Glenn Beck: Get 9/11 Right!!!!

[eots]

what physical evidence was presented and what cross examination was it subjected to ?
Do you not understand that there have been many court case brought by the state with false evidence in the past, so if the 9/11 commission was as flawed as its participants say it was how can you trust its conclusions or selective and manufactured evidence ?

 

[SFC Ollie]

Top Ten Photos 9/11 Conspiracy Nuts Hate | The Lay Scientist

 

[Toro]

Top Ten Photos 9/11 Conspiracy Nuts Hate | The Lay Scientist

Good find.

Well done Ollie.

 

[daveman]

Top Ten Photos 9/11 Conspiracy Nuts Hate | The Lay Scientist

Obviously all Photoshopped.


There, did I get that right, eots, Terral?

 

[eots]

top ten photos 9/11 conspiracy nuts hate | the lay scientist

lets us examine. This piece of shite ollie has presented us

1. Flight 77 wreckage (from the landing gear) at the pentagon. Conspiracy theorists used to argue that no plane ever hit the pentagon, claiming that there was no visible debris at the site. They seem to have retreated from this claim in the last couple of years.

untrue no one has backed off anything,the questions of the flight path,the lack of debris,no engines,no damage form wings, surveillance tapes unreleased...all still remain

2. Debris from the twin towers falling onto wtc7. Many conspiracy theorists still believe that fires and debris couldn't have reached wtc7 (the tall building lower-right) to inflict significant damage, claiming that wtc7 must have been subjected to a controlled demolition.

again untrue no one doubts damage or fire this is not the issue with the the wtc ...but its clear this nincompoop never read the nist report that says damage played no significant role in the collapse

3. Wtc6 lies in ruins. Conspiracy theorists have also argued that wtc7 couldn't have been struck by debris since wtc6 - which lies between the twin towers and wtc7 - "wasn't that damaged". Note that the center has entirely collapsed. In spite of evidence like this, and reports from fire-fighters, who used instruments to measure the gradual movement and distortion of wtc7's structure over several hours up until its collapse, truthers still prefer to believe that a controlled demolition occurred.

again he makes false claims and avoids the real issues with wtc 7
in favor of these ones he made up

4 & 5. Fires rage in wtc5 and wtc6. Many conspiracy theorists refuse to accept that fire could have spread to wtc7, even though fires clearly raged across much of the wtc complex

.

More lies no one questions fires at the wtc..fires dont cause symmetrical near free-fall collapses of

 

[eots]

well you are both more than welcome to fuck off at anytime

so are you
and your troofer brothers

I have had EOTS on ignore for months now.

At some point, you simply have to let those who can't swim drown and get on with the race.

He still PM's me and I wish USMB would come up with a more efficient way of deleting a message...I mean Fastmail has a feature that takes mail from certain people and puts it directly into the garbage can.

As for the thread, Glenn Beck is a joke; one of the reasons many Americans yearn for the good old days of having 3 networks and television that went off the air at about 1:00 AM. Cable TV just needs to fill 168 hours of programming per week. None of the news stations or Fox (they're not a news network) want to be the first to go with infomercials so they put morons like Beck on the air. If it were not Glenn Beck, it would be someone else who just jumps up and down and waves hers or his arms to get attention.

Off the subject but not really, I'm really quite stunned to have not seen the guy from CNN on FOX yet....he quit recently and I can't remember his name. Lou Dobbs....it came to mind thanks to a Google search. I'd give him a listen I suppose but the fact that he hasn't surfaced with FOX TTBOMK...suggests that he may be interested in contributing something and not just showing up and letting his PA's dig up "news" to talk about.

I'm fascinated at the FOX and Tea Party phenomenon though....really. I hope I never find out but at what age do you simply ignore common sense and frankly objectivity and decide..."hey, these people are making sense finally"? Has any of the tea-baggers burned their Medicare cards yet to rally against Government health care?

Anyway, this post is what happens to you when you don't have you're 2nd cup of coffee before turning on the computer at 5:00 in the morning. Have a good day America. I love you.

huh what ? did you say something ????

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Hi Ollie:

The fact is that Ollie, CandyCorn, California Girl and the rest of these 911Truth Deniers are DEAD WRONG about 9/11, just like Glenn Beck!



Let us examine what appears in the Opening Post of this Topic to see what Ollie and company are ignoring.



The FAA Chronology Timeline specifically says that the report of the aircraft crashing into the west side of the Pentagon came in at 9:32 AM and NOT at 9:38 AM like the Official Cover Story says. Now Ollie and his 911Truth Deniers can explain WHY this evidence disagrees with 'their' version of what happened on 9/11!!!

Everyone here should read Barbara Honegger's Famous Paper (PDF file) called:

The Pentagon Attack Papers: The Clock that Broke the Lie

GL,

Terral

Um Terral, you really cannot prove a conspiracy by quoting a professional conspiracy nut.....

you try to prove your conspiracy by quoting lying bureaucrats that have been caught in lies repeatedly

thats the logic of the official conspiracy theory apologists around here.only listen to what the corrupt Bureaucrats and the corporate controlled media tell them,not what independent experts in their fields say. their logic amuses me to know end.

 

[DiveCon]

Um Terral, you really cannot prove a conspiracy by quoting a professional conspiracy nut.....

you try to prove your conspiracy by quoting lying bureaucrats that have been caught in lies repeatedly

thats the logic of the official conspiracy theory apologists around here.only listen to what the corrupt Bureaucrats and the corporate controlled media tell them,not what independent experts in their fields say. their logic amuses me to know end.

we're still waiting for the first piece of proof from you troofer morons that explosives were used

 

[Obamerican]

Um Terral, you really cannot prove a conspiracy by quoting a professional conspiracy nut.....

you try to prove your conspiracy by quoting lying bureaucrats that have been caught in lies repeatedly

thats the logic of the official conspiracy theory apologists around here.only listen to what the corrupt Bureaucrats and the corporate controlled media tell them,not what independent experts in their fields say. their logic amuses me to know end.

..to NO end, you stupid idiot.

 

[candycorn]

you try to prove your conspiracy by quoting lying bureaucrats that have been caught in lies repeatedly

thats the logic of the official conspiracy theory apologists around here.only listen to what the corrupt Bureaucrats and the corporate controlled media tell them,not what independent experts in their fields say. their logic amuses me to know end.

..to NO end, you stupid idiot.

His repeated failures at spelling basic words amuse me to no end.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

you try to prove your conspiracy by quoting lying bureaucrats that have been caught in lies repeatedly

thats the logic of the official conspiracy theory apologists around here.only listen to what the corrupt Bureaucrats and the corporate controlled media tell them,not what independent experts in their fields say. their logic amuses me to know end.

..to NO end, you stupid idiot.

great rebuttal Ohio Goofer.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Former FBI Deputy Director John O'Neill wanted to investigate the terrorists who were planning to blow up the trade towers on 9-11, but he was prevented from doing so by George W. Bush signing presidential directive W199i. Presidential directive W199i prohibited the FBI and Defense Department officials from stopping terrorists.

frontline: the man who knew | PBS

Sorry but do some actual reading and research. Presidential directive W199i is non-existent. Never existed. Was not ever written or signed by any President.

FAIL

yeah thats what you always do in your debates here Gomer,FAIL.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Hi Ollie:

The fact is that Ollie, CandyCorn, California Girl and the rest of these 911Truth Deniers are DEAD WRONG about 9/11, just like Glenn Beck!

Sorry but do some actual reading and research. Presidential directive W199i is non-existent. Never existed. Was not ever written or signed by any President.

Let us examine what appears in the Opening Post of this Topic to see what Ollie and company are ignoring.

1. The Pentagon was first attacked at 9:31:39 AM and not at the Official Time of 9:38. The Executive Summary Chronology of a Multiple Hijacking Crisis September 11, 2001 Timeline (Link #1) says:

"0932 ATC AEA reports aircraft crashes into west side of Pentagon."

The FAA Chronology Timeline specifically says that the report of the aircraft crashing into the west side of the Pentagon came in at 9:32 AM and NOT at 9:38 AM like the Official Cover Story says. Now Ollie and his 911Truth Deniers can explain WHY this evidence disagrees with 'their' version of what happened on 9/11!!!

Everyone here should read Barbara Honegger's Famous Paper (PDF file) called:

The Pentagon Attack Papers: The Clock that Broke the Lie

GL,

Terral

Of course they are dead wrong Terral.This is what they always do when confronted with evidence and facts and witness testimonys. they then of course close their eyes,cover their ears and then start singing out loud to themselves to live in denial.

 

[DiveCon]

Hi Ollie:

The fact is that Ollie, CandyCorn, California Girl and the rest of these 911Truth Deniers are DEAD WRONG about 9/11, just like Glenn Beck!

Sorry but do some actual reading and research. Presidential directive W199i is non-existent. Never existed. Was not ever written or signed by any President.

Let us examine what appears in the Opening Post of this Topic to see what Ollie and company are ignoring.

1. The Pentagon was first attacked at 9:31:39 AM and not at the Official Time of 9:38. The Executive Summary Chronology of a Multiple Hijacking Crisis September 11, 2001 Timeline (Link #1) says:

"0932 ATC AEA reports aircraft crashes into west side of Pentagon."

The FAA Chronology Timeline specifically says that the report of the aircraft crashing into the west side of the Pentagon came in at 9:32 AM and NOT at 9:38 AM like the Official Cover Story says. Now Ollie and his 911Truth Deniers can explain WHY this evidence disagrees with 'their' version of what happened on 9/11!!!

Everyone here should read Barbara Honegger's Famous Paper (PDF file) called:

The Pentagon Attack Papers: The Clock that Broke the Lie

GL,

Terral

Of course they are dead wrong Terral.This is what they always do when confronted with evidence and facts and witness testimonys. they then of course close their eyes,cover their ears and then start singing out loud to themselves to live in denial.

still waiting for that evidence of explosives

 

[Obamerican]

Hi Ollie:

The fact is that Ollie, CandyCorn, California Girl and the rest of these 911Truth Deniers are DEAD WRONG about 9/11, just like Glenn Beck!

Sorry but do some actual reading and research. Presidential directive W199i is non-existent. Never existed. Was not ever written or signed by any President.

Let us examine what appears in the Opening Post of this Topic to see what Ollie and company are ignoring.

1. The Pentagon was first attacked at 9:31:39 AM and not at the Official Time of 9:38. The Executive Summary Chronology of a Multiple Hijacking Crisis September 11, 2001 Timeline (Link #1) says:

"0932 ATC AEA reports aircraft crashes into west side of Pentagon."

The FAA Chronology Timeline specifically says that the report of the aircraft crashing into the west side of the Pentagon came in at 9:32 AM and NOT at 9:38 AM like the Official Cover Story says. Now Ollie and his 911Truth Deniers can explain WHY this evidence disagrees with 'their' version of what happened on 9/11!!!

Everyone here should read Barbara Honegger's Famous Paper (PDF file) called:

The Pentagon Attack Papers: The Clock that Broke the Lie

GL,

Terral

Of course they are dead wrong Terral.This is what they always do when confronted with evidence and facts and witness testimonys. they then of course close their eyes,cover their ears and then start singing out loud to themselves to live in denial.

Sucking cock here too, bitch? You're a fucking idiot.

 

[SFC Ollie]

Former FBI Deputy Director John O'Neill wanted to investigate the terrorists who were planning to blow up the trade towers on 9-11, but he was prevented from doing so by George W. Bush signing presidential directive W199i. Presidential directive W199i prohibited the FBI and Defense Department officials from stopping terrorists.

frontline: the man who knew | PBS

Sorry but do some actual reading and research. Presidential directive W199i is non-existent. Never existed. Was not ever written or signed by any President.

FAIL

yeah thats what you always do in your debates here Gomer,FAIL.

Are you claiming this fake document exists? Please produce it.

 

[daveman]

Sorry but do some actual reading and research. Presidential directive W199i is non-existent. Never existed. Was not ever written or signed by any President.

FAIL

yeah thats what you always do in your debates here Gomer,FAIL.

Are you claiming this fake document exists? Please produce it.

It's filed right next to this one that proves Bush outed Valerie Plame:

 

[Obamerican]

Former FBI Deputy Director John O'Neill wanted to investigate the terrorists who were planning to blow up the trade towers on 9-11, but he was prevented from doing so by George W. Bush signing presidential directive W199i. Presidential directive W199i prohibited the FBI and Defense Department officials from stopping terrorists.

frontline: the man who knew | PBS

That is a FBI case number, it seems. FAIL!!!!

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Hi Ollie:

The fact is that Ollie, CandyCorn, California Girl and the rest of these 911Truth Deniers are DEAD WRONG about 9/11, just like Glenn Beck!



Let us examine what appears in the Opening Post of this Topic to see what Ollie and company are ignoring.



The FAA Chronology Timeline specifically says that the report of the aircraft crashing into the west side of the Pentagon came in at 9:32 AM and NOT at 9:38 AM like the Official Cover Story says. Now Ollie and his 911Truth Deniers can explain WHY this evidence disagrees with 'their' version of what happened on 9/11!!!

Everyone here should read Barbara Honegger's Famous Paper (PDF file) called:

The Pentagon Attack Papers: The Clock that Broke the Lie

GL,

Terral

Of course they are dead wrong Terral.This is what they always do when confronted with evidence and facts and witness testimonys. they then of course close their eyes,cover their ears and then start singing out loud to themselves to live in denial.

Sucking cock here too, bitch? You're a fucking idiot.

your mom needs to give you a spanking Ohio Goofer.you always have such great rebuttals. amazing how childish you are.you get banned at AWE so candy corn troll boy emails you to tell you about another site you can post at,so you bring your grudge with me from that site over to hear.How mature. wonder how long you will last here at this site before they ban you here as well.

 

[eots]

Sibel D. Edmonds


Sibel D. Edmonds – Witness before the 9/11 Commission. Former Language Translation Specialist, performing translations for counterterrorism and counterintelligence operations, FBI.


Letter to 9/11 Commission 8/1/04 : "I find your report seriously flawed in its failure to address serious intelligence issues that I am aware of, which have been confirmed, and which as a witness to the commission, I made you aware of. Thus, I must assume that other serious issues that I am not aware of were in the same manner omitted from your report. These omissions cast doubt on the validity of your report and therefore on its conclusions and recommendations." Internet Service for Individuals and Business Internet Service - www.com


Washington Post Article FBI Was Warned About Moussaoui: 3/21/06:

"An FBI agent [Harry Samit] who interrogated Zacarias Moussaoui before Sept. 11, 2001, warned his supervisors more than 70 times that Moussaoui was a terrorist and spelled out his suspicions that the al-Qaeda operative was plotting to hijack an airplane, according to federal court testimony yesterday. [Editor's note: All 70 efforts occurred in the 4 weeks before 9/11.]

Agent Harry Samit told jurors at Moussaoui's death penalty trial that his efforts to secure a warrant to search Moussaoui's belongings were frustrated at every turn by FBI officials he accused of "criminal negligence." Article archived at The 9/11 Truth Movement - 911truth.org


Coleen Rowley – Former Special Agent and Minneapolis Division Counsel, FBI. 24-year FBI career. Agent Rowley was selected one of Time Magazine's three 2002 Persons of the Year for revealing FBI headquarters' efforts to "throw up roadblocks and undermine" FBI field investigations of Al Qaeda operatives in the four weeks prior to 9/11.
Memo to FBI Director Robert Mueller 5/21/02: Regarding FBI headquarters (FBIHQ) obstruction of terrorism investigations. "The fact is that key FBIHQ personnel whose job it was to assist and coordinate with field division agents on terrorism investigations and the obtaining and use of FISA searches (and who theoretically were privy to many more sources of intelligence information than field division agents), continued to, almost inexplicably, throw up roadblocks and undermine Minneapolis' by-now desperate efforts to obtain a FISA search warrant, long after the French intelligence service provided its information and probable cause became clear. HQ personnel brought up almost ridiculous questions in their apparent efforts to undermine the probable cause.




Article 7/22/04: "My translations of the 9/11 intercepts included [terrorist] money laundering, detailed and date-specific information ... if they were to do real investigations, we would see several significant high-level criminal prosecutions in this country [the US] ... and believe me, they will do everything to cover this up." Latest news, comment and reviews from the Guardian | guardian.co.uk