Stephanie
Diamond Member
- Jul 11, 2004
- 70,230
- 10,864
- 2,040
another view on that ugly speech
Links in article and video at site
SNIP:
posted at 2:31 pm on January 22, 2013 by Ed Morrissey
I guess Id be more saddened by this had we had a chance to say hello at all. Isnt this the same President who told Republicans I won on Day 3 his first term while locking them out of the process of writing his stimulus bill? Ron Fournier laments the departure of a man who never arrived:
In the second two years, after Republicans took control of the House, we couldnt even get the Senate to fulfill its legal obligation to produce budgets, while Obamas two budget proposals were so radical that they couldnt muster a single Democratic vote in favor in three separate floor votes on Capitol Hill, let alone any Republicans. Instead, we careened from cliff to cliff, and in fact are still careening while Obama insists loudly that he wont negotiate on debt limits, all while national debt skyrockets past $16 trillion.
However, Fournier is undoubtedly correct that Obamas inaugural speech was mostly a thumb in the eye to his opposition. As a new spot from Crossroads GPS demonstrates, that message came through loud and clear to everyone:
David Ignatius ripped Obamas speech in yesterdays Washington Post in their blog named wait for it PostPartisan:
All of it here
Goodbye to the ?post-partisan? President? « Hot Air
Links in article and video at site
SNIP:
posted at 2:31 pm on January 22, 2013 by Ed Morrissey
I guess Id be more saddened by this had we had a chance to say hello at all. Isnt this the same President who told Republicans I won on Day 3 his first term while locking them out of the process of writing his stimulus bill? Ron Fournier laments the departure of a man who never arrived:
Politics is the delicate art of compromise: Two warring factions solving problems by finding ways in which all sides can declare victory. It is not, as Obama said, the work of absolutists. Which is why he needs to walk the narrow line between confidence and hubris, or otherwise he wont get anything through the GOP-controlled House.
History doesnt make excuses. If Obamas agenda fails because Republicans dont bow to his demands, that will be on him. He has to work with or around the GOP. Apparently, hes chosen the latter.
What happened to the idealistic young politician who argued against dividing the country into red and blue Americas? It seems were not going to see him again.
Well, lets take stock. In the first two years, we had ObamaCare, the aforementioned stimulus bill that failed to stimulate and create jobs, and Dodd-Frank. Oh, yes, and the oft-heralded Lily Ledbetter Act, which gave trial lawyers extra time to file discrimination lawsuits. On which of these was Obama post-partisan, again?
In the second two years, after Republicans took control of the House, we couldnt even get the Senate to fulfill its legal obligation to produce budgets, while Obamas two budget proposals were so radical that they couldnt muster a single Democratic vote in favor in three separate floor votes on Capitol Hill, let alone any Republicans. Instead, we careened from cliff to cliff, and in fact are still careening while Obama insists loudly that he wont negotiate on debt limits, all while national debt skyrockets past $16 trillion.
However, Fournier is undoubtedly correct that Obamas inaugural speech was mostly a thumb in the eye to his opposition. As a new spot from Crossroads GPS demonstrates, that message came through loud and clear to everyone:
David Ignatius ripped Obamas speech in yesterdays Washington Post in their blog named wait for it PostPartisan:
All of it here
Goodbye to the ?post-partisan? President? « Hot Air