Godfather of Global Warming: AGW doomsday Predictions are Incorrect

Discussion in 'Science and Technology' started by JimBowie1958, Jun 23, 2012.

  1. JimBowie1958
    Offline

    JimBowie1958 Old Fogey

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2011
    Messages:
    39,343
    Thanks Received:
    5,506
    Trophy Points:
    1,170
    Location:
    Fredericksburg, VA
    Ratings:
    +21,477
    Green

    Wow, just wow!
     
  2. Annie
    Offline

    Annie Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2003
    Messages:
    50,847
    Thanks Received:
    4,644
    Trophy Points:
    1,790
    Ratings:
    +4,770
    I just looked at the Guardian for Lovelock, interesting interview:

    James Lovelock on shale gas and the problem with 'greens' | Environment | guardian.co.uk

    While there's lots to read, I found the following interesting:

     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  3. uscitizen
    Offline

    uscitizen Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    45,941
    Thanks Received:
    4,791
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    My Shack
    Ratings:
    +4,807
    Of course they are incorrect. The big rock is supposed to smack us on 12-21-2012.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
  4. JimBowie1958
    Offline

    JimBowie1958 Old Fogey

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2011
    Messages:
    39,343
    Thanks Received:
    5,506
    Trophy Points:
    1,170
    Location:
    Fredericksburg, VA
    Ratings:
    +21,477
    You shouldnt believe every movie you see.

    I heard it was Godzilla returning on a Global rampage.
     
  5. Saigon
    Offline

    Saigon Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2012
    Messages:
    11,434
    Thanks Received:
    870
    Trophy Points:
    175
    Location:
    Helsinki, Finland
    Ratings:
    +1,240
    A few quotes the OP seems to have 'forgotten' to post:

    "The fear of nuclear is now too great after Fukushima and the cost of building new build plants is very expensive and impractical."

    "Hydro, biomass, solar, etc, have all got great promise"

    "You've got to cut back on burning fossil fuels, but you've also got to be sensible and reasonable. Like when in business, you've got to adapt to each new situation and try to survive until things get better. "

    "The people who don't believe in the environment and climate science, etc, are the deniers. They are a totally different category [to the greens]. They've got their own religion. They believe that the world was right before these damn people [the greens] came along and want to go back to where we were 20 years ago. That's also silly in its own way."

    I am hoping the OP will explain how he happened to 'forget' to post these parts of the interview.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  6. Old Rocks
    Online

    Old Rocks Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    46,584
    Thanks Received:
    5,425
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Portland, Ore.
    Ratings:
    +10,390
    Seems to me that Lovelock is stating what many advocates of alternative energies are stating. That the solution for replacing fossil fuels is all of the above, no magic bullet.

    As for 'doomsday' scenerious, the serious scientists have been saying for the last two decades that the big danger in global warming creating a climate change is the affects on agriculture and infrastructure. We had a foretaste of this in 2010 and 2011. Plus there is the little matter of the ocean clathrates, and how they are reacting to the increased warming.
     
  7. JimBowie1958
    Offline

    JimBowie1958 Old Fogey

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2011
    Messages:
    39,343
    Thanks Received:
    5,506
    Trophy Points:
    1,170
    Location:
    Fredericksburg, VA
    Ratings:
    +21,477
    I didnt forget anything; they werent relevant to the point I was illustrating that many scientists are becoming increasingly critical of the AGW side of the debate.

    I agree with the statements you quote, and only qualify the last one by asserting that yes, I have my own religion and do not need to replace it with enviornmental wacko worship of Gaya. I do not agree that it is silly in the least.

    God put manking here as stewards of the Earth, but not to worship it.
     
  8. Saigon
    Offline

    Saigon Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2012
    Messages:
    11,434
    Thanks Received:
    870
    Trophy Points:
    175
    Location:
    Helsinki, Finland
    Ratings:
    +1,240
    Jim -

    Why did you misrepresent the content of the man's statements?
     
  9. JimBowie1958
    Offline

    JimBowie1958 Old Fogey

    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2011
    Messages:
    39,343
    Thanks Received:
    5,506
    Trophy Points:
    1,170
    Location:
    Fredericksburg, VA
    Ratings:
    +21,477
    Why dont you stop beating your wife?

    Saigon, you need to show me where I misrepresented his statements, which IMO, you have failed to do.

    And thanks for the negative rep prior to trying to get an explanation from me on my post, Einstein.

    Typical leftist view of discussion; to disagree with a lefty is to be dishonest or stupid or evil or some combination of all three.

    Which is why such Jacobinism is dangerous to a free democratic society; you guys do not tolerate disagreement whatsoever. You illustrate that.
     
  10. Saigon
    Offline

    Saigon Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2012
    Messages:
    11,434
    Thanks Received:
    870
    Trophy Points:
    175
    Location:
    Helsinki, Finland
    Ratings:
    +1,240
    Jim -

    The fact that you deliberately removed the half dozen comments which undermine the argument you want to make is not honest posting.

    btw, I am not a "lefty" whatever that means.

    btw. I didn't neg rep you for anything to do with your political views - purely the fact that you cherry picked the quotes you presented.
     
    Last edited: Jun 24, 2012

Share This Page