"Global warming"?? We don't have no stinking global warming!.. We have Ice age coming

and again show me a fucking test planet thats just like earth with no humans on in it that we fucking caused the the cycle.. tick tock tic tock waiting. and of course I will come back at you with that. The Earth is like what 45 million years old? and your test equipment only go back 300 years? at the most? so guess who wins?
 
Just a last thought on this thread. outside on my dock and floating looking up go the stars and hearing the sounds of frogs croak and chirpeds [ spl?] singing. Earth is to big for just 9 billion folk for humans ot cause climate change it would be have to along of one of those dead planets in the movies "star wars" sega. and I think the scientist of today are affraid of and watching to many movies.
 
Global Climate Change Position Statement

However, comprehensive scientific assessments of our current and potential future climates clearly indicate that climate change is real, largely attributable to emissions from human activities, and potentially a very serious problem. This sober conclusion has been recently reconfirmed by an in-depth set of studies focused on “America’s Climate Choices” (ACC) conducted by the U.S. National Academies (NRC, 2010a, b, c, d). The ACC studies, performed by independent and highly respected teams of scientists, engineers, and other skilled professionals, reached the same general conclusions that were published in the latest comprehensive assessment conducted by the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC, 2007). Recently, some errors in the IPCC (2007) reports have been acknowledged and questions about the transparency of the IPCC process have been raised. An independent review by the InterAcademy Council (IAC), a collaboration of the world’s leading national science academies, found “that the IPCC assessment process has been successful overall and has served society well,” and that “through its unique partnership between scientists and governments, the IPCC has heightened public awareness of climate change, raised the level of scientific debate, and influenced the science agendas of many nations.” (IAC, 2010) The IAC also recommended managerial and procedural improvements that would strengthen future assessments.

"But one must say clearly that we redistribute de facto the world’s wealth by climate policy. Obviously, the owners of coal and oil will not be enthusiastic about this. One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy." -- IPCC

IPCC Official: ?Climate Policy Is Redistributing The World?s Wealth? | Watts Up With That?

IPCC = bigger fraud than Bernie Madoff
 
Texas climatologist: Global temperatures ?likely? to set a new record this year | SciGuy | a Chron.com blog

The Texas state climatologist — the top climate official in one of the most conservative states in the country — has predicted that this year probably will be the warmest on record.

In his periodic report on Texas weather and crops released this week, Texas A&M University atmospheric scientist John Nielsen-Gammon said:

“Global temperatures have been relatively flat for the past several years. Some people use that information to try to imply that global warming has stopped. But it turns out that the factors causing global warming are still there, it’s just that the El Niño-La Niña cycle has temporarily trended cooler and has partially masked the warming. In the tropical Pacific, there’s actually fairly cold water just below the surface. With a La Niña event, that cold water is drawn all the way up to the surface, and interacts with the atmosphere and causes it to be cooler. If you leave the refrigerator door open, the room will be a little cooler. If my forecast is correct, and there’s no La Niña to hide the underlying warming trend, global surface temperatures are likely to increase and set a new record this year.”

He may well be right.

A quick check of the 10 warmest years on record, based upon data going back to 1880, shows that 2010 was the warmest year on record, followed by 2005. Last year was the 10th warmest.

The last two years, as shown in the chart below, were La Nina years so we would expect them to be a bit cooler. The most recent El Nino year, 2010, was the warmest overall year on record.

Enso-global-temp-anomalies-600x435.png


The significance of this prediction is that it’s coming from Nielsen-Gammon, who was appointed by George W. Bush back in 2000 when he was still the governor. He has continued to serve under Gov. Rick Perry for the last 12 years.

"If you leave the refrigerator door open, the room will be a little cooler."

That's actually not true. We did this experiment in the 8th grade and it turns out that the cooling effect generated on the inside of a refrigerator is more than offset by the heat generated by the compressor on the outside of it.

Try it sometime.
 
Last edited:
as far as I know, the world is at least 7000 years old. Then came Noah who saved the earth from the Global Warming related superstorm that flooded the earth. Well at least he saved the Ferrets and Hamsters from extinction !!!
 
Maybe Global Warming Is Racist? it seems to be attacking many "Non-White Nations". Sandy was definitely racist. Boy did Sandy show her hatred of anyone living in the Tri-State region. Especially those Damn Yankees!!!
 
Climate change | Royal Society

Background

It is certain that increased greenhouse gas emissions from the burning of fossil fuels and from land use change lead to a warming of climate, and it is very likely that these green house gases are the dominant cause of the global warming that has been taking place over the last 50 years.

Whilst the extent of climate change is often expressed in a single figure – global temperature – the effects of climate change (such as temperature, precipitation and the frequency of extreme weather events) will vary greatly from place to place.

Increasing atmospheric CO2 also leads to ocean acidification which risks profound impacts on many marine ecosystems and in turn the societies which depend on them.

The Society has worked on the issue of climate change for many years to further the understanding of this issue. These activities have been informed by decades of publicly available, peer-reviewed studies by thousands of scientists across a wide range of disciplines. Climate science, like any other scientific discipline, develops through vigorous debates between experts, but there is an overwhelming consensus regarding its fundamentals. Climate science has a firm basis in physics and is supported by a wealth of evidence from real world observations. Our work has taken the following forms:

Two considerations:
Utilities burning coal/oil are less environmentally damaging then people heating their homes with wood.
A)produces less CO2 then a wood burning cookstove.
B)Does destroy the forests that NEED CO2 to exist.

"The U.S. landscape acts as a net carbon sink—it sequesters more carbon than it emits.
Two types of analyses confirm this:
1) atmospheric, or top-down, methods that look at changes in CO2 concentrations; and
2) land-based, or bottom-up, methods that incorporate on-the-ground inventories or plot measurements.
Net sequestration (i.e., the difference between carbon gains and losses) in U.S. forests, urban trees and agricultural soils totaled almost 840 teragrams (Tg) of CO2 equivalent (or about 230 Tg or million metric tons of carbon equivalent) in 2001 (Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks).
This offsets approximately 15% of total U.S. CO2 emissions from the energy, transportation and other sectors. Net carbon sequestration in the forest sector in 2005 offset 10% of U.S. CO2 emissions. In the near future, we project that U.S. forests will continue to sequester carbon at a rate similar to that in recent years. Based on a comparison of our estimates to a compilation of land-based estimates of non-forest carbon
sinks from the literature, we estimate that the conterminous U.S. annually sequesters 149–330 Tg C year1. Forests, urban trees, and wood
products are responsible for 65–91% of this sink.

http://www.ncrs.fs.fed.us/pubs/jrnl/2007/nrs_2007_woodbury_001.pdf

In other words the USA has enough CO2 absorbing capacity to convert ALL the USA emissions Plus 15% more!

So if we didn't use oil/coal for electric utilities what would we do as alternative? Solar? Wind? Wood?
 
AAAS - AAAS News Release

The scientific evidence is clear: global climate change caused by human activities is occurring now, and it is a growing threat to society. Accumulating data from across the globe reveal a wide array of effects: rapidly melting glaciers, destabilization of major ice sheets, increases in extreme weather, rising sea level, shifts in species ranges, and more. The pace of change and the evidence of harm have increased markedly over the last five years. The time to control greenhouse gas emissions is now.

The atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide, a critical greenhouse gas, is higher than it has been for at least 650,000 years. The average temperature of the Earth is heading for levels not experienced for millions of years. Scientific predictions of the impacts of increasing atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases from fossil fuels and deforestation match observed changes. As expected, intensification of droughts, heat waves, floods, wildfires, and severe storms is occurring, with a mounting toll on vulnerable ecosystems and societies. These events are early warning signs of even more devastating damage to come, some of which will be irreversible.

got you upset didnt we? prove it.. show me a fucking test planet that dont haved humans on it?????

Seriously? this is where the debate has devolved? Test planets? WTF?
 
so is al gore going to stage another polar bear floating on ice with a fake background/green screen of the north pole? {being he is really beginning to look like a fool lately}
 
I wonder if Al Gore will claim that Global Warming will be the primary cause of the next Yellow Stone Park eruption.(the one that occurs every 654,987 years), I am still waiting to hear Al Gore blame the Eruption of 80/81 on Bush or Global Warming.
 
AAAS - AAAS News Release

The scientific evidence is clear: global climate change caused by human activities is occurring now, and it is a growing threat to society. Accumulating data from across the globe reveal a wide array of effects: rapidly melting glaciers, destabilization of major ice sheets, increases in extreme weather, rising sea level, shifts in species ranges, and more. The pace of change and the evidence of harm have increased markedly over the last five years. The time to control greenhouse gas emissions is now.

The atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide, a critical greenhouse gas, is higher than it has been for at least 650,000 years. The average temperature of the Earth is heading for levels not experienced for millions of years. Scientific predictions of the impacts of increasing atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases from fossil fuels and deforestation match observed changes. As expected, intensification of droughts, heat waves, floods, wildfires, and severe storms is occurring, with a mounting toll on vulnerable ecosystems and societies. These events are early warning signs of even more devastating damage to come, some of which will be irreversible.

got you upset didnt we? prove it.. show me a fucking test planet that dont haved humans on it?????

Seriously? this is where the debate has devolved? Test planets? WTF?

of course you do thats the only way you could prove man caused it here? kind of simple isnt it?... other wise you can never prove it hence the name of a "theory". not a "fact". Earth and the solar system that effects her is to complex and we all know it will happen again if we were here or not. I still think you man made global warming dumb fucks watched the star wars movies way to much. Ya do know its just the movies right?
 
do the radical liberals know that the earth goes thru cycles? have they ever heard of La Lina? maybe they think that La Lina and her brother were two of the three ships that Christopher Columbus built to sail around the world in 42 days, and that the Mayflower was a ship of illegal aliens that had no right to land on Plymouth Rock.
 

Forum List

Back
Top