Golan Heights is Officially Part of Israel

[harmonica]

you've always been a looney
when the Rams lost, that just made you more looney
the Arabs should've learned after the first war THEY started, then the next, then the next--etc
but they never did = dumbasses

Zionist terrorism started this war. Can you say Irgun?

sure they did

 

[harmonica]

Arab anti-Semitism, and the Nazis

Another stupid and ignorant response. This is only one example. The Arabs have had a History of Anti Semitism for thousands of years If you had just half a brain you will see the above date ; MARCH 1944

https://www.quora.com/Was-there-anti-Semitism-in-the-Arabic-world-before-1948

Just one more example; However you are too stupid to know the difference

I did not say 1948. The Zionist migration started around the turn of the century. They moved into the area as racist assholes and are, to this day, racist assholes. However, I do agree Zionists are anti-Semitic.

like I said--looney

 

[eagle1462010]

BRAVO ZULU!

 

[Billo_Really]

Fatboy, the only asshole here is you.

That was harsh.

 

[Billo_Really]

Did Bathtub Barry tell You that?

Zionism was a response to Arab pogroms against local Jews.
No Zionist ever shot a bullet prior to that.

Zionism was a response to Herzl.

Some dude just called me an asshole. What are you going to do about it?

 

[fncceo]

Did Bathtub Barry tell You that?

Zionism was a response to Arab pogroms against local Jews.
No Zionist ever shot a bullet prior to that.

Zionism was a response to Herzl.

Some dude just called me an asshole. What are you going to do about it?

Get yourself a homeland.

 

[Billo_Really]

RE: Golan Heights is Officially Part of Israel ​

⁜→ Billo_Really, et al,

BLUF: One does not lead to the other. It is such a very broad statement. However, if Israel were to succumb to the demands of the Arab Palestinians of the West Bank (including Jerusalem) and the Gaza Strip, the integrity of the Jewish National Home will be slowly eroded away (death by a 1000 cuts).

Further: The Arab Palestinians of the West Bank (including Jerusalem) and the Gaza Strip should not be rewarded for their extensive history of criminal behaviors over the last half-century.

International law and the UN Charter was created, in part, to prevent the kind of things that happened in WWII. One of them being the Holocaust. So, by not honoring IHL, Israel is promoting the very things that eventually led to the loss of 6 million Jews, thus rendering their deaths to be in vain.

(COMMENT)

The Arab Palestinians of the West Bank (including Jerusalem) and the Gaza Strip routinely violate Customary and International Humanitarian Law (IHL).

The Arab Palestinians of the West Bank (including Jerusalem) and the Gaza Strip routinely support or directly participate in criminal acts directed against Israel with the intention of → or calculated to → cause death or serious bodily injury to the civilian population, or to any other person not taking an active part in the hostilities, the purpose of such act, by its nature or context, is to intimidate a population and to compel a government or an international organization to do (or to abstain from doing) some act that furthers the criminal objective.

[See only UN General Assembly Resolution 3314 (XXIX) (Definition of Aggression), 14.12.1974; UN General Assembly Resolution 2625 (XXV) (Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations), 24.10.1970.]​

The UN, through the Security Council Resolution 1624 (2005) Condemns → in the strongest terms →

◈ The incitement of terrorist acts,

◈ The repudiating attempts at the justification or glorification (apologie) of terrorist acts that may incite further terrorist acts,​

You are correct in that the intent of Customary and IHL included the concept to respect and preserve the territorial integrity and existing political independence. And when the Arab Palestinians of the West Bank (including Jerusalem) and the Gaza Strip attempt to violate the territorial integrity and political independence of Israel, it only serves to reinforce the need to strengthen the international boundaries as established and to take such further actions as necessary to protect the sovereignty of Israel.

Most Respectfully,
R

You cannot acquire land by force. That has nothing to do with the Palestinians.

The entire world is against you.

EU Rejects Israeli Claim to Syrian Golan
“The EU has a very simple and clear position,” she said. “The EU does not recognize Israeli sovereignty over any of the territories occupied by Israel since June 1967, in line with international law and with UN Security Council Resolutions 242 and 497. And this also applies to the Golan Heights.”
​

You have no right denying the Palestinian's their freedom.

 

[Billo_Really]

Get yourself a homeland.

Already got one. Why don't you go fuck yourself!

 

[fncceo]

Get yourself a homeland.

Already got one. Why don't you go fuck yourself!

If I could do that, why would I waste time on the Internet?

 

[fncceo]

You cannot acquire land by force.

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Golan Heights is Officially Part of Israel
⁜→ Billo_Really, et al,

I don't think that is what the International Law says at all. It is obvious that you have not read and understood it.

You cannot acquire land by force.

(WHAT DOES IT SAY - and - WHAT DOES IT MEAN)

The typical legal support that the pro-Arab Palestinians of the West Bank (including Jerusalem) and the Gaza Strip use when making the claim "You cannot acquire land by force" are:

⁜ UN Charter, Article 2(4)(1945);

⁜ Declaration on Principles of International Law Concerning Friendly Relations..., Principle1 (1970)
This Principle was derivative of Article 2(4), UN Charter. However, it does add some clarification to the issue.

Every State has the duty to refrain from the threat or use of force to violate the existing international boundaries of another State or as a means of solving international disputes, including territorial disputes and problems concerning frontiers of States.

❖ All Members shall refrain in their international relations:

◈ Threat of force against:

✦ The territorial integrity

✦ Political independence of any state,​

◈ Use of force against:

✦ The territorial integrity

✦ Political independence of any state,​

(QUESTION)

In the Israeli-Palestinian conflict:

❖ Who are the two states (parties) involved?

❖ What claim is being made?

❖ When did the violation occur?

❖ Where is the territory involved?

❖ Why is the complaint being made?​

I think you will find that the International Law you are citing cannot be applied.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[Billo_Really]

RE: Golan Heights is Officially Part of Israel
⁜→ Billo_Really, et al,

I don't think that is what the International Law says at all. It is obvious that you have not read and understood it.

You cannot acquire land by force.

(WHAT DOES IT SAY - and - WHAT DOES IT MEAN)

The typical legal support that the pro-Arab Palestinians of the West Bank (including Jerusalem) and the Gaza Strip use when making the claim "You cannot acquire land by force" are:

⁜ UN Charter, Article 2(4)(1945);

⁜ Declaration on Principles of International Law Concerning Friendly Relations..., Principle1 (1970)
This Principle was derivative of Article 2(4), UN Charter. However, it does add some clarification to the issue.

Every State has the duty to refrain from the threat or use of force to violate the existing international boundaries of another State or as a means of solving international disputes, including territorial disputes and problems concerning frontiers of States.

❖ All Members shall refrain in their international relations:

◈ Threat of force against:

✦ The territorial integrity

✦ Political independence of any state,​

◈ Use of force against:

✦ The territorial integrity

✦ Political independence of any state,​

(QUESTION)

In the Israeli-Palestinian conflict:

❖ Who are the two states (parties) involved?

❖ What claim is being made?

❖ When did the violation occur?

❖ Where is the territory involved?

❖ Why is the complaint being made?​

I think you will find that the International Law you are citing cannot be applied.

Most Respectfully,
R

Israel occupied these territories during the '67 war. The laws of occupation are clear. The world is not going to allow you to do the same thing Germany tried to do to Poland.

 

[fncceo]

Israel occupied these territories during the '67 war

Before that, Jordan and Egypt occupied the West Bank and Gaza respectively. Israel took control of those territories as part of a cease-fire agreement with those countries.

 

[USAF 2023]

Get yourself a homeland.

Already got one. Why don't you go fuck yourself!

After you !

 

[USAF 2023]

RE: Golan Heights is Officially Part of Israel
⁜→ Billo_Really, et al,

I don't think that is what the International Law says at all. It is obvious that you have not read and understood it.

You cannot acquire land by force.

(WHAT DOES IT SAY - and - WHAT DOES IT MEAN)

The typical legal support that the pro-Arab Palestinians of the West Bank (including Jerusalem) and the Gaza Strip use when making the claim "You cannot acquire land by force" are:

⁜ UN Charter, Article 2(4)(1945);

⁜ Declaration on Principles of International Law Concerning Friendly Relations..., Principle1 (1970)
This Principle was derivative of Article 2(4), UN Charter. However, it does add some clarification to the issue.

Every State has the duty to refrain from the threat or use of force to violate the existing international boundaries of another State or as a means of solving international disputes, including territorial disputes and problems concerning frontiers of States.

❖ All Members shall refrain in their international relations:

◈ Threat of force against:

✦ The territorial integrity

✦ Political independence of any state,​

◈ Use of force against:

✦ The territorial integrity

✦ Political independence of any state,​

(QUESTION)

In the Israeli-Palestinian conflict:

❖ Who are the two states (parties) involved?

❖ What claim is being made?

❖ When did the violation occur?

❖ Where is the territory involved?

❖ Why is the complaint being made?​

I think you will find that the International Law you are citing cannot be applied.

Most Respectfully,
R

Israel occupied these territories during the '67 war. The laws of occupation are clear. The world is not going to allow you to do the same thing Germany tried to do to Poland.

Another ignorant response. Germany initiated the War. Israel didn’t . Before 67 Gaza, the W. Bank and E. Jerusalem were legally considered parts of Egypt and Jordan .

 

[USAF 2023]

RE: Golan Heights is Officially Part of Israel ​

⁜→ Billo_Really, et al,

BLUF: One does not lead to the other. It is such a very broad statement. However, if Israel were to succumb to the demands of the Arab Palestinians of the West Bank (including Jerusalem) and the Gaza Strip, the integrity of the Jewish National Home will be slowly eroded away (death by a 1000 cuts).

Further: The Arab Palestinians of the West Bank (including Jerusalem) and the Gaza Strip should not be rewarded for their extensive history of criminal behaviors over the last half-century.

International law and the UN Charter was created, in part, to prevent the kind of things that happened in WWII. One of them being the Holocaust. So, by not honoring IHL, Israel is promoting the very things that eventually led to the loss of 6 million Jews, thus rendering their deaths to be in vain.

(COMMENT)

The Arab Palestinians of the West Bank (including Jerusalem) and the Gaza Strip routinely violate Customary and International Humanitarian Law (IHL).

The Arab Palestinians of the West Bank (including Jerusalem) and the Gaza Strip routinely support or directly participate in criminal acts directed against Israel with the intention of → or calculated to → cause death or serious bodily injury to the civilian population, or to any other person not taking an active part in the hostilities, the purpose of such act, by its nature or context, is to intimidate a population and to compel a government or an international organization to do (or to abstain from doing) some act that furthers the criminal objective.

[See only UN General Assembly Resolution 3314 (XXIX) (Definition of Aggression), 14.12.1974; UN General Assembly Resolution 2625 (XXV) (Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations), 24.10.1970.]​

The UN, through the Security Council Resolution 1624 (2005) Condemns → in the strongest terms →

◈ The incitement of terrorist acts,

◈ The repudiating attempts at the justification or glorification (apologie) of terrorist acts that may incite further terrorist acts,​

You are correct in that the intent of Customary and IHL included the concept to respect and preserve the territorial integrity and existing political independence. And when the Arab Palestinians of the West Bank (including Jerusalem) and the Gaza Strip attempt to violate the territorial integrity and political independence of Israel, it only serves to reinforce the need to strengthen the international boundaries as established and to take such further actions as necessary to protect the sovereignty of Israel.

Most Respectfully,
R

You cannot acquire land by force. That has nothing to do with the Palestinians.

The entire world is against you.

EU Rejects Israeli Claim to Syrian Golan
“The EU has a very simple and clear position,” she said. “The EU does not recognize Israeli sovereignty over any of the territories occupied by Israel since June 1967, in line with international law and with UN Security Council Resolutions 242 and 497. And this also applies to the Golan Heights.”
​

You have no right denying the Palestinian's their freedom.

Ask the why Olmert’s plan was rejected and there will be no response

 

[USAF 2023]

RE: Golan Heights is Officially Part of Israel
⁜→ Billo_Really, et al,

Sometimes you baffle me.

By annexing the Golan Heights, Israel has taken one major shit on all the victims of the Holocaust.

(COMMENT)

This is one of those times. The Golan Heights has nothing at all to do with WWII (VE Day was in May 1945 - before - Syrian Independence in Apr 1946).

Most Respectfully,
R

International law and the UN Charter was created, in part, to prevent the kind of things that happened in WWII. One of them being the Holocaust. So, by not honoring IHL, Israel is promoting the very things that eventually led to the loss of 6 million Jews, thus rendering their deaths to be in vain.

Really? Is that why the U.N. “ peacekeeping force” deliberately left the area amid Nasser’s threats and eventually blocking Israel’s right to International Waters?

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Golan Heights is Officially Part of Israel
⁜→ Billo_Really, et al,

I see you would view this as very cut and dried. But that is not very astute.

Israel occupied these territories during the '67 war. The laws of occupation are clear. The world is not going to allow you to do the same thing Germany tried to do to Poland.

(COMMENT)

In 1967, there were no Arab Palestinians. Between 1950 and 1988 the West Bank belong to Jordan. In fact, Khaled Mashal (former Chief Political Officer for HAMAS) was born in Silwad, Jordanian ruled West Bank.
When Israel occupied the West Bank, it did not belong to any Arab Palestinian entity. The West Bank was Jordanian Sovereign Territory, wherein the Arab Palestinian of the West Bank had representatives to Parliament that voted to accept annexation (self-determination).

In July 1988 the King of Jordan (HM Hussein) cut all tied and abandon the West Bank. At that time, there was no Arab Palestinian political entity to fill the void with a functioning government and no Arab Palestinian entity laying claim to the territory (terra nullis). At that point, the only government was the Israeli Government.

Israel DID NOT occupy Arab Palestinian territory in 1967; it occupied Jordanian territory. Since that time, the Arab Palestinians of the West Bank only began to attempt to establish some sort of claim in November 1988.

Most Respectfully,
R

​

 

[Billo_Really]

Before that, Jordan and Egypt occupied the West Bank and Gaza respectively. Israel took control of those territories as part of a cease-fire agreement with those countries.

Israel seized those territories in the '67 war.

 

[Billo_Really]

Another ignorant response. Germany initiated the War. Israel didn’t . Before 67 Gaza, the W. Bank and E. Jerusalem were legally considered parts of Egypt and Jordan .

The war started when Israeli tanks rolled into Egypt. How many times do you have to be corrected on this?