God and jesus believe in socialism

[uscitizen]

No, God and Jesus believe in private initiative in helping the poor and sick. They did not believe in Person A forcing Person B to do so at the point of a gun.

"give unto Ceaser that which is Ceasers"

It is my money and I want to keep it.

 

[AllieBaba]

No, God and Jesus believe in private initiative in helping the poor and sick. They did not believe in Person A forcing Person B to do so at the point of a gun.

"give unto Ceaser that which is Ceasers"

It was Christ's way of saying don' tmix politics with religion.

The overall view of the OT is you abide the law of the land, so long as the law of the land doesn't require you to act in opposition to the Word.

 

[Kevin_Kennedy]

No, God and Jesus believe in private initiative in helping the poor and sick. They did not believe in Person A forcing Person B to do so at the point of a gun.

"give unto Ceaser that which is Ceasers"

I've already addressed this.

 

[Truthmatters]

No, God and Jesus believe in private initiative in helping the poor and sick. They did not believe in Person A forcing Person B to do so at the point of a gun.

"give unto Ceaser that which is Ceasers"

It was Christ's way of saying don' tmix politics with religion.

The overall view of the OT is you abide the law of the land, so long as the law of the land doesn't require you to act in opposition to the Word.

In what way is keeping the money changers from raping the people against gods plan?

 

[uscitizen]

Jesus only got bent out of shape while running the money changers from the temple.
Boy was that a mistake, he was crucified shortly thereafter for that escapade.

 

[ScreamingEagle]

When you give to your church, especially the Catholic church, that is socialism because that money is distributed to the poor.

Socialism is merely an intermediate step toward Communism....

Therefore if Catholics are the "socialists" you claim they are.....they should then be touted as the darlings of socialist/communist regimes such as in the USSR or the PRC, or Cuba....or Venezuela today...

But we all know THAT has never happened......

Yarn us another one....

PS: Again....why is it socialists/communists don't believe in Jesus/God or even support the Catholic church....since you say Jesus was such a big Socialist......?

 

[uscitizen]

Jesus was a socialist. The religions founded on him are not.

 

[amrchaos]

Yes, that which is Caesar's. Not that which Caesar claims is his.

Some one who obviously has no concept of taxation and caesar, if caesar said it was his then it was his.

Someone who obviously has no concept of property rights. If Caesar lays claim to something that is by right mine, and takes it by force, that doesn't make it his.

Caesar was emperopr of ancient Rome. In the time of Jesus, Caesar could order the execution of an entire region. Now do you understand where Jesus is coming from?

Or are you one of those people that consider Jesus words timeless and transcends historical references??

 

[uscitizen]

The joos were looking for a warlord to release them from their bondage to Rome.

What they got was one who released them from their personal bondages. The joos did not like that uch.

 

[amrchaos]

Jesus only got bent out of shape while running the money changers from the temple.
Boy was that a mistake, he was crucified shortly thereafter for that escapade.

Perfect example to what happens to lefties when they mess with my tax dollars!!

Do not believe me? Well, the lefts current messiah is about to get his 'political' nine inch nails due to his "holier than thou' social policies and tax schemes!! And Notice how he has not implemented ay of them as of yet. Just the threat of them has the population in a tizzy!!!

 

[uscitizen]

Jesus only got bent out of shape while running the money changers from the temple.
Boy was that a mistake, he was crucified shortly thereafter for that escapade.

Perfect example to what happens to lefties when they mess with my tax dollars!!

Do not believe me? Well, the lefts current messiah is about to get his 'political' nine inch nails due to his "holier than thou' social policies and tax schemes!! And Notice how he has not implemented ay of them as of yet. Just the threat of them has the population in a tizzy!!!

Heaven taxes?

 

[PLYMCO_PILGRIM]

GOD AND JESUS BELIEVE IN SOCIALISM

God’s low to the Israelites was distribution of the wealth. “Gleaning” was one way that socialism was practiced. God took from other nations and gave to the Israelites and then he took for the Israelites and gave to the nations. He took the Kingdom of Heaven from them and gave it to the nations.
Jesus approved of taxes, healing the sick and feeding the poor which were socialistic practices.
Right Wing Regilioius Nuts and Village Idiots call this “stealing” and “robbery” The government do ask from you more than what you can afford and what is fair.
Giving to charities is not the same as the government distributions because they distribute according to rules, regulations and guide lines. Money given to charitable organizations it is almost never given to the poor.
GOD was the ultimate socialist when he gave his son as a ransom for our sins.
When you give to your church, especially the Catholic church, that is socialism because that money is distributed to the poor.




Is God a Socialist?
Oct 10, 2008
Is God a Socialist? - Vox

See your confusing charity with socialism. Charity is voluntary...for example you can choose how much money to give to the church.

Socialism is not voluntary, its arbitrary and run by the government...not by our own free will.

Get the difference?

 

[DiamondDave]

Jesus was a socialist. The religions founded on him are not.

No matter how many times you try to repeat it.. it does not make it true..

As stated by myself and other SO many times.. there was nothing in his teachings about FORCED redistribution... there was noting about government controlled systems for entitlement

wingers trying to justify their liberal guilt does not make Jesus, or anyone, preaching or supporting voluntary charity, a socialist

 

[☭proletarian☭]

Can you actually explain how this is true before you just say it. Most civil rights laws were passed by republican legislatures before 1964.

And the Republicans were founded as a liberal party and remained that way until after the Reconstruction, when the southern Klansmen migrated from the Democrats to the Republican party. Now the part is the partyof rich reactionaries who want to institute an oligarchy, were as the Democrats is the party of rich make-it-up-as-we-go-alongs who want to institute an oligarchy,

The Republican Party was never liberal in any sense of the word. The Democratic Party was the old classical liberal party, but that ended with the end of Cleveland's administration and the rise of progressivism.

Wrong, dude. The Republican party was founded on the principles of classical liberalism, which is why they opposed slavery and stressed individualism and individual rights. Even to this day, nearly all of their rhetoric still centers around classical liberal ideals of personal freedom.

 

[Kevin_Kennedy]

Some one who obviously has no concept of taxation and caesar, if caesar said it was his then it was his.

Someone who obviously has no concept of property rights. If Caesar lays claim to something that is by right mine, and takes it by force, that doesn't make it his.

Caesar was emperopr of ancient Rome. In the time of Jesus, Caesar could order the execution of an entire region. Now do you understand where Jesus is coming from?

Or are you one of those people that consider Jesus words timeless and transcends historical references??

So it is your argument that Jesus believed everything belonged to Caesar? Including everyone's life? Because following your logic Caesar could claim his right to anything, including the lives of his subjects.

 

[Mr. Peepers]

I also like the system of pay in Japan. CEO's can only make 1,000 times what their lowest paid employee makes.

That's wrong. They only make 70x more than the lowes paid employee. I work for a Japanese company.

 

[Kevin_Kennedy]

And the Republicans were founded as a liberal party and remained that way until after the Reconstruction, when the southern Klansmen migrated from the Democrats to the Republican party. Now the part is the partyof rich reactionaries who want to institute an oligarchy, were as the Democrats is the party of rich make-it-up-as-we-go-alongs who want to institute an oligarchy,

The Republican Party was never liberal in any sense of the word. The Democratic Party was the old classical liberal party, but that ended with the end of Cleveland's administration and the rise of progressivism.

Wrong, dude. The Republican party was founded on the principles of classical liberalism, which is why they opposed slavery and stressed individualism and individual rights. Even to this day, nearly all of their rhetoric still centers around classical liberal ideals of personal freedom.

I'd suggest you look at history a bit closer. The Republican Party was the party of high tariffs, central banking, inflation, paper money, and statism from its very inception. Those positions are all opposed to classical liberalism. The Republican Party can trace its roots back to the Whig Party, and earlier the Federalist Party and Alexander Hamilton. Whereas the Democratic Party can trace its roots back to Thomas Jefferson and James Madison.

Now I won't argue that today the Republican Party's rhetoric seems more in line with classical liberalism than the Democratic Party, but that is because the Democratic Party embraced progressivism after Grover Cleveland's administration. That's why the liberals of the Democratic Party attempted to create their own party, the National Democratic Party, but ultimately failed.

 

[Mr. Peepers]

The Nazis were not Rightwing but Totalitarian Left

Incorrect. They were definitely right-wing.

 

[Kevin_Kennedy]

The Nazis were not Rightwing but Totalitarian Left

Incorrect. They were definitely right-wing.

Socialism is a left-wing ideology.

 

[☭proletarian☭]

Hitler killed communists and socialists

racism, xenophobia, and dreams of returning to a better age are hallmarks of social reactionary conservatism- as I said, hje was on the economic left and social far right