GOP leaders to Steele: BACK OFF!

Some dumbfuck posters (one in particular here) obviously didn't follow the news in 2003.

Contracostatimes.com Archive Search -

Published on January 8, 2003, Contra Costa Times (Walnut Creek, CA){PUBLICATION2} OAKLAND'S REEVES RIPS GOP RACISM

The highest ranking African-American in the California Republican Party on Tuesday condemned the racism he has endured working for the GOP.
"Black Republicans are expected to provide window dressing and cover to prove that this is not a racist party, yet our own leadership continues to act otherwise," party Secretary Shannon Reeves wrote in an e-mail to party board members. His comments were sparked by news last week that Vice Chairman Bill Back had circulated an ...
Complete Article, 534 words ( )


http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=CC&p_theme=cc&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&s_dispstring=allfields%28shannon%20reeves%29%20AND%20date%281/1/2003%20to%2012/20/2003%29&p_field_date-0=YMD_date&p_params_date-0=date:B,E&p_text_date-0=1/1/2003%20to%2012/20/2003%29&p_field_advanced-0=&p_text_advanced-0=%28%22shannon%20reeves%22%29&xcal_numdocs=20&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&xcal_useweights=no

Archive Search - ContraCostaTimes.com

Only $2.95 away from looking like more than the complete idiot she usually is.
 
I got the partisans to show their true colors in this thread :)

You guys are suckers :lol:

And the following parisans suckers have shown just who they really are

Uh, who are Steele's "constituents"?

And are you saying that Steele is that Senator who is "trying to actually do something positive in response to this atrocious health plan from Nancy Pelosi, Reid, and Obama"? If so, you just totally missed the point of this.

so why did you call him a senator? elected by "constiuents?"

And people wonder why no one takes the radical right seriously ......


As if we didn't already know about Erik since he is honest about himself. But nodog always claims to be down the middle...sucker :lol:

Yeah you sure pulled one - ya know calling Steele a senator and saying he has constituents. Boy, when someone corrects you for that idiocy they sure show their true colors don't they?
 
See up by my name "Am I serious"

I tend to do things to evoke a response in an effort to find out more about just who a poster is. So you should always ask yourself "Is he serious" when I post. Or ask me, sometimes I will shock you ;).

or perhaps we should just ask - does he have the sense God gave a turnip?
right now - all the indicators seem to point to no.
Especially if the only way you can try to dig yourself out of your hole is to claim you were joking.
As if someone correcting you about Steele being a senator is a partisan attack ....
Lame
 
Some dumbfuck posters (one in particular here) obviously didn't follow the news in 2003.

[Irrelevant information about possible racism in the California GOP in 2003 omitted]

Only $2.95 away from looking like more than the complete idiot she usually is.
Although a better source than your idiotic thinking that a forum post is some kind of 'source' - LMFAO - so the fuck what? Steele was Lt. Gov. of Maryland in 2003.

But watching you have another emotional meltdown is fascinating - in a train wreck sense.


(And you're still a racist with that OP.)
 
Last edited:
A little OT, but related:

Eric Zimmermann reports that the Republican National Committee has decided it no longer likes the American Medical Association.


Michael Steele took a shot at the American Medical Association (AMA) today, saying the organization doesn't have "credibility" on healthcare reform.

"The AMA is -- does not have the credibility on this health care issue, as they would like to project," Steele said on Fox and Friends this morning.


The relative strength and/or influence of the AMA is certainly subject to debate. For that matter, it's understandable that the RNC chairman would try to undermine the credibility of the physicians' group the same day 150 medical doctors applaud health care reform in the Rose Garden.

That said, Steele's criticism seemed a little odd. For one thing, it occurred the same morning the Republican National Committee hosted a conference call to boast about support from former AMA President Donald Palmisano. Steele was stepping on his own message -- if the AMA doesn't have credibility, why should anyone be impressed with the RNC's call with Palmisano?

For that matter, Steele may not realize this, but the American Medical Association has historically been a close Republican Party ally on health care reform. It has a lengthy record of trashing Democratic reform proposals -- in 1945, the AMA helped portray Truman's proposal for national health insurance as a creep toward communism -- and Sam Stein recently noted, "The group's reputation on this matter is so notorious that historians pinpoint it with creating the ominous sounding phrase 'socialized medicine' in the early decades of the 1900s."



:lol:

The Washington Monthly
 
A little OT, but related:

Eric Zimmermann reports that the Republican National Committee has decided it no longer likes the American Medical Association.


Michael Steele took a shot at the American Medical Association (AMA) today, saying the organization doesn't have "credibility" on healthcare reform.

"The AMA is -- does not have the credibility on this health care issue, as they would like to project," Steele said on Fox and Friends this morning.


The relative strength and/or influence of the AMA is certainly subject to debate. For that matter, it's understandable that the RNC chairman would try to undermine the credibility of the physicians' group the same day 150 medical doctors applaud health care reform in the Rose Garden.

That said, Steele's criticism seemed a little odd. For one thing, it occurred the same morning the Republican National Committee hosted a conference call to boast about support from former AMA President Donald Palmisano. Steele was stepping on his own message -- if the AMA doesn't have credibility, why should anyone be impressed with the RNC's call with Palmisano?

For that matter, Steele may not realize this, but the American Medical Association has historically been a close Republican Party ally on health care reform. It has a lengthy record of trashing Democratic reform proposals -- in 1945, the AMA helped portray Truman's proposal for national health insurance as a creep toward communism -- and Sam Stein recently noted, "The group's reputation on this matter is so notorious that historians pinpoint it with creating the ominous sounding phrase 'socialized medicine' in the early decades of the 1900s."



:lol:

The Washington Monthly
:)

Thanks for that Eric.
Good read.
 
A little OT, but related:

Eric Zimmermann reports that the Republican National Committee has decided it no longer likes the American Medical Association.





The relative strength and/or influence of the AMA is certainly subject to debate. For that matter, it's understandable that the RNC chairman would try to undermine the credibility of the physicians' group the same day 150 medical doctors applaud health care reform in the Rose Garden.

That said, Steele's criticism seemed a little odd. For one thing, it occurred the same morning the Republican National Committee hosted a conference call to boast about support from former AMA President Donald Palmisano. Steele was stepping on his own message -- if the AMA doesn't have credibility, why should anyone be impressed with the RNC's call with Palmisano?

For that matter, Steele may not realize this, but the American Medical Association has historically been a close Republican Party ally on health care reform. It has a lengthy record of trashing Democratic reform proposals -- in 1945, the AMA helped portray Truman's proposal for national health insurance as a creep toward communism -- and Sam Stein recently noted, "The group's reputation on this matter is so notorious that historians pinpoint it with creating the ominous sounding phrase 'socialized medicine' in the early decades of the 1900s."



:lol:

The Washington Monthly
:)

Thanks for that Eric.
Good read.

Token or not (and I, too, am inclined to believe he is), the guy sure is a joke.
 
See up by my name "Am I serious"

I tend to do things to evoke a response in an effort to find out more about just who a poster is. So you should always ask yourself "Is he serious" when I post. Or ask me, sometimes I will shock you ;).
Thank you for blessing us all with that incredibly boring, and even more incredibly corny gimmick.
 
Not buying this one. Looks like another bogus Liberal Media/Democrat plant stories. The corrupt Liberal Media in coordination with the Democrats have been planting these kinds of bogus stories for years in an attempt to present an image that the Republicans hate each other and are bitterly divided. This is just old-school politics 101. In reality i think Obama has actually managed to unite the Republicans against his oppressive Socialist policies. I know the Liberal Media/Democrats will continue planting these bogus stories but i don't think too many are buying this kind of stuff anymore. 2010 could be a great year for the Republicans if they don't find a way to screw themselves. This kind of story is just more wishful thinking on the part of the Liberal Media/Democrats.

Republicans hate each other? Who says that?

If anything, Democrats have admired the way the Republicans work together and walk in lockstep. They have party disicpline. Republicans first, country second. They vote as if they were all one race and one religion.

MS simply isn't a welcome Republican. Like Colin Powel. They aren't the white color.

As I always say - we must keep free speech as unrestricted as possible. This way vile racists can expose themselves. That's three so far in this thread.
This post is overflowing with white guilt. Unfortunately, so is the country we live in!
 
Jonathan Martin, Manu Raju Jonathan Martin, Manu Raju – Mon Oct 5, 5:53 am ET
GOP leaders, in a private meeting last month, delivered a blunt and at times heated message to RNC Chairman Michael Steele: quit meddling in policy.

The plea was made during what was supposed to be a routine discussion about polling matters and other priorities in House Minority Leader John Boehner’s office. But the session devolved into a heated discussion about the roles of congressional leadership and Steele, according to multiple people familiar with the meeting.

The congressional leaders were particularly miffed that Steele had in late August unveiled a seniors’ “health care bill of rights” without consulting with them. The statement of health care principles, outlined in a Washington Post op-ed, began with a robust defense of Medicare that puzzled some in a party not known for its attachment to entitlements.

GOP leaders to Steele: Back off - Yahoo! News

You know why we voted you in Mike. Know your place.
Now fetch my luggage.

I remember at the time asking who could name any Republicans that had actually signed onto Steele's senior bill of rights.
 
Token or not (and I, too, am inclined to believe he is), the guy sure is a joke.
Actually, he is one of the more sane members of the republican party.

He was to the left of McCain all of his political career, but the RNC selectors were happy enough that he came from the right section of the Crayola box.

80462491.jpg
 
Not like it matters, but I had to laugh when I realized something. Republicans put in Michael Steele obviously because of Barack Obama. However, the irony is that a bunch of White Senators are telling a African American they put in charge to quiet down. Oh the delicious irony. :lol:

Seriously though, Michael Steele is a joke. He's worse than Biden in speaking his mind but at least Biden is constant in the positions he's taking. Steele is basically winging it everytime out there because the Republicans are about as organized as a army of untrained soldiers. So Steele really has no clue sometimes what talking points to parrot, so when he makes a wrong squawk, the GOP scolds him for it. :lol:
 

Forum List

Back
Top