Google celebrates 41st Anniversary of an Ape called "Lucy."

Mrs. M.

Man Feed Guest Writer
Nov 2, 2015
739
393
940
lucy-australopithecus-621653.jpg

Google is celebrating the “41st anniversary of Lucy" today with a doodle of an ape, that evolves into a walking man! According to one news source, Lucy was discovered in 1973. She lived 3.2 million years ago and her fossilized remains reveal her to be a hominid from the Australopithecus afarensis species.

Why don't more scientists respond to stories promoted by evolutionists when they have already proven evolution is a lie?

Most likely they fear losing their jobs. Some scientists depend upon grants to continue their research. In 2007 there was one organization known as Creation Research Society that had hundreds of members with master's degrees or doctorates in the various fields of science. Apparently, not everyone is in agreement with where man came from!

The chart evolutionists have used to support their theory, tracing hominids seven million years up to modern man, has been exposed as a lie.

According to a TIME magazine article printed on November 10,1975, there was a story about Mrs. Leakey's discovery which revealed serious flaws in their chart! In order for the evolutionists to cover their mistake, they claimed all they had to do was move man back 3 million years, so that they would overlap in time. By doing such a thing, they destroyed their own theory of evolution.

As one expert for the Creation Scientists aptly pointed out, “How could man evolve from the Ausralopithecus if man was already here one million years before them?

In other words, how can evolutionists claim Lucy is a missing link to man when man had already been on the earth for one million years before Lucy was ever born? The flawed research used by evolutionists is covered in Marvin Lubenov's book, “Bones of Contention.”

Interesting that the news article today never mentioned the Peking man. The story on the Peking man bones was that the finders of those bones, kept them hidden away from the public. Permission was granted to two French scientists to study the bones of the "Peking man." When the French scientists exposed the bones as animal bones, the bones suddenly disappeared! The truth is revealed in Marvin Lubenov's book, “Bones of Contention.”

To sum up some of the evidence provided thus far by the evolutionists, the Peking man bones were animal bones, the "Pilt down Man" (another hoax) was built out of fossilized human skull and the jawbone of an ape according to William R. Fix who wrote, “The Bone Peddlers: Selling Evolution.”

What about “Lucy?”

Lucy is an ape, not a missing link to humans. Why would the evolutionists use an ape to prove their theory of evolution? Their fossils show that they had short legs, long arms, and that their fingers and toes were curled rather than straight (human hands are not curled). What is the significance? That they swung from trees? We already know that apes swing from trees!

We can be grateful for honest scientists and researchers such as Dr. Charles Oxnard, Dr. Eric von Fange, Marvin Lubenov, John D. Morris Ph.D, Dr. Jack Couzzo, William R. Fix and Dr. Kent Hovind. The latter, whose offer of scientific evidence, exposing evolution as a lie, was rewarded with trumped up charges and a prison sentence!

It appears some people will resort to anything in order to silence the truth and perpetuate a lie.

Congratulations, Lucy. Celebrating the anniversary of an ape, has become the new normal!
 
Last edited:
Lucy's knee bones were discovered then about a year later the rest of her was found only 1,5 kilometers away!

Also, baboon bones were found to be mixed in with what they unearthed. You guys didn't learn about that did ya'? Ooops!

"Lucy! Joo got some splainin' to do!"
 
Lucy's knee bones were discovered then about a year later the rest of her was found only 1,5 kilometers away!

Also, baboon bones were found to be mixed in with what they unearthed. You guys didn't learn about that did ya'? Ooops!

"Lucy! Joo got some splainin' to do!"

1.5 km in 3 million years .... lessee that works out to.... a little less than two tenths of an inch a year.

She was a world traveller, that one.
 
lucy-australopithecus-621653.jpg



Why don't more scientists respond to stories promoted by evolutionists when they have already proven evolution is a lie?
No one has proven evolution is a lie, far from it.

No one has to prove evolution is a lie; the evolutionists have to prove its a fact, something they can't do. Evolution is a faith based fairy tale.
LOL There is tons of concrete imperical evidence of evolution. It is not a faith based fairy tale by any means. It is religion that is faith based. People of reason and common sense know that. Those who have been brainwashed to deny evolution are the ones believing fairy tales.
 
lucy-australopithecus-621653.jpg



Why don't more scientists respond to stories promoted by evolutionists when they have already proven evolution is a lie?
No one has proven evolution is a lie, far from it.

No one has to prove evolution is a lie; the evolutionists have to prove its a fact, something they can't do. Evolution is a faith based fairy tale.
LOL There is tons of concrete imperical evidence of evolution. It is not a faith based fairy tale by any means. It is religion that is faith based. People of reason and common sense know that. Those who have been brainwashed to deny evolution are the ones believing fairy tales.

Yes, I completely forgot all that 'tons of concrete evidence' for human evolution. Why, all of it combined would almost cover my kitchen table ... Don't know if would weigh a 'ton', though, more like maybe a hundred pounds ...
 
lucy-australopithecus-621653.jpg

Google is celebrating the “41st anniversary of Lucy" today with a doodle of an ape, that evolves into a walking man! According to one news source, Lucy was discovered in 1973. She lived 3.2 million years ago and her fossilized remains reveal her to be a hominid from the Australopithecus afarensis species.

Why don't more scientists respond to stories promoted by evolutionists when they have already proven evolution is a lie?

Most likely they fear losing their jobs. Some scientists depend upon grants to continue their research. In 2007 there was one organization known as Creation Research Society that had hundreds of members with master's degrees or doctorates in the various fields of science. Apparently, not everyone is in agreement with where man came from!

The chart evolutionists have used to support their theory, tracing hominids seven million years up to modern man, has been exposed as a lie.

According to a TIME magazine article printed on November 10,1975, there was a story about Mrs. Leakey's discovery which revealed serious flaws in their chart! In order for the evolutionists to cover their mistake, they claimed all they had to do was move man back 3 million years, so that they would overlap in time. By doing such a thing, they destroyed their own theory of evolution.

As one expert for the Creation Scientists aptly pointed out, “How could man evolve from the Ausralopithecus if man was already here one million years before them?

In other words, how can evolutionists claim Lucy is a missing link to man when man had already been on the earth for one million years before Lucy was ever born? The flawed research used by evolutionists is covered in Marvin Lubenov's book, “Bones of Contention.”

Interesting that the news article today never mentioned the Peking man. The story on the Peking man bones was that the finders of those bones, kept them hidden away from the public. Permission was granted to two French scientists to study the bones of the "Peking man." When the French scientists exposed the bones as animal bones, the bones suddenly disappeared! The truth is revealed in Marvin Lubenov's book, “Bones of Contention.”

To sum up some of the evidence provided thus far by the evolutionists, the Peking man bones were animal bones, the "Pilt down Man" (another hoax) was built out of fossilized human skull and the jawbone of an ape according to William R. Fix who wrote, “The Bone Peddlers: Selling Evolution.”

What about “Lucy?”

Lucy is an ape, not a missing link to humans. Why would the evolutionists use an ape to prove their theory of evolution? Their fossils show that they had short legs, long arms, and that their fingers and toes were curled rather than straight (human hands are not curled). What is the significance? That they swung from trees? We already know that apes swing from trees!

We can be grateful for honest scientists and researchers such as Dr. Charles Oxnard, Dr. Eric von Fange, Marvin Lubenov, John D. Morris Ph.D, Dr. Jack Couzzo, William R. Fix and Dr. Kent Hovind. The latter, whose offer of scientific evidence, exposing evolution as a lie, was rewarded with trumped up charges and a prison sentence!

It appears some people will resort to anything in order to silence the truth and perpetuate a lie.

Congratulations, Lucy. Celebrating the anniversary of an ape, has become the new normal!
---
This OP is like a Lit major who never took a Physics class commenting on & criticizing Einstein's theory of relativity.
What is an uninformed opinion worth?
.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top