GM reiterates Braves won't part with prospects, even for Peavy

Discussion in 'Sports' started by CrimsonWhite, Oct 23, 2008.

  1. CrimsonWhite
    Offline

    CrimsonWhite *****istrator Emeritus Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2006
    Messages:
    7,978
    Thanks Received:
    1,755
    Trophy Points:
    123
    Location:
    Guntucky
    Ratings:
    +1,757
    This is bullshit. The Braves should get this done.

     
  2. Paulie
    Offline

    Paulie Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2007
    Messages:
    31,533
    Thanks Received:
    4,851
    Trophy Points:
    1,130
    Ratings:
    +15,374
    Why? He'd be a rental for just next season until he becomes a free agent at the end, and the Braves won't give him the money he'll want. They didn't want to give Tex the money either. The Braves have always relied on their farm system to develop their talent, and they have one of the best. Why waste prospects on a rental pitcher?

    If I were you, I'd be forgetting about competing for the next couple years. You guys are in rebuild mode.
     
    Last edited: Oct 24, 2008
  3. CrimsonWhite
    Offline

    CrimsonWhite *****istrator Emeritus Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2006
    Messages:
    7,978
    Thanks Received:
    1,755
    Trophy Points:
    123
    Location:
    Guntucky
    Ratings:
    +1,757
    We haven't competed since 1996. Yes owned the divison for another 8 years after that, but haven't truly competed since then. Our farm system is great, but this one dimensional strategy doesn't seem to be working. Besides, pitiching development has always been our strong suit, but with Mazzone gone, that development program has gone to shit. If rental pitchers is what it takes to get a rotation toghether, then so be it. Wren said he wants to add two starters in the off season, why not Peavy?
     
    Last edited: Oct 24, 2008
  4. Paulie
    Offline

    Paulie Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2007
    Messages:
    31,533
    Thanks Received:
    4,851
    Trophy Points:
    1,130
    Ratings:
    +15,374
    Wow I didn't realize the stipulations he had in the contract extension he signed last Dec. Fucking premadonna no-trade clauses, with certain teams allowed and others not. This guy's a douche bag, and he's not really worth all that hassle, he falls apart late in games. I forgot about the extension, because he was GOING to be a FA at the end of the season. You'd have to pick up the remainder of his contract for something like 32 mil for two more years. So I was wrong, he wouldn't be a rental.

    He's demanding those no-trade powers in whatever deal he may sign with a prospective team, too. I'd rather put up a couple more bucks and get Sabathia, then try and go cheap and get that kind of ridiculous stipulative bullshit.
     
  5. Paulie
    Offline

    Paulie Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2007
    Messages:
    31,533
    Thanks Received:
    4,851
    Trophy Points:
    1,130
    Ratings:
    +15,374
    If I were you I'd be happy with Hudson and Jurrjens, and even Hampton now that he'll be healthy. That's not a bad first 3.

    Keep the prospects, I think you guys need offense right now more than starting pitching. You might want to think about unloading Francouer too, before his value goes completely down the toilet.

    Trade him for some pitching if you can, and sign Vlad or Milton Bradley. They are both FA's.
     
  6. CrimsonWhite
    Offline

    CrimsonWhite *****istrator Emeritus Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2006
    Messages:
    7,978
    Thanks Received:
    1,755
    Trophy Points:
    123
    Location:
    Guntucky
    Ratings:
    +1,757
    Offense is okay, even without Tex(That still hurts though). Hudson, Jurrjens, and Hampton? Are you fucking kdding me? None of those three are a #1 starter. Hampton better not come back. If he comes back after siting his ass on the bench for the better part of three years, then I'll watch just watch footbal. :D
     
  7. Paulie
    Offline

    Paulie Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2007
    Messages:
    31,533
    Thanks Received:
    4,851
    Trophy Points:
    1,130
    Ratings:
    +15,374
    I don't know man, I'm going to have to disagree with you about Hudson not being a #1. His career ERA is 3.48 with most of his career in the AL (3.17 this past season), he gives you 200 innings and stays healthy, averages about 150 K's, averages 16 wins and 7 losses, and has great stuff and great command. He is EASILY a #1 on a lot of teams. There's only a few pitchers in the NL that have better numbers than that.

    And Jurrjens just completed his first full season. He did pretty damn well. 13 wins, a sub-4 ERA, 140 K's, 2/1 K to walk ratio, 188 innings...And really good stuff. I think he'll develop into a good #2.
     

Share This Page