Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
*yawn*
Even the predictable softball tosser, Bob Schieffer, doesn't believe you moonbats.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SJWclx7H2tg
What part of my post did I have wrong?
A complete and total lack of evidence, and expecting the accused to prove they are innocent instead of the accuser proving the accusation.
By the way, were you this upset when Obama took money from a Foreign Oil company, or do you reserve your fuax outrage only for groups that support Republicans?
Whoever sincerely thinks the Chamber isn't using foreign money has their head shoved up their ass.
They have spent more than 10 million on ads alone, for nearly all GOP candidates. They are using their general account, which solicits foreign money to fund these attack ads.
Of course they'll claim they have internal safeguards to make sure no foreign money goes to political ads, but of course, money is fungible. In other words, If they say they aren't using foreign money on our elections, they're full of sh-t.
TruthOut has a great article, explaining how they are doing it, and how they are getting away with it.
Of course, the usual RW subjects, Rove and the boys, have instead of adressing the issue, pointed fingers at "Soros" and ThinkProgress. What they fail to mention, is that ThinkProgress doesn't buy political ads. And they fully disclose their mission, instead of lying about it. Greg Sargent did an excellent fact-checking piece on this- The Plum Line - How about some fact-checks of Karl Rove's and right's falsehoods?
With all of these facts standing, only one, GOP candidate, that I know of, have called on the Chamber to disclose exactly who's funding these attack ads- Gloves come off in Senate debate
Everyone should be outraged over this. But instead, righties don't care. The chamber is the exact same lot of people who've funded efforts to block disclosure reform over and over. That oughta tell you something.
Your side is losing. Deal with it.
What part of my post did I have wrong?
A complete and total lack of evidence, and expecting the accused to prove they are innocent instead of the accuser proving the accusation.
By the way, were you this upset when Obama took money from a Foreign Oil company, or do you reserve your fuax outrage only for groups that support Republicans?
Nope. The chamber is using money to fund attack ads from their general account which solicits foreign money. Money is fungible. It's incredible how little you care about how foreign money is ruining our democracy.
Yeah, I actually was. Although I don't recall him spending 11 million on attack ads with foriegn money.
The C of C has made all the required legal disclosures.
The laws protecting lists of donors came about in the civil rights era when the State of Alabama targeted donors to the civil rights movement.
Obama is doing the same thing Alabama did.
Whoever sincerely thinks the Chamber isn't using foreign money has their head shoved up their ass.
They have spent more than 10 million on ads alone, for nearly all GOP candidates. They are using their general account, which solicits foreign money to fund these attack ads.
Of course they'll claim they have internal safeguards to make sure no foreign money goes to political ads, but of course, money is fungible. In other words, If they say they aren't using foreign money on our elections, they're full of sh-t.
TruthOut has a great article, explaining how they are doing it, and how they are getting away with it.
Of course, the usual RW subjects, Rove and the boys, have instead of adressing the issue, pointed fingers at "Soros" and ThinkProgress. What they fail to mention, is that ThinkProgress doesn't buy political ads. And they fully disclose their mission, instead of lying about it. Greg Sargent did an excellent fact-checking piece on this- The Plum Line - How about some fact-checks of Karl Rove's and right's falsehoods?
With all of these facts standing, only one, GOP candidate, that I know of, have called on the Chamber to disclose exactly who's funding these attack ads- Gloves come off in Senate debate
Everyone should be outraged over this. But instead, righties don't care. The chamber is the exact same lot of people who've funded efforts to block disclosure reform over and over. That oughta tell you something.
Your side is losing. Deal with it.
Losing to what? Foriegn money? The money the chamber is pouring in is unprecedented! Why would they refuse to release who's funding 'em? Something to hide?
What part of my post did I have wrong?
A complete and total lack of evidence, and expecting the accused to prove they are innocent instead of the accuser proving the accusation.
By the way, were you this upset when Obama took money from a Foreign Oil company, or do you reserve your fuax outrage only for groups that support Republicans?
Nope. The chamber is using money to fund attack ads from their general account which solicits foreign money. Money is fungible. It's incredible how little you care about how foreign money is ruining our democracy.
Yeah, I actually was. Although I don't recall him spending 11 million on attack ads with foriegn money.
The C of C has made all the required legal disclosures.
The laws protecting lists of donors came about in the civil rights era when the State of Alabama targeted donors to the civil rights movement.
Obama is doing the same thing Alabama did.
So it doesn't bother you one bit that they'd use foriegn money to try to win this election? It's a violation of federal election laws to use outside money to fund attack ads. Doesn't it bother you?
Doesn't it bother you that the C of C is being asked to prove their innocence, based upon nothing more substantial than the spurious and specious charge, as though we're in Soviet Russia?The C of C has made all the required legal disclosures.
The laws protecting lists of donors came about in the civil rights era when the State of Alabama targeted donors to the civil rights movement.
Obama is doing the same thing Alabama did.
So it doesn't bother you one bit that they'd use foriegn money to try to win this election? It's a violation of federal election laws to use outside money to fund attack ads. Doesn't it bother you?
The C of C has made all the required legal disclosures.
The laws protecting lists of donors came about in the civil rights era when the State of Alabama targeted donors to the civil rights movement.
Obama is doing the same thing Alabama did.
So it doesn't bother you one bit that they'd use foriegn money to try to win this election? It's a violation of federal election laws to use outside money to fund attack ads. Doesn't it bother you?
The US CoC has created more Jobs than every politician combined could dream of doing. Yet because of Obama they are now public Enemy number 1.
To funny.
The US CoC has created more Jobs than every politician combined could dream of doing. Yet because of Obama they are now public Enemy number 1.
To funny.
Even local chambers are running from the corporate-funded US Chamber. They realize the US COC doesn't represent small business, they represent the huge corporations.
I've gotta run for now, but please, continue with your show of support for the foreign-funded COC. I'm sure they love you back. Although they'd love nothing more than to ship your jobs overseas.
Ha, I'll bb on later.
LOL..... what a bunch of Hypocrites Obama and Axelrod are. I guess Obama forgot he has a reception with them after the elections:Whoever sincerely thinks the Chamber isn't using foreign money has their head shoved up their ass.
They have spent more than 10 million on ads alone, for nearly all GOP candidates. They are using their general account, which solicits foreign money to fund these attack ads.
Of course they'll claim they have internal safeguards to make sure no foreign money goes to political ads, but of course, money is fungible. In other words, If they say they aren't using foreign money on our elections, they're full of sh-t.
TruthOut has a great article, explaining how they are doing it, and how they are getting away with it.
Of course, the usual RW subjects, Rove and the boys, have instead of adressing the issue, pointed fingers at "Soros" and ThinkProgress. What they fail to mention, is that ThinkProgress doesn't buy political ads. And they fully disclose their mission, instead of lying about it. Greg Sargent did an excellent fact-checking piece on this- The Plum Line - How about some fact-checks of Karl Rove's and right's falsehoods?
With all of these facts standing, only one, GOP candidate, that I know of, have called on the Chamber to disclose exactly who's funding these attack ads- Gloves come off in Senate debate
Everyone should be outraged over this. But instead, righties don't care. The chamber is the exact same lot of people who've funded efforts to block disclosure reform over and over. That oughta tell you something.
Your side is losing. Deal with it.
Losing to what? Foriegn money? The money the chamber is pouring in is unprecedented! Why would they refuse to release who's funding 'em? Something to hide?
