God and jesus believe in socialism

GOD AND JESUS BELIEVE IN SOCIALISM

God’s low to the Israelites was distribution of the wealth. “Gleaning” was one way that socialism was practiced. God took from other nations and gave to the Israelites and then he took for the Israelites and gave to the nations. He took the Kingdom of Heaven from them and gave it to the nations.
Jesus approved of taxes, healing the sick and feeding the poor which were socialistic practices.
Right Wing Regilioius Nuts and Village Idiots call this “stealing” and “robbery” The government do ask from you more than what you can afford and what is fair.
Giving to charities is not the same as the government distributions because they distribute according to rules, regulations and guide lines. Money given to charitable organizations it is almost never given to the poor.
GOD was the ultimate socialist when he gave his son as a ransom for our sins.
When you give to your church, especially the Catholic church, that is socialism because that money is distributed to the poor.




Is God a Socialist?
Oct 10, 2008
Is God a Socialist? - Vox
Blasphemy hardly wins anyone over to the side of the jackbooted authoritarian liar.

Speaking of jackboots, those were worn by the fascist Nazis.

They were extremely RIGHT wing, not left.

Hitler was not interested in individual freedom he was a National Socialist; he's one of yours.
 
☭proletarian☭;1828053 said:
The nazis belonged to the economic left and social far right

That is incorrect.

He was an economic and social Leftist.
 
Speaking of jackboots, those were worn by the fascist Nazis.

They were extremely RIGHT wing, not left.

The Nazis were not Rightwing but Totalitarian Left

The official name of the Nazis was the National Socialist Workers Party, this name is hardly a “Conservative” term. It is really a Progressive/Marxist name, since Hitler was a man of the Left

I bet you think the communist Chinese are republican then because they live in the Peoples Republic of China.:cuckoo:

No, we agree: the ChiComs are Leftists
 
☭proletarian☭;1828053 said:
The nazis belonged to the economic left and social far right

That is incorrect.

He was an economic and social Leftist.

That's a lie. They were fascists... government and the corporate structure were merged. They were far right.... and totally opposed to communism.

That's a lie that the American Left has been telling for years! Fascists are as far Left as you can get!

We on the right are for individual Liberty and Freedom.
 
☭proletarian☭;1828466 said:
☭proletarian☭;1828420 said:
wow... ignorant and illiterate...

Indeed.


Good to see you admit you have a problem.

Now, on to step two.

I have no problem and I no longer have patience to deal with liars.

Fascism is one form of Librulism.

Tithing and Socialism have NOTHING in common
 
Last edited:
Sure, because the two majpr political parties in the US are representative of ideological principles :lol:

Does David Duke represent the Republican party, then?

Although that would explain all the talk of secession immediately following the election of the first black president :lol:
 
Is there a way to tie this to the Law of the Jubilee? Forgiveness of debts, freedom for those who sold themselves into servitude, the return of ones inheritence, etc.

Being a suspicious sort, I suspect the one who created the thread was acting as agent provocateur. I imagine he is pleased to see so many rise to the bait.
 
GOD AND JESUS BELIEVE IN SOCIALISM

God’s low to the Israelites was distribution of the wealth. “Gleaning” was one way that socialism was practiced. God took from other nations and gave to the Israelites and then he took for the Israelites and gave to the nations. He took the Kingdom of Heaven from them and gave it to the nations.
Jesus approved of taxes, healing the sick and feeding the poor which were socialistic practices.
Right Wing Regilioius Nuts and Village Idiots call this “stealing” and “robbery” The government do ask from you more than what you can afford and what is fair.
Giving to charities is not the same as the government distributions because they distribute according to rules, regulations and guide lines. Money given to charitable organizations it is almost never given to the poor.
GOD was the ultimate socialist when he gave his son as a ransom for our sins.
When you give to your church, especially the Catholic church, that is socialism because that money is distributed to the poor.




Is God a Socialist?
Oct 10, 2008
Is God a Socialist? - Vox

God and Jesus' plan and design for His Creation have nothing in common with any system that man has ever contrived.

God's way is perfect, man's way is flawed. God's plan is perfect, and man's plans fail. God's authority is perfect, and man's government is corrupt.

Socialism is a man thing, not a God thing. It is weak, and God has a powerful system.
 
☭proletarian☭;1828214 said:
What does the Bible say about Christian tithing?
The Old Testament records two other tithes; one tithe was called the "festival tithe," when they came to Jerusalem three times a year for fellowship. The expense for the festival, (travel, food, etc.) was taken from this tithe. The third tithe was given in the third year and was a tithe holy unto the Lord. It was a tithe of almsgiving for the poor and needy. All of these tithes were brought to the storehouse, and the priest oversaw the distribution of same. The first tithe was for the upkeep of the priests, since they had no inheritance. All of their income and portion was to be given to them by God's people. This tithe in and of itself, is not considered an offering. It is the minimum requirement for all of God's people.

Bible.com



  • All that believed were together, and had all things in common; And sold their possessions and goods, and parted them to all men, as every man had need.
    (Acts 2:44-45)

  • There was not a needy person among them, for as many as owned lands or houses sold them and brought the proceeds of what was sold. They laid it at the apostles’ feet, and it was distributed to each as any had need. There was a Levite, a native of Cyprus, Joseph, to whom the apostles gave the name Barnabas (which means “son of encouragement”). He sold a field that belonged to him, then brought the money, and laid it at the apostles’ feet.
    (Acts 4:34-37)
This is what the Lord has commanded: Gather of it, every man of you, as much as he can eat; you shall take an omer apiece, according to the number of persons who each of you has in his tent. And the people of Israel did so; they gathered some more, some less. But when they measured it with an omer, he that gathered much had nothing over, and he that gathered little had no lack; each gathered according to what he could eat
(Ex. 16:16-18)
Biblical Communism: What Does the Bible Say About Communism & Socialism?


Acts 2:44-45

And all who believed were together and had all things in common. And they were selling their possessions and belongings and distributing the proceeds to all, as any had need.



What Does the Bible Say About Socialism?

I believe our nation was founded on the concept of personal choice and the right to pursue your own religious beliefs. I'm happy that these people were happy doing this and no one has prevented anyone from doing this today but it seems that the left is hell bent on turning us into a village whether we want to or not.

Go join a cult. We won't stop you but don't drag us into it.
 
☭proletarian☭;1828053 said:
The nazis belonged to the economic left and social far right

That is incorrect.

He was an economic and social Leftist.

That's a lie. They were fascists... government and the corporate structure were merged. They were far right.... and totally opposed to communism.

They were not. You are confusing hitler with Mussilini. He was a fascist and fascism was birthed right out of socialism because Mussilini was a former socialist. Hitler, on the other hand, had his own unique brand of socialism that sought to purify the german nation.

And what you are referring to is corpratism. That was the fascist economic model that was a hybrid of capitalism and communism. It said that an individual can own the means a production but must channel his efforts for the community itself which usually put every business under the direct control of the government. This differed slightly from communism which owned and controlled the means of production but still retained the idea that one labored for the community and not for the benefit of themselves. This is what the fascist economic model and communist had in common.
 
☭proletarian☭;1828501 said:
Sure, because the two majpr political parties in the US are representative of ideological principles :lol:

Does David Duke represent the Republican party, then?

Although that would explain all the talk of secession immediately following the election of the first black president :lol:

sigh...:rolleyes:
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top