GOP Anti-Constitution?

Discussion in 'Congress' started by midcan5, Feb 16, 2011.

  1. midcan5
    Offline

    midcan5 liberal / progressive

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2007
    Messages:
    11,355
    Thanks Received:
    2,508
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Location:
    Philly, PA
    Ratings:
    +3,890
    I think by now it must be clear republicans are simply hypocrites when it comes to the US Constitution.

    'House GOP Rejects Requirement That PATRIOT Act Surveillances Be Conducted in Compliance With Constitution'

    by John Nichols

    "Less than a month after making a show of reading the U.S. Constitution into the Congressional Record, the leaders of the Republican-controlled U.S. House engineered a vote to extend the surveillance authorities that both the Bush and Obama administrations have used to conduct “roving surveillance” of communications, to collect and examine business records and to target individuals who are not tied to terrorist groups for surveillance." House GOP Rejects Requirement That PATRIOT Act Surveillances Be Conducted in Compliance With Constitution | Common Dreams
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  2. RetiredGySgt
    Online

    RetiredGySgt Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    40,968
    Thanks Received:
    6,333
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +10,811
    It is not Unconstitutional. Pretty simple concept.

    You leftoids keep telling us that because the Supreme Court ruled women have a right to privacy that legalized and made Constitutional Abortion. Well the Court has either ruled on this or found no cause to rule on it. Making it CONSTITUTIONAL.
     
  3. California Girl
    Offline

    California Girl BANNED

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2009
    Messages:
    50,337
    Thanks Received:
    8,957
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +8,963
    You should warm up before stretching that far. We wouldn't want you to pull a muscle.

    What a moronic claim. Seriously.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  4. editec
    Offline

    editec Mr. Forgot-it-All

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    41,426
    Thanks Received:
    5,599
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Maine
    Ratings:
    +5,634
    Constitutional rights were already plenty eroded thanks to the War on Drugs AND the laws written to help rid the USA of organized crime. (RICO laws).

    The Patriot Act is just icing on that cake.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  5. LordBrownTrout
    Online

    LordBrownTrout Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2007
    Messages:
    17,023
    Thanks Received:
    3,227
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    South Texas
    Ratings:
    +8,020
    Honestly, is EITHER party constitutional nowadays? Let's not kid ourselves here.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  6. uscitizen
    Offline

    uscitizen Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    45,941
    Thanks Received:
    4,790
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    My Shack
    Ratings:
    +4,808
    I love how the TP Caucus neoconized so rapidly.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  7. peach174
    Offline

    peach174 Gold Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2010
    Messages:
    22,594
    Thanks Received:
    4,713
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    S.E. AZ
    Ratings:
    +9,533
    If both parties became constitutional what would they have to run on?
    It would harm the Dems much more so than the repubs. The left would not be able to say in their campaigns - if elected I will get this for your or that for you or do this or that for you. :)
     
  8. Bern80
    Offline

    Bern80 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2004
    Messages:
    8,094
    Thanks Received:
    722
    Trophy Points:
    138
    Ratings:
    +728
    The privacy issue and thus what surveilance can or can't be done without a warrant or probably cause depends on what is meant specifically by the word 'search' in the 4th ammendment. Does search in some way equate to privacy? Can an unreasonable search be defined as, for example, someone starring in your bedroom window? Or is it something that simply applies to law enforcement? Wire taps, surveilance, search warrants, they are all basically ways of observing people. Do you have the right to not be watched?

    I'm not sure a right to privacy can be implied there simply because privacy is not neccessary for one to exercise their freedom. You may not want someone perv peering across the way but nothing other than your own psychoogical apprehension prevents you from taking an action as a result. Not sure what I think about it really, but what is for certain is that privacy is not neccessary for one to exercise their freedom.
     
  9. Avorysuds
    Offline

    Avorysuds Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2010
    Messages:
    13,834
    Thanks Received:
    1,655
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Location:
    Eugene Oregon
    Ratings:
    +2,142
    You say this as if every Republican elected was a TP person...
     
  10. SFC Ollie
    Offline

    SFC Ollie Still Marching

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2009
    Messages:
    28,744
    Thanks Received:
    4,425
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    Extreme East Ohio
    Ratings:
    +4,474
    Isn't this the same patriot Act that a Democrat congress passed a few years back? And don't the Democrats still control the Senate that passed it this week?
     

Share This Page