately causes great bodily injury, as defined in Section 12022.7, or death, to any person other than an accomplice, shall be punished by an additional and consecutive term of imprisonment in the state prison for 25 years to life.

Bill Text - SB-620 Firearms: crimes: enhancements.
So, If a person is killed or injured during the commission of a crime the previous still stands. I don't disagree with this.

liberals are always soft on crime….

That’s why we have all the problems we have…

 

[Moonglow]

Uncle Hawkins is always short on relevant info and more about long winded rants...

 

[Moonglow]

"Senate Bill 620 removed the mandatory enhancement for using a gun for crime. SB 620 removed the mandatory enhancement from the Penal Code and placed it at the discretion of the judge presiding over the case."

He didn't make it legal, he left it to the discretion up to the judiciary. There is a very distinct difference.
Additionally:
(d) Notwithstanding the limitation in subdivision (a) relating to being an element of the offense, the additional term provided by this section shall be imposed for any violation of Section 245 if a firearm is used, or for murder if the killing is perpetrated by means of shooting a firearm from a motor vehicle, intentionally at another person outside of the vehicle with the intent to inflict great bodily injury or death.
...
(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any person who, in the commission of a felony specified in subdivision (a), personally uses a firearm, shall be punished by an additional and consecutive term of imprisonment in the state prison for 10 years. The firearm need not be operable or loaded for this enhancement to apply.
(c) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any person who, in the commission of a felony specified in subdivision (a), personally and intentionally discharges a firearm, shall be punished by an additional and consecutive term of imprisonment in the state prison for 20 years.
(d) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any person who, in the commission of a felony specified in subdivision (a), Section 246, or subdivision (c) or (d) of Section 26100, personally and intentionally discharges a firearm and proximately causes great bodily injury, as defined in Section 12022.7, or death, to any person other than an accomplice, shall be punished by an additional and consecutive term of imprisonment in the state prison for 25 years to life.

Bill Text - SB-620 Firearms: crimes: enhancements.
So, If a person is killed or injured during the commission of a crime the previous still stands. I don't disagree with this.

liberals are always soft on crime….

That’s why we have all the problems we have…

Care to elaborate since laws were made strict by both the GOP and Dems?

 

[Deno]

"Senate Bill 620 removed the mandatory enhancement for using a gun for crime. SB 620 removed the mandatory enhancement from the Penal Code and placed it at the discretion of the judge presiding over the case."

He didn't make it legal, he left it to the discretion up to the judiciary. There is a very distinct difference.
Additionally:
(d) Notwithstanding the limitation in subdivision (a) relating to being an element of the offense, the additional term provided by this section shall be imposed for any violation of Section 245 if a firearm is used, or for murder if the killing is perpetrated by means of shooting a firearm from a motor vehicle, intentionally at another person outside of the vehicle with the intent to inflict great bodily injury or death.
...
(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any person who, in the commission of a felony specified in subdivision (a), personally uses a firearm, shall be punished by an additional and consecutive term of imprisonment in the state prison for 10 years. The firearm need not be operable or loaded for this enhancement to apply.
(c) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any person who, in the commission of a felony specified in subdivision (a), personally and intentionally discharges a firearm, shall be punished by an additional and consecutive term of imprisonment in the state prison for 20 years.
(d) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any person who, in the commission of a felony specified in subdivision (a), Section 246, or subdivision (c) or (d) of Section 26100, personally and intentionally discharges a firearm and proximately causes great bodily injury, as defined in Section 12022.7, or death, to any person other than an accomplice, shall be punished by an additional and consecutive term of imprisonment in the state prison for 25 years to life.

Bill Text - SB-620 Firearms: crimes: enhancements.
So, If a person is killed or injured during the commission of a crime the previous still stands. I don't disagree with this.

liberals are always soft on crime….

That’s why we have all the problems we have…

Care to elaborate since laws were made strict by both the GOP and Dems?

The proof is in the pudding....

liberals are soft on crime...

Your support of blm is all the proof needed...

 

[Moonglow]

"Senate Bill 620 removed the mandatory enhancement for using a gun for crime. SB 620 removed the mandatory enhancement from the Penal Code and placed it at the discretion of the judge presiding over the case."

He didn't make it legal, he left it to the discretion up to the judiciary. There is a very distinct difference.
Additionally:
(d) Notwithstanding the limitation in subdivision (a) relating to being an element of the offense, the additional term provided by this section shall be imposed for any violation of Section 245 if a firearm is used, or for murder if the killing is perpetrated by means of shooting a firearm from a motor vehicle, intentionally at another person outside of the vehicle with the intent to inflict great bodily injury or death.
...
(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any person who, in the commission of a felony specified in subdivision (a), personally uses a firearm, shall be punished by an additional and consecutive term of imprisonment in the state prison for 10 years. The firearm need not be operable or loaded for this enhancement to apply.
(c) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any person who, in the commission of a felony specified in subdivision (a), personally and intentionally discharges a firearm, shall be punished by an additional and consecutive term of imprisonment in the state prison for 20 years.
(d) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any person who, in the commission of a felony specified in subdivision (a), Section 246, or subdivision (c) or (d) of Section 26100, personally and intentionally discharges a firearm and proximately causes great bodily injury, as defined in Section 12022.7, or death, to any person other than an accomplice, shall be punished by an additional and consecutive term of imprisonment in the state prison for 25 years to life.

Bill Text - SB-620 Firearms: crimes: enhancements.
So, If a person is killed or injured during the commission of a crime the previous still stands. I don't disagree with this.

liberals are always soft on crime….

That’s why we have all the problems we have…

Care to elaborate since laws were made strict by both the GOP and Dems?

The proof is in the pudding....

liberals are soft on crime...

Your support of blm is all the proof needed...

Want to show me where I have ever supported the BLM ? Or eat your own words like you do your own turds...

P.S. There are libs in both parties....gheesh...

 

[Deno]

"Senate Bill 620 removed the mandatory enhancement for using a gun for crime. SB 620 removed the mandatory enhancement from the Penal Code and placed it at the discretion of the judge presiding over the case."

He didn't make it legal, he left it to the discretion up to the judiciary. There is a very distinct difference.
Additionally:
(d) Notwithstanding the limitation in subdivision (a) relating to being an element of the offense, the additional term provided by this section shall be imposed for any violation of Section 245 if a firearm is used, or for murder if the killing is perpetrated by means of shooting a firearm from a motor vehicle, intentionally at another person outside of the vehicle with the intent to inflict great bodily injury or death.
...
(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any person who, in the commission of a felony specified in subdivision (a), personally uses a firearm, shall be punished by an additional and consecutive term of imprisonment in the state prison for 10 years. The firearm need not be operable or loaded for this enhancement to apply.
(c) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any person who, in the commission of a felony specified in subdivision (a), personally and intentionally discharges a firearm, shall be punished by an additional and consecutive term of imprisonment in the state prison for 20 years.
(d) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any person who, in the commission of a felony specified in subdivision (a), Section 246, or subdivision (c) or (d) of Section 26100, personally and intentionally discharges a firearm and proximately causes great bodily injury, as defined in Section 12022.7, or death, to any person other than an accomplice, shall be punished by an additional and consecutive term of imprisonment in the state prison for 25 years to life.

Bill Text - SB-620 Firearms: crimes: enhancements.
So, If a person is killed or injured during the commission of a crime the previous still stands. I don't disagree with this.

liberals are always soft on crime….

That’s why we have all the problems we have…

Care to elaborate since laws were made strict by both the GOP and Dems?

The proof is in the pudding....

liberals are soft on crime...

Your support of blm is all the proof needed...

Want to show me where I have ever supported the BLM ? Or eat your own words like you do your own turds...

P.S. There are libs in both parties....gheesh...

If you're a liberal you support them....

 

[Moonglow]

"Senate Bill 620 removed the mandatory enhancement for using a gun for crime. SB 620 removed the mandatory enhancement from the Penal Code and placed it at the discretion of the judge presiding over the case."

He didn't make it legal, he left it to the discretion up to the judiciary. There is a very distinct difference.
Additionally:
(d) Notwithstanding the limitation in subdivision (a) relating to being an element of the offense, the additional term provided by this section shall be imposed for any violation of Section 245 if a firearm is used, or for murder if the killing is perpetrated by means of shooting a firearm from a motor vehicle, intentionally at another person outside of the vehicle with the intent to inflict great bodily injury or death.
...
(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any person who, in the commission of a felony specified in subdivision (a), personally uses a firearm, shall be punished by an additional and consecutive term of imprisonment in the state prison for 10 years. The firearm need not be operable or loaded for this enhancement to apply.
(c) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any person who, in the commission of a felony specified in subdivision (a), personally and intentionally discharges a firearm, shall be punished by an additional and consecutive term of imprisonment in the state prison for 20 years.
(d) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any person who, in the commission of a felony specified in subdivision (a), Section 246, or subdivision (c) or (d) of Section 26100, personally and intentionally discharges a firearm and proximately causes great bodily injury, as defined in Section 12022.7, or death, to any person other than an accomplice, shall be punished by an additional and consecutive term of imprisonment in the state prison for 25 years to life.

Bill Text - SB-620 Firearms: crimes: enhancements.
So, If a person is killed or injured during the commission of a crime the previous still stands. I don't disagree with this.

liberals are always soft on crime….

That’s why we have all the problems we have…

Care to elaborate since laws were made strict by both the GOP and Dems?

The proof is in the pudding....

liberals are soft on crime...

Your support of blm is all the proof needed...

Want to show me where I have ever supported the BLM ? Or eat your own words like you do your own turds...

P.S. There are libs in both parties....gheesh...

If you're a liberal you support them....

You don't speak for me and no I don't...Go find someone you can manipulate so you can feel better about yerself...

 

[MrShangles]

"Senate Bill 620 removed the mandatory enhancement for using a gun for crime. SB 620 removed the mandatory enhancement from the Penal Code and placed it at the discretion of the judge presiding over the case."

He didn't make it legal, he left it to the discretion up to the judiciary. There is a very distinct difference.
Additionally:
(d) Notwithstanding the limitation in subdivision (a) relating to being an element of the offense, the additional term provided by this section shall be imposed for any violation of Section 245 if a firearm is used, or for murder if the killing is perpetrated by means of shooting a firearm from a motor vehicle, intentionally at another person outside of the vehicle with the intent to inflict great bodily injury or death.
...
(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any person who, in the commission of a felony specified in subdivision (a), personally uses a firearm, shall be punished by an additional and consecutive term of imprisonment in the state prison for 10 years. The firearm need not be operable or loaded for this enhancement to apply.
(c) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any person who, in the commission of a felony specified in subdivision (a), personally and intentionally discharges a firearm, shall be punished by an additional and consecutive term of imprisonment in the state prison for 20 years.
(d) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any person who, in the commission of a felony specified in subdivision (a), Section 246, or subdivision (c) or (d) of Section 26100, personally and intentionally discharges a firearm and proximately causes great bodily injury, as defined in Section 12022.7, or death, to any person other than an accomplice, shall be punished by an additional and consecutive term of imprisonment in the state prison for 25 years to life.

Bill Text - SB-620 Firearms: crimes: enhancements.
So, If a person is killed or injured during the commission of a crime the previous still stands. I don't disagree with this.

This way the liberal judge can us it against Americans and not illegal immigrants, sounds bout right.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Moonglow]

"Senate Bill 620 removed the mandatory enhancement for using a gun for crime. SB 620 removed the mandatory enhancement from the Penal Code and placed it at the discretion of the judge presiding over the case."

He didn't make it legal, he left it to the discretion up to the judiciary. There is a very distinct difference.
Additionally:
(d) Notwithstanding the limitation in subdivision (a) relating to being an element of the offense, the additional term provided by this section shall be imposed for any violation of Section 245 if a firearm is used, or for murder if the killing is perpetrated by means of shooting a firearm from a motor vehicle, intentionally at another person outside of the vehicle with the intent to inflict great bodily injury or death.
...
(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any person who, in the commission of a felony specified in subdivision (a), personally uses a firearm, shall be punished by an additional and consecutive term of imprisonment in the state prison for 10 years. The firearm need not be operable or loaded for this enhancement to apply.
(c) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any person who, in the commission of a felony specified in subdivision (a), personally and intentionally discharges a firearm, shall be punished by an additional and consecutive term of imprisonment in the state prison for 20 years.
(d) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any person who, in the commission of a felony specified in subdivision (a), Section 246, or subdivision (c) or (d) of Section 26100, personally and intentionally discharges a firearm and proximately causes great bodily injury, as defined in Section 12022.7, or death, to any person other than an accomplice, shall be punished by an additional and consecutive term of imprisonment in the state prison for 25 years to life.

Bill Text - SB-620 Firearms: crimes: enhancements.
So, If a person is killed or injured during the commission of a crime the previous still stands. I don't disagree with this.

This way the liberal judge can us it against Americans and not illegal immigrants, sounds bout right.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yes indeed, the law allows a judge to make a judgement..

 

[Deno]

"Senate Bill 620 removed the mandatory enhancement for using a gun for crime. SB 620 removed the mandatory enhancement from the Penal Code and placed it at the discretion of the judge presiding over the case."

He didn't make it legal, he left it to the discretion up to the judiciary. There is a very distinct difference.
Additionally:
(d) Notwithstanding the limitation in subdivision (a) relating to being an element of the offense, the additional term provided by this section shall be imposed for any violation of Section 245 if a firearm is used, or for murder if the killing is perpetrated by means of shooting a firearm from a motor vehicle, intentionally at another person outside of the vehicle with the intent to inflict great bodily injury or death.
...
(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any person who, in the commission of a felony specified in subdivision (a), personally uses a firearm, shall be punished by an additional and consecutive term of imprisonment in the state prison for 10 years. The firearm need not be operable or loaded for this enhancement to apply.
(c) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any person who, in the commission of a felony specified in subdivision (a), personally and intentionally discharges a firearm, shall be punished by an additional and consecutive term of imprisonment in the state prison for 20 years.
(d) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any person who, in the commission of a felony specified in subdivision (a), Section 246, or subdivision (c) or (d) of Section 26100, personally and intentionally discharges a firearm and proximately causes great bodily injury, as defined in Section 12022.7, or death, to any person other than an accomplice, shall be punished by an additional and consecutive term of imprisonment in the state prison for 25 years to life.

Bill Text - SB-620 Firearms: crimes: enhancements.
So, If a person is killed or injured during the commission of a crime the previous still stands. I don't disagree with this.

liberals are always soft on crime….

That’s why we have all the problems we have…

Care to elaborate since laws were made strict by both the GOP and Dems?

The proof is in the pudding....

liberals are soft on crime...

Your support of blm is all the proof needed...

Want to show me where I have ever supported the BLM ? Or eat your own words like you do your own turds...

P.S. There are libs in both parties....gheesh...

Do you consider your self a liberal?

 

[Deno]

"Senate Bill 620 removed the mandatory enhancement for using a gun for crime. SB 620 removed the mandatory enhancement from the Penal Code and placed it at the discretion of the judge presiding over the case."

He didn't make it legal, he left it to the discretion up to the judiciary. There is a very distinct difference.
Additionally:
(d) Notwithstanding the limitation in subdivision (a) relating to being an element of the offense, the additional term provided by this section shall be imposed for any violation of Section 245 if a firearm is used, or for murder if the killing is perpetrated by means of shooting a firearm from a motor vehicle, intentionally at another person outside of the vehicle with the intent to inflict great bodily injury or death.
...
(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any person who, in the commission of a felony specified in subdivision (a), personally uses a firearm, shall be punished by an additional and consecutive term of imprisonment in the state prison for 10 years. The firearm need not be operable or loaded for this enhancement to apply.
(c) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any person who, in the commission of a felony specified in subdivision (a), personally and intentionally discharges a firearm, shall be punished by an additional and consecutive term of imprisonment in the state prison for 20 years.
(d) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any person who, in the commission of a felony specified in subdivision (a), Section 246, or subdivision (c) or (d) of Section 26100, personally and intentionally discharges a firearm and proximately causes great bodily injury, as defined in Section 12022.7, or death, to any person other than an accomplice, shall be punished by an additional and consecutive term of imprisonment in the state prison for 25 years to life.

Bill Text - SB-620 Firearms: crimes: enhancements.
So, If a person is killed or injured during the commission of a crime the previous still stands. I don't disagree with this.

This way the liberal judge can us it against Americans and not illegal immigrants, sounds bout right.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yes indeed, the law allows a judge to make a judgement..

Yea, forget the law..

Leave it up to a liberal judge....

 

[MindWars]

Jerry Brown Signs Bill Ensuring Teachers Can't Shoot Back if Attacked | Breitbart

 

[airplanemechanic]

View attachment 177356

Jerry Brown Signs Bill Ensuring Teachers Can't Shoot Back if Attacked | Breitbart

I like that school, for the most part, one boy and one girl per table. Where was that when I was in school? Back then if you wanted to sit near a girl you had to be a teachers pet. And more girls than boys, that's a fun class. I never had that! LOL

 

[jwoodie]

So, If a person is killed or injured during the commission of a crime the previous still stands. I don't disagree with this.

So it all depends on how good (or bad) a shot the criminal is? Isn't threatening someone with deadly force during the commission of a crime good enough for you?