Global warming coming faster and sooner

We see quite a bit of ignorance on display here. We are pumping 8 billion tons of CO2 into the atmosphere every year. That's one ton of CO2 for every person on the earth. Soon we will have doubled the amount of CO2. The North Pole will soon be ice free for the first time in 1,000,000 years. If you want the facts about global warming, go to the NOAA website.

Global Warming Frequently Asked Questions

so a million years ago, why was the north pole ice free? trans ams and mustangs?
 
Well soon all will be good, Obama's not going to wait for something as clumsy as Congress to deal with this. Nope, he's going unilaterally:

Obama's Carbon Ultimatum - WSJ.com

Obama's Carbon Ultimatum
The coming offer you won't be able to refuse.


Liberals pretend that only President Bush is preventing the U.S. from adopting some global warming "solution." But occasionally their mask slips. As Barack Obama's energy adviser has now made clear, the would-be President intends to blackmail -- or rather, greenmail -- Congress into falling in line with his climate agenda.
[Review & Outlook] AP

Jason Grumet is currently executive director of an outfit called the National Commission on Energy Policy and one of Mr. Obama's key policy aides. In an interview last week with Bloomberg, Mr. Grumet said that come January the Environmental Protection Agency "would initiate those rulemakings" that classify carbon as a dangerous pollutant under current clean air laws. That move would impose new regulation and taxes across the entire economy, something that is usually the purview of Congress. Mr. Grumet warned that "in the absence of Congressional action" 18 months after Mr. Obama's inauguration, the EPA would move ahead with its own unilateral carbon crackdown anyway.

...

The EPA hasn't made a secret of how it would like to centrally plan the U.S. economy under the 1970 Clean Air Act. In a blueprint released in July, the agency didn't exactly say it'd collectivize the farms -- but pretty close, down to the "grass clippings." The EPA would monitor and regulate the carbon emissions of "lawn and garden equipment" as well as everything with an engine, like cars, planes and boats. Eco-bureaucrats envision thousands of other emissions limits on all types of energy. Coal-fired power and other fossil fuels would be ruled out of existence, while all other prices would rise as the huge economic costs of the new regime were passed down the energy chain to consumers.

....

The strategy is most notable for what it says about the climate-change lobby and its new standard bearer. Supposedly global warming is the transcendent challenge of the age, but Mr. Obama evidently doesn't believe he'll be able to convince his own party to do something about it without a bureaucratic ultimatum. Mr. Grumet justified it this way: "The U.S. has to move quickly domestically . . . We cannot have a meaningful impact in the international discussion until we develop a meaningful domestic consensus."

Normally a democracy reaches consensus through political debate and persuasion, but apparently for Mr. Obama that option is merely a nuisance. It's another example of "change" you'll be given no choice but to believe in.
 
Last edited:
Want to know what the global warming hype is all about? Wall Street wants to make money trading carbon credits.

JPMorgan jumps into carbon trading - Aug. 12, 2008
Share Investor: Carbon Credit trading puts global markets at extreme risk

Oh well. Hopefully this will be a moot point pretty soon. Black Light Power just had it's energy system confirmed by a university lab. It's totally clean, it isn't nuclear but isn't a conventional chemical reaction either.

BlackLight Power Inc.

Sorry, you are wrong.

The North Pole melting has nothing to do with profits except the profits of the oil, coal, and automobile industries..
 
I'm talking about how governments all over are caving in and buying into the global warming hype. There are two reasons: they want to raise carbon taxes, and/or help Wall Street by creating a carbon trading market.

Heavy industry does not benefit from this. They are fighting carbon caps/credits, but they are losing. If heavy industry were in the driver's seat regarding policy, we would have pro-industry policies in place, and we wouldn't have lost so much of our industrial base over the last 35 years. The auto industry is floundering, and the oil and coal companies are only temporarily making big profits until the inevitable crash in prices like we had in the 80's.
 
Last edited:
I'm talking about how governments all over are caving in and buying into the global warming hype. There are two reasons: they want to raise carbon taxes, and/or help Wall Street by creating a carbon trading market.

Heavy industry does not benefit from this. They are fighting carbon caps/credits, but they are losing. If heavy industry were in the driver's seat regarding policy, we would have pro-industry policies in place, and we wouldn't have lost so much of our industrial base over the last 35 years. The auto industry is floundering, and the oil and coal companies are only temporarily making big profits until the inevitable crash in prices like we had in the 80's.

If we had pro industry policies in place?

There have been two oil men in the White House for the last eight years!

What kind of fantasy world are you living in?
 
Please explain how CAFE laws were raised or how virtually everyone in government (even Bush) now claims that man is causing global warming.

Because the evidence is so overwhelming, that only an idiot would deny it.

Even Exxon and Bush doesn't deny global warming anymore. The only people that do are living in a fantasy world.
 
LONDON, England (CNN) -- Climate change is happening faster than previously predicted according to a new World Wildlife Fund report.

The WWF say climate change threat has worsened in the 15 months since the IPCC last reported.

Bringing together some of the most recent scientific reports and data, "Climate change: faster, stronger, sooner" reveals that global warming is accelerating more rapidly than the predictions made in the IPCC's Fourth Assessment Report published in 2007.

One of the most concerning aspects of recent data is evidence that, in some places, the Arctic Ocean is losing sea ice 30 years ahead of current IPCC predictions.

Summer sea ice is now forecasted to completely disappear in the summer months sometime between 2013 and 2040 -- something which hasn't happened for over a million years.
The report's author, geoscientist Dr Tina Tin told CNN: "Arctic sea ice is melting much faster than everybody had been expecting. Why? Well, maybe it's because the positive feedback mechanisms have kicked in much quicker than we have been able to quantify."

Climate changing 'faster, stronger, sooner' - CNN.com


Probably from them starting up their "Black Hole" machine.:cuckoo:
 
And you keep ignoring the SCIENTIFIC fact that as it increases it has a diminishing effect. And there is not one shred of evidence that the Earth's environment has ever had runaway problems. In fact the evidence indicates that Nature is in fact unlikely to ever support a run away effect at all.

This is entirely wrong. There have been many times that there has been a feedback effect, initiated by geological events, that caused massive and sudden increases in greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. Not only were there major effects in weather, but in one case, the Permian-Triassic, 95% of all species died out in an estimated 8000 years. This has happened, though not with as massive of an extinctions, several times since that period. The last was about 55 million years ago, and there was about a 20% species die-off world wide.
 
Global warming coming faster and sooner

LONDON, England (CNN) -- Climate change is happening faster....

You enviroloons really need to make up your mind if you expect to be taken seriously. Is it global warming or climate change that we're worried about? :lol:
 
Billionaire global warming champion Ted Turner says when the planet gets 8 degrees hotter in 10...errrr I mean 30 years we will resort to cannabalism.

Since he also says we need to reduce the global population, this should work out famously!

Problem solved....thanks Ted. Keep up the good work.

[youtube]DSlB1nW4S54[/youtube]​


Ted on not taking drastic action to correct global warming:

“Not doing it will be catastrophic. We’ll be eight degrees hotter in ten, not ten but 30 or 40 years and basically none of the crops will grow. Most of the people will have died and the rest of us will be cannibals. Civilization will have broken down. The few people left will be living in a failed state — like Somalia or Sudan — and living conditions will be intolerable. The droughts will be so bad there’ll be no more corn grown. Not doing it is suicide.”
 
The earth has been experiencing climatic changes for 4-5 billion years. The earth has been much warmer than it is now, and life continued. What do you think caused the earth to experience climatic cycles before man existed?

This is exactly the argument that I support also. The Earth has been going through cyclical Climate changes before humans had factories and the industrial
revolution. This hysteria about Human global warming is all false.


Volcanoes emit more CO2 gases than humans. Also the worlds oceans releases
billions of tons of methane gas, which speeds up global warming a lot faster than CO2 emissions by humans.

There is also the case now of Sun spots on the surface of the Sun. Scientists
are finding evidence that Sun spot activity on the surface of the Sun, has an
effect on the Earths overall temperature.

So all this "Human Global Warming" hysteria may be nothing more than an elaborate scam.
 
Last edited:
I don't know of any natural process that operates in a straight line. They all generally pick up speed or slow down in some logrithmic way. The headline should say "Global warming coming faster and sooner....than what? Than our brilliant evironmentalists expected? Than what was "estimated" to begin with? What? They wouldn't want to put it that way because it would reveal that they are really grasping for anything to understand and define what is supposed to be the greatest natural disaster to come and it would be admission that they don't really know exactly what they are talking about. But then we already knew that.
 
This is exactly the argument that I support also. The Earth has been going through cyclical Climate changes before humans had factories and the industrial
revolution. This hysteria about Human global warming is all false.


Volcanoes emit more CO2 gases than humans. Also the worlds oceans releases
billions of tons of methane gas, which speeds up global warming a lot faster than CO2 emissions by humans.

There is also the case now of Sun spots on the surface of the Sun. Scientists
are finding evidence that Sun spot activity on the surface of the Sun, has an
effect on the Earths overall temperature.

So all this "Human Global Warming" hysteria may be nothing more than an elaborate scam.


But I'm sure it's a scam for our own good !:badgrin:
 
This is exactly the argument that I support also. The Earth has been going through cyclical Climate changes before humans had factories and the industrial
revolution. This hysteria about Human global warming is all false.


Volcanoes emit more CO2 gases than humans. Also the worlds oceans releases
billions of tons of methane gas, which speeds up global warming a lot faster than CO2 emissions by humans.

There is also the case now of Sun spots on the surface of the Sun. Scientists
are finding evidence that Sun spot activity on the surface of the Sun, has an
effect on the Earths overall temperature.

So all this "Human Global Warming" hysteria may be nothing more than an elaborate scam.

The earth has gone through many climatic cycles. But the present interglacial period has been exceptionally uneventful in those terms. By burning fossil fuels to the point of adding nearly 40% more greenhouse gases to the atmosphere, we have ended that uneventful period.

No, volcanoes do not emit more CO2 than humans do. In fact, by USGS figures, mankind emits 150 times as much CO2 as volcanoes do. The ocean does not emit billions of tons of methane yearly. In fact, most of the methane in the ocean never reaches surface, as methane using metabolize it. However, there are vast amounts of clathrates in the ocean sediments that can be released if the oceans are heated up. This has happened in the past and has resulted in major periods of extinction.

We have tracked the total solar irradiance by satellite for 50 years now, and there has been no increase, in fact, there has been an insignificant decrease. At present, we are experiancing a period of very low sunspot activity, something normally associated with a cooling period, but the rate of warming has shown no signs of decreasing.

"An elaborate scam"? Tell me, just how do you involve tens of thousands of scientists world wide is such fields as geology, climatalogy, and biology in an elaborate scam without someone reporting it? Every single scientific society in the world, every single National Academy of Science, and every single major university in the world have policy statements stating that global warming is real and that the primary cause of it is the burning of fossil fuels.
 
The earth has gone through many climatic cycles. But the present interglacial period has been exceptionally uneventful in those terms. By burning fossil fuels to the point of adding nearly 40% more greenhouse gases to the atmosphere, we have ended that uneventful period.

No, volcanoes do not emit more CO2 than humans do. In fact, by USGS figures, mankind emits 150 times as much CO2 as volcanoes do. The ocean does not emit billions of tons of methane yearly. In fact, most of the methane in the ocean never reaches surface, as methane using metabolize it. However, there are vast amounts of clathrates in the ocean sediments that can be released if the oceans are heated up. This has happened in the past and has resulted in major periods of extinction.

We have tracked the total solar irradiance by satellite for 50 years now, and there has been no increase, in fact, there has been an insignificant decrease. At present, we are experiancing a period of very low sunspot activity, something normally associated with a cooling period, but the rate of warming has shown no signs of decreasing.

"An elaborate scam"? Tell me, just how do you involve tens of thousands of scientists world wide is such fields as geology, climatalogy, and biology in an elaborate scam without someone reporting it? Every single scientific society in the world, every single National Academy of Science, and every single major university in the world have policy statements stating that global warming is real and that the primary cause of it is the burning of fossil fuels.

Like I said, the Earth goes through its natural cycles of heating up and cooling off.With or without human input. Its been happening for millions of years.This whole human global warming hysteria is all over exagerated media,
and scientific hype.Your info, old rocks is all false. Distributed by a biased Scientific community, that wants millions more in research funding, for their false "Human Global warming hype".
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top