Glenn Beck

In the context of what he is talking about... he is saying to the Democrats.... 'you got into bed with these people - real, honest to God, revolutionaries.... and there will be a price to pay.... you made promises to them, and they are violent radicals.... they call for violence (and he's right, they do).... and, if it comes to it and you don't honor those promises... and they take up arms.... you're gonna have to pick a side and fight.'

If revolutionaries take up arms against you, you either surrender or fight. That's not rocket science, is it? The left have said as much about the TEA Parties. Where is the outrage about that? Nope, don't see any. See plenty of it when someone talks tough from the right though.

Who are the revolutionary radicals? Is Nancy Pelosi a revolutionary radical?

She's supported by Code Pink.

You gonna tell me they aren't a bunch of over the top nutjobs?

No, they are nutjobs.

Are you saying that Pelosi is a revolutionary radical?
 
So just to be clear do you see anything wrong with this picture?

So are you ok with communism?

I underlined everything I agree with

No, I am not "ok" with communism.

I have a problem with the House Minority leader being named a revolutionary in pretty much the same breath as him saying that in order to stop such people you have to shoot them in the head.

Wait where is this video? This is as wrong as obama telling people to get up in their neighbors faces.
 
Beck on Pelosi

I think beck doesn't agree with pelosi very much......it appears he thinks she is insane and dishonest.

That doesn't really answer my question.

Well He has never said that she was a marxist revolutionary from my search results so the answer is No, Beck does not believe nancy pelosi is a marxist revolutionary. If someone provides evidence otherwise then I will change my answer.

In the link provided by Ravi he clearly states that he thinks she's not, but that she has the support of radicals
 
In another thread a Liberal posted there is a voice recording of Glenn Beck telling people to shoot Progressives ( rather marxist progressives) in the head.

While I doubt he actually literally means for anyone to shoot people, it is over the top. It is direct and irresponsible. Of course having condemned it, my question is will the left condemn their spokesmen for similar speech and direct irrefutable lies about right wing politicians and performers?

I can think of several Liberal commentators and News programs that have directly attacked Palin and others with lies and misinformation and haven't quit as more facts come out that the Arizona shooter did not do the crime because of anything Palin said or believes.

We have posters right on this board that continue to claim Palin was somehow responsible for the Arizona shootings. Others that claim her rhetoric and map were over the line ( ignoring the fact that in 2004 and 2009 the same imagery was used by Liberals) and claiming she has some blame coming to her.

I already know the answer.

Names and quotes....I'll be happy to condemn anything comparable.
 
So just to be clear do you see anything wrong with this picture?

So are you ok with communism?

I underlined everything I agree with

No, I am not "ok" with communism.

I have a problem with the House Minority leader being named a revolutionary in pretty much the same breath as him saying that in order to stop such people you have to shoot them in the head.

You need to read it again. He didn't name her AS a revolutionary. But she is one of the ones responsible for bringing the revolutionaries into the party. What he said was "Nancy Pelosi, those are the people you should be worried about."

And he's right. There are communists inside the Democratic Party. Find out for yourself. The evidence is there.
 
So are you ok with communism?

I underlined everything I agree with

No, I am not "ok" with communism.

I have a problem with the House Minority leader being named a revolutionary in pretty much the same breath as him saying that in order to stop such people you have to shoot them in the head.

You need to read it again. He didn't name her AS a revolutionary. But she is one of the ones responsible for bringing the revolutionaries into the party. What he said was "Nancy Pelosi, those are the people you should be worried about."

And he's right. There are communists inside the Democratic Party. Find out for yourself. The evidence is there.

Yes, I have read it several times now ... it can be taken has him talking to Pelosi or about her ... it's just vague enough for Beck. That's how he rolls.
 
That doesn't really answer my question.

Well He has never said that she was a marxist revolutionary from my search results so the answer is No, Beck does not believe nancy pelosi is a marxist revolutionary. If someone provides evidence otherwise then I will change my answer.

In the link provided by Ravi he clearly states that he thinks she's not, but that she has the support of radicals

glenn beck said:
'Glenn Beck': Party's Over for Democrats? - Glenn Beck - FOXNews.com See, this doesn't work. The Clintons, Bidens, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi — they're not Nazis and they're not communists. It doesn't work, OK?

Beck does not think she is a marxist revolutionary according to ravi's link and stated that she wasn't.
 
So just to be clear do you see anything wrong with this picture?

I can't even figure what he is trying to say, other than he wants someone to shoot him in the head, along with some other group. With his references to different groups and the overuse of the pronoun "they", it's hard to tell if he's talking about tea-partiers or congress-critters.

He didn't say he wanted someone to shoot him in the head.... he said that's the only way he's gonna stop talking about the Founders. He's clearly a very passionate individual. I see nothing wrong with being passionate about your beliefs.


I think that you, like I, actually listened to his words in the excerpt in full context of the show, and understood completely what he was saying. I never missed a show during that whole time frame, and never could have mistaken his intent.

Even the written excerpt doesn't allow much room for misunderstanding, unless one simply doesn't want to give Beck credit for being perceptive about what he speaks. We seem to be a lot more forgiving of the likes of Bill Maher and his pure vitriol than any minor ambiguity from GB.
 
So just to be clear do you see anything wrong with this picture?

So are you ok with communism?

I underlined everything I agree with

No, I am not "ok" with communism.

I have a problem with the House Minority leader being named a revolutionary in pretty much the same breath as him saying that in order to stop such people you have to shoot them in the head.

So if someone planned on over throwing the government by force, and planned on basically getting rid of the Constitution.

You would stand off to the side?

B/c that is what the far far left wants. socialism or communism
 
No, I am not "ok" with communism.

I have a problem with the House Minority leader being named a revolutionary in pretty much the same breath as him saying that in order to stop such people you have to shoot them in the head.

You need to read it again. He didn't name her AS a revolutionary. But she is one of the ones responsible for bringing the revolutionaries into the party. What he said was "Nancy Pelosi, those are the people you should be worried about."

And he's right. There are communists inside the Democratic Party. Find out for yourself. The evidence is there.

Yes, I have read it several times now ... it can be taken has him talking to Pelosi or about her ... it's just vague enough for Beck. That's how he rolls.

There's nothing 'vague' about it. He quite clearly does not name her as a revolutionary. Have the courage to admit you read into his words something that is not there. Read the actual words, not what you think he said.

I find this quite a lot with people.... I've had it done to me... I'm sure you've had it done to you... people misconstrue your meaning. It happens. But it is always wrong.
 
Well He has never said that she was a marxist revolutionary from my search results so the answer is No, Beck does not believe nancy pelosi is a marxist revolutionary. If someone provides evidence otherwise then I will change my answer.

In the link provided by Ravi he clearly states that he thinks she's not, but that she has the support of radicals

glenn beck said:
'Glenn Beck': Party's Over for Democrats? - Glenn Beck - FOXNews.com See, this doesn't work. The Clintons, Bidens, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi — they're not Nazis and they're not communists. It doesn't work, OK?

Beck does not think she is a marxist revolutionary according to ravi's link and stated that she wasn't.

In your link he clearly says she isn't a communist.

I am curious to see what/where he is pointing to here though:

I don't know where Barack Obama fits. Is he over here? Or is he over here?

Cass Sunstein — I don't know where he fits.

Nancy Pelosi, I'm not sure. I don't think she fits over there but I'm not sure she fits over here. I don't know. It's for you to decide.
 
Who are the revolutionary radicals? Is Nancy Pelosi a revolutionary radical?

She's supported by Code Pink.

You gonna tell me they aren't a bunch of over the top nutjobs?

No, they are nutjobs.

Are you saying that Pelosi is a revolutionary radical?

I'm saying she has thier support, and to placate them the not so far left gives them power by putting thier people in seats of power.

She used them to help get elected, now they want her to pony up.

Basically, she thier bitch now.
 
So are you ok with communism?

I underlined everything I agree with

No, I am not "ok" with communism.

I have a problem with the House Minority leader being named a revolutionary in pretty much the same breath as him saying that in order to stop such people you have to shoot them in the head.

So if someone planned on over throwing the government by force, and planned on basically getting rid of the Constitution.

You would stand off to the side?

B/c that is what the far far left wants. socialism or communism

Where did I say that I would stand off to the side?

Did I say I have a problem with a stopping attempted overthrow by force?

No, I did not.
 
In the link provided by Ravi he clearly states that he thinks she's not, but that she has the support of radicals



Beck does not think she is a marxist revolutionary according to ravi's link and stated that she wasn't.

In your link he clearly says she isn't a communist.

I am curious to see what/where he is pointing to here though:

I don't know where Barack Obama fits. Is he over here? Or is he over here?

Cass Sunstein — I don't know where he fits.

Nancy Pelosi, I'm not sure. I don't think she fits over there but I'm not sure she fits over here. I don't know. It's for you to decide.

You would actually have to watch the (pause for dramatic effect) Glenn Beck show.

:muahaha:
 
You need to read it again. He didn't name her AS a revolutionary. But she is one of the ones responsible for bringing the revolutionaries into the party. What he said was "Nancy Pelosi, those are the people you should be worried about."

And he's right. There are communists inside the Democratic Party. Find out for yourself. The evidence is there.

Yes, I have read it several times now ... it can be taken has him talking to Pelosi or about her ... it's just vague enough for Beck. That's how he rolls.

There's nothing 'vague' about it. He quite clearly does not name her as a revolutionary. Have the courage to admit you read into his words something that is not there. Read the actual words, not what you think he said.

I find this quite a lot with people.... I've had it done to me... I'm sure you've had it done to you... people misconstrue your meaning. It happens. But it is always wrong.

And yes, I begrudgingly concede that he was talking to her and not about her in after reading the link PP put up.
 
Yes, I have read it several times now ... it can be taken has him talking to Pelosi or about her ... it's just vague enough for Beck. That's how he rolls.

There's nothing 'vague' about it. He quite clearly does not name her as a revolutionary. Have the courage to admit you read into his words something that is not there. Read the actual words, not what you think he said.

I find this quite a lot with people.... I've had it done to me... I'm sure you've had it done to you... people misconstrue your meaning. It happens. But it is always wrong.

And yes, I begrudgingly concede that he was talking to her and not about her in after reading the link PP put up.

Why 'begrudgingly'? Are you not happy to learn that he didn't do it, or does your loathing of Beck outweigh your intellect?
 
No, I am not "ok" with communism.

I have a problem with the House Minority leader being named a revolutionary in pretty much the same breath as him saying that in order to stop such people you have to shoot them in the head.

So if someone planned on over throwing the government by force, and planned on basically getting rid of the Constitution.

You would stand off to the side?
B/c that is what the far far left wants. socialism or communism

Where did I say that I would stand off to the side?

Did I say I have a problem with a stopping attempted overthrow by force?

No, I did not.

Sorry, Poor editing


Would you stand off to the side?

The first one looked more like an accusation. I am sorry for that.
 
Last edited:
There's nothing 'vague' about it. He quite clearly does not name her as a revolutionary. Have the courage to admit you read into his words something that is not there. Read the actual words, not what you think he said.

I find this quite a lot with people.... I've had it done to me... I'm sure you've had it done to you... people misconstrue your meaning. It happens. But it is always wrong.

And yes, I begrudgingly concede that he was talking to her and not about her in after reading the link PP put up.

Why 'begrudgingly'? Are you not happy to learn that he didn't do it, or does your loathing of Beck outweigh your intellect?

It's about on par ... I really despise glennbeck.
 
And yes, I begrudgingly concede that he was talking to her and not about her in after reading the link PP put up.

Why 'begrudgingly'? Are you not happy to learn that he didn't do it, or does your loathing of Beck outweigh your intellect?

It's about on par ... I really despise glennbeck.

I really despise Nancy Pelosi. But anytime anyone claims she said something, I give her the courtesy to find out the facts before I judge her on it. If I were you, I would try doing the same thing with Beck. I have been told all kinds of crap that he's 'said'. Every single time, I have found the original accusation to be based on bullshit.

And, for the record, I don't have much time for Beck either. I don't despise him. But I am not a Beck fan. I just really like to be sure of what I'm saying before I say it. That way, I don't make myself look stupid as often.
 
I doubt Beck said this because it would be National News considering today's overtly political AP.

And I think Beck's a whackadoodle loon so I mean, I've got no dog so to speak.
 

Forum List

Back
Top