Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
All right man, let me drop the big enchilada on you. CHILDREN are the USUAL recipients of welfare.
Now, please, again, explain to us how being a welfare recipient = a poor financial manager.
You are working from an ill concieved stereo type.
Maybe I do have a comprehension problem.
No argument here.
Explain to me how old you believe a person to be at birth.
I said that a person is responsible for their decisions in life pretty much from birth.
What I did NOT say was that 3 year olds were cashing in on the welfare programs under discussion.
Well who is? Do you have any evidence that anyone did not use this money to benefit their kids?
No argument here.
I said that a person is responsible for their decisions in life pretty much from birth.
What I did NOT say was that 3 year olds were cashing in on the welfare programs under discussion.
Well who is? Do you have any evidence that anyone did not use this money to benefit their kids?
Already asked and answered.
Well who is? Do you have any evidence that anyone did not use this money to benefit their kids?
Already asked and answered.
Then the answer is no. You have nothing but an article about people actually taking the cash offered and equating that to fraud somehow.
Did you not know that children are the USUAL recipients of welfare?
I've never seen a child cash a welfare check...
Already asked and answered.
Then the answer is no. You have nothing but an article about people actually taking the cash offered and equating that to fraud somehow.
Nope.
I already answered this in a previous post.
Then the answer is no. You have nothing but an article about people actually taking the cash offered and equating that to fraud somehow.
Nope.
I already answered this in a previous post.
Yep. Anyone can see there is no proof here.
I've never seen whales fuck.
I don't believe it... I'll bet you're big into chubby porn...
But the topic was children receiving what they were intended to receive... I'm sure you knew that, didn't you?
And do we have any evidence in this case that they did not?
Then the answer is no. You have nothing but an article about people actually taking the cash offered and equating that to fraud somehow.
Nope.
I already answered this in a previous post.
Yep. Anyone can see there is no proof here.
I don't believe it... I'll bet you're big into chubby porn...
But the topic was children receiving what they were intended to receive... I'm sure you knew that, didn't you?
And do we have any evidence in this case that they did not?
You should go back ad read this thread from the beginning...
You're trying to spin and strawman so much that you're losing track of just what bullshit you're typing...
Soros of all people joined in this thing to give cash to families on food stamps and/or TANF. The fact that people actually went to collect the money is being somehow used to claim fraud? We've just seen an unprecedented expendature on first a useless war and then an unprecedented corporate cash welfare free for all that insured and paid for multi million dollar salaries and you fuckers have the nerve to contest $200 for the poorest in America TO DO WHATEVER THE HELL THEY WANT TO WITH, AS FAR AS I"M CONCERNED.
I guess it comes down to what I've thought before. Go fuck yourselves.
And do we have any evidence in this case that they did not?
You should go back ad read this thread from the beginning...
You're trying to spin and strawman so much that you're losing track of just what bullshit you're typing...
I know...he seems to keep getting stuck on inconsequentials and meaningless points as if it disproves the assertion.
Soros of all people joined in this thing to give cash to families on food stamps and/or TANF. The fact that people actually went to collect the money is being somehow used to claim fraud? We've just seen an unprecedented expendature on first a useless war and then an unprecedented corporate cash welfare free for all that insured and paid for multi million dollar salaries and you fuckers have the nerve to contest $200 for the poorest in America TO DO WHATEVER THE HELL THEY WANT TO WITH, AS FAR AS I"M CONCERNED.
I guess it comes down to what I've thought before. Go fuck yourselves.
Tucking tail and pouting and shouting.
No surprise.
Soros of all people joined in this thing to give cash to families on food stamps and/or TANF. The fact that people actually went to collect the money is being somehow used to claim fraud? We've just seen an unprecedented expendature on first a useless war and then an unprecedented corporate cash welfare free for all that insured and paid for multi million dollar salaries and you fuckers have the nerve to contest $200 for the poorest in America TO DO WHATEVER THE HELL THEY WANT TO WITH, AS FAR AS I"M CONCERNED.
I guess it comes down to what I've thought before. Go fuck yourselves.
Tucking tail and pouting and shouting.
No surprise.
There is no tucking tail or pouting. That's just how it is. They spent $200 a head for families with school children. It was funded by stimulus money and some cash from a donor. The donated money is private charity so you can take your opinion on fifty bucks of that money and stuff it. The rest was allocated from the stimulus money that is intended to be hitting main street from the start. There is nothing out of line happening here you guys just don't like where the line is.
Tucking tail and pouting and shouting.
No surprise.
There is no tucking tail or pouting. That's just how it is. They spent $200 a head for families with school children. It was funded by stimulus money and some cash from a donor. The donated money is private charity so you can take your opinion on fifty bucks of that money and stuff it. The rest was allocated from the stimulus money that is intended to be hitting main street from the start. There is nothing out of line happening here you guys just don't like where the line is.
Well yeah, of course.
Except for the whole fraud thing going on, you're exactly right. Oh yeah, except for also the $50. It's actually $40 of each $200 is coming from the private charity. Which means that 80% is being funded by the taxpayers...towards a program with the possibility and likelihood of rampant fraud.
But you've already said that they should spend taxpayer money on whatever they want. Fine, thats your position. I however think it should be spent a bit more wisely.
There is no tucking tail or pouting. That's just how it is. They spent $200 a head for families with school children. It was funded by stimulus money and some cash from a donor. The donated money is private charity so you can take your opinion on fifty bucks of that money and stuff it. The rest was allocated from the stimulus money that is intended to be hitting main street from the start. There is nothing out of line happening here you guys just don't like where the line is.
Well yeah, of course.
Except for the whole fraud thing going on, you're exactly right. Oh yeah, except for also the $50. It's actually $40 of each $200 is coming from the private charity. Which means that 80% is being funded by the taxpayers...towards a program with the possibility and likelihood of rampant fraud.
But you've already said that they should spend taxpayer money on whatever they want. Fine, thats your position. I however think it should be spent a bit more wisely.
Where is the fraud? Do you have one confirmed case of fraud?
Well yeah, of course.
Except for the whole fraud thing going on, you're exactly right. Oh yeah, except for also the $50. It's actually $40 of each $200 is coming from the private charity. Which means that 80% is being funded by the taxpayers...towards a program with the possibility and likelihood of rampant fraud.
But you've already said that they should spend taxpayer money on whatever they want. Fine, thats your position. I however think it should be spent a bit more wisely.
Where is the fraud? Do you have one confirmed case of fraud?
Nope. Which is why I said "the possibility and likelihood of rampant fraud." There is no way to track to see how the money was spent, so it's impossible to give an actual confirmed case.
But like I also said, it's also impossible to give one confirmed case that the money was spent as it should have been spent. Double edged sword there, this lack of tracking. Kinda cuts both ways.
Although I would say that anyone who claims that the fraud is not occurring is not living in reality.
