GOP cagey about voting in 2012

[daveman]

A major probe by the Justice Department between 2002 and 2007 failed to prosecute a single person for going to the polls and impersonating an eligible voter, which the anti-fraud laws are supposedly designed to stop.

Wonder why they stopped counting at 2007...?

Four NY Democrats Plead Guilty to Voter Fraud | The Gateway Pundit

Indiana GOP goes after election fraud; 65 indictments in southern Indiana | RedState

Voter Fraud | North Carolina | Voter ID Laws | The Daily Caller

Archived-Articles: Democrats and Vote Fraud: On the Road to Rigged Elections

The manipulation continued during the official recount, as the Minnesota Canvassing Board detected just enough "ballot errors" to put Franken over the top. John Lott later analyzed the Board's inconsistent decisions, nearly all of which favored the Democratic candidate.

Some 17,000 more ballots were counted in the Minnesota Senate election than there were recorded voters. Mark Ritchie had dismantled the state's ballot reconciliation program, which previously required voting districts to validate the number of votes cast against the number of ballots issued. Outside investigators also found that 1,400 convicted felons had voted illegally.​

It would be nice if Democrats didn't hold the democratic process in such contempt.

 

[Avatar4321]

In order to support your premise you have to quote some no name person from over 30 years ago and somehow impute that persons statements on all modern Republicans.

I'm very confident the OP is talking out of his ass.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

With NO ID requirements how does one FIND, much less prosecute people that vote multiple times? Sheep and amazingly stupid sheep.

 

[rdean]

I'm sick of their "wide eyed" innocents with "oh, but we're just trying to stop a crime from being committed".

The fuckers.

Too bad they didn't stop Wall Street from bringing down the economy.
Too bad they didn't stop Bush from sending thousands off to die and tens of thousands to be maimed to create a friend for Iran.
Too bad they didn't catch Bin Laden.
Too bad their policies caused us to be downgraded.
Too bad they did nothing to help the victims from Katrina.
Too bad they blame their failures on Democrats.
Too bad they put us trillions into debt.
Too bad they make America poor and in debt.

Too bad.

Just

Too, too bad.

But they want to stop a problem that doesn't even exist.

The fuckers.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

I'm sick of their "wide eyed" innocents with "oh, but we're just trying to stop a crime from being committed".

The fuckers.

Too bad they didn't stop Wall Street from bringing down the economy.
Too bad they didn't stop Bush from sending thousands off to die and tens of thousands to be maimed to create a friend for Iran.
Too bad they didn't catch Bin Laden.
Too bad their policies caused us to be downgraded.
Too bad they did nothing to help the victims from Katrina.
Too bad they blame their failures on Democrats.
Too bad they put us trillions into debt.
Too bad they make America poor and in debt.

Too bad.

Just

Too, too bad.

But they want to stop a problem that doesn't even exist.

The fuckers.

More evidence of why most of your threads end up in the Romper room.

 

[rdean]

I'm sick of their "wide eyed" innocents with "oh, but we're just trying to stop a crime from being committed".

The fuckers.

Too bad they didn't stop Wall Street from bringing down the economy.
Too bad they didn't stop Bush from sending thousands off to die and tens of thousands to be maimed to create a friend for Iran.
Too bad they didn't catch Bin Laden.
Too bad their policies caused us to be downgraded.
Too bad they did nothing to help the victims from Katrina.
Too bad they blame their failures on Democrats.
Too bad they put us trillions into debt.
Too bad they make America poor and in debt.

Too bad.

Just

Too, too bad.

But they want to stop a problem that doesn't even exist.

The fuckers.

More evidence of why most of your threads end up in the Romper room.

This board leans right. There is nothing there that is not true. Or you would have pointed it out. But you can't. We both know you can't. But you had to say "something". And it was a pretty lame "something".

 

[code1211]

Anyone who is a registered democrat in swing state should beware, their vote is under attack.

What if:

In a state that is predominantly Democrat, the local administration implements voter registration laws and the result is that fewer Republican votes wold be counted.

In response, the Republican President of the US sends his AG to the State in violation of Constitutional Law, to sue the local authorities and allow more Republican votes to be counted and to open the door to wide speed fraud and abuse.

This is what you suggest.

Why is it wise to demand a photo ID to buy liquor, cigarettes, prescription drugs, use a credit card, open a bank account, drive a vehicle etc. etc. etc. and not demand the same to vote?

 

[code1211]

We are. And are busy recruiting elegible voters right now. And holding the bullshit laws promoted by the GOP to prevent people from voting up to the light.

Are there any standards to which a person claiming the right to vote need be held?

Must he/she be human? Of age? A citizen? Registered? Residence?

Is there any qualification that a person needs to possess in order to vote?

 

[code1211]

Every stupid uninformed democrat vote prevented from being cast or counted is a good thing for America.

While that is true, what might the practice of of photo ID's do to restrict the rights of Democrat Voters in excess of Republican voters?

 

[code1211]

Voter fraud is mostly myth; Voter suppression is real and growing.

Proof?

 

[code1211]

Anyone who is a registered democrat in swing state should beware, their vote is under attack.

you mean their votes of course, but I think you are being pessimistic they are still going to be able to vote as many times as they want.

Do you even understand the contents of the opening post of this thread?

The statement in the opening post is one of fact. Anytime a block of voters can be counted on to vote in a particular way, the reduction of votes in opposition to that block increases the impact of the block.

Just as the voting BLOCK of Black voters is monolithic, so are the Conservative Christians. Both vote in overwhelming majorities in favor of a particular party and both are mostly unthinking in terms of rational critique of candidates beyond party labels.

The question, then is this:

Why does the demand for a photo ID favor one party over the other?

 

[JoeB131]

By all means, vote yourself more welfare.

Working is for chumps.

 

[daveman]

But they want to stop a problem that doesn't even exist.

The fuckers.

Why do you lie all the time?

A major probe by the Justice Department between 2002 and 2007 failed to prosecute a single person for going to the polls and impersonating an eligible voter, which the anti-fraud laws are supposedly designed to stop.

Wonder why they stopped counting at 2007...?

Four NY Democrats Plead Guilty to Voter Fraud | The Gateway Pundit

Indiana GOP goes after election fraud; 65 indictments in southern Indiana | RedState

Voter Fraud | North Carolina | Voter ID Laws | The Daily Caller

Archived-Articles: Democrats and Vote Fraud: On the Road to Rigged Elections

The manipulation continued during the official recount, as the Minnesota Canvassing Board detected just enough "ballot errors" to put Franken over the top. John Lott later analyzed the Board's inconsistent decisions, nearly all of which favored the Democratic candidate.

Some 17,000 more ballots were counted in the Minnesota Senate election than there were recorded voters. Mark Ritchie had dismantled the state's ballot reconciliation program, which previously required voting districts to validate the number of votes cast against the number of ballots issued. Outside investigators also found that 1,400 convicted felons had voted illegally.​

It would be nice if Democrats didn't hold the democratic process in such contempt.

 

[taichiliberal]

A major probe by the Justice Department between 2002 and 2007 failed to prosecute a single person for going to the polls and impersonating an eligible voter, which the anti-fraud laws are supposedly designed to stop.

Wonder why they stopped counting at 2007...?

Four NY Democrats Plead Guilty to Voter Fraud | The Gateway Pundit

Indiana GOP goes after election fraud; 65 indictments in southern Indiana | RedState

Voter Fraud | North Carolina | Voter ID Laws | The Daily Caller

Archived-Articles: Democrats and Vote Fraud: On the Road to Rigged Elections

The manipulation continued during the official recount, as the Minnesota Canvassing Board detected just enough "ballot errors" to put Franken over the top. John Lott later analyzed the Board's inconsistent decisions, nearly all of which favored the Democratic candidate.

Some 17,000 more ballots were counted in the Minnesota Senate election than there were recorded voters. Mark Ritchie had dismantled the state's ballot reconciliation program, which previously required voting districts to validate the number of votes cast against the number of ballots issued. Outside investigators also found that 1,400 convicted felons had voted illegally.​

It would be nice if Democrats didn't hold the democratic process in such contempt.

It would be nice if neocon parrots would pay attention to the details of ALL THE FACTS before hyping HALF THE TRUTH. Observe:

Franken laughs last | Brad Friedman | Comment is free | guardian.co.uk

Conservative media raise ACORN bogeyman to baselessly cast doubt on Franken's campaign victory | Media Matters for America

And your other examples PROVE that the standing system does work in capturing and stopping voter fraud from becoming wide spread....WITHOUT re-districting implementing new rules that make it more difficult (and expensive) for people to vote.

Oh, and who said the Justice Dept. stopped investigating and prosecuting against voter fraud? It's called periodical reports, Davey Boy.

 

[taichiliberal]

With NO ID requirements how does one FIND, much less prosecute people that vote multiple times? Sheep and amazingly stupid sheep.

Thank God you're retired. Who said there were "no ID requirements"? Do you know how voter registration even works for your state, let alone any other state? Seems you were projecting your last sentence.

 

[taichiliberal]

I'm sick of their "wide eyed" innocents with "oh, but we're just trying to stop a crime from being committed".

The fuckers.

Too bad they didn't stop Wall Street from bringing down the economy.
Too bad they didn't stop Bush from sending thousands off to die and tens of thousands to be maimed to create a friend for Iran.
Too bad they didn't catch Bin Laden.
Too bad their policies caused us to be downgraded.
Too bad they did nothing to help the victims from Katrina.
Too bad they blame their failures on Democrats.
Too bad they put us trillions into debt.
Too bad they make America poor and in debt.

Too bad.

Just

Too, too bad.

But they want to stop a problem that doesn't even exist.

The fuckers.

These are the same willfully ignorant SOB's that swallowed and repeatedly regurgitated all the GOP swill defending the disenfranchisement of TENS OF THOUSANDS of predominantly DEM voters in 2000 and 2004. I swear, they should all go work for Putin.

 

[daveman]

A major probe by the Justice Department between 2002 and 2007 failed to prosecute a single person for going to the polls and impersonating an eligible voter, which the anti-fraud laws are supposedly designed to stop.

Wonder why they stopped counting at 2007...?

Four NY Democrats Plead Guilty to Voter Fraud | The Gateway Pundit

Indiana GOP goes after election fraud; 65 indictments in southern Indiana | RedState

Voter Fraud | North Carolina | Voter ID Laws | The Daily Caller

Archived-Articles: Democrats and Vote Fraud: On the Road to Rigged Elections

The manipulation continued during the official recount, as the Minnesota Canvassing Board detected just enough "ballot errors" to put Franken over the top. John Lott later analyzed the Board's inconsistent decisions, nearly all of which favored the Democratic candidate.

Some 17,000 more ballots were counted in the Minnesota Senate election than there were recorded voters. Mark Ritchie had dismantled the state's ballot reconciliation program, which previously required voting districts to validate the number of votes cast against the number of ballots issued. Outside investigators also found that 1,400 convicted felons had voted illegally.​

It would be nice if Democrats didn't hold the democratic process in such contempt.

It would be nice if neocon parrots would pay attention to the details of ALL THE FACTS before hyping HALF THE TRUTH. Observe:

Franken laughs last | Brad Friedman | Comment is free | guardian.co.uk

Conservative media raise ACORN bogeyman to baselessly cast doubt on Franken's campaign victory | Media Matters for America

And your other examples PROVE that the standing system does work in capturing and stopping voter fraud from becoming wide spread....WITHOUT re-districting implementing new rules that make it more difficult (and expensive) for people to vote.

Oh, and who said the Justice Dept. stopped investigating and prosecuting against voter fraud? It's called periodical reports, Davey Boy.

I knew it. It's different. Somehow. It just is.

Your confidence that all voter fraud is caught is laughable. But then, you don't see anything wrong with Democrats stealing elections.

 

[taichiliberal]

By all means, vote yourself more welfare.

Working is for chumps.

Do you bray like a neocon jackass in your real life as well?

Read the article and debate the FACTS, Joey. Man up!

 

[taichiliberal]

Wonder why they stopped counting at 2007...?

Four NY Democrats Plead Guilty to Voter Fraud | The Gateway Pundit

Indiana GOP goes after election fraud; 65 indictments in southern Indiana | RedState

Voter Fraud | North Carolina | Voter ID Laws | The Daily Caller

Archived-Articles: Democrats and Vote Fraud: On the Road to Rigged Elections

The manipulation continued during the official recount, as the Minnesota Canvassing Board detected just enough "ballot errors" to put Franken over the top. John Lott later analyzed the Board's inconsistent decisions, nearly all of which favored the Democratic candidate.

Some 17,000 more ballots were counted in the Minnesota Senate election than there were recorded voters. Mark Ritchie had dismantled the state's ballot reconciliation program, which previously required voting districts to validate the number of votes cast against the number of ballots issued. Outside investigators also found that 1,400 convicted felons had voted illegally.​

It would be nice if Democrats didn't hold the democratic process in such contempt.

It would be nice if neocon parrots would pay attention to the details of ALL THE FACTS before hyping HALF THE TRUTH. Observe:

Franken laughs last | Brad Friedman | Comment is free | guardian.co.uk

Conservative media raise ACORN bogeyman to baselessly cast doubt on Franken's campaign victory | Media Matters for America

And your other examples PROVE that the standing system does work in capturing and stopping voter fraud from becoming wide spread....WITHOUT re-districting implementing new rules that make it more difficult (and expensive) for people to vote.

Oh, and who said the Justice Dept. stopped investigating and prosecuting against voter fraud? It's called periodical reports, Davey Boy.

I knew it. It's different. Somehow. It just is.

Oh you mean that the voter disenfranchisement of TENS OF THOUSANDS by the GOP in 2000 and 2004? Yep, it was different because NOBODY WAS INDICTED OR PROSECUTED FOR THAT DESPITE THE EVIDENCE.....and hypocritical little neocon toadies like YOU, Davey boy, couldn't be happier.

Your confidence that all voter fraud is caught is laughable. But then, you don't see anything wrong with Democrats stealing elections.

When you can produce solid evidence that the DEMS put a man into the White House via the fraud perpetraited by a relative in governorship or via voting computers by a party loyalists who vowed to do whatever it takes to win, give me a call.

I never stated that all voter fraud was caught....I just provided FACTS that what is going on is NOT the rampant, game changing onslaught that your GOP tin gods are feeding you to parrot....and as YOUR examples show, the system is working to capture and prevent this (maybe to make up for 2000 and 2004)! Carry on.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

With NO ID requirements how does one FIND, much less prosecute people that vote multiple times? Sheep and amazingly stupid sheep.

Thank God you're retired. Who said there were "no ID requirements"? Do you know how voter registration even works for your state, let alone any other state? Seems you were projecting your last sentence.

Yet you claim requiring ID is discriminatory NOW? One must prove who they are to register, or are you claiming that keeps blacks from voting too?

The problem is dead people vote, people with friends not voting vote for them, etc etc etc.