Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
No, as usual. Any more than Argentina is a theocracy because it establishes the Roman Church as its official religion.As usual the rabbi ignores backing up his own bullshit.
If people are too dumb to go back and research it (hell, too dumb to look it up on Wiki) then engaging in discussion would be fruitless.
Iran is a theocracy. Iraq is not. Your inability to differentiate the two might be your problem.
Okay so I took your advice and looked up iran's constitution. So you're saying it's a theocracy because it says:
"Islam is the official religion of the State and it is a fundamental source of legislation."
Http://www.iranonline.com/iran/iran-info/government/constitution-1.html
Is that correct?
Acknowledging contributions from Mesopotamia's history and recognizing Iraq's first theocracy are exclusive. Would you say the US existed in 1247 because the river we now call the Mississippi was there?
Wow, here you are hoping the Iraqis fail. What a cold heart you have.
Does having your head surrounded by rectum make it difficult to breathe?
What's your experience been? I'm not the one who could not place the 14th Amendment in the correct century.
How? The existence of councils of puppet scholars in self-proclaimed "Islamic" states does not, in my mind, mean that a clergy is permitted to exist by Islam itself. Ijtihad isn't a privilege reserved for a cabal of old men despite what some governments may believe.That's painful hairsplitting borderlining intellectual dishonesty because you're trying to use theological concepts to ignore ruling classes.
Iraq isn't fully secular; you're right. My views of governance in the Islamic world are simply very black and white. A society which isn't fully Islamic is un-Islamic.Iraq doesn't have a secular government. It's absolutely impossible considering a Religion is cited as the supreme law of the land and all legislation will be based on that Religion. You may not like the perversions you see in the invention of hierarchies but that doesn't mean they don't exist.
Of the three largest minorities, Kurds, Shiites and Sunnis, my understanding is the Sunnis are the smallest.
We know that the Kurd religion is actually a sect of the Sunnis. So you would expect them, politically, to work together. However, the Kurds were mistreated terribly under Saddam.
My feeling is the Kurds will actually, eventually side, politically with the Shiites and the Sunnis will be marginalized.
Things are still being sorted out. Eventually, you will see a Shiite "cleric" in charge. Once the Christians have been completely wiped out, they will turn on the Sunnis.
I don't see it happening any other way.
No, as usual. Any more than Argentina is a theocracy because it establishes the Roman Church as its official religion.If people are too dumb to go back and research it (hell, too dumb to look it up on Wiki) then engaging in discussion would be fruitless.
Iran is a theocracy. Iraq is not. Your inability to differentiate the two might be your problem.
Okay so I took your advice and looked up iran's constitution. So you're saying it's a theocracy because it says:
"Islam is the official religion of the State and it is a fundamental source of legislation."
Http://www.iranonline.com/iran/iran-info/government/constitution-1.html
Is that correct?
Iran is a theocracy because it is run by the mullahs. Iran is the one with the N at the end. Iraq has a Q at the end. This might be the source of your confusion.
As usual the rabbi ignores backing up his own bullshit.
If people are too dumb to go back and research it (hell, too dumb to look it up on Wiki) then engaging in discussion would be fruitless.
Iran is a theocracy. Iraq is not. Your inability to differentiate the two might be your problem.
Okay so I took your advice and looked up iran's constitution. So you're saying it's a theocracy because it says:
"Islam is the official religion of the State and it is a fundamental source of legislation."
Http://www.iranonline.com/iran/iran-info/government/constitution-1.html
Is that correct?
Of the three largest minorities, Kurds, Shiites and Sunnis, my understanding is the Sunnis are the smallest.
We know that the Kurd religion is actually a sect of the Sunnis. So you would expect them, politically, to work together. However, the Kurds were mistreated terribly under Saddam.
My feeling is the Kurds will actually, eventually side, politically with the Shiites and the Sunnis will be marginalized.
Things are still being sorted out. Eventually, you will see a Shiite "cleric" in charge. Once the Christians have been completely wiped out, they will turn on the Sunnis.
I don't see it happening any other way.
Sunnis make up over one third of the Iraqi population and are about one half Kurdish and one half Arab. By comparison, 8% of Iran is Sunni. To me, the likelihood of a second Iran seems very slim.
If people are too dumb to go back and research it (hell, too dumb to look it up on Wiki) then engaging in discussion would be fruitless.
Iran is a theocracy. Iraq is not. Your inability to differentiate the two might be your problem.
Okay so I took your advice and looked up iran's constitution. So you're saying it's a theocracy because it says:
"Islam is the official religion of the State and it is a fundamental source of legislation."
Http://www.iranonline.com/iran/iran-info/government/constitution-1.html
Is that correct?
If the religion is the law what would you call it if not a Theocracy?
No, as usual. Any more than Argentina is a theocracy because it establishes the Roman Church as its official religion.If people are too dumb to go back and research it (hell, too dumb to look it up on Wiki) then engaging in discussion would be fruitless.
Iran is a theocracy. Iraq is not. Your inability to differentiate the two might be your problem.
Okay so I took your advice and looked up iran's constitution. So you're saying it's a theocracy because it says:
"Islam is the official religion of the State and it is a fundamental source of legislation."
Http://www.iranonline.com/iran/iran-info/government/constitution-1.html
Is that correct?
Iran is a theocracy because it is run by the mullahs. Iran is the one with the N at the end. Iraq has a Q at the end. This might be the source of your confusion.
No, as usual. Any more than Argentina is a theocracy because it establishes the Roman Church as its official religion.Okay so I took your advice and looked up iran's constitution. So you're saying it's a theocracy because it says:
"Islam is the official religion of the State and it is a fundamental source of legislation."
Http://www.iranonline.com/iran/iran-info/government/constitution-1.html
Is that correct?
Iran is a theocracy because it is run by the mullahs. Iran is the one with the N at the end. Iraq has a Q at the end. This might be the source of your confusion.
Show us where Argentina claims the RCC is its official State religion and is a fundamental source of legislation. Or is this another claim you will not back up?
No, as usual. Any more than Argentina is a theocracy because it establishes the Roman Church as its official religion.
Iran is a theocracy because it is run by the mullahs. Iran is the one with the N at the end. Iraq has a Q at the end. This might be the source of your confusion.
Show us where Argentina claims the RCC is its official State religion and is a fundamental source of legislation. Or is this another claim you will not back up?
It's already been quoted dumbshit. Do you think IRan is NOT a theocracy?
No, as usual. Any more than Argentina is a theocracy because it establishes the Roman Church as its official religion.
Iran is a theocracy because it is run by the mullahs. Iran is the one with the N at the end. Iraq has a Q at the end. This might be the source of your confusion.
Show us where Argentina claims the RCC is its official State religion and is a fundamental source of legislation. Or is this another claim you will not back up?
It's already been quoted dumbshit. Do you think IRan is NOT a theocracy?
Show us where Argentina claims the RCC is its official State religion and is a fundamental source of legislation. Or is this another claim you will not back up?
It's already been quoted dumbshit. Do you think IRan is NOT a theocracy?
Show us where Argentina claims the RCC is its official State religion and is a fundamental source of legislation. Or is this another claim you will not back up?
It's already been quoted dumbshit. Do you think IRan is NOT a theocracy?
Show us where Argentina claims the RCC is its official State religion and is a fundamental source of legislation. Or is this another claim you will not back up?
Already done.
Do you think Iran is NOT a theocracy?
Show us where Argentina claims the RCC is its official State religion and is a fundamental source of legislation. Or is this another claim you will not back up?
Already done.
Do you think Iran is NOT a theocracy?
Iran is a theocracy so your little attempt at distraction is as reetawrded as you. For the third time:
Show us where Argentina claims the RCC is its official State religion and is a fundamental source of legislation. Or is this another claim you will not back up?
Instead of lying and saying "already done" why don't you show us where that is in Argentina's Constitution?
Quote it from their Constitution.
Already done.
Do you think Iran is NOT a theocracy?
Iran is a theocracy so your little attempt at distraction is as reetawrded as you. For the third time:
Show us where Argentina claims the RCC is its official State religion and is a fundamental source of legislation. Or is this another claim you will not back up?
Instead of lying and saying "already done" why don't you show us where that is in Argentina's Constitution?
Quote it from their Constitution.
That's already been done. On this thread.
So IRan is a theocracy. It is run by clerics. Iraq is not run by clerics. There's your difference right there.
Case closed. Yet again.
Iran is a theocracy so your little attempt at distraction is as reetawrded as you. For the third time:
Show us where Argentina claims the RCC is its official State religion and is a fundamental source of legislation. Or is this another claim you will not back up?
Instead of lying and saying "already done" why don't you show us where that is in Argentina's Constitution?
Quote it from their Constitution.
That's already been done. On this thread.
So IRan is a theocracy. It is run by clerics. Iraq is not run by clerics. There's your difference right there.
Case closed. Yet again.
You know you can't back up your claim about Argentina and instead of admitting it you choose to admit yourself into Cuntland. See ya bitch.
Then you try to rewrite the definition of a theocracy to suit your needs.
That's already been done. On this thread.
So IRan is a theocracy. It is run by clerics. Iraq is not run by clerics. There's your difference right there.
Case closed. Yet again.
You know you can't back up your claim about Argentina and instead of admitting it you choose to admit yourself into Cuntland. See ya bitch.
Then you try to rewrite the definition of a theocracy to suit your needs.
You admitted Iran is a theocracy because it is run by the mullahs. Iraq is not run by the mullahs. Obviously it is not a theocracy. Neither is Argentina, despite having an official state religion.
You've been pwned, s0n. Get over it.
Show us where Argentina claims the RCC is its official State religion and is a fundamental source of legislation. Or is this another claim you will not back up?
Already done.
Do you think Iran is NOT a theocracy?
Iran is a theocracy so your little attempt at distraction is as reetawrded as you. For the third time:
Show us where Argentina claims the RCC is its official State religion and is a fundamental source of legislation. Or is this another claim you will not back up?
Instead of lying and saying "already done" why don't you show us where that is in Argentina's Constitution?
Quote it from their Constitution.
