- Banned
- #101
Hate the game, not the playah.Paul nailed the earmark question.
If by nailing you mean admitting that he taking them while voting against them, yes, yes he did.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Hate the game, not the playah.Paul nailed the earmark question.
If by nailing you mean admitting that he taking them while voting against them, yes, yes he did.
Paul nailed the earmark question.
If by nailing you mean admitting that he taking them while voting against them, yes, yes he did.
How the hell else is he supposed to get the money expropriated from his taxpayers back to his taxpayers?Paul nailed the earmark question.
If by nailing you mean admitting that he taking them while voting against them, yes, yes he did.
Exactly!
Ron Paul tries to have it both ways.
AND RON PAUL WOULD NOT SIGN THE NO EARMARK PLEDGE. And guess who wanted millions in earmarks, recently? Ron Paul!
How the hell else is he supposed to get the money expropriated from his taxpayers back to his taxpayers?If by nailing you mean admitting that he taking them while voting against them, yes, yes he did.
Exactly!
Ron Paul tries to have it both ways.
AND RON PAUL WOULD NOT SIGN THE NO EARMARK PLEDGE. And guess who wanted millions in earmarks, recently? Ron Paul!
C'mon....Tell us.
Ron paul is full of it!
He puts earmarks in bills he KNOWS will pass without his vote and then votes no.
He tries to have it both ways.
Yes, he said that and he's correct...The marriage of big gubmint and big bidness -which is what F&F is- is the definition of fascism, nitwit.That little fascist weasel Gingich is getting his ass kicked from every direction.
Dr. Paul is exactly right...Fannie & Freddie are borderline fascism.
He said that?
United States and China are the only relationships we need to worry about? Seriously Huntsman? I think that's rather short sighted.
That doesn't get the tax monies collected from things like fuel taxes back to the taxpayers in his district.How the hell else is he supposed to get the money expropriated from his taxpayers back to his taxpayers?Exactly!
Ron Paul tries to have it both ways.
AND RON PAUL WOULD NOT SIGN THE NO EARMARK PLEDGE. And guess who wanted millions in earmarks, recently? Ron Paul!
C'mon....Tell us.
Cut taxes. Cut spending.
Paul nailed the earmark question.
If by nailing you mean admitting that he taking them while voting against them, yes, yes he did.
Ron paul is full of it!
He puts earmarks in bills he KNOWS will pass without his vote and then votes no.
He tries to have it both ways.
You're an idiot... Pay attention.
Yeah.....put Congress on part time so they can get even less done. Brilliant.
Paul nailed the earmark question.
If by nailing you mean admitting that he taking them while voting against them, yes, yes he did.
Exactly!
Ron Paul tries to have it both ways.
AND RON PAUL WOULD NOT SIGN THE NO EARMARK PLEDGE. And guess who wanted millions in earmarks, recently? Ron Paul!
This is Paul's best debate yet. He must be getting some speech coaching. If he would have been this good from the beginning, he'd be on top in the polls right now.
Yes, yet it is...You look it up, numbnutz.Yes, he said that and he's correct...The marriage of big gubmint and big bidness -which is what F&F is- is the definition of fascism, nitwit.He said that?
Nope, sorry. That's not the definition of fascism. Look it up some time.