IndependntLogic
Senior Member
- Jul 14, 2011
- 2,997
- 399
- 48
3. A null, or dumbing down of the body politic to where it cannot govern
You seem to be a very smart man and present well thought our positions. However, I think the "dumbing down" has been a more significent factor in our demise. Stupid people make stupid decisions.
And why would the ultra rich not want the USA to continue on exactly the same course we are on now.
You know the ultra rich never participate in a economic downturn. They never worry about where their next meal is coming from or how to keep a roof over their heads. So why would they worry or want change?
And what is wrong with the USA having a declining standard of living. No one ever said the good times would go on forever. When we as a nation of ignorant people keep voting into office the same idiots over and over, why should we expect better results. You know what they say about being crazy; doing the same thing and expecting different results.
Education is the answer and lack of education is the problem. IMO.
I contend that things are going EXACTLY as the ultra rich wish and they have no desire to see change that would negatively effect them and they have the ability and money to make sure that change does not happen. At least change that would cost them.
And example is giving corporations the same status as individuals. Now who do you think that benefits?
Me? Not hardly. Who really wanted that change?. The ultra rich. Why? Cause it is good for them.
Do you think we live in a plutocracy Robert?
Good retort and rebuttal.
Your points are all correct and only need to be elaborated on somewhat.
Our nation state was framed as a Constitutional Federal Republic. In so doing, and nothing was ever done like this historically up to that point, the concept was a bastion of ultimate freedom unlike what the world had ever seen. So much so, that our founding papers even begin with the haunting mantra of:
"We, The People.........."
In this it was concepted that this group of very wild, independent, and very self surviving bunch would do best, by that which would govern itself the least.
It worked. It worked so well that we became the most powerful and envied nation state on Earth, ever.
I disagree. There was also this part about forming a more perfect UNION. It was our unity which made us great. Otherwise, we would be a bunch of city-states today.
And we went to the moon. And our national flag still flies there in the vacuum.
We have done wonders.
And it was all based on:
cheap money
cheap fuels
cheap food
minimal government
I disagree again - sort of. Our money wasn't cheap. Our fuels and food being cheap were not huge factors. Minimal government depends on when and what you're talking about. Obviously there was less government in the West when it was literally untamed and rape, murder etc... were just a daily part of life. But that didn't make us great. You also left out free labor. Then those danm socialists came in a ruined that by interferring with the perfectly good economy, didn't they? Dang. But we have had social programs and given money and resources to citizens and companies since before we were a country. The belief that we were EVER Libertarian or Free market or any of the things by people with selective political memories embrace, is a myth. Never took place. Didn't make us great.
And then as all Republics find themselves, we emrbaced the notion of full raging socialist democracy, rife with a government that is passing up to 5000+ new laws per year, that is n into debt at the rate of $18,760,000 every hour, and that is now so far buried in debt that shortly, it will never be able to pay it off.
And finally to talk like an "ol timer" (god, how did I get here, a fucking week away from 60???), when I was 18, I paid $.26 cents per gallon of gas. My first Jeep loan at Wells Fargo was $11.61 per month for 2 years, I could go to a fast food place, take my GF to a show, fill up my Jeep, and have change left over out of a $5 bill.
It's not the years past, its the mileage as we race to oblivion, as all cultures before us have done. I just didn't think we would see it in my lifetime.
Thank you for the kind words,
Robert
Again the misconception here is that social programs have caused all of our problems. That's simply not true. When you had the Jeep etc... your income was part of a HUGE Middle Class that had significant buying power because as you pointed out, you could use a lot of disposable income.
Over the last 30 years, the top 1% has gone from receiving about 10% of our nation's total income to almost ONE FOURTH of the total income of the country. The Romneys of the world i.e. the Top 1% of the top 1% have TRIPLED their income.
And the Middle Class has seen virtually no increase in income. There are 400 people in this country who make more than the lower 50% of all wage-earners combined.
So we have fewer people with all the money. Those people and corporations are paying a lower effective tax rate than they have in a half century. The rest haven't seen their income keep up with even a nominal inflation rate and they pay on average, a higher effective rate.
And they don't have the disposable income needed to sustain the economy or even basic social services.
It used to be Big American Corporations would contribute to our country's greatness. not anymore. There ARE no Big American Corporations anymore.
There IS a solution for this but nearly 40% of our country is so brain-washed by party & ideology, they refuse to even acknowledge the basics of the problem. They have become so polarized, they would rather hate "the muslim in the white house" and nearly half of the country, than admit the experiment that started under Reagan (Gasp! Did he just criticize Reagan?!?!? And btw, that was my first & 2nd presidential vote), is exactly the source of the problem we now face.
So they will vote our Middle Class out of existence when it could have been saved.