Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Hey, it's the "free market", what's wrong or illegal about the sale? We have good relations with Qatar, so what's really the big deal? Beck has his own network, it's available on satellite tv.
Do we know what Beck's offer was? How do you know it was "free market"?... particularly when the information sited tells us that Beck was refused for ideological reasons.
Who cares what Beck's offer was? Selling one's interest in a business is not part of the "Free Market"? A person can sell or not sell their interest in a business to who ever they want, that in itself is being free. Do you think that a person who has a large stake in Foxnews should sell their interest to Soros because he made them a larger offer than the Kock brothers?
Gore Turned Down Glenn Beck For Qatar
By Alana Goodman
03 January 2013
Glen Beck was too "right wing" - So Gore sold to "an authoritarian-Islamist government that has criminalized homosexuality, discriminates against non-Muslims, prosecutes journalists, and has a “Not Free” rating from Freedom House."
Before Al-Jazeera, there was Glenn Beck.
According to The Wall Street Journal, Glenn Beck’s media company, The Blaze, approached Current Media about a sale last year, but was told in the words of one source that “the legacy of who the network goes to is important to us and we are sensitive to networks not aligned with our point of view.”
In explaining the reasons for selling to Al-Jazeera, Current co-founder and CEO Joel Hyatt told the Journal that the Qatari-based broadcaster “was founded with the same goals we had for Current,” including “to give voice to those whose voices are not typically heard” and “to speak truth to power.”
Sure, Al Jazeera can “speak truth to power,” as long as the powerful are not in Qatar.
(Excerpt)
Read more:
Gore Turned Down Glenn Beck for Qatar « Commentary Magazine
Hey, it's the "free market", what's wrong or illegal about the sale? We have good relations with Qatar, so what's really the big deal? Beck has his own network, it's available on satellite tv.
Do we know what Beck's offer was? How do you know it was "free market"?... particularly when the information sited tells us that Beck was refused for ideological reasons.
And how is that not still a free market? It's Gore's company, he can do whatever he wants with it.
Do we know what Beck's offer was? How do you know it was "free market"?... particularly when the information sited tells us that Beck was refused for ideological reasons.
And how is that not still a free market? It's Gore's company, he can do whatever he wants with it.
Thats just like you liberal pukes... side with Al Jazeera.
Have you bought you a prayer rug yet?
And how is that not still a free market? It's Gore's company, he can do whatever he wants with it.
Thats just like you liberal pukes... side with Al Jazeera.
Have you bought you a prayer rug yet?
I'm not a liberal, and I'm not siding with anyone. It's Gore's company, he can do whatever he wants with it. But it's just like you conservo-pukes to try to dictate to other people how they should live and act, just because you don't like it.
Gore Turned Down Glenn Beck For Qatar
By Alana Goodman
03 January 2013
Glen Beck was too "right wing" - So Gore sold to "an authoritarian-Islamist government that has criminalized homosexuality, discriminates against non-Muslims, prosecutes journalists, and has a Not Free rating from Freedom House."
Before Al-Jazeera, there was Glenn Beck.
According to The Wall Street Journal, Glenn Becks media company, The Blaze, approached Current Media about a sale last year, but was told in the words of one source that the legacy of who the network goes to is important to us and we are sensitive to networks not aligned with our point of view.
In explaining the reasons for selling to Al-Jazeera, Current co-founder and CEO Joel Hyatt told the Journal that the Qatari-based broadcaster was founded with the same goals we had for Current, including to give voice to those whose voices are not typically heard and to speak truth to power.
Sure, Al Jazeera can speak truth to power, as long as the powerful are not in Qatar.
(Excerpt)
Read more:
Gore Turned Down Glenn Beck for Qatar « Commentary Magazine
The hypocrisy of your piss drinking isn't even funny any more.
Here is Bush chumming with the Emir of Qatar.
Hey, it's the "free market", what's wrong or illegal about the sale? We have good relations with Qatar, so what's really the big deal? Beck has his own network, it's available on satellite tv.
Nothing.
And of course if Gore were a republican this wouldnt be an issue.
Do we know what Beck's offer was? How do you know it was "free market"?... particularly when the information sited tells us that Beck was refused for ideological reasons.
Who cares what Beck's offer was? Selling one's interest in a business is not part of the "Free Market"? A person can sell or not sell their interest in a business to who ever they want, that in itself is being free. Do you think that a person who has a large stake in Foxnews should sell their interest to Soros because he made them a larger offer than the Kock brothers?
Yeah... he's free to sell to who he wants. And we're free to think he's crud because of it. Glenn Beck is a guy who believes that the U.S. Constitution means what it says. Compare that to Islamists who believe that apostates and homosexuals should be subject to the death penalty and women treated as chattel.
Hey, it's the "free market", what's wrong or illegal about the sale? We have good relations with Qatar, so what's really the big deal? Beck has his own network, it's available on satellite tv.
Nothing.
And of course if Gore were a republican this wouldnt be an issue.
Sure it would. The left would be throwing screaming fits.
Who cares what Beck's offer was? Selling one's interest in a business is not part of the "Free Market"? A person can sell or not sell their interest in a business to who ever they want, that in itself is being free. Do you think that a person who has a large stake in Foxnews should sell their interest to Soros because he made them a larger offer than the Kock brothers?
Yeah... he's free to sell to who he wants. And we're free to think he's crud because of it. Glenn Beck is a guy who believes that the U.S. Constitution means what it says. Compare that to Islamists who believe that apostates and homosexuals should be subject to the death penalty and women treated as chattel.
I agree, that you are free to do that, this is why we are on these forums. Glenn Beck is a guy that makes a show of it and states that he believes in it. Is that what Turkish people believe in? How about Lebanese people? Have there been any homosexuals put to death in Qatar solely because they were homosexuals? Are women treated as chattel in Qatar?
Thats just like you liberal pukes... side with Al Jazeera.
Have you bought you a prayer rug yet?
I'm not a liberal, and I'm not siding with anyone. It's Gore's company, he can do whatever he wants with it. But it's just like you conservo-pukes to try to dictate to other people how they should live and act, just because you don't like it.
Yes you are.... your siding with Al Gore and his choice to sell to a group that would lop his, and your dome off in a heartbeat.
Yes, its capitalism.... but this is MY freedom of speech as well.
I think Al Gore is a pathetic fuck, and a traitor as well.
Gore Turned Down Glenn Beck For Qatar
By Alana Goodman
03 January 2013
Glen Beck was too "right wing" - So Gore sold to "an authoritarian-Islamist government that has criminalized homosexuality, discriminates against non-Muslims, prosecutes journalists, and has a “Not Free” rating from Freedom House."
Before Al-Jazeera, there was Glenn Beck.
According to The Wall Street Journal, Glenn Beck’s media company, The Blaze, approached Current Media about a sale last year, but was told in the words of one source that “the legacy of who the network goes to is important to us and we are sensitive to networks not aligned with our point of view.”
In explaining the reasons for selling to Al-Jazeera, Current co-founder and CEO Joel Hyatt told the Journal that the Qatari-based broadcaster “was founded with the same goals we had for Current,” including “to give voice to those whose voices are not typically heard” and “to speak truth to power.”
Sure, Al Jazeera can “speak truth to power,” as long as the powerful are not in Qatar.
(Excerpt)
Read more:
Gore Turned Down Glenn Beck for Qatar « Commentary Magazine
The hypocrisy of your piss drinking isn't even funny any more.
Here is Bush chumming with the Emir of Qatar.
And Bush is relevant how too this topic??
Who cares what Beck's offer was? Selling one's interest in a business is not part of the "Free Market"? A person can sell or not sell their interest in a business to who ever they want, that in itself is being free. Do you think that a person who has a large stake in Foxnews should sell their interest to Soros because he made them a larger offer than the Kock brothers?
Yeah... he's free to sell to who he wants. And we're free to think he's crud because of it. Glenn Beck is a guy who believes that the U.S. Constitution means what it says. Compare that to Islamists who believe that apostates and homosexuals should be subject to the death penalty and women treated as chattel.
I agree, that you are free to do that, this is why we are on these forums. Glenn Beck is a guy that makes a show of it and states that he believes in it. Is that what Turkish people believe in? How about Lebanese people? Have there been any homosexuals put to death in Qatar solely because they were homosexuals? Are women treated as chattel in Qatar?
