Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
there were demonstrations at the time and the attack has been attributed to the video.
No, that would be Obama...he told us he was on hand to receive the caskets of the ambassador and the diplomatic personnel killed in Benghazi. The four Americans he let die rather than beef up their security after repeated requests...all the way back to June.
But Obama told all of us how he received the caskets off the plane before he told host Jon Stewart ON THE COMEDY CHANNEL that the killing of our Libyan ambassador, Christopher Stevens, and three other Americans was "not optimal." Which seemed to piss-off the mother of one of the victims when she said..."My son is not very optimal - he is also very dead."
Should you have further interest here is a link...
Mother of Benghazi victim speaks out
And that is playing politics with tragedy?
Just that big hearted gesture of meeting the plane carrying the NOT OPTIMAL bodies of the dead diplomatic crew. I don't guess there's EVER BEEN a thoughtful gesture like that from a president. It must be a first. WOW...meeting the plane carrying his dead ambassador and the OPTIMALLY DEAD STAFF...
I just don't know how that sumbitch Obama found the time to do that. Wow!
He doesn't give a flying fuck about anybody but himself.Obama cares deeply for everyone of his staff.
there were demonstrations at the time and the attack has been attributed to the video.
Bull fucking shit. No one knew about that video until the Obama admins. spoke of it. Think outside the trap. How would this look so close to the election. A terrorist attack on our embassy resulting in the brutal death of our ambassador. One who begged for more security.
Not cuz of a video but the rise of al Qaida. They knew Obama is weak proven by his apology and throwing under the bus of Hillary Clinton.
Open your mind.
Usama bin Laden was interviewed by PBS Frontline's John Miller in Afghanistan in 1998. During that interview bin Laden bitterly complained about the presence of a U.S. airbase in Mecca that was placed there to facilitate Operation Desert Storm and should have been removed but wasn't. He also complained about Israeli settlements expanding more deeply into Gaza. He told Miller that if the airbase was not removed, and if the Jewish settlements in Gaza were not withdrawn, the U.S. would have cause to regret it.
Early in the Bush presidency a series of reports of extremely suspicious activity, namely a group of Muslims enrolled in flight training who wished only to learn how to fly a passenger airline but not take off or land, reached his desk but were ignored.* A Presidential Daily Briefing in late 2000 warned that Usama bin Laden was planning an attack on the U.S. homeland. That warning was also ignored.** Shortly after that warning the 9/11 attack on the World Trade Center took place.
But I've never heard any of this drum-pounding and blame-laying after that very clear example of gross and possibly criminal malfeasance on the part of the Bush Administration. And while it's possible the Obama Administration dropped the ball on the Benghazi assault (yet to be positively determined) the event comes nowhere near the level of negligence clearly demonstrated in the 9/11 example, nor do its consequences in any way compare in terms of magnitude.
* Coleen Rowley's Memo to FBI Director Robert Mueller
** http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/11/opinion/the-bush-white-house-was-deaf-to-9-11-warnings.html?_r=0
I'm talking about the bin Sultan airbase which was positioned in Mecca for the express purpose of facilitating the so-called "Gulf War" by H.W. Bush in 1990. When that base was proposed it caused a furor among Saudi radicals who eventually tolerated it because Bush promised to remove it immediately after Iraq was evicted from Kuwait.Usama bin Laden was interviewed by PBS Frontline's John Miller in Afghanistan in 1998. During that interview bin Laden bitterly complained about the presence of a U.S. airbase in Mecca that was placed there to facilitate Operation Desert Storm and should have been removed but wasn't. He also complained about Israeli settlements expanding more deeply into Gaza. He told Miller that if the airbase was not removed, and if the Jewish settlements in Gaza were not withdrawn, the U.S. would have cause to regret it.
Early in the Bush presidency a series of reports of extremely suspicious activity, namely a group of Muslims enrolled in flight training who wished only to learn how to fly a passenger airline but not take off or land, reached his desk but were ignored.* A Presidential Daily Briefing in late 2000 warned that Usama bin Laden was planning an attack on the U.S. homeland. That warning was also ignored.** Shortly after that warning the 9/11 attack on the World Trade Center took place.
But I've never heard any of this drum-pounding and blame-laying after that very clear example of gross and possibly criminal malfeasance on the part of the Bush Administration. And while it's possible the Obama Administration dropped the ball on the Benghazi assault (yet to be positively determined) the event comes nowhere near the level of negligence clearly demonstrated in the 9/11 example, nor do its consequences in any way compare in terms of magnitude.
* Coleen Rowley's Memo to FBI Director Robert Mueller
** http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/11/opinion/the-bush-white-house-was-deaf-to-9-11-warnings.html?_r=0
You are talking about the military bases Clinton used for his useless 8 years of no-fly zones, aren't you? 9/11 was planned during this time.
Dude, lay off the brown acid.I'm talking about the bin Sultan airbase which was positioned in Mecca for the express purpose of facilitating the so-called "Gulf War" by H.W. Bush in 1990. When that base was proposed it caused a furor among Saudi radicals who eventually tolerated it because Bush promised to remove it immediately after Iraq was evicted from Kuwait.
G.W. Bush quietly removed the base shortly after the 9/11 attack. He also pressured Sharon to evict the settlers from Gaza. Those are the reasons why there were no further attacks during his presidency. If he had done those things when the warnings of imminent terrorist activity commenced the 9/11 attack would not have happened.
Clinton's "no-fly" activities served to extend radical Moslem tolerance of the airbase subsequent to the "Gulf War," but when that activity ceased at the end of the Clinton Presidency the terrorist warnings began. And Bush ignored them.
I'm talking about the bin Sultan airbase which was positioned in Mecca for the express purpose of facilitating the so-called "Gulf War" by H.W. Bush in 1990. When that base was proposed it caused a furor among Saudi radicals who eventually tolerated it because Bush promised to remove it immediately after Iraq was evicted from Kuwait.Usama bin Laden was interviewed by PBS Frontline's John Miller in Afghanistan in 1998. During that interview bin Laden bitterly complained about the presence of a U.S. airbase in Mecca that was placed there to facilitate Operation Desert Storm and should have been removed but wasn't. He also complained about Israeli settlements expanding more deeply into Gaza. He told Miller that if the airbase was not removed, and if the Jewish settlements in Gaza were not withdrawn, the U.S. would have cause to regret it.
Early in the Bush presidency a series of reports of extremely suspicious activity, namely a group of Muslims enrolled in flight training who wished only to learn how to fly a passenger airline but not take off or land, reached his desk but were ignored.* A Presidential Daily Briefing in late 2000 warned that Usama bin Laden was planning an attack on the U.S. homeland. That warning was also ignored.** Shortly after that warning the 9/11 attack on the World Trade Center took place.
But I've never heard any of this drum-pounding and blame-laying after that very clear example of gross and possibly criminal malfeasance on the part of the Bush Administration. And while it's possible the Obama Administration dropped the ball on the Benghazi assault (yet to be positively determined) the event comes nowhere near the level of negligence clearly demonstrated in the 9/11 example, nor do its consequences in any way compare in terms of magnitude.
* Coleen Rowley's Memo to FBI Director Robert Mueller
** http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/11/opinion/the-bush-white-house-was-deaf-to-9-11-warnings.html?_r=0
You are talking about the military bases Clinton used for his useless 8 years of no-fly zones, aren't you? 9/11 was planned during this time.
G.W. Bush quietly removed the base shortly after the 9/11 attack. He also pressured Sharon to evict the settlers from Gaza. Those are the reasons why there were no further attacks during his presidency. If he had done those things when the warnings of imminent terrorist activity commenced the 9/11 attack would not have happened.
Clinton's "no-fly" activities served to extend radical Moslem tolerance of the airbase subsequent to the "Gulf War," but when that activity ceased at the end of the Clinton Presidency the terrorist warnings began. And Bush ignored them.
Oh, it's not nice to fool with Mother Nature.Did someone sequester your brain?
If these opaquely sarcastic one-liners are your best effort at participating in a serious discussion it would serve your image better to say nothing at all.Dude, lay off the brown acid.I'm talking about the bin Sultan airbase which was positioned in Mecca for the express purpose of facilitating the so-called "Gulf War" by H.W. Bush in 1990. When that base was proposed it caused a furor among Saudi radicals who eventually tolerated it because Bush promised to remove it immediately after Iraq was evicted from Kuwait.
G.W. Bush quietly removed the base shortly after the 9/11 attack. He also pressured Sharon to evict the settlers from Gaza. Those are the reasons why there were no further attacks during his presidency. If he had done those things when the warnings of imminent terrorist activity commenced the 9/11 attack would not have happened.
Clinton's "no-fly" activities served to extend radical Moslem tolerance of the airbase subsequent to the "Gulf War," but when that activity ceased at the end of the Clinton Presidency the terrorist warnings began. And Bush ignored them.
yawn, you can only cry 'wolf' so many times before you put the rest of America to sleep
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
I can only guess at his reason for not doing so. But there is no question that the airbase, combined with our support of Israel, provoked the 9/11 attack. But if you doubt that I'll be happy to post the transcript of bin Laden's condemnations and the warning he issued in the 1998 interview.I'm talking about the bin Sultan airbase which was positioned in Mecca for the express purpose of facilitating the so-called "Gulf War" by H.W. Bush in 1990. When that base was proposed it caused a furor among Saudi radicals who eventually tolerated it because Bush promised to remove it immediately after Iraq was evicted from Kuwait.You are talking about the military bases Clinton used for his useless 8 years of no-fly zones, aren't you? 9/11 was planned during this time.
G.W. Bush quietly removed the base shortly after the 9/11 attack. He also pressured Sharon to evict the settlers from Gaza. Those are the reasons why there were no further attacks during his presidency. If he had done those things when the warnings of imminent terrorist activity commenced the 9/11 attack would not have happened.
Clinton's "no-fly" activities served to extend radical Moslem tolerance of the airbase subsequent to the "Gulf War," but when that activity ceased at the end of the Clinton Presidency the terrorist warnings began. And Bush ignored them.
Why didn't Clinton remove it during his 8 years if you knew it was such a problem?
