Give a man a fish

You've heard the saying, "Give a man a fish and feed him for a day, teach a man to fish and feed him for life" or some other way of saying it.

President Obama and the left in this country are the ones who want to give a man a fish. The reason why is because once that man learns to fish, he will no longer be dependent on the government and the government will loose control of that man.

The left in this country has been working for a very long time making every citizen dependent on the government. It's the only way anyone on the left can get elected to office now. The regular citizen will vote for anybody on the left as long as they keep getting stuff and they don't care what else the left does to this country. As long as their belly is full, they don't care.

It's a shame really.

Interesting attempt. The problem is, those of us on the Left are the ones trying to help people get easier access to education.
 
You've heard the saying, "Give a man a fish and feed him for a day, teach a man to fish and feed him for life" or some other way of saying it.

President Obama and the left in this country are the ones who want to give a man a fish. The reason why is because once that man learns to fish, he will no longer be dependent on the government and the government will loose control of that man.

The left in this country has been working for a very long time making every citizen dependent on the government. It's the only way anyone on the left can get elected to office now. The regular citizen will vote for anybody on the left as long as they keep getting stuff and they don't care what else the left does to this country. As long as their belly is full, they don't care.

It's a shame really.

Interesting attempt. The problem is, those of us on the Left are the ones trying to help people get easier access to education.

The only thing is, the left wants to give them access to the wrong education. One that relies on others for food to mouth.
 
You've heard the saying, "Give a man a fish and feed him for a day, teach a man to fish and feed him for life" or some other way of saying it.

President Obama and the left in this country are the ones who want to give a man a fish. The reason why is because once that man learns to fish, he will no longer be dependent on the government and the government will loose control of that man.

The left in this country has been working for a very long time making every citizen dependent on the government. It's the only way anyone on the left can get elected to office now. The regular citizen will vote for anybody on the left as long as they keep getting stuff and they don't care what else the left does to this country. As long as their belly is full, they don't care.

It's a shame really.

Interesting attempt. The problem is, those of us on the Left are the ones trying to help people get easier access to education.

The only thing is, the left wants to give them access to the wrong education. One that relies on others for food to mouth.

What you just said makes no sense.

How does going to school and college and getting a degree make you reliant on others?
 
I've always liked the "Build a man a fire, he will be warm for a day. Light a man on fire and he will be warm for the rest of his short life."

Same principle, more amusing:)

I don't think God is very amused by it.
 
Today's education system that tunnels young people into fields where there is no employment opportunities is a good place to begin...not to mention that simply showing up at school you can be fed three times a day without any parental involvement to help at all.

That's a good start about how it trains our current population to do not for themselves.
 
Today's education system that tunnels young people into fields where there is no employment opportunities is a good place to begin...not to mention that simply showing up at school you can be fed three times a day without any parental involvement to help at all.

That's a good start about how it trains our current population to do not for themselves.

Sure. Because elementary students would do so much better if they learned to scrounge for food at an early age.
 
Today's education system that tunnels young people into fields where there is no employment opportunities is a good place to begin...not to mention that simply showing up at school you can be fed three times a day without any parental involvement to help at all.

That's a good start about how it trains our current population to do not for themselves.

Sure. Because elementary students would do so much better if they learned to scrounge for food at an early age.

Then parental education could be a good start in return for the free and reduced lunch. Parents should show up at the meals to learn to make them for their children. Their foodstamps should be allowed for community kitchens to make meals for and with their offspring. That would be a good, progressive start.
 
Today's education system that tunnels young people into fields where there is no employment opportunities is a good place to begin...not to mention that simply showing up at school you can be fed three times a day without any parental involvement to help at all.

That's a good start about how it trains our current population to do not for themselves.

Sure. Because elementary students would do so much better if they learned to scrounge for food at an early age.

Then parental education could be a good start in return for the free and reduced lunch. Parents should show up at the meals to learn to make them for their children. Their foodstamps should be allowed for community kitchens to make meals for and with their offspring. That would be a good, progressive start.

Your lack of understanding on this subject is astounding.
 
Sure. Because elementary students would do so much better if they learned to scrounge for food at an early age.

Then parental education could be a good start in return for the free and reduced lunch. Parents should show up at the meals to learn to make them for their children. Their foodstamps should be allowed for community kitchens to make meals for and with their offspring. That would be a good, progressive start.

Your lack of understanding on this subject is astounding.

So you're saying he'll fit in well on this site.
 
Yes, I deal with whiny small businessmen every day... The bane of my existence.

But the reality is, we have the lowest tax rate in the industrialized world, and most of what the government spends money on benefits business. I've never seen a businessman yet who wouldn't run over his own mother to get a lucrative government contract.

We have one of the highest tax rates in the industrialized world.
Most of what our government spends is on Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and interest on the debt.

Um, no, we don't. Do some research.

12 Countries With The Highest & Lowest Tax Rates | Business Pundit

BUt at least you are honest enough to admit that most of what we spend isn't discretionary, so we might as well make the rich pay their fair share to support it.

You know, smarter than borrowing money from China to finance it.
What, exactly, IS their "fair share"?
 
You've heard the saying, "Give a man a fish and feed him for a day, teach a man to fish and feed him for life" or some other way of saying it.

President Obama and the left in this country are the ones who want to give a man a fish. The reason why is because once that man learns to fish, he will no longer be dependent on the government and the government will loose control of that man.

The left in this country has been working for a very long time making every citizen dependent on the government. It's the only way anyone on the left can get elected to office now. The regular citizen will vote for anybody on the left as long as they keep getting stuff and they don't care what else the left does to this country. As long as their belly is full, they don't care.

It's a shame really.

Give a man a fish


And democrats want you to pay taxes on it.
 
[
No balls. All hot air.
Either you are a man of conviction or not.
YOU are the one that values the $$$ over principle. You take it all the while condemning the very people that provide it for you.

Uh, no guy, I reject the notion that they provide me anything.

I provide them with labor and results.

Really? They provided nothing? So you just showed up on a public sidewalk and did your job? No physical plant? No tools? No parts and supplies?

You just stood there on the sidewalk, and got paid.

Interesting.
 
How are Republicans going to teach anyone to fish if they keep gutting education.

How is the left going to teach anyone to fish by telling them it doesn't matter if they catch fish or not...it just matters how they feel about themselves fishing?

Earning medals for participation is a good way to starve to death.
 
Republicans tell you that you are not allowed to fish because they own all the lakes and rivers

Fishing is only for the elite
 
Interesting attempt. The problem is, those of us on the Left are the ones trying to help people get easier access to education.

The only thing is, the left wants to give them access to the wrong education. One that relies on others for food to mouth.

What you just said makes no sense.

How does going to school and college and getting a degree make you reliant on others?

By getting a degree in something that's worthless in the market.

10 Worthless Degrees Hiring Managers Don't Want to See [INFOGRAPHIC] | inspirationfeed.com
 
sometimes you have to give someone a fish while you teach them to fish.

if they starve to death while learning you have not helped them
 
Sure. Because elementary students would do so much better if they learned to scrounge for food at an early age.

Then parental education could be a good start in return for the free and reduced lunch. Parents should show up at the meals to learn to make them for their children. Their foodstamps should be allowed for community kitchens to make meals for and with their offspring. That would be a good, progressive start.

Your lack of understanding on this subject is astounding.
I agree. It's so much better for the government to raise kids.
 
Reality is more like... you catch 10 fish, the government takes four, three to cover the costs of your business, 2 go to those that have no interest in fishing (or anything else for theat matter) and you keep one to feed your family. Any small business owner will know what I'm saying.

If you are losing money in business it is because of the horrible math skills demonstrated in your post. Who took the "2 go to those that have no interest in fishing"?
 
Last edited:
Republicans tell you that you are not allowed to fish because they own all the lakes and rivers

Fishing is only for the elite


Liberals will not allow the fishing due to the 3 toad frog issue, the protected waters, and at the same time tax you for a fishing license, tax your boat, tax the boat fuel, tax you for each fish you catch. And take the tax money and give it to those who are too lazy to fish.
 

Forum List

Back
Top