GOP Budget Offers Second-Rate Vision for First-Rate Country

[Flaylo]

Deny the obvious much...

Repeating the same lies don't prove shat.

Now that's an expression you take to heart...

You keep repeating the same shat, from rightwing sources of course.

 

[Seawytch]

Ah yes....another budget from the Budget Munster Paul Ryan...that cuts safety nets but not a bit off defense. It's got those great giveaways to the 1% that the American people are really clamoring for though. That's what the American people want, right, to cut taxes on the wealthiest 1%?

Oops, no it isn't...

 

[Stephanie]

The Democrat's plan is wait till the GOP comes up with a plan and make fun of it.

That's their plan.

Exactly, and you notice they are out in FULL FORCE...Even their useful sheep is on the ball.

 

[The Rabbi]

The idiot Republicans signed Grover Norquist's pledge and Congress came to a screeching halt. That sheer stupidity combined with crony capitalism precedes any plan, from any party, for anything.

Crony capitalism? You mean Solyndra and another dozen darlings of hte Obama Administration that got millions at taxpayer expense?

Repeating the same lie about Obama and Solandra isn't going to make it true, shathead.

The Obama Administration did not fund Solyndra and a bunch of other companies at gov't expense, guaranteeing their debt and letting the principles off scot-free?
Really?

 

[mudwhistle]

The Democrat's plan is wait till the GOP comes up with a plan and make fun of it.

That's their plan.

The idiot Republicans signed Grover Norquist's pledge and Congress came to a screeching halt. That sheer stupidity combined with crony capitalism precedes any plan, from any party, for anything.

During the debt-ceiling debate Boehner offered Obama a billion dollar tax-increase and he turned it down.

He didn't want to look like he was willing to work with those evil, women-hating, spending-cutting terrorists. Plus, he needed to run on a "Do-Nothing Congress". That would have ruined all of his plans.

 

[Claudette]

Crony capitalism? You mean Solyndra and another dozen darlings of hte Obama Administration that got millions at taxpayer expense?

Repeating the same lie about Obama and Solandra isn't going to make it true, shathead.

The Obama Administration did not fund Solyndra and a bunch of other companies at gov't expense, guaranteeing their debt and letting the principles off scot-free?
Really?

Of course he did.

Thats just one of those facts that Fail&Go doesn't want to acknowledge.

After all Barry does love his green agenda and the hell with what we taxpayers want.

 

[Flaylo]

Repeating the same lie about Obama and Solandra isn't going to make it true, shathead.

The Obama Administration did not fund Solyndra and a bunch of other companies at gov't expense, guaranteeing their debt and letting the principles off scot-free?
Really?

Of course he did.

Thats just one of those facts that Fail&Go doesn't want to acknowledge.

After all Barry does love his green agenda and the hell with what we taxpayers want.

Post the facts if you believe that shat, what's taking so long.

 

[rightwinger]

Let's see?

How should we balance the budget?

Here's an idea! Let's cut taxes on the rich by ten percent while we raise taxes on the poor

If we call it a FAIR TAX, nobody can object

 

[TakeAStepBack]

The "poor" don't pay taxes anyway. It's a fallacious argument.

Only 49% of the population pays taxes and the "rich" account for about ~34% of all federal tax revenue.

 

[Flaylo]

The "poor" don't pay taxes anyway. It's a fallacious argument.

Only 49% of the population pays taxes and the "rich" account for about ~34% of all federal tax revenue.

Thats a lie, the poor do pay taxes, the working poor that is. Plus a big amount of those rich get most of their tax burden written off anyways you dumb facker.

 

[TakeAStepBack]

Yawn.

"the working poor". Is that an attempt to take an emotional hostage in the debate?

It isn't a lie. Your envy is really showing though.

 

[Flaylo]

Yawn.

"the working poor". Is that an attempt to take an emotional hostage in the debate?

It isn't a lie. Your envy is really showing though.

I talk facts i don't give a shat about sympathy, the working poor do pay taxes, try doing a little reseearch on those who don't pay before you talk shat to me.

 

[Stephanie]

Ah yes....another budget from the Budget Munster Paul Ryan...that cuts safety nets but not a bit off defense. It's got those great giveaways to the 1% that the American people are really clamoring for though. That's what the American people want, right, to cut taxes on the wealthiest 1%?

Oops, no it isn't...

OUR DEFESNE of this country is the ONE damn thing this government is SUPPOSE to do..
yet you people would rather they cut that then any entitlements that people ABUSE now days..

 

[Decepticon]

Apparently we should not have invested any money in private companies when were were developing the microchip for the space program.

What we have here is CONZ fundamental lack of perspective.
When you invest in NEW TECHNOLOGY, does one expect to get ALL THEIR MONEY BACK, ALL THE TIME?

No. It's risky. Which is why GOVERNMENT TAKES IT ON and NOT private industry. If we wait until market forces DRIVE us to alternative energy, it'll cost more than if we invest and PLAN our way to it.

You CONZ let us know when investments in alternative technologies should be expected to pay off all the time, willya? Because that shows a basic willful ignorance about the issue and a disingenuous attitude in dealing with the facts in favor of making Obama "look bad".


Tell you what? How about we APPLY YOUR OWN STANDARD of cost-effectiveness to our return on investment to the IRAQ WAR?

Now, go ahead and complain about the 500 million Obama lost in proper ratio to the almost 4 TRILLION DOLLARS the Iraq war will end up costing us.

Enjoy your nice big tall glass of STFU.

 

[Wiseacre]

At least Ryan and the repubs have the political courage to put their budget out there, which is more than can be said for the cowardly democrats. You may not like it, but it does reduce the deficits and tries to cap entitlement spending.

 

[The Rabbi]

The "poor" don't pay taxes anyway. It's a fallacious argument.

Only 49% of the population pays taxes and the "rich" account for about ~34% of all federal tax revenue.

Thats a lie, the poor do pay taxes, the working poor that is. Plus a big amount of those rich get most of their tax burden written off anyways you dumb facker.

Post proof or STFU

 

[DaGoose]

WOW Assault on the middle class??

What a bunch of hooey.

I guess cutting spending and getting entitlements under control is an assault if your a left wing loon.

Of course we can carry on as we are now and end up like Greece. Happy thought doncha think.

Cutting spending is fine and tweaking entitlements is ok as long as the people who paid in their whole working lives collect the benefits that they've paid for (entitlements= benefits that you have paid in and are ENTITLED to get back).

But doing both while giving massive tax breaks to the wealthy is nothing more than warmed over Reaganomics. And Reaganomics has been nothing more than a massive FAIL. (Just ask Reagan's Budget Director David Stockman)

 

[DaGoose]

Straight from the Huffington Post I see...

Do 20 Seig Heils and move on asswipe.

The Left doesn't want to see the rich get richer, even if it means the poor would get richer too.

And how are the poor "getting richer"? Please explain.

 

[kwc57]

Ethan Rome: Apocalypse Now: GOP Budget Offers Second-Rate Vision for First-Rate Country

The Republican budget proposal says our worst days are ahead and the only way to avert a calamity is for working families and seniors to suffer so the rich can get richer. The Republicans say their assault on the middle class is necessary to avoid "debt, doubt and decline." That's bull. The Republican plan repeals the Affordable Care Act, makes savage cuts to Medicaid and ends Medicare as we know it to give massive tax breaks to the super-rich.

The GOP budget is an immoral and callous clarion call for the middle class to pay more and get less. It promotes prosperity for the few instead of opportunity for all. It says we should be on our own instead of bound together by common purpose.

Amen to that.

Oh my, how will you get your free stuff and just who will wipe your ass for you? The frustration of being a liberal must be overwhelming.

 

[kwc57]

WOW Assault on the middle class??

What a bunch of hooey.

I guess cutting spending and getting entitlements under control is an assault if your a left wing loon.

Of course we can carry on as we are now and end up like Greece. Happy thought doncha think.

When those cuts involve no cuts on the rich and giving the rich more tax cuts its an assault on the middleclass, a facktard like you who has been relentless facked and jizzed with rightwing bullshat I expect the above answer from.

ohhhhhh, wealth envy to boot.......