Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Said1 said:I thought you were against multi-culturalism anyway? Was that all for show?
rtwngAvngr said:But we've identified the not so good ending, and have come up with the concept of individual rights to combat it. Hence, going forward, our nationalism contains these improvements.
I believe nations should pursue their interests individually. --This is another definitions of nationalism. The smart ones will see the long term benefits of cooperative trade and tolerance.
Said1 said:What?
ScreamingEagle said:Where else is Un-Nationalism supposed to go?
As far as multi-culturalism is concerned, I am against it if it usurps nationalism. I'm a great supporter of the American melting pot.
Said1 said:I don't know if it's just me, but that's seem to be what's happening a lot lately. Do I imagine such things?
ScreamingEagle said:Please elaborate.
Said1 said:Special rights for minorities. My daughter not being allowed to wear her halloween costum too school because it might offend some non-christian kid, when in reality it will only offend some kids parent(s), who is really only complaining about it becasue unike the workings of their country, they CAN.....should I go on?
ScreamingEagle said:You seem to be ignoring my first question.
Regarding "special rights" for minorities, I'd rather call it tyranny of the minority because that's what it is....an internal form of terrorism.
Said1 said:What first question?
ScreamingEagle said:Where else is Un-Nationalism supposed to go?
Said1 said:I've already said I hope I'm wrong, and I meant that. Seriously though, I think the definition of patriotism is better suited, considering the way inwhich most self-proclaimed nationalist define their culture, drawing on the past not the future. This exists presently and is not how I see Americans or the majority of North Americans in general. Anyway, tomato-tomahto.
I would define that as protectionism, but again - tomato-tomahto.
rtwngAvngr said:I always think of autarky as strictly being related to trade.
Said1 said:I'm flatttered that you value my opinion so much, really I do. But honestly, I have no idea what you're talking about. I give up, where is it supposed to go?
:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1252110/posts
Another French politician, Pierre Lellouche who - unlike Vedrine - has always been regarded as pro-American, writes: "I do not agree with the notion that the policies of George Bush are a temporary aberration. What's been happening in America for the past 15 years isn't neoconservatism but nationalism."
Said1 said:Special rights for minorities. My daughter not being allowed to wear her halloween costum too school because it might offend some non-christian kid, when in reality it will only offend some kids parent(s), who is really only complaining about it becasue unike the workings of their country, they CAN.....should I go on?
ScreamingEagle said:According to many libs, the New World Order. In order to have a WORLD order, nationalism has got to go.
Since you live in Canada - which probably considers itself already a member of the NWO - I can understand your confusion about the topic.
Said1 said:Econ 1000, man.
rtwngAvngr said:This is a lopsided implementation of multiculturalism. the right to never feel in the minority is crazy.
Said1 said:I think you know what I mean.
rtwngAvngr said:I just like to make the distinction because i really do believe in a true multiculturalism. Not the white hate we have going now.
