Goodbye Poor Japan...

[Againsheila]

One scientist said the entire west coast should be evacuated. .

That one scientist was a loon, and rightly ignored.

Where do you live?

 

[Unkotare]

One scientist said the entire west coast should be evacuated. .

That one scientist was a loon, and rightly ignored.

Where do you live?

Not on the west coast, and to pre-respond to your next illogical statement, that does not have any bearing on the facts of the situation.

 

[Unkotare]

Don't compare Fukushima to Chernobyl - opinion - 16 March 2012 - New Scientist

 

[Unkotare]

Fukushima radiation in Canadian waters is not a threat, scientists say (+video) - CSMonitor.com

 

[Againsheila]

That one scientist was a loon, and rightly ignored.

Where do you live?

Not on the west coast, and to pre-respond to your next illogical statement, that does not have any bearing on the facts of the situation.

Sure it doesn't. Why don't you come live here for the next 20 years, then we'll talk, okay?

 

[Againsheila]

Fukushima radiation in Canadian waters is not a threat, scientists say (+video) - CSMonitor.com

Fukushima: A Nuclear War without a War: The Unspoken Crisis of Worldwide Nuclear Radiation | Global Research

While the long-term repercussions of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster are yet to be fully assessed, they are far more serious than those pertaining to the 1986 Chernobyl disaster in the Ukraine, which resulted in almost one million deaths (New Book Concludes – Chernobyl death toll: 985,000, mostly from cancer Global Research, September 10, 2010, See also Matthew Penney and Mark Selden The Severity of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Disaster: Comparing Chernobyl and Fukushima, Global Research, May 25, 2011)

 

[Unkotare]

Where do you live?

Not on the west coast, and to pre-respond to your next illogical statement, that does not have any bearing on the facts of the situation.

Sure it doesn't. Why don't you come live here for the next 20 years, then we'll talk, okay?

Ok, I'll be right there. Still won't change the facts of the situation one iota. Try to be rational.

 

[Unkotare]

Fukushima radiation in Canadian waters is not a threat, scientists say (+video) - CSMonitor.com

Fukushima: A Nuclear War without a War: The Unspoken Crisis of Worldwide Nuclear Radiation | Global Research

While the long-term repercussions of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster are yet to be fully assessed, they are far more serious than those pertaining to the 1986 Chernobyl disaster in the Ukraine, which resulted in almost one million deaths (New Book Concludes – Chernobyl death toll: 985,000, mostly from cancer Global Research, September 10, 2010, See also Matthew Penney and Mark Selden The Severity of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Disaster: Comparing Chernobyl and Fukushima, Global Research, May 25, 2011)

If you add junk 'science' to your preexisting paranoia the results are unlikely to be helpful or accurate. One million people have not died because of Chernobyl. That's ridiculous. Every person within 100,000 miles of Ukraine who ever gets cancer from the date of that accident until the end of time cannot be attributed to Chernobyl. People get cancer. In fact, if a person lives long enough they are all but guaranteed to get some form of cancer sooner or later. It's life. Read the link to real science I provided for you, pour yourself a drink, and relax.

 

[Unkotare]

Urgent update! Tokyo still not empty! Population still growing despite juvenile rantings of ignorant dope on internet! Film at 11.

 

[Nutz]

Urgent update! Tokyo still not empty! Population still growing despite juvenile rantings of ignorant dope on internet! Film at 11.

LMAO!

 

[Unkotare]

Why, it's a virtual ghost town, I tell ya!

 

[Unkotare]

The Tokyo Marathon and the Tokyo Art Fair were big successes - for a post-apocalyptic ghost town.

Maybe all the people are holograms or something. Yeah, that's it!

- BIOtech 2014 ?Asia's Largest Bio Event!

 

[Unkotare]

Btw:

"Japan’s Fukushima nuclear disaster is unlikely to lead to a rise in the number of people developing cancer like after Chernobyl in 1986, even though the most exposed children may face an increased risk, U.N. scientists said on Wednesday.

In a major study, the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) said it did not expect “significant changes” in future cancer rates that could be attributed to radiation exposure from the reactor meltdowns."

Fukushima meltdown unlikely to cause many cancers: U.N. scientists ? Japan Today: Japan News and Discussion

 

[Imperious]

Here is a perfect example of why we as humans shouldn't be playing with things we don't fully understand!
A very minor comparison would be the recent lead epidemic in our paint.

What's going to be next?

 

[JWBooth]

"Oh, no, there goes Tokyo
Go go Godzilla

History shows again and again how nature points up the folly of man
Godzilla! "

 

[bianco]

The truth;

Video

Fall Out

When a tsunami triggered the explosion at the Fukushima nuclear plant in 2011, the world feared the worst and for good reason.

It is the most devastating nuclear disaster since Chernobyl.

Tens of thousands of people were forced to leave their homes and millions of others now live in fear of serious illness.

Radiation is everywhere — in the soil, trees, food, air and water.

The Japanese are trying to clean it up, but they're fighting a losing battle.

Now, Liz Hayes goes inside the exclusion zone to the ghost cities, deserted and abandoned, never to be lived in again.

And 60 Minutes will also broadcast a warning from one of Australia's leading medical and nuclear experts, who says the 2020 Tokyo Olympics should be cancelled due to radiation contamination.

 

[Unkotare]

Btw:

"Japan’s Fukushima nuclear disaster is unlikely to lead to a rise in the number of people developing cancer like after Chernobyl in 1986, even though the most exposed children may face an increased risk, U.N. scientists said on Wednesday.

In a major study, the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) said it did not expect “significant changes” in future cancer rates that could be attributed to radiation exposure from the reactor meltdowns."

Fukushima meltdown unlikely to cause many cancers: U.N. scientists ? Japan Today: Japan News and Discussion

.

 

[SteadyMercury]

God damn it! I had a chance to visit Tokyo some years back and turned it down. Now it will be a footnote in history.

Wow. Just wow. Tokyo gone. Hard to believe.

Bump, because this shit from back in February never gets old.

 

[Unkotare]

God damn it! I had a chance to visit Tokyo some years back and turned it down. Now it will be a footnote in history.

Wow. Just wow. Tokyo gone. Hard to believe.

Bump, because this shit from back in February never gets old.

He's still clinging to it. Now he thinks it's happening in secret...

 

[SteadyMercury]

He's still clinging to it. Now he thinks it's happening in secret...

Yup! They are going to hide 30 million people down in Nagoya.

Hey maybe they can move them all to those FEMA camps we've built in the US to force the people into when martial law is declared.